Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Supplemental Information Extraction of sediment associated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with granular activated carbon M.I. Rakowska*.†, D. Kupryianchyk‡, T. Grotenhuis†, H.H.M. Rijnaarts†, A.A. Koelmans‡.§ † Subdepartment of Environmental Technology. Department of Agrotechnology and Food Science, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands ‡ Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management Group. Department of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands § IMARES – Institute for Marine Resources & Ecosystem Studies, Wageningen UR, Ijmuiden, The Netherlands Number of pages: 17 Number of additional text pages: 3 Number of Tables: 5 Numbers of Figures: 13 Determination of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) TPH extraction was performed according to NEN 5733 [1]. In short, 4 g (w.w.) sediment, 10 mL water and 50 mL acetone were cold extracted for 30 minutes at 175 strokes per minute, followed by a second extraction with 25 mL of hexane. To the resulting extracts, 50 mL of water was added. After phase separation a hexane subsample was analyzed for TPH, using a HP 5890 Gas Chromatograph (GC) equipped with a SIM DIST column and Flame Ionization Detector with nitrogen as the carrier gas. After 5 minutes at an initial temperature of 40 ˚C, GC temperature increased at 10 ˚C per minute to a final temperature of 300 ˚C. Carbon number fractions were determined using the retention times of a boiling point standard. TPH is determined as the area between C10 and C40. Solid phase extractions with Tenax and four types of GAC Tenax extractions. As a reference, single-step 24 h solid-phase extractions (SPE) with Tenax, were performed to determine the residual fractions of PAHs in Petroleum Harbor (PH) sediment. The results served as control tests for the selection of the best performing GAC, and allowed a direct comparison of GAC versus Tenax extraction efficiency. The single step SPE method was adapted from [2, 3]. In short, the extractions were carried out in 50 mL separatory funnels, which were filled with PH sediment (1.5 g dry matter), 40 mL of Mili-Q water containing 100 mg/L NaN3 and 0.01M CaCl2, and 1.5 g of Tenax adsorbent. The separatory funnels were shaken end-to-end at 160 strokes per minute for 24 h. After 24 h the sediment suspension was separated from the sorbent, centrifuged and dried with Na2SO4 for determination of residual concentration of PAHs remaining in the sediment after Tenax extraction. The Tenax beads with preconcentrated PAHs and residual sediment samples were extracted in hexane/acetone (1:1) with microwave assisted extraction (MAE). All hexane/acetone extracts were primarly concentrated with a rotary evaporator, further reduced to 1 mL under gentle stream of nitrogen and switched to acetonitrile for PAH analysis. For details on the Microwave assisted procedure, the reader is referred to [4]. The Tenax extractions were carried out in triplicate. GAC extractions. A series of 4 types of granulated carbons (GAC 1240W, 840W, RB 3W and RB 4W, kindly supplied by Norit, Amersfoort, The Netherlands) with varying particle size range (0.450-1.70), (0.60-2.36), 3 and 4 mm respectively, were evaluated for their efficiency in extracting PAHs from PH sediment. Single-step