Download Pancreas Cancer Research Program 2 3 4

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

National Institutes of Health wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
2
PCRP Welcomes New Clinical
Faculty Members
3
Meet Three New Pancreas Researchers
4
How You Can Support Cancer
Research Grants
The Long Road to a Cancer
Research Grant
Pancreas Cancer Research Program
at Huntsman Cancer Institute
Fall 2016 Newsletter
Firsthand Account: “Science Keeps Me Going”
A Distinguished Professor
Emeritus of Comparative
Literature, Film Studies, and
Italian does not cross one’s
path every day. Huntsman
Cancer Institute (HCI) patient
Peter Bondanella holds that
distinction. His credits include
a list of about three dozen
published original books and
translations from the Italian
and many illustrious awards
and nominations.
Patient Advocacy
Meetings
The difficulties of pancreas
and other gastrointestinal
cancers mean patients and their
loved ones need extra hope,
inspiration, knowledge, and
support for high-quality living.
HCI’s Gastrointestinal Cancers
Program sponsors annual patient
advocacy meetings to provide
information about laboratory
discoveries, clinical trials, and
support services helping people
with these cancers.
Peter Bondanella (left) took up oil painting when he retired. His self-portrait
(right) reveals his pre-chemotherapy appearance.
When he and his wife, Julia,
retired from Indiana State
University, they wanted to resettle in an affordable place with a pleasant climate. “I wanted
to be someplace without the things I hated about the weather in Indiana—too cold and
too humid,” Peter says. The Bondanellas were introduced to St. George through a family
connection, and they now live there.
Late in 2015, his doctor found a cyst on one of Peter’s kidneys in an ultrasound image and
encouraged him to wait six months for another ultrasound. Simple kidney cysts often don’t
cause problems, and the watch-and-wait approach helps avoid unnecessary treatment.
Peter wasn’t comfortable with watch-and-wait. “I said ‘I want a CT scan or an MRI or
both—yesterday,’” he says. “I’d be dead now for sure if I hadn’t insisted.” As a result of
those tests, Peter was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in January 2016.
Peter’s brother-in-law and sister-in-law are cancer researchers at Stowers Cancer Institute
at the University of Kansas, also a National Cancer Institute–designated Cancer Center,
which puts it in the same circle of excellence as HCI. “When I got my diagnosis, my
continued on page 2
For information about future
meetings, call Tahnie Blackburn
at 801-585-6048.
Contact us
Cancer Genetics Study
801-585-7343
E-mail: [email protected]
Gastrointestinal Cancers Program
801-587-4422
1-877-624-4422 toll free
High Risk Pancreas Cancer Clinic
801-587-9555
Pancreas Cancer Research Program
801-585-6048
1-866-809-3799 toll free
www.huntsmancancer.org/gi/
Firsthand Account
(continued from page 1)
sister-in-law called the National Institutes of Health and
talked to the head of oncological surgery—one of the guys
who helps decide who gets to be an NCI–designated Cancer
Center,” says Peter. “He told her that if he had relatives with
cancer living in St. George, he would send them to HCI.”
So Peter came to HCI for treatment from the beginning.
“Not that I didn’t think I could get good treatment in St.
George,” he says. “But I couldn’t get clinical trials there.”
He is now in a trial pairing a new drug that works through the
immune system with a chemotherapy combination approved
for treating pancreatic cancer. “The immunotherapy drug
unplugs an enzyme that the tumor makes to keep it hidden
from my immune system,” he says.
“In preliminary studies, adding this immunotherapy raised
the number of patients whose tumors shrank from 23% to
38%,” says Ignacio Garrido-Laguna, MD, the HCI medical
oncologist on Peter’s cancer care team. “Patients have few
side effects, so Peter was able to visit Italy this fall while his
treatment continues.”
“Going to Italy was the best thing that’s happened since my
diagnosis,” Peter says.
In his paintings, Peter taps his familiarity with classic Italian art. This portrait of
his two Italian greyhounds is “from the side, like Renaissance portraits,” he says.
“I can’t imagine a better place to deal with my cancer than
HCI,” he adds. Everyone knows my first name.”
Peter and Julia donated their extensive library to the
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Next April, his former
graduate students from Indiana University are gathering “to
do a little program in my honor,” Peter says. “Science keeps
me going. I hope to be there.”
