Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Salt Tectonics, Associated sedimentary structures and hydrocarbon Traps presented by: Adeniyi Sanyaolu, Dan Sopher, Nick Shane & Cormac O’Reilly MSc Exploration Geophysics School of Earth and Environment University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT Topics to be covered Depositional environments of Evaporites Physical properties of salt Salt related structures Sedimentary structures associated with salt Role of salt in generation of hydrocarbons Salt related hydrocarbon traps Case study: Persian Gulf What are Evaporites? How are Evaporites Deposited Two principle modes of Deposition: Subaqueous Precipitation Subaerial Precipitation Shallow to deep water Evaporating dish process Periodic replenishment Subkhas Sediments around salt lakes Oases Evaporite minerals include gypsum, sylvite, polyhalite, anhydrite, etc. Where are Evaporites Deposited? After Tucker ,1991 Physical Properties of Salt Denisty: 0.00215Kg/cm3 Hardness: 2.5 (Moh’s) Colour: clear to white Soluble in water High Ductility High Thermal conductivity Flows easily under pressure and at geological timescales by either: Pressure solution Dislocation Creep SALT TECTONICS Salt, which is weak and buoyant is found in many sedimentary basins where it occur as a weak layer between other lithologies, as such it behaves like a pressured viscous fluid during deformation and tends to flow. Key factors in salt tectonics are: Buoyancy (density contrast) Differential Loading Regional Tilt The weakness of salt SALT FLOW A tabular layer of salt can deform either by poiseuille flow or couette flow. Poiseulli flow involves the vertical thinning of overburden and the lateral extrusion of salt from under sediment depocenters. Couette flow on the other hand corresponds to layer parallel simple shear as overlying sediments translate seaward Extrusion of Salt SALT STRUCTURES Salt flow or movement results in the formation of structures. Salt forms two main types of structures: Salt pillows: here the movement of salt results in the uplift of overlying lithologies. Salt diapirs: here the overlying sediments are pierced by the moving salt and diarpirs can be of different shapes (Walls, columns, bulbs and mushrooms). The geometry of salt structures is dependent on the rate of sedimentation and the rate at which the salt flows. Salt Dome Growth Stages Salt Dome Growth Stages Seni & Jackson (1984) Seni & Jackson (1984) Other processes that enhance salt flow A number of processes are known to thin or weaken overburden thereby creating paths or spaces for salts to move into. These processes include : PASSIVE DIAPIRISM MOVEMENT TRIGGERED BY DIFFERENTIAL LOADING MOVEMENT TRIGERRED BY EXTENSION MOVEMENT TRIGERRED BY CONTRACTION MOVEMENT CAUSED BY STRIKE-SLIP FAULTING NEAR DIAPIR DEFORMATION ALLOCHTHONOUS SALT Salt diapirs in seismic section Associated Sedimentary Structures Peripheral Sinks Basins developed due to flow of salt layer. Primary Peripheral sink generated far from diapir early in development. Secondary Peripheral sink generated on penetration of the upper layers After Halbouty, 1967 Turtles Form Between two adjacent Salt diapirs Salt flow generates accommodation in the centre of the basin Continued salt flow leaves anticlinal structures that pinch out towards the diapirs “Turtles”. After Ordling, 2005 Unconformities and lateral changes After Allen ,1992 Effects of salt on h/c maturation • Geothermal heat flow is the product of 2 factors: (1) Thermal gradient (2) Thermal conductivity variation with depth • Thermal conductivity of salt is 3 to 4 times greater than that of other sedimentary rocks. • Salt body will funnel geothermal heat and cause a higher temperature anomaly in the surrounding rocks. • Anomaly can be up to 2 to 3 times greater than what would normally be expected. Effects of salt on h/c maturation Geothermal gradients created by salt structures may move surrounding rocks into the maturation window. Factors which effect the geothermal gradient of salt are: (1) size of the salt structure (2) geometrical shape of the salt structure (3) depth of burial Salt structures can produce both positive and negative anomalies. Oil maturation window : Temperatures of 80 °c - 120 °c Gas maturation window : Temperatures of 120 °c - 150 °c If heat flow anomaly is characterised in detail, this can help to better define the geometry of the salt body Positive and negative anomalies Hydrocarbon Traps in Salt Provinces Salt diapirs were the first diapiric structures to be recognised and best understood due to their economic importance. Doming The upturned sediments, truncated against the