extractions of PAHs from sediment samples with all GACs were performed in the same way as Tenax extraction, also using a 1:1 (w/w) sediment to sorbent ratio. Briefly, 50 mL brown colored bottles were filled with 1.5 g (d.w.) sediment, 1.5 g GAC and aqueous NaN3 / CaCl2 solution, and shaken at 160 strokes per minute for 24h. The sediment was separated from GAC by sieving (500 µm), centrifuged and dried with Na2SO4 for determination of residual concentration of PAHs remaining in the sediment after GAC extraction. The extractions with GAC were carried out in triplicate. Further extraction steps and analysis were identical to that of the Tenax and sediment samples. The residual fractions of the total amount of 13 EPA PAHs remaining in the sediment after extraction were calculated by dividing the PAH quantity extracted, by the total quantity of PAHs determined in PH sediment by Soxhlet extraction (see main text). The lowest residual fraction of PAHs was found after extraction with GAC 1240W, which was selected for further tests (Fig. 1 and Fig. S1). Boehm titration The acidic surface groups (carboxyl, lactone and phenolic) and the total quantity of basic groups present on granular activated carbon (GAC 1240W) were determined with Boehm titrations as described elsewhere [5-7]. Since the method is based on the assumption that NaOH neutralizes carboxyl, lactone and phenolic groups, Na2CO3 neutralizes carboxyl and lactone groups and NaHCO3 neutralizes carboxyl groups, the quantity of acid and basic groups can be calculated. In short, to four 100 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 20 mL of 0.05N NaHCO3, NaOH, HCl and Na2CO3, ~0.2 g GAC was added. Additionally, two blank bottles filled with 20 mL of 0.05N NaOH and 0.05N HCl were prepared. The bottles were shaken end-to-end for 24 h, after which the solutions were filtrated using 0.2 µm cellulose filters. The supernatants were titrated with the excess of base and acid with NaOH and HCl respectively. The titrations were carried out with Metrohm 702 SM Titrino (NaOH) and SCHOTT TitroLine easy (HCl). Table S1. Characteristics of Petroleum Harbor sediment; concentrations of PAH in the sediment, aqueous phase concentrations determined with POM-SPE and POM – water partitioning coefficients Compound fluorene (FL) phenanthrene (PHE) anthracene (ANT) fluoranthene (FLU) pyrene (PYR) benzo[a]anthracene (BaA) chrysene (CHR) benzo[b]fluoranthene (BbF) benzo[k]fluoranthene (BkF) benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) dibenzo[a.h]anthracene (DBA) benzo[g.h.i]perylene (BghiP) indeno[1.2.3.c.d]pyrene (InP) Σ13 EPA PAHs TOC [%] OC [%] BC [%] BC/TOC TPH [%] a Log KOW 4.2a 4.6b 4.7c 5.2b 5.2b 5.9b 5.8b 6.0a 6.1c 6.1c 7.0b 6.9b 7.0b Data taken from Maruya et al.[8] Data reported by Jonker & Smedes [9] c Data from de Maagd et al. [10] d Data taken from Hawthorne et al. [11] b CSED, CW, mg/kg µg/L 99.8 (6.5) 63.74 (7.42) 304.8 (16.9) 179.99 (15.78) 116.7 (5.3) 16.76 (1.71) 323.5 (14.6) 23.98 (2.01) 199.5 (5.9) 13.65 (1.16) 106.9 (9.2) 0.75 (0.07) 96.6 (11.4) 0.57 (0.07) 92.0 (11.9) 0.14 (0.02) 40.7 (4.1) 0.04 (0.01) 105.9 (15.3) 0.10 (0.01) 10.0 (3.2) 1.79*10-3 (3.65*10-4) 45.9 (4.4) 1.34*10-2 (1.43*10-3) 51.3 (4.2) 8.96*10-3 (1.55*10-3) 1604.3 (90.2) 4.46 2.61 1.85 0.415 0.54 (0.041) Log KPOMd 3.83 4.20 4.30 4.56 4.57 5.46 5.43 5.80 5.97 