Download The Responsive National State (1871-1914)

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Jacob Schulman
AP Euro
February 14, 2007
Mr. Mumma
Days 6 & 7: The Responsive National State (1871-1914)
I. The Responsive National State:
A. Unification of Italy and Germany marked end of a period of nation building
- After 1871, Europe was organized into strong states
- Only on the extreme borders of Europe did people strive for unity and independence
B. After 1871, European nations had a common framework- national state
- Emergence of mass politics, growing loyalty towards the national state
C. Ordinary people felt increasing loyalty
- More people could vote1914- UMS is the rule
Made ordinary men feel like they were needed, that they could influence government
- Women started to demand voting:
- First success in US, by 1913- 12 states allowed women to vote
- Protests before 1914 gave way to triumph for women’s suffrage after WWI
D. National parliaments/parties started to represent people more responsively:
- Multiparty system existed in most countriesCould leverage rights for members
- Governments passed laws to eliminate general problemsMade them look better
E. Downside to building support:
- Gvts could manipulate national feeling to create a sense of unity, undermining problems
- After 1871: Gvts used antiliberal, militaristic policis to manage domestic issues, but
increased international tensionsLed to war in 1914
F. Some leaders tried to build extreme nationalist movements by stirring animosity towards
imaginary enemies (Esp. Jews)
The German Empire:
A. Germany after 1871: Federal union of Prussia + 24 other small states
- Strong national government with chancellor (Bismarck until 1890)
- Elected lower house (Reichstag)Gave political parties opportunities
B. National Liberals: supported Bismarck, legislation needed to further unify Germany
- Backed Bismarck’s attack on the Church- “Kulturkampf” (“Struggle for civilization”)
- Didn’t like Pius IX’s claim of papal infallibilityWanted church loyalty above nat’l loyalty
- Kulturkampf had only some success (only with Prots)Caths supported the church
- Bismarck ended Kulturkampf in 1878- uneasy alliance for economic sake
C. 1873: Worldwide financial crash
- Grain prices dropped due to shipments from US, Canada
- More railroads cut shipping prices
- Peasant farmers (Cath) couldn’t keep upCatholic Center Party had to raise tariffs
- Prot Junkers had to embrace cause of higher tariffspreviously favored free trade
Bismarck went along with the tariffMade everyone happy
D. Bismarck wanted to raise taxesChose to make higher tariffs
- Other nations did similarFrance: high tariffs to protect agriculture
- German gvt responded effectivelyGot even greater loyalty
Rise of self-centered nationalism came from protectionismLed to internat’l tension
E. Bismarck tried to stop growth of socialism: Feared its revolutionary message
- After 2 unsuccessful attempts to kill William I by radicals, Bismarck passed law through
the Reichstag
- Law strictly controlled socialist meetings, censored writings, outlawed Social Democratic
Party
The socialists displayed disciplineBismarck had to try something else
1
F. Bismarck’s conservative state took social measures to get the support of the working class
- Laws of 1883, 1884: National sickness and accident insurance
- Law of 1889: old-age pensions and retirement benefits
Paid through contributions from wage earners and employers, grants from the state
First of its kind system
* Didn’t take people from voting socialist, but it protected them at least some
* Combination of political competition and government effort to win support
G. Issues in German domestic policy were socialism and Marxian Social Democratic party
- 1890: William II Emperor (young, unstable, idealistic)Opposed Bismarck’s law to keep
the ban on the socialist party
Forced Bismarck to resignGerman foreign policy changed for the worse
Made new laws to aid workers, legalize socialist party activity
H. William II couldn’t get workers to renounce socialism
- More Social Democrats were elected to the Reichstag in 1890s
Broadened base and got more patriotic tone after war in SE Africa
I. 1912: Socialists became the largest party in the Reichstagheightened fears of upheaval
Were actually becoming less radical
- Leading up to WWI: Socialist opposition to more military spending and expansion
declined
2
Republican France:
A. War with Prussia undid efforts made by Napoleon III1871-France divided again
- Those who declared the 3rd Republic refused to admit defeat
Starved and defended Paris for weeks
B. France was forced by Germany to give up the Alsace-Lorraine Territory
Proclaiming of the “Paris Commune” (1871)- want Paris to govern without rest of Fr.
