Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Impression management wikipedia , lookup
Relational transgression wikipedia , lookup
Group cohesiveness wikipedia , lookup
Group dynamics wikipedia , lookup
Expressions of dominance wikipedia , lookup
Group development wikipedia , lookup
Interpersonal relationship wikipedia , lookup
Relationship counseling wikipedia , lookup
James M. Honeycutt wikipedia , lookup
Social perception wikipedia , lookup
Nonverbal Communication: Reread the sections on proximity, eye contact and touch in our textbook. Visit locations where groups of singles congregate (dances, church, the school cafeteria, etc.) and watch the non-verbal behaviors of the singles. If married folks are in the room, it might be interesting to compare their nonverbal behaviors to those of the single people. What types of nonverbal behaviors do you observe? Are there any differences in the nonverbal behaviors of the males and the females? Are there singles from different cultures in the room? Do the males and females from those cultures have any unique nonverbal behaviors? This does not have to be done in one sitting and may involve several locations. Observing the nonverbal communication that occurs in the cafeteria was very interesting. In Bingham’s cafeteria there are several different groups to observe and while there are no married couples, there are couples all around. In addition to dating couples, there were groups of friends, people sitting alone, and groups of just boys, just girls, or mixed company. Just as these groups are diverse, the nonverbal communication and how it was perceived was diverse as well. With so much noise it was hard to notice the nonverbal communication going on, but once I took a second look it was easy to see that it was abundant. The first nonverbal that came to my attention is that used by the people sitting alone. They avoided eye contact with those passing by and had a hunched over posture as though they were trying to be as small as possible. They had also claimed the surrounding seats with their possessions and were on their phones. Overall they gave off the air of “Don’t talk to me”. That was a nonverbal communication that others seemed to respect. Another group that I observed was groups of friends. They all sat really close and were louder. They would laugh and talk yet did not seem to make direct eye contact very often. They were obviously listen to each other and responding appropriately, yet hardly made eye contact with the speaker. There was also more than one conversation going on at once, and most of those were nonverbal ones with other members of the group. These groups also seemed to have their own nonverbal gestures. What I found interesting was that these things I observed seemed to be the same for most of the groups of friends I observed as well as my own friend group. Amongst the groups of a single gender I noticed a lot of differences between male and female interaction. In the group of females, there was a lot of nonverbal communication that was made just by the exchanging of looks. While the males had next to none nonverbal communication. As far as I could tell they had nothing that set them apart in how they communicated nonverbally. If the group was mixed in gender, there was a lot of nonverbal communication going on. Often there was a girl trying to get a certain guy’s attention and her friend cheering her on all without any speaking. If she was trying to show him that she was interested, she would make eye contact while he was speaking more than the other members of that group. She also was in close proximity to him. When watching the singles in the room and those people in a relationship, I noticed that it was easy to tell who was in a relationship and who was not. Those in a relationship had more constant eye contact while speaking. The couples were also usually touching. Along with the physical contact and the more constant eye contact, those in relationships had a nonverbal behavior of intimacy to them. They seemed to be connected at a deeper level. Comparing this to the singles in the room was interesting. The couples seemed to be there for each other while the single persons were not as committed to who they were sitting with. Another observation I had was how the single people reacted to those in a relationship. They seemed either like they felt uncomfortable at the couples’ closeness or in a way jealous of them having a relationship of that sort. While observing the difference between these groups, I was surprised at how easy it was to tell who was in a relationship just by their nonverbal behavior. The amount of nonverbal communication I observed in just a few minutes in the cafeteria proves to me that we really are constantly communicating with one another whether we intend to or not. Strong, Bryan, and Theodore F. Cohen. The Marriage and Family Experience. Custom Edition ed. Mason, Ohio: Cengage Learning, 2013. 616. Print.