5.96 6.30 6.09 6.26 Table S2. Chemical and physical characteristics of coal based granular activated carbons. Data obtained from low temperature nitrogen adsorption isotherms and Boehm titrations performed for the quantification of functional groups present on GAC surface. GAC Type Particle SBETa SBJHb Vtot (BET)c size (m2/g) (m2/g) (cm3/g) Vtot (BJH) d (cm3/g) (mm) Average BJH Carboxyl Lactone Phenolic Basic pore Averag (mmol/g) (mmol/g) (mmol/g) (mmol/g) width e pore wadse radiusf (nm) (nm) 1240W 0.45-1.70 1112 113 0.607 0.129 2.182 2.283 0.019 0.016 0.020 0.083 830W 0.60-2.36 1112 113 0.607 0.129 2.182 2.283 0.030 0.014 0.026 0.099 RB3W 3 997 51 0.482 0.052 1.936 2.053 0.031 0.007 0.007 0.134 RB4W 4 1035 29 0.470 0.035 1.816 2.475 0.012 0.023 0.010 0.133 a BET surface area BJH adsorption cumulative surface area of pores between 1.0 and 25.0 nm radius c Single point adsorption total pore volume of pores less than 25.0 nm radius at p/p0=0.96107 d BJH adsorption cumulative volume of pores between 1.0 and 25.0 nm radius e Adsorption average pore width (4V/A by BET) f BJH adsorption average pore radius (2V/A) b Table S3. Multiple comparisons, ANOVA (Tukey HSD, p < 0.05) between residual fractions obtained after GAC extractions versus residual fractions after Tenax-SPE. The p values are reported for 3, 4 and 5&6 ring PAHs. 24 h - SPE extraction PAH 4 ring 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 5&6 ring 0.602 0.910 0.098 0.011 Tenax vs. GAC 1240W GAC 830W RB 3W RB 4W 3 ring 0.774 0.110 0.001 0.000 GAC 1240W vs. Tenax GAC 830W RB 3W RB 4W 0.774 0.018 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.602 0.218 0.010 0.001 GAC 830W vs. Tenax GAC 1240W RB 3W RB 4W 0.110 0.018 0.030 0.003 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.910 0.218 0.329 0.042 RB 3W vs. Tenax GAC 1240W GAC 830W RB 4W 0.001 0.000 0.030 0.550 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.142 0.098 0.010 0.329 0.641 RB 4W vs. Tenax GAC 1240W GAC 830W RB 3W 0.000 0.000 0.003 0.550 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.142 0.011 0.001 0.042 0.641 Table S4. Partitioning coefficients (LogKSED (SD)) for PAHs, in individual sediment – water equilibration systems, and mean LogKSED values. LogKSED Sediment (d.w.) (g) 0.75 3.75 7.50 18.75 37.50 75.00 χ2(5)a p LogKSEDb a FL PHE ANT FLU PYR BaA CHR BbF BkF BaP DBA BghiP InP 3.28(0.03) 3.24(0.03) 3.17(0.03) 3.18(0.04) 3.14(0.03) 3.15(0.03) 13.838 0.017 3.20(0.05) 3.29(0.04) 3.25(0.03) 3.19(0.03) 3.20(0.03) 3.22(0.03) 3.22(0.02) 13.147 0.022 3.23(0.04) 3.86(0.05) 3.88(0.02) 3.77(0.02) 3.81(0.02) 3.86(0.02) 3.86(0.02) 11.941 0.036 3.84(0.04) 4.18(0.03) 4.18(0.03) 4.11(0.03) 4.12(0.02) 4.12(0.02) 4.13(0.02) 11.596 0.041 4.14(0.04) 4.22(0.04) 4.21(0.04) 4.14(0.02) 4.16(0.02) 4.16(0.03) 4.16(0.01) 11.037 0.051 4.18(0.04) 5.19(0.05) 5.20(0.05) 5.14(0.05) 5.11(0.04) 5.13(0.04) 5.13(0.04) 11.221 0.047 5.15(0.04) 5.26(0.07) 5.29(0.08) 5.18(0.05) 5.20(0.05) 5.20(0.05) 5.20(0.05) 12.360 0.030 5.23(0.04) 5.84(0.06) 5.90(0.15) 5.80(0.06) 5.81(0.06) 5.81(0.06) 5.81(0.06) 3.015 0.698 5.84(0.08) 6.00(0.10) 6.08(0.05) 5.96(0.06) 5.95(0.05) 5.93(0.04) 5.94(0.04) 11.566 0.041 5.99(0.07) 6.06(0.06) 6.04(0.07) 5.98(0.06) 6.00(0.07) 5.99(0.06) 6.00(0.06) 9.596 0.088 6.02(0.04) 6.81(0.16) 6.89(0.18) 6.70(0.15) 6.69(0.14) 6.70(0.14) 6.70(0.14) 10.235 0.069 6.77(0.11) 