Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
HONG KONG BAR ASSOCIATION COMMENTS ON SFC’S DRAFT SECURITIES AND FUTURES (CONTRACT NOTES, STATEMENTS OF ACCOUNT AND RECEIPTS) RULES INTRODUCTION 1. The Draft Securities and Futures (Contract Notes, Statements of Account and Receipts) Rules (“the Draft Contract Notes Rules”) are made pursuant to Clause 148 of the Securities and Futures Bill (“the Bill”). By way of the Draft Contract Notes Rules, the SFC seeks to set out detailed requirements regarding issuance of contract notes, statements of account and receipts which must be fulfilled by all intermediaries (licensed or exempt under Part V of the Bill) or their associated entities. 2. Clause 148 of the Bill empowers the SFC to make rules regarding preparation of contract notes, statements of account, receipts and notification by intermediaries and their associated entities. However, we note that the Draft Contract Notes Rules deal only with contract notes, statements of account and receipts, and make no specific provision for notification. 3. The existing requirements in respect of issuance of contract notes and statements of account can be found in the Securities Ordinance Cap 333, the Commodities Trading Ordinance Cap 250, the Leveraged Foreign Exchange Trading (Books, Contract Notes and Conduct of Business) Rules Cap 451, the Code of Conduct for Persons Registered with the Securities and Futures Commission (“Code”) and the Fund Manager Code of Conduct (“FMCC”). The Draft Contract Notes Rules are intended to rationalise and streamline the existing requirements. EXEMPTION FROM DUTY TO PROVIDE CONTRACT NOTE 4. Section 5 states that an intermediary or its associated entity is not required to provide a contract note, statement of account or receipt if it knows or has reasonable cause to believe that another intermediary has prepared and delivered the same for the client. According to the consultation document, it is the SFC’s policy to allow introducing brokers, assets managers and some others not to issue contract notes to the client where another intermediary, for example, the execution broker, already provides clients with necessary information. There is, however, a risk that intermediaries who fail to issue the documents required may make use of section 5 as a general defence as it may not be difficult to demonstrate “reasonable cause to believe”. INFORMATION IN THE CONTRACT NOTE 5. Section 4 sets out the basic information which needs to be contained in every contract note, statement of account and receipt. Section 6(3)-(6) lists other particulars which must be contained in a contract note. For the sake of completeness, it is submitted that section 6 should cross-refer to section 4 so that it will be clear that a contact note should contain the information required under section 6 in addition to that required under section 4. 6. According to section 6(3)(b), where the intermediary that has entered into the relevant contract is acting as principal, a contract note must include a statement that it is so acting except in the case of a leveraged foreign exchange contract. It is unclear and we see no reason why a leveraged foreign exchange contract should be an exception in this regard. According to the current requirement as stipulated in r. 4 of the Leveraged Foreign Exchange Trading (Books, Contract Notes and Conduct of Business) Rules Cap 451, a contract note shall include, where the licensed trader is acting as principal, a statement that it is so acting. AVERAGE PRICE 7. Section 6(4) states that the intermediary, at the request of the client, needs to provide in the contract note an average price per unit for the sale or purchase of the same description of securities. We presume that the average price per unit as stated in section 6(4)(b)(ii) is the average price per unit for the purchase or sale of the same description of securities covered by that contract note. 8. Section 6(7) of the Draft Contract Notes Rules provides that an intermediary is required to provide a detailed analysis of an average price no later than the end of the second business day after the request is received. The Draft Contract Notes Rules do not contain any provision relating to general requests and we suggest that this should be considered. SHORT SELLING 9. Pursuant to section 6(4)(b)(iii), a contract note must include “an indication where it relates to:(A) a short selling order, where the intermediary knows this; or (B) a borrowing or lending under a securities borrowing and lending agreement.” 10. There appears to be missing from the section what indication is required. It is submitted that the contract note should include a statement as to whether the transaction is for short selling. Further, according to paragraph 14 of Schedule 3 to the Code of Conduct for Persons Registered with the Securities and Futures Commission (“the Code of Conduct for Registered Persons”), the registered person is required to ensure that the designated security in respect of the short selling transaction will be available to the registered person or that the client should make delivery of the same of the settlement date. It should be considered 2 whether the basis as to how the designated security is to be available on the settlement date should be set out in the contract note. 11. Section 6(4)(b)(iii) requires a contract note to contain an indication regarding short selling only when the intermediary knows it. It is submitted that a higher standard should be imposed because of the following reasons:(1) In view of the provisions of the Code of Conduct for Registered Persons, a registered person has a duty to take certain steps on receipt of an order for the sale of an amount of securities in the context of short selling. In the circumstances, even if an intermediary does not have direct knowledge as to whether the transaction is of a short-selling nature, it should be able to ascertain whether the order is of such a nature or not. (2) 12. According to Clause 166 (11) of the Bill, a person shall be guilty of the offence of conveying or accepting a short selling order unless he has received an assurance that the client has a presently exercisable and unconditional right to vest the securities in the purchaser or that the securities in question are available to be lent or delivered to the client. Further, it is a general defence if a person can prove that he had reasonable grounds to believe and did believe that the order was not a short selling order or he did not know that the order was a short selling order. It is submitted that in view of the matters stated in paragraph 11 above, section 6(4)(b)(iii) should make it plain that a contract note must include an indication that the transaction is for short selling where it relates to a short selling order. A defence, similar to that set out in Clause 166(11) of the Bill, should be available to the intermediary or its associated entity. SUMMARY OF TERMS AND STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT 13. The matter raised in paragraph 6 above in relation to contract note equally applies to statement of accounts. MARGINED TRANSACTIONS 14. Section 9 deals with statements of account in relation to margined transactions. If both ordinary transactions and margined transactions are carried out on one business day, the Draft Contract Notes Rules do not contain any clear provision on whether the statement should set out both types of transactions or whether separate statements should deal with separate types of transactions. PENALTY 15. Clause 148(3) of the Bill states that rules can set out the penalty for an intermediary or its associated entity for breach of the rules without reasonable 3 excuse whereas Clause 148(4) imposes more severe penalty on those who contravene the rules with intent to defraud. We note that the Draft Contract Notes do not draw any such distinction and simply provide for penalty for an intermediary or its associated entity who fails to comply with the Rules without reasonable excuse. Further, according to the Bill, both fine and imprisonment can be imposed. However, the Draft Contract Notes only provide for a maximum fine at level 4. It should be considered whether a provision reflecting Clause 148(4) with a higher maximum penalty should be enacted. OTHER MATTERS 16. Finally, we note that the Draft Contract Notes Rules do not contain any specific provision that deals with discretionary accounts. We would invite the SFC to consider whether those accounts pose different requirements and merit separate treatment. 25th January 2002 4