PCRP Welcomes New Clinical Faculty Members
Jonathan Whisenant, MD, is a medical oncologist. His primary area of interest is gastrointestinal
cancers, including pancreatic cancer. Before joining Huntsman Cancer Institute (HCI) in January 2016,
he practiced with Utah Cancer Specialists in Salt Lake City. Whisenant received his medical degree from
the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF). He completed residency in internal medicine at the
University of Colorado and returned to UCSF for a joint fellowship in hematology and medical oncology.
Randa Tao, MD, is a radiation oncologist who works with the pancreas cancer
Jonathan
care team. Her practice includes treatments that use precise image-guided radiation
Whisenant
therapy that focuses on the cancer and spares healthy tissue. Tao was a research fellow
in molecular radiation oncology with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute at the
National Institutes of Health. She earned her medical degree at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai in New York City and completed a radiation oncology residency at the University of Texas
MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Randa Tao
Ziga Cizman, MD, MPH, and Gabriel Fine, MD, are interventional radiologists.
They perform procedures including ablations, embolizations, drains, ports, and bone
pain management. Their research interests include biological therapies for cancer such
as immunotherapy.
Ziga Cizman
Cizman earned his medical degree from Thomas Jefferson University. He served
as chief radiology resident at the University of North Carolina and completed a
fellowship in interventional radiology at Emory University School of Medicine.
Gabriel Fine
Fine earned his medical degree from the University of Washington in Seattle, where he completed residency in radiology. He
was a Sarnoff Cardiovascular Research Foundation fellow in molecular imaging at Brigham and Women’s and Massachusetts
General hospitals. He completed an interventional oncology/radiology fellowship at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.
— page 2 —
Meet Three New Pancreas Researchers
Eric Snyder, MD,
PhD, a Huntsman
Cancer Institute
(HCI) investigator,
recently joined the
Pancreas Cancer
Eric Snyder
Research Program
(PCRP). He heads HCI’s Snyder Lab.
His research investigates a link between
lung and pancreatic cancers. Snyder
and his research team study the role of
proteins called transcription factors in
the development of the two cancers.
Kajsa Affolter, MD,
assistant professor
of pathology at the
University of Utah
(U of U) School of
Medicine, recently
Kajsa Affolter
joined the PCRP.
She is a pathologist specializing in
gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Her
work supports pancreas cancer
research efforts, particularly evaluating
experiments involving whole tumors.
Martin McMahon, PhD, helps new
discoveries move from research labs
toward clinical trials for improved
cancer treatments in his role as HCI’s
Senior Director
for Preclinical
Translation. He
is a professor of
dermatology in the
U of U School of
Martin McMahon
Medicine, but in
a previous position at the University
of California, San Francisco (UCSF),
he was co-director of the Pancreas
Cancer Research Program, where
he contributed much important
research to the field. McMahon is the
Cumming-Presidential Professor of
Cancer Biology.
The Long Road to a Cancer Research Grant
Cancer research takes money, and quite a bit of it. All
Huntsman Cancer Institute (HCI) researchers depend heavily
on grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Here’s
the story of how one of the many research grants developed by
members of the Pancreas Cancer Research Program grew from a
question to an idea to a proposal still in review at NIH.
“Great research questions are plentiful,”
says Matthew Firpo, PhD, a member of
the Pancreas Cancer Research Program.
“They often derive from clinical need.”
Starting earlier this year, Firpo and HCI
investigators Charles Murtaugh, PhD,
and Sean Mulvihill, MD, combined their
interests and expertise to develop a new
research proposal to the NIH.
Matthew Firpo
Coming Up with the Idea
Recently published studies suggest there are
four different types of pancreatic cancer,
each with its own characteristics at the
molecular level. Knowing the type of the
cancer a patient has would allow a cancer
care team to practice precision medicine,
choosing the treatment that will work best
for the individual patient.
Charles Murtaugh
“Our idea is to find specific proteins or other molecules that
each type of tumor releases into the blood. Then a simple
blood draw could show what type of pancreatic cancer a
patient has,” says Firpo.
“It’s a risky undertaking that might fail for at least three
reasons,” Murtaugh says. “First, our techniques for
detecting molecules circulating in the blood might not be
sensitive enough. Second, the tumor subtypes may not
differ enough in the molecules they release to tell them
apart. And third, it’s possible that when the pancreatic
cancer tumors can’t be removed, the clinical outcomes are
so poor that knowing which type will not be useful.”