6.55(0.08) 6.59(0.07) 6.54(0.07) 6.54(0.04) 6.58(0.04) 6.52(0.04) 3.897 0.564 6.56(0.05) 6.90(0.08) 6.88(0.10) 6.77(0.04) 6.78(0.04) 6.75(0.04) 6.74(0.04) 12.154 0.033 6.82(0.09) Kruskal – Wallis tests for significant differences between individual sediment-water equilibration systems. Single mean values of sediment – water partitioning coefficients (LogKSED) with associated errors (SD, n=18) obtained from sediment - water equilibration tests, without carbon amendment. b Table S5. Granular activated carbon – sediment partitioning coefficients (LogKMIX (SD)) for a series of PAHs. LogKMIX Sed (d.w.) (g) 0.75 3.75 7.50 18.75 37.50 75.00 GAC (g) FL PHE ANT FLU PYR BaA CHR BbF BkF BaP DBA BghiP 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 6.42(0.06) 5.38(0.04) 5.10(0.12) 4.36(0.05) 3.78(0.04) 3.28(0.03) 6.16(0.10) 5.08(0.04) 4.94(0.04) 4.31(0.03) 3.93(0.04) 3.76(0.02) 6.35(0.07) 5.10(0.03) 4.93(0.03) 4.40(0.03) 4.13(0.03) 4.03(0.02) 5.99(0.08) 4.72(0.02) 4.71(0.02) 4.37(0.03) 4.25(0.02) 4.19(0.02) 5.89(0.09) 4.69(0.02) 4.57(0.02) 4.35(0.02) 4.26(0.01) 4.21(0.01) 6.55(0.09) 5.39(0.06) 5.40(0.07) 5.22(0.05) 5.18(0.04) 5.14(0.04) 6.55(0.11) 5.30(0.06) 5.36(0.06) 5.26(0.06) 5.23(0.05) 5.23(0.06) 7.00(0.14) 5.85(0.07) 5.91(0.06) 5.83(0.06) 5.81(0.06) 5.80(0.06) 7.12(0.09) 6.02(0.06) 6.08(0.05) 5.99(0.05) 5.96(0.05) 5.94(0.05) 6.96(0.13) 6.04(0.08) 6.09(0.07) 6.06(0.07) 6.02(0.07) 6.00(0.07) 7.91(0.28) 6.77(0.17) 6.79(0.16) 6.72(0.15) 6.68(0.14) 6.72(0.14) 7.51(0.08) 7.59(0.05) 7.83(0.05) 6.68(0.05) 6.65(0.04) 6.52(0.04) InP 7.85(0.07) 6.80(0.05) 6.83(0.04) 6.81(0.04) 6.77(0.05) 6.74(0.04) Figure S1. Industrial sieving unit for separation of GAC from high volume sediment slurries. Figure S2. Separation of granular activated carbon from treated sediment. Picture shows detail of sediment being sieved using the unit depicted in Figure S1. Figure S3. Fast desorbing (in 24 h) fraction of total PAHs (13EPA PAH) in PH sediment as determined with Tenax extraction and residual fraction of total PAHs in PH sediment as determined with Tenax extraction (grey bars). Residual fractions of PAHs after extractions with four types of GAC (black bars). Fast and residual Tenax-based fractions (grey bars) together make up 100% of PAH present in the sediment. Figure S4. Single sediment – water partitioning coefficients (LogKSED) obtained in this study as a function of PAH LogKOW. Figure S5. LogKMIX distribution coefficients at fGAC/fSED = 1 weight ratio as a function of LogKOW (closed symbols) and sediment – water partitioning coefficients obtained from the individual control system without carbon amendment (open symbols). Figure S6. LogKMIX distribution coefficients at fGAC/fSED = 0.2 weight ratio as a function of LogKOW (closed symbols) and sediment – water partitioning coefficients obtained from individual control system without carbon amendment (open symbols). Figure S7. LogKMIX distribution coefficients at fGAC/fSED = 0.1 weight ratio as a function of LogKOW (closed symbols) and sediment – water partitioning coefficients obtained from individual control system without carbon amendment (open symbols). Figure S8. LogKMIX distribution coefficients at fGAC/fSED = 0.04 weight ratio as a function of LogKOW (closed symbols) and sediment – water partitioning coefficients obtained from individual control system without