Download IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE NATIVE AMERICAN

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE NATIVE
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NATIONS & THE
TRADITIONAL COURT OF EQUITY OF THE
NORTHERN CHEYENNE TRIBE
Mailing Address: Clerks of the Court, Attention: Tom Widlar / Verdell
Duhart, P O Box 465, Lame Deer, Montana, Indian country [59043]
Tel: 402-403-1788
Email: [email protected]
SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT FOR WAR CRIMES, AND
CRIMES AGAINST PEACE THAT VICTIMIZED THE
“NATIVE AMERICAN” INDIGENOUS PEOPLEs
Movants / Complainants: The Peoples’ Restoration and
Reparations Trust (more than 150,000 participating
Plaintiffs have signed this Complaint);
Respondents: The Government of the United States of
America; The Government of the United Kingdom; the
Holy See/The Vatican; the Federal Reserve Board; the
President of the United States of America; the Estates
and Trusts of all the former Forty-Three Presidents of the
United States of America; the Congress of the United
States of America; the Supreme Court of the United
States of America; Governors and Attorneys-General of all
the Fifty States of the Union; John Does 1-100 who have
in their various capacities influenced, affected or
otherwise coerced administrative action to the detriment
of “Native American” Indigenous Peoples;
Case Number: PRRT/GOTUS/SCM/April/A/2016
REASON, PURPOSE AND FUNCTION OF THE
LAWSUIT:
1
The Respondents have never made reparations nor
restored the personal and realty rights of Indigenous
Peoples in this continent despite various international
laws, treaties, federal laws, agreements, contracts, and
covenants that promised and guaranteed their
unalienable rights that spring from eternal law, divine
law and natural law – the veritable source of man-made
law.
The Movants/Complainants have suffered unimaginable
tangible and intangible loss coupled with untold mental
agony since 1492 when the cornerstone of the cause of
justice was placed squarely in the quicksand of selfinterests.
Past and present governments that were instituted under
the Lockean ideal failed to rectify this wanton
victimization of Indigenous People in this continent.
Respondents used the clarion call of “manifest destiny” to
literally grab territories belonging to Indigenous People
sanctified and made wholesome through treaties, sales
purchases, legislative legerdemain, and convolutedly
decided cases in the United States Supreme Court that
were destined to be adhesion contracts that favored only
the Respondents to the utter detriment and disadvantage
of the Movants/Complainants.
Whenever a revolt resulted caused by these illegal and
fraudulent land grabs, the “savage” landowners were
murdered by a compliant frontier United States Army led
by the likes of “General” Andrew Jackson, a sworn
2
“Indian fighter,” no different in his tactics and strategies
than that of Lt. William Calley, Jr., of the infamous My
Lai Massacre of 1968, where almost 500 unarmed
civilians were brutally murdered in the name of a “just
war.” In international law, “just war” is an accepted tenet
to right the wrongs of mankind by any set of rules and
doctrines belonging to the party with a better and bigger
gun.
Killing in the course of territorial expansion seems to be
part of the manifest destiny of the Respondents. The
Movants/Complainants have a manifest destiny too – to
reclaim, redeem, and restore their stolen property, their
stolen rights and dignity as a means and an end to the
cause of justice. The American government, since its
inception in 1776, has done everything within its power
and authority to disenfranchise the
Movants/Complainants. There, seemingly, appears to be
no hope.
THE RESPONDENTS HAVE VIOLATED, AND ARE IN
BREACH OF THE FOLLOWING:
1. The Sublimus Deus of June 2,1537, issued by Pope
Paul III, a papal edict, that forbid the enslavement of
Indigenous people in “new found” colonies in
particular the New World, the American colonies.
In 1982, United States Congress promulgated Public
Law 97-280 (96 Stat. 1211) that declared the Holy
Bible as the Word of God. This is a clear mandate
that the prevarication of “church and state
3
separation,” as advocated by the Respondents, is still
in vogue.
This federal law, that validates the Word of God,
suggests that disobedience to it is a disobedience to
God. The Word of God is specific about the
preservation of ancestral property in Leviticus 25:23;
Proverbs 22:28; Proverbs 23:10, and this could be the
very reason why “church and state must remain
separate.” Freedom of religion is actually freedom
from religion.
Separating church from state in the fashion of the
1634 Peace of Westphalia may be politically correct
and socially acceptable, but when the cause of justice
is affected using religion as a vanguard, a standard,
a cause celebre, or yardstick to prove a point to
educate these “savages’ with the big stick of
education, acculturation, assimilation and
civilization, it takes on a whole different meaning.
The Holy See / The Vatican has done nothing to
impose its ecclesiastical edicts upon the United
States and Great Britain when the Native
Americans, unknowingly, unwittingly, upheld God’s
edicts in Leviticus 25:23; Deuteronomy 19:14;
Proverbs 22:28 and Proverbs 23:10 to not practice the
concept of private property ownership.
The Holy See / The Vatican has to be held
accountable, responsible and liable for this gross
oversight.
