Download The family history boom and identity: From bloodlines and status

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Using interviews, the media
and Mass Observation to
research the family history
boom
Dr Anne-Marie Kramer
Leverhulme Early Career Fellow
Department of Sociology, University of Warwick
Research Methods Festival, Oxford
Wednesday 7th July 2010
[email protected]
The family history ‘boom’
 Unparallelled public access to historical records
 New technologies
 Celebrity genealogy TV programmes
 Personal and family biographies & ‘rootedness’ remain
extremely important & foundational to identity (Kramer,
forthcoming)
= Booming family heritage industry
The research project I
 ‘The cultural status of genealogy’ – Leverhulme funded
Early Career Fellowship (Aug 2008 – present)
 Explores the meaning and consequences of the current
boom in UK family history research for the individuals
undertaking it, their families, and British society more
broadly
 Interested in exploring how family history research
functions in the personal life of individuals and families
in relation to ‘connection, relationship, reciprocal
emotion, entwinement, memory, history’ (Smart, 2007:
189)
The research project II
 Investigates how the meaning of family history is understood
broadly within British society.
 Locates the family history phenomenon in relation to personal
life
Asks:
 what has stimulated the appetite for family history research
or the quest for ‘rootedness’, and what sustains it
 what a focus on family history can offer to our understanding
of how connectedness, relatedness and affinity function to
mediate and structure personal and family lives.
Beyond the in-depth interview
 Sociologists need to innovate in terms of the
methodological resources they use, going beyond the indepth interview and the sample survey (Savage, 2007)
 A return to sociological description (Savage, 2007)
 Treating documents as more than inert texts, but actors
in their own right (Prior, 2008)
Sources
 Media analysis:
Broadsheet newspaper coverage of FHR (2000 –
2008)
TV analysis (Who Do You Think You Are?)
Genealogy magazines (6 monthlies)
 Mass Observation Directive, Summer 2008 Part 1 on
‘Doing Family History Research’
 Interviews with archivists, professional and amateur
family historians
Levels of analysis: who to
research?
 Investigating the ‘boom’ – but from whose perspective?
 National – familial – individual & personal identities
 Multiple viewpoints: those identifying as family
historians; those interested but not active; those with a
family member involved in it; those actively ambivalent
or hostile
Levels of analysis: Working with
multiple texts
 Media saturation of everyday life: public representation
of family history plus how media texts function and
saturate personal lives
 Written versus oral responses
 Weaving the strands together