Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Press Release LCQ7: GDP and public expenditure Wednesday, July 3, 2002 Following is a question by the Hon Martin Lee and a written reply by the Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury, Mr Frederick Ma, in the Legislative Council today (July 3): Question: Will the Government: (a) provide this Council with a "long-term growth curve" of Hong Kong's Gross Domestic Product ("GDP") (compiled by using the expenditure approach and applicable to the ensuing text) calculated on the basis of constant market prices, and with an analysis of the duration of each economic cycle and the years when each cycle began and ended, since GDP was first compiled; (b) provide an analysis of the short-term impact of the public expenditure on GDP; and (c) advise this Council of the elasticity of GDP relative to the public expenditure and of the multiplier effect of public expenditure, calculated by using the latest data; if the above figures are not available, of the reasons for that, and whether it plans to make such calculations? Reply: (a) The Census and Statistics Department has been compiling the expenditure-based Gross Domestic Product as from the reference year of 1961. Over the past 40 years, the Hong Kong economy had gone through a number of ups and downs, with the growth rate of the economy as measured by the constant price GDP also showing much variations between periods, as broadly described below. In the 1960s and 1970s, the Hong Kong economy expanded at a robust pace averaging at around 9% per annum. For these two periods, the troughs occurred in 1966/1967 and 1974/1975 respectively. The former trough was caused by the social instability in the mid-1960s, while the latter trough was due to the global economic recession after the oil crisis. As the economy became increasingly mature, Hong Kong's economic growth proceeded at a slower rate of around 6.5% per annum in the 1980s. During this period, there were brief relapses in 1982 and 1985, both affected by a setback in the external economic environment at that time, as well as in 1989. The Hong Kong economy still maintained a steady and notable growth in the early to mid-1990s, averaging at around 5% per annum between 1991 and 1997. Then, with the outbreak of the Asian financial crisis in the latter part of 1997, the Hong Kong economy suffered a severe setback, and for the first time it recorded negative growth on an annual basis in 1998. The 1 economy soon rebounded, and attained double-digit growth in 2000. But upon the global economic downturn last year, the Hong Kong economy slowed down abruptly during the course of the year, and had only a slight growth for 2001 as a whole. Affected by these two significant setbacks, the Hong Kong economy yielded growth averaging at only around 2% per annum between 1998 and 2001. From this, it is clear that owing to the relatively small scale of the Hong Kong economy and its high degree of external orientation, the vicissitudes of the economy are bound to be influenced largely by fluctuations in the global economy. (b) The Government's budgetary figures are generally presented on the basis of fiscal account and for that account public expenditure is 22% of GDP. However, the way this question is asked requires it to be presented as the share of public expenditure reckoned on a GDP basis instead of on a fiscal basis. The Hong Kong economy is predominantly led by the private sector. Public sector expenditure, reckoned on a GDP basis, accounted for around 12% of GDP in 2001(Note). Of this, the share of government consumption expenditure in GDP was 8%, and the combined share of public sector expenditures on building and construction and on machinery and equipment in GDP was 4%. With consumers' propensity to save and the leakage to imports both rendering a diluting or offsetting effect, an increase in public sector expenditure on the whole would only render a limited short-term boost to GDP. If the Government seeks to raise public sector expenditure year after year for the sake of stimulating the economy, this would inevitably impose increasingly heavy burden on public finances. Besides, undue expansion of the public sector would also take up an excessive amount of resources in the economy, thereby hampering resource usage efficiency and overall economic vitality. Note: Generally speaking, public sector expenditure reckoned on a GDP basis covers the expenditures incurred by Government departments themselves, as well as by some quasi-government non-profit bodies. On the other hand, it does not include the expenditures of those Government departments and statutory entities engaged in the production of goods and services principally for sale to the public, such as the Housing Department, Post Office and Water Supplies Department. Furthermore, expenditures incurred by the Government in the provision of social welfare and public assistance are also not included, because such expenditures are in the nature of transfer payments and not direct consumption of economic resources. (c) Crude estimates from the econometric model are as follows : Broad category of public sector expenditure -------------- Multiplier effect of increasing the respective public sector expenditure by $1 on Hong Kong's GDP ----------------------($) Effect of increasing the respective public sector expenditure by one percentage point on the growth rate of Hong Kong's GDP ----------------------(% point) 2 Government consumption expenditure 0.7 0.057 Public sector Expenditure on building and construction 0.5 0.015 0.15 0.001 Public sector expenditure on machinery and equipment 3