NA, led by Adolphe Thiers wouldn’t acceptFrench army crushed it
B. France slowly started to build a national unit, got much stability before 1914
- Monarchists could agree on who would be kingstarted to fade out
- Thiers’ firm measures showed the conservative countryside how good the new gvt was
C. Leon Gambetta: combined eloquence with personal touch
- Established absolute parliamentary supremacy between 1877-1879
Third Republic had firm foundations for 10 years, even with splitting into parties
D. Moderate Republicans- wanted to win the hears of the next generation
Legalized trade unions, acquired Colonies
E. Jules Ferry: got laws passed 1879-1886 for free public educationNation-builder
- France education had been controlled by the churchchanged to new teachers teaching
patriotic republicanism to win loyalty of the young citizens of the republic
- Encouraged teachers to marry, promised they would teach at same locationDifferent
from old nuns (celibate), could better cope with loneliness, worried about low birthrate
F. Many French Catholics rallied to the republic in the 1890slimited acceptance of the
modern world by pope Leo XIII
G. Dreyfus Affair: Imprisonment of a Jewish captain in the French army for being Jewish
Exposed disunity that still existed in France and that the political views were not consistent
all over France
- Dreyfus was finally proved innocent and revived republican views against the church
Gvt severed all ties with the Church and were not paid by the state any longer
Great Britain and Ireland:
A. Britain in the 19th cent was seen as an example of peace and successful evolution
- Seemed to enjoy an effective 2 party parliament skillfully governing the country
B. After middle class males got to vote in 1832, politicians were worried about new addition
- John Stuart Mill- On Liberty- (Benthamite), want to protect the rights of individuals in the
emerging age of mass election
- 1867- Benjamin Disraeli (Conservative Party)- extends vote the all middle-class males
and higher paid workerswanted to broaden Conservative support
Third Reform Bill of 1884: UMSwanted more votes
C. House of Lords was content to slumberTried to reassert itself
- Ruled against labor unions; after Liberal Party emerged, vetoed laws passed by the
commons- “People’s Budget” (to increase spending on social welfare)
Gave in when King threatened to introduce more lords to pass the bill
D. Led to popular democracySocial welfare measures passed quickly between 1906-1914
- Liberal Party- David Lloyd George- raised taxes on the rich in the People’s Budget
Nat’l health insurance, unemployment benefits, pensions
E. Ireland almost brought England to civil war on eve of WWIFamine fueled rev. movement
Eng started to ease up on Irelandprime minister William Gladstone intro’d bills to give
self-gvtHurt by the fact that Ireland was not unified (Caths [Ulster county] and Prots)
- Ulsterites vowed to resist home rule in IrelandRaised volunteers (100k) and were
supported by most of England
- Bill to compromise home-rule (excluding Northern counties) was not passed
Irish question was overtaken by a world war in August 1914
F. Irish developments showed the power of national feeling in the 19th centuryNo triumphs
were able to be won with conflicting nationalisms from Caths/Prots in Ireland
3
- Sweden couldn’t stop the Norwegian national movementAble to break free
Austro-Hungarian Empire:
A. Conflicting nationalisms in Ireland was similar to Austro-Hungarian Empire in early 20th cent
- 1849: Magyar nat’lism drove Hungarians to declare independent empireCrushed
Ruled by Emperor Joseph Francis as a conquered territory, tried to Germanize it
B. Defeat by Prussia in 1866 caused Austria to compromise and establish “dual-monarchy”
- Divided the empire in 2Magyars got independence, “barbarians”
Had only a shared king, ministries of finance, defence, etc.
C. Austria: Germans were only 1/31895- Germans felt threatened by other ethnicities
- Particular division in the language to be used for educationMade it difficult to receive a
majority to pass bills, instead ruled by decree
D. Hungary: Magyar nobility restored constitution of 1848 and dominated everyone else
- Promoted use of Hungarian language in schools, gvtAngered minorities (leaders
wanted independence from Hungary)
E. 1871: Austro-Hungarian empire was destroyed by nationalism
Jewish Emancipation and Modern Anti-Semitism:
A. Revolutionary changes in Jewish life in W. and C. Europe
- France 1791: Jews gained civil rights (slowly though)
- Frankfurt Assembly endorsed full rights for German Jews
- 1871: Constitution of new German Empire consolidate Jewish emancipation in C.Eu.
