Download 6. Zariski Topology Definition 6.1. A topological space X is

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
6. Zariski Topology
Definition 6.1. A topological space X is Noetherian if it satisfies the
descending chain condition for closed sets, that is for closed sets Yi if
Y1 ⊃ Y2 ⊃ · · · , then for some R, we have Yr = Yr+1 for all r ≥ R.
Example 6.2. (i) An (k) with the Zariski topology is Noetherian. For
any
√ descending chain Y1 ⊃ Y2 ⊃ · · · , we have Yi = V (Ji ) where Ji =
Ji is a radical ideal, and so J1 ⊂ J2 ⊂ · · · ∈ k[x1 , . . . , xn ]. Since
k[x1 , . . . , xn ] is Noetherian, the ascending chain of Ji ’s satisfies the
ascending chain condition, and the result follows.
(ii) Let X ⊂ An (k). Then X endowed with the subspace topology is
Noetherian.
(iii) Let X = Spec(A) where A is a Noetherian ring. Then the closed
sets are V (I) = {P : I ⊂ P }.
Recall an irreducible subset Y of X is a subset such that if Y = Y1 ∪Y2
and Y1 and Y2 are closed, then either Y = Y1√or Y = Y2 . Also remember
that Y = V (J) is irreducible if and only if J is prime.
Proposition 6.3. In a Noetherian topological space X, every nonempty closed subset Y ⊂ X can be written as a finite union Y =
Y1 ∪ · · · ∪ Yr , where each Yi is irreducible. If Yi 6⊂ Yj for i 6= j, then this
decomposition is unique. Each Yi is called an irreducible component of
Y.
Proof: Let S be the set of nonempty closed subsets Y ⊂ X that do
not have such a decomposition. If S 6= ∅, the Noetherian hypothesis
implies that S has a minimal element, Y . Since Y ∈ S, Y admits no
finite decomposition into a union of irreducibles. In particular, Y is not
irreducible. Thus we may write Y = Y1 ∪Y2 where Y1 , Y2 are closed and
Y1 6= Y and Y2 6= Y . Since Y ∈ S is minimal, neither Y1 nor Y2 ∈ S.
So Y1 = Y10 ∪ · · · ∪ Ys0 and Y2 = Y100 ∪ · · · ∪ Yt00 giving a decomposition
for Y = Y10 ∪ · · · ∪ Ys0 ∪ Y100 ∪ · · · ∪ Yt00 and thus S = ∅.
Now suppose Y = Y10 ∪ · · · ∪ Ys0 S
is another such representation. Then
0
0
Y1 ⊂ Y = Y1 ∪ · · · ∪ Yr , so Y1 = (Y10 ∩ Yi ). But Y10 is irreducible, so
Y10 ⊂ Yi for some i, say i = 1. Similarly, Y1 ⊂ Yj0 for some j. Then
Y10 ⊂ Yj0 , so j = 1, and thus Y1 = Y10 . Now let Z = (Y − Y1 ). Then
Z = Y2 ∪· · ·∪Yr , and also Z = Y20 ∪· · ·∪Ys0 . So we proceed by induction
on r to obtain uniqueness.
Definition 6.4. An ideal Q ⊂ A is primary if one of the equivalent
conditions holds:
(1) Every zero divisor of A/Q is nilpotent.
(2) If xy ∈ Q, then x ∈ Q or y n ∈ Q for some n ≥ 1 (ie y ∈ Q).
1
2
If Q is primary, then
√
Q = P is prime, and we say Q is P -primary.
If Q1 and Q2 are P -primary, then Q1 ∩ Q2 is P -primary.√ If M is a
maximal ideal, then M r is M -primary. More generally, if I = M is
maximal, then I is M -primary. Observe that it is not true that P r is
P -primary for any prime ideal P .
Example 6.5. Let A = k[x, y, z]/(xy − z 2 ) = k[x, y, z]. Then P =
(x, z) is prime because A/P ∼
= k[y] is an integral domain.√But P 2 is
not P -primary because x · y = z 2 ∈ P 2 yet x ∈
/ P and y ∈
/ P2 = P.
Definition 6.6. An irredundant primary decomposition of an ideal
I ⊂ A is an expression
√ I = Q1 ∩ · · · ∩ Qr with Qi primary and
(1) the prime Pi = Qi are all distinct.
(2) No Qi can be omitted from the decomposition, that is
\
Qj 6⊂ Qi for any i.
i6=j
Theorem 6.7. Let A be a commutative Noetherian ring.
(1) Every ideal I ⊂ A has an irredundant primary decomposition:
I = Q1 ∩ · · · ∩ Qr .
√
√
(2) The set of primes P1 = Q1 , . . . , Pr = Qr is determined by
I. These are the associated primes of I, denoted Ass(I).
(3) This decomposition of I need not be unique, but the Qi belonging
to the minimal elements of the set {Pj } are uniquely determined
by I. Non-minimal
elements are called embedded
√
√ primes.
(4) If I = I, then I has a unique decomposition I = P1 ∩· · ·∩Pt
where Pi is prime and Pi 6⊂ Pj for i 6= j.
Example 6.8. This is an example of a non-unique primary decomposition. Let A = k[x, y]. Then let I = (x2 , xy). Now, I admits two
2
decompositions Q1 ∩ Q2 = (x) ∩ (x, y)
Q1 ∩ Q02 = (x) ∩ (x2 , y).
p and
√
√
Then Q1 = P1 = (x) and Q2 = Q02 = (x, y) = P2 . Note that
P1 ⊂ P2 , so P2 is an embedded prime.
Related documents