Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Title: Breakable Bones Can Make You Blind: How Osteopetrosis Affects Vision Authors: Amy Steinway OD, Maegan Sauer OD, Scott Richter OD, Susan P. Schuettenberg OD FAAO Abstract: Osteopetrosis is a rare disease that can often present with ocular manifestations. This poster will review a case study and further investigate an optometrist’s approach to treatment, management, and inter-professional care of patients with osteopetrosis. I. Case History Patient Demographics: 20 year old Caucasian female (Ashkenazi Jewish) Chief Compliant: Referred for subjective decrease in VA OD. Ocular/Medical History: Patient was diagnosed with osteopetrosis at three months of age; had been followed by other optometrist but referred for change in vision Current Medications: none Other pertinent information: patient had a bone marrow transplant with a course of chemotherapy before II. Pertinent findings Clinical: VAs: 20/200 OD, counting fingers with eccentric viewing OS Pupils/EOMs: 30^pd Constant Left Exotropia in all gazes, small amplitude horizontal nystagmus with fast phase to the left that dampens on temporal gaze, PERRL +APD OS, comitant with no muscle restrictions OU CVF: restricted temporally OD/OS Tonometry: 22/24 with Goldmann; 20/20 with handheld Perkin’s tonometer Gonioscopy: open to scleral spur with poorly defined trabecular meshwork 360 OU Pachymetry: 521/591 Physical: Dilated Fundus Exam: c/d ratio of 0.7/0.6 OD/OS with pallor 360, well-defined nerves but decreased vascular count; normal macula, vitreous, retina Visual Field Exam with HVF 24-2 and Goldmann: bitemporal field defects encroaching into macular area OS III. Differential diagnosis Primary: Bilateral Optic Atrophy secondary to Osteopetrosis, Ocular Hypertension Others: pituitary adenoma, other compressive etiology, dominant optic atrophy, openangle glaucoma IV. Diagnosis and Discussion General Osteopetrosis is a rare disease that causes bones to become dense, yet very fragile. It is caused by a genetic defect where defective osteoclasts cause increased skeletal mass1. It is most often diagnosed with radiographic imaging such as x-rays, where bones have a chalky white appearance2. It can affect many of the cranial nerves due to the changes in the foramina they travel through3. The condition can therefore present with ophthalmic complications. There are two main types of osteopetrosis: the autosomal dominant form occurs in 1/20,000 while the autosomal recessive form occurs in about 1/250,000 people4. The autosomal dominant form involves a milder presentation and is more likely of late onset. The autosomal recessive type is diagnosed early on with changes in bone structure, hematologic sequelae, and neurological deficiencies4. The risk of developing vision loss is 75% within one year of birth in the recessive form1. Vision loss is one possible outcome of osteopetrosis due to direct compression of the optic nerves by an overgrowth of orbital bones. Optic atrophy can present secondary to the narrowing of the optic nerve canal and other changes in the base of the skull or due to elevated intracranial pressure from decreased venous outflow5. Other common ophthalmic findings include nystagmus, proptosis, ptosis, strabismus, papilledema and chorioretinal degeneration. Additional testing such as VEP and ERG can be used to determine optic nerve function and retinal involvement. If a patient has an associated retinal degeneration the ERG would be affected by lower amplitudes and there is no treatment option available. A flash VEP might reveal a delay which can precede the pallor and other indications of compression7. Case Study This patient had been diagnosed with autosomal recessive osteopetrosis at three months of age. She had undergone a successful bone marrow transplant, but decreased vision remains. Due to the bilateral hemianopic visual field at initial presentation, this patient was referred for an MRI of the brain with and without contrast to rule out a pituitary adenoma or other compressive etiology. After several up visits, ocular hypertension was diagnosed due to above average pressure readings that were consistently elevated. V. Treatment and Management General Optic nerve decompression is a surgical intervention performed to prevent further gradual vision loss by altering the size of the optic canal6. Optic nerve sheath fenestration is another controversial option to stop vision loss. Bone marrow transplants are recommended to exchange damaged osteoclasts for properly working ones and has a success rate of 50%1. Case Study Managing the patient’s symptoms of decreasing vision is crucial. Due to the binocular presentation, visual acuities were attempted with a face turn to the left and with base in prism OD with no improvement. The patient uses a low vision device (Designs for Vision Type II 6x microscope doublet- near vision is 0.5M at 4cm OD/ 1.6M at 15cm OS) to assist her with near tasks. She enlarges the print on her cell phone when necessary and chooses not to wear distance vison correction which subjectively improved her vision mildly. Due to the optic nerves being compromised and the difficulty of following with an HRT and OCT, treatment with ocular anti-hypertensives was recommended. Therefore, a monocular trial of Xalatan was started OD. The prostaglandin analog was discontinued one month later due to inefficiency and the patient was prescribed Alphagan 0.15% BID in a monocular trial. The pressure was lowered sufficiently, so the drop was given BID for both eyes. Two years later, there was a drift with increasing intraocular pressure so the dose was increased to TID. After relatively controlled IOPs, the patient became pregnant and wanted to discontinue treatment until nursing was completed. IOPs off of the medication returned to her initial IOP range without treatment. She continues to return for quarterly visits to check her IOPs without medication. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors were contraindicated due to the carbonic anhydrase II deficiency of autosomal recessive osteopetrosis. During the course of management, the patient became pregnant twice and decided to discontinue the medications treating the ocular hypertension due to the potential risk to the fetus. VI. Conclusion For patients diagnosed with osteopetrosis, an important aspect of care is comanagement. Optometrists and ophthalmologists are necessary to monitor vision and manage ocular symptoms. Communicating any changes of findings in visual field testing or optic nerve presentation with other professionals on the medical team is important for the continuity of care. Working closely with the orthopedist or hematologist is necessary to provide the ultimate patient care to manage the patient’s symptoms and to check for stability. The optometrist has a critical role in the treatment of patients with osteopetrosis. Being able to manage the visual demands while monitoring for changes in neurological presentation is an asset to the team of doctors providing care. Early diagnosis as an infant could allow for earlier intervention and possibly save vision. Current research is being done to develop an in utero diagnostic test, and new surgical treatment modalities are being explored. Sources 1. Siatkowski, R.M., et al. “Blindness From Bad Bones.” Survey of Ophthalmology.1999; Vol 43 (6): 487-490. 2. http://www.niams.nih.gov/health_info/bone/additional_bone_topics/osteopetrosis.pdf. “Osteopetrosis Overview.” NIH Osteoporosis and Related Bone Diseases National Resource Center. January 2012. 3. Essabar, L. et al. “Malignant infantile osteopetrosis: case report with review of literature.” Pan African Medical Journal. 2014; 17:63. 4. Stark, Z. and R. Savarirayan. “Review: Osteopetrosis.” Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 200; 4:5. 5. Gerritsen, E. J. A, et al. “Autosomal Recessive Osteopetrosis: Variability of Findings at Diagnosis and During the Natural Course.” Pediatrics. 1994; Vol. 93 (2): 247-253. 6. Hwang J.M. et al. “Complete visual recovery in Osteopetrosis by early optic nerve decompression.” Pediatric Neurosurgery. 2000; 33:328-332. 7. Thompson D.A, et al. “Early VEP and ERG evidence of visual dysfunction in autosomal recessive osteopetrosis.” Neuropediatrics. 1998; 29 (3): 137-144.