carbon amendment (open symbols). Figure S9. LogKMIX distribution coefficients at fGAC/fSED = 0.02 weight ratio as a function of LogKOW (closed symbols) and sediment – water partitioning coefficients obtained for individual control system without carbon amendment (open symbols). Figure S10. LogKMIX distribution coefficients at fGAC/fSED = 0.01 weight ratio as a function of LogKOW (closed symbols) and sediment – water partitioning coefficients obtained from individual control system without carbon amendment (open symbols). Figure S11. Isotherms for sorption of PAHs to GAC in the presence of sediment. Figure S12. Apparent sorption isotherms for (a) FL, (b) PHE, (c) ANT and (d) FLU. Open symbols without lines represent experimentally determined values, closed symbols with dashed curves indicate data obtained from fitting to Freundlich isotherm equation, and closed symbols with dotted lines represent values obtained from fitting to Langmuir equation. Figure S13. Freundlich affinity (pseudo-)equilibrium constants (LogKF,GAC) (μg/kgGAC)/(μg/L)nF,GAC as a function of octanol-water partitioning coefficients for GAC in the presence of PH sediment. References [1] 5733 N. 1997. NEN 5733 Soil - Determination of mineral oil content in soil and sediments with gas chromatography”. [2] Cornelissen G, Rigterink H, ten Hulscher DEM, Vrind BA, van Noort PCM. 2001. A simple Tenax® extraction method to determine the availability of sediment-sorbed organic compounds. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 20:706-711. [3] Cuypers C, Grotenhuis T, Joziasse J, Rulkens W. 2000. Rapid Persulfate Oxidation Predicts PAH Bioavailability in Soils and Sediments. Environmental Science & Technology 34:2057-2063. [4] Noordkamp ER, Grotenhuis JTC, Rulkens WH. 1997. Selection of an efficient extraction method for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in contaminated soil and sediment. Chemosphere 35:1907-1917. [5] Boehm HP. 1994. Some aspects of the surface chemistry of carbon blacks and other carbons. Carbon 32:759-769. [6] Contescu A, Contescu C, Putyera K, Schwarz JA. 1997. Surface acidity of carbons characterized by their continuous pK distribution and Boehm titration. Carbon 35:83-94. [7] László K. 2005. Adsorption from aqueous phenol and aniline solutions on activated carbons with different surface chemistry. Colloid Surface A, 265:32-39. [8] Maruya KA, Risebrough RW, Horne AJ. 1996. Partitioning of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons between sediments from San Francisco Bay and their porewaters. Environ Sci Technol, 30:2942-2947. [9] Jonker MTO, Smedes F. 2000. Preferential Sorption of Planar Contaminants in Sediments from Lake Ketelmeer, The Netherlands. Environmental Science & Technology 34:1620-1626. [10] de Maagd PG-J, ten Hulscher DTEM, van den Heuvel H, Opperhuizen A, Sijm DTHM. 1998. Physicochemical properties of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Aqueous solubilities, n-octanol/water partition coefficients, and Henry's law constants. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 17:251-257. [11] Hawthorne SB, Jonker MTO, van der Heijden SA, Grabanski CB, Azzolina NA, Miller DJ. 2011. Measuring Picogram per Liter Concentrations of Freely Dissolved Parent and Alkyl PAHs (PAH-34), Using Passive Sampling with Polyoxymethylene. Anal Chem, 83:6754-6761.