* Exclusion from government employment and discrimination remained
B. Process of emancipation gave Jews challenges and opportunities
- Traditional Jewish jobs were undermined by free-market reforms
- Arts were opening to Jewish talent; excelled in wholesale and retail trade
- By 18871: Most Jews improved their position and joined the middle classes
C. Anti-Semitism reappeared after stock marked crash of 1873
- Modern development that built on general reaction against liberalism and its policies
- Belief that the Jewish race (NOT religion) posed a threat to German people
D. Anti-Semites made political parties to attack Jews (3% of votes in 1893 German election)
E. Karl Lueger and “Christian Socialists” won victories to turn Theodore Herzl from German
nationalism to Zionism (creation of a Jewish state)
- Lueger- fierce anti-semiteappealed to the German-speaking middle-class+Hitler
F. Before 1914: Most oppressive in E. U. (poverty)Russian Jews were denounced, police
and army didn’t pay attention as peasants looted and destroyed Jewish property
Jews left in search of a place to call their own
II. Marxism and the Socialist Movement:
A. Socialism troubled the prosperous and conservative citizens
- Before 1914- time of increasing conflict b/w Socialism and Nationalism
The Socialist International:
A. Socialism appealed to huge numbers of workers, growth of parties after 1871 was huge
B. Bismarck was unable to check the growth of the German Social Democratic party
- 1912: Millions of followers, largest party in Reichstag (Most successful in Germany)
C. Parties emerged in Russia (1883), France (late 1880s) (French Section of the Workers
International); Belgium and Austria-Hungary had strong parties too
D. Marxian socialist parties eventually linked together into an international organization
- The Communist Manifesto- “working men have no country”; moved to England
depressed, thought that the revolution would follow economic crisis (Capital-1867)
- Stayed friends with Richard Engels
E. Practical Organizer: 1864- founded the First International Working Men’s Association- used
as a means to spread his “scientific” doctrines of socialist revolution
F. Embraced the Paris Commune as a giant step towards socialist revolution
G. International proletarian solidarity was important1889- socialist leaders came together to
4
form the 2nd International (until 1914)
- Every three years, met to discuss Socialist impact; had 1 main leader
Unions and Revisionism:
A. Socialism wasn’t really radical and revolutionaryWith more members, grew towards more
gradual change and improvement for the working class, less towards revolution
B. Workers were less inclined to follow radical programsfocused their attention on new
rights after they could vote, not immune to patriotic education, workers weren’t a unified social
group
C. Workers’ standard of living rose gradually after 1850 (higher wages, etc.)
Caused workers to become more moderate
D. Growth of labor unions reinforced the trend toward moderationInitially, unions were put
down and outlaws (people were even arrested for participating)
- GB: 1824,1825- unions gain right to exist, BUT NOT the right to strike
- More practical unions after Owen’s attempt to make 1 huge one failed
- Full acceptance in Britain by 1870sright to strike without being legally liable for $ lost
E. Germany was most industrialized, socialized, unionized country by 1914
- Unions didn’t get rights until 1869, until antisocialist law repealed in 1890
Skyrocketed the number of union members
- 1906-1913: Successful collective bargaining was prominentTONS were made
F. German trade unions and leaders were revisionists
- Revisionism: effort by various socialists to update Marxian doctrines to reflect realities
- Edward Bernstein: Evolutionary Socialism (1899)- Marx’s predictions of greater poverty
for the proletariat were proved false
Wanted to combine with other forces to win gradual gains for workers through unions
Denounced as heresy by the German Social Democratic Party and by 2nd International
G. France: Jean Juares- socialist leader- repudiated revisionist doctrines
- Russia: Questions of revolution split Russian Marxists
H. Before 1914: Socialist parties had clear-cut characteristics
- Russians and Austro-Hungarians were the most radical
- German empire was reformism, influenced by huge trade-union movement
- France: talked revolution and tried to practice it, but was not successful
- England: non-Marxian Labour party
I. Socialist policies and doctrines varied from nation to nation
- “nationalized” behind a façade of international unity
5