Download Emulsion Polymerization Reactor Group (13622)

Members:
Ryan Foringer
John Mill
Curtis Williamson
Stephen Heisler
Customer Needs
Functional decomposition
Project Plan
System Architecture
 PFD
Aqueous and
Surfactant Tank
Oil Tank
CIP
Emulsion Reactor
Purifier
Coater
System Architecture
 P&ID
System Architecture
 Equation
Overall Reaction:
aS aq  bOl  cEaq
Molar Balance:
dnS
 nS t 0  nS t tf  a1
dt
dnO
 nO t 0  nO t tf  b1
dt
dnE
 nE t 0  nE t tf  c1
dt
“S” denotes Surfactant
“O” denotes Oil
“E” denotes Emulsion
“a,b,c” parameters denote the stoichiometric values
Risk Assessment
ID
Risk Item
Describe
the risk
briefly
1
2
3
4
5
Chemicals
don't mix
Chemicals
don't flow
properly
Chemicals
don't form
emulsion
Mixing
device
doesn't
function
Testing
Facilities
Not
available
TECHNICAL RISK ASSESSMENT
Effect
Cause
Likelihood Severity Importance Action to Minimize Risk
What is the effect on
What action(s) will you take
any or all of the
(and by when) to prevent,
project deliverables if
reduce the impact of, or
the cause actually
What are the possible causes
transfer the risk of this
happens
of this risk
L*S
occurring
Project is not possible, Surfactant not added, agitator
customer needs not not working, materials not
met
compatible
Project is not possible,
customer needs not
met
valves not opened correctly
Project is not possible,
customer needs not incompatible chemical
met
combinations
Project is not possible, Incorrect Mixing configuration,
customer needs not shear too much for blade to
met
handle, no power
Cannot test chemical
combinations, process
configurations
closed, booked
1
1
1
1
2
Owner
Who is
responsible for
following
through on
mitigation?
3
Prevent; ensure compatibility
of chemicals, Ensure
3 functionality of agitator
Ryan
3
Reduce: ensure functionality
3 of valves
Stephen
3
Prevent; ensure compatibility
3 of chemicals
Curtis
3
Prevent; thorough
testing/analysis of mixing
3 options
John
2
Prevent; schedule testing
ahead of time to ensure
4 availability
John
Engineering Specifications
Surfactant
HLB value
Cost per Unit MW (g/mol) Density (g/mL)
Cocamide MEA
13.5
SLS
40
SDS
Laureth 4
9.7
PEG-60 Almond Glyceride
15
Oil
HLB value
Cost per Unit MW (g/mol) Density (g/mL)
C12-15 Alkyl Benzoate
13
Olive Oil
7
ODE
Avacado Oil
7
Specification Source Importance Units Initial Value Computed Value Design Value
Oil Tank
?
3
L
0.5
Oil Inlet
?
2 cm
2
Oil
?
1
L
0.2
Aqueous Tank
?
3
L
2
Aqueous Inlet
?
3 cm
4
Water
?
1
L
1
Surfactant
?
1 mg
100
Reactor
?
1
L
2
Reactore Outlet
?
2 cm
4
-
Status
Pough Charts
Measure Particle Size
Description
Criteria
weight
Cost
3
Safety
1
Complexity
2
Accuracy/Precision
3
In-line Capability
3
Easy to Maintain
1
+
Net Score
Tyndall Effect with Lasers Optical Microscope SEM/TEM Microscope Calibrated Shear Rate
Design 1
Design 2
Design 3
Design 4
1
0
-1
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
-1
-1
-1
1
1
1
1
-1
-1
1
1
0
-1
1
7
4
3
11
3
3
9
2
4
1
-6
9
Pough Charts
Method of Mixing
Description
Criteria
weight
Cost
3
Safety
1
Complexity
2
Accuracy/Precision
3
Easy to Maintain
1
+
Net Score
Shear Mixer
Design 1
-1
0
0
0
1
1
3
-2
Sonicator Magnetic Stirrer Propeller Blade Homogenizer
Design 2 Design 3
Design 4
Design 5
-1
1
0
-1
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
-1
1
-1
0
1
-1
0
1
-1
4
6
4
3
3
3
0
6
1
3
4
-3
Pough Charts
Flow Control
Description
Criteria
Cost
Safety
Complexity
Easy to Maintain
+
Net Score
weight
3
1
2
1
Gravity Feed Hand Pump Electric Pump Pressurized Tanks
Design 1
Design 2
Design 3
Design 4
1
1
1
-1
1
1
1
-1
1
1
1
-1
1
-1
0
0
7
6
6
0
0
1
0
6
7
5
6
-6