4
2. The Mayflower Compact of 11 November, 1620 where
the signatories declared that:
“Having undertaken, for the glory of God, and
advancement of the Christian faith, and honor of our
King and Country, a voyage to plant the first colony
in the northern parts of Virginia, do by these
presents solemnly and mutually, in the presence of
God, and one of another, covenant and combine our
selves together into a civil body politic, for our better
ordering and preservation and furtherance of the
ends aforesaid; and by virtue hereof to enact,
constitute, and frame such just and equal laws,
ordinances, acts, constitutions and offices, from time
to time, as shall be thought most meet and
convenient for the general good of the Colony, unto
which we promise all due submission and obedience.”
(emphasis added)
None of these promises were complied with or
adhered to for the “general good of the Colony” which
meant no irrigable lands and soil for Indigenous
People who will then suffer irreparably, and await
handouts from the Respondents as a symbol of
control, submission, obedience, and appeasement
3. The Royal Proclamation of October 7, 1763 which
promised and guaranteed that the rights of
Indigenous People shall be protected and preserved.
The revolutionary fervor and fever suppressed and
subsumed this Proclamation because it stood in the
way of free or cheap land ripe for the taking.
5
4. The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 which also
promised and guaranteed that the rights of
Indigenous People shall be protected and preserved.
Two years later, with the “ratification” of the U.S.
Constitution, Indians were relegated to the demands,
constraints, restraints, and strictures of the Indian
Commerce Clause (Art. 1, sec. 8, cl. 3) where the
Respondents gave themselves hall pass to do as they
wish in “regulating commerce” which included
interfering in Indian matters whether personal,
private, or public.
5. The Constitution of the United States of America,
1789, wherein the Indian Commerce Clause was
specifically designed “to regulate commerce with
Indian nations” which was interpreted by the
Respondents to mean aggrandizement and wanton
larceny using legislative imperatives as the yardstick
of the crimes perpetrated in the name of progress
and civilization while espousing Christian values.
6. Articles 46 and 47 of the Hague Convention of 1907
which criminalized pillage and the deprivation of
human rights and property rights. The Hague
Convention was invoked to try Nazis for war crimes
during the “Nuremberg Trials.” Respondents have to
be tried for similar war crimes.
What the Respondents did since the dawn of
“revolutionary civilization” in the thirteen American
colonies is no different from what the Nazis did in
carrying out orders from a superior for which they were
severely punished following the Nuremberg Trials.
6
Side bar: Adolf Hitler was a quick study – he learned
from the United States of America. He says so
unabashedly in his “Mein Kempf.” The Bank of
International Settlements (BIS), run by Thomas
McKittrick, an American, between 1940 and 1946,
helped Hitler loot Jewish gold while financing his
war effort as did the Bank of England with the
friendly and accommodating nod from its Chief,
Norman Montagu.
7. The United Nations Charter of 1945 where the
Respondents agreed to foster “friendly relations
among nations based on respect for the principle of
equal rights and self-determination of peoples.”
Equity and a sense of justice was replaced with
untold and unimaginable iniquity in the name of
progress and the advancement of Christian
civilization.
8. The United Nations Declaration on Human Rights
that underscored the need for the protection of
fundamental human rights for all people. These
protections emerged in the form of oppression and
discrimination
9. “Federal Indian laws” designed to guarantee Indian
self-government were tailored to grant “plenary
power” to the Respondents where the written laws
could be set aside if self-interests were not served.
The United States Supreme Court, although its
decrees have no enforcement powers, conspired to
confuse, confound, contain, and restrain the rights of
7
Indigenous People when issues like land, and human
rights were raised in a “court of law.”
10.
The Congress of the United States made laws
that were, and are, repugnant to the Indigenous
People and to the United States Constitutions so that
a compliant United States Supreme Court could set
it aside only to be overruled by newer legislation.
11.
The United States and Great Britain entered
into the Treaty of Ghent in 1814 to end the War of
1812 and to make reparations especially to the
Native Americans. Nothing materialized for the
benefit of the Native Americans who helped England
fight the United States. England could have pushed
and pressured the United States for a clearer
mandate to benefit the Native Americans, but
decided, in the name of peace and future economic
gain, to look the other way.
This thrust and parry, in the name of the rule of law,
is legion, and the Respondents have gotten away
without reverence to the cause or the course of
justice. To each his own seems to have been the
battle cry as all parties retreated to the treaty table
much to the detriment of Native Americans.
DAMAGES SOUGHT:
Ten trillion dollars as compensatory, aggravated,
general, exemplary and special damages. With the advent
8
and inception of Quantitative Easing, this should pose no
problem to the Federal Reserve Board.
CAVEAT:
Tribal judgments are entitled to full faith and credit
under 28 United States Code § 1738, and in the event the
Respondents fail to file an Answer to this Summons and
Complaint within 21 days, a default judgment and a
writ of execution/possession will be awarded in favor of
the Complainants/Movants.
The Complainants/Movants have secured international
collections’ imperatives to collect on this Complaint
should their Motion prevail in the court of human
conscience.
SO ORDERED, this ________ day of ____________, 2016
Judge Silver Cloud Musafir
Chief Judge,
Member, National American Indian Court Judges
Association
9
10