The grant proposal addresses each of these risks. The goal
is to convince the NIH peer-review panel, made up of
other cancer scientists, that the risks do not outweigh
the rewards of a successful outcome. The best arguments
grant applicants can make are based on their own past
achievements. It’s also essential to give preliminary data that
shows the approach is feasible.
Collecting Preliminary Data
Sean Mulvihill
The previous studies used tumor tissue
from patients’ surgeries. But most patients’ tumors can’t be
removed with surgery. The cancer care team needs to know
the tumor type while it is still in the body.
To be considered for NIH funding, grant proposals usually
include solid data that shows the proposed study is feasible
and likely to have positive results. It takes money to gather
this data, but NIH offers very little funding to do so.
HCI has a disease-oriented team (DOT) dedicated to
pancreas cancer research, along with nine more for other
types of cancer. The DOTs choose proposals to receive
— page 3 —
continued on page 4
The Long Road
(continued from page 3)
funding for preliminary studies through a competitive
process that includes review by other scientists.
Significance
“We depend on Huntsman Cancer Foundation to fund
preliminary studies,” says Firpo. “The foundation exists
for the sole purpose of funding HCI research.”
Investigators
Innovation
The investigators decided it was important to submit
the grant while the topic was hot rather than waiting for
additional seed funding for preliminary data.
“NIH has a special category for exploratory studies such
as ours. There’s less emphasis on having preliminary data
that proves our approach would work,” Firpo says. “We
thought our track record and the potential impact of the
research would be enough to make it competitive.”
Entering the Competition
In July 2016, the investigators submitted their proposal
for a two-year grant to the NIH. Their scientific peerreview panel meets at the beginning of November.
It is seldom an easy sell. “When you submit an exploratory
grant like this, it can be hard to find reviewers with a deep
knowledge of the question and approach,” says Murtaugh.
“Also, with pancreatic cancer, you can run up against a
defeatist feeling among some reviewers that the disease is
so dismal nothing can be done. On the other hand, there
are others who feel any advance against such a terrible
disease is worth pursuing.”
Three members of the panel review each proposal
thoroughly on five key questions (see Figure 1). They
score each question from 1 (best) to 9 (worst); the overall
score is the average of all five. Usually, the full panel
discusses only the grants with overall scores between
1 and 5.
Approach
Environment
Is this work worth doing? If successful, will it
have an impact on science or patient health?
Are these people good enough to do what
they say they want to do?
Does this work break new ground, or is it just
repeating old work with a slight difference?
How likely is it that the procedures will work,
or that the resulting data can be analyzed in a
way that will provide real insight?
Is this work being done in a supportive
environment, with excellent facilities,
equipment, and intellectual vibrancy?
Figure 1. The NIH scientific peer-reviewers score each grant proposal
from 1 (best) to 9 (worst) based on these guidelines.
“If we get funded, we could start work as soon as March
2017,” says Murtaugh, “although it could be delayed if
Congress is slow in passing a budget for NIH.”
If the proposal does not pass, they will receive a critique to
guide their revisions before they try again. In the meantime,
they intend to ask for seed money from the Pancreatic
Cancer DOT to collect preliminary data to support the
proposal in case they have to resubmit.
“Getting funded on the first round would be great, but it’s
pretty rare,” Firpo says. “So we’re already preparing for a
resubmission by collecting preliminary data.
“If our grant is funded on the first round, we’ll have a head
start on our study,” he adds.
Another panel, called the council, decides which grants
that make it past the peer review receive funding. This
grant will be reviewed by the National Cancer Institute.
The council has some flexibility in their selections. For
example, a grant that didn’t score as well as others could
still get funded if it satisfies the institute’s immediate needs.
Getting the Results
Sometime in November, the investigators will learn how
their proposal scored with the peer-review panel. If their
proposal passes that panel, they’ll find out whether their
study gets funding in February.
— page 4 —
How You Can Support Research Grants
• Participate in the Pancreas Cancer Research Program
tissue collection program. We rely on tissue samples
from patients and from people who do not have
cancer for our studies. For more information, call
Tahnie Blackburn at 801-585-6048.
• Give to Huntsman Cancer Foundation and the
Pancreas Cancer Research Program. Your donations
directly support the research that helps us convince
the NIH to invest in our work.
• Let your representatives in Congress know why you
support ample NIH funding for cancer research.
The NIH will always be our best source of long-term
investment in research.