impermeable salts, provide excellent traps for hydrocarbons. Graben Pinch out Cap rock Walling Flank Faults Walling Unconformity Flank Faults Figure from Allen & Allen (1992) Widespread in USA, Mexico, SW Russia, West Central Africa and Canadian Arctic… Priority province U.S. province that is ranked among the world priority provinces Boutique province Case Study – Persian Gulf Case Study – Persian Gulf The dark circular patches represent the surface expression of salt domes that have risen diapirically from the Cambrian Hormuz salt horizon through the younger sediments to reach the surface. Only in a hot arid environment such as that of the Gulf can the soluble salt escape rapid erosion. Source: Landsat 7, NASA (2002) Case Study – Persian Gulf • Extensional rifting of Arabic Plate > basin development > evaporites deposited up to 2.5km thick (Hormuz Series) and up to 4km (Oman Salt Basin) • Diapiric movement initiated by extensional and strike slip movements of Precambrian basement block • Pathways for salt movement: - basement faults cut overlying seds` (doming + walls) - pull apart from wrench fault deflections - reactivation of extensional grabens with salt deposits - instability of thick salt beds at the foot of tilt blocks (gravity glides) Pillows.. Rim anticlines.. Turtlebacks.. Case Study - Persian Gulf SW NE Precambrian Basement Zagros Reverse Fault Neoproterozoic Evaporite Basins Develop TIME Sedimentation continuous + Upper Jurassic evaporite deposits Overburden thickens, basement block movements rejuvenated Diapirism + Upper Jurassic + Miocene Cap rocks + faulting and folding Turtleback Structures in the Persian Gulf Marmul Field, South Oman Salt Basin – formed by initial salt withdrawal and shallow dissolution. Structural inversion after shallow dissolution Ara Pillow dissolution Near surface and subsurface meteoric waters caused dissolution, evidenced by unconformities Reasons for Prolific Hydrocarbons • Uplift of the Zagros ranges in the Pliocene • Thick sedimentary sequence (>18000m) with occasional anaerobic intervals, and large basin • Rich source rocks at several levels (Neoproterozoic, Palaeozoic, Jurassic, Lower Cretaceous and Lower Tertiary. • Excellent carbonate (faulted) and sandstone reservoir rocks with high permeability and porosity • Cap rocks of salt, anhydrite and shale sealing the reservoirs; providing multiple stacked reservoirs • Continuous structural growth of growth of major folds, due to salt diapirism or basement block uplift • Deep seated diapirism, providing 60% of oil field structures in the Basin Conclusions • Salts deform as a viscous fluid with little or no ultimate stress and will flow if subjected to minimal shear stress. Flow of salt imposes strain on other lithologies they are associated with forming different structures • Different salt styles control trap styles in supra- and subsalt environments and have varying effects on sediment transport, deposition, and on hydrocarbon generation and migration. Better predictive models for reservoirs will be based on improved knowledge of mechanisms of salt • The presence of salt also effects the maturation process of hydrocarbons due to its very high thermal conductivity. • Some 60% of the ultimate recoverable oil reserves of the Persian Gulf Basin originate from Salt tectonism, and 40% of the known world oil reserves are due to salt diapirism in this basin References Alsop, G. I., Blundell, D. J. & Davidson, I. (eds), Salt Tectonics, Geological Society Special Publications No. 100, 129-151 (1996) Jackson, M. P .A & Talbot, C. J., Advances in Salt Tectonics. In: Continental Deformation (Edited by Hancock, P. L.), Pergamon Press, 159-179, (1994) Allen, P. A., & Allen, J. R., Basin Analysis, Blackwell (1992) Tucker, M. E., Sedimentary Petrology, Geoscience Texts (1991) Halbouty, M. T., Salt Domes, Gulf publishing company (1967) Odling, N., EARS5131 course notes, University of Leeds, MSC Exploration Geophysics (2005) Nagihara, S., Application of marine heat flow data important in oil and gas exploration, (2005) Shaker, S.S., Geopressure compartmentilization in salt basins: their assessement for hydrocarbon entrapment in the gulf of Mexico, Geopressure Analysis Services (2004) Letouzey, J., Salt movement, tectonic events, and structural style in the central Zagros fold and thrust belt. Institut Francais du petrole.(2004) Nagihara, S., Regional synthesis of the sedimentary thermal history and hydrocarbon maturation in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico. Department of Geosciences, Texas State University (2003) Mello, U.T., The role of salt in restraining the maturation of subsalt source rocks (2000)