Download document 8945872

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
Transcript
+ ImprovIng care through evIdence
GUIDELINES UpDatE
| print | SUBSCriBE | WEBSitE
PAGE
PAGE
Practice Parameter:
for the
22 || Guideline
Evaluating AnOf
Apparent
Management
Acute
Unprovoked
First
And Chronic Pain Seizure
In
In Adults
EvidenceSickle
Cell(An
Disease.
Based Approach).
American
Pain Society.
American Academy of
Neurology
4 | The Management of Sickle
Clinical
Policy:National
Critical
3 | Cell
Disease.
PAGE
PAGE
Issues In of
The
Evaluation
Institutes
Health,
National
And
Management
Of
Heart Lung and Blood
Adult Patients Presenting
Institute.
To The Emergency
Department With Seizures.
American College of
PAGE 2 | Guideline for the
Emergency Physicians
Management Of Acute
And Chronic Pain In
EFNSCell
Guideline
PAGE 4 |Sickle
Disease.On The
Management
Of Status
American
Pain Society.
Epilepticus. European
Federation Of Neurological
Societies
PAGE
5 | Editorial Comment
Current Guidelines For
Management
Of Seizures
Sickle Cell Disease:
In
The Emergency
Management
Of AcuteDepartment
Complications
I
nInthis
thisissue
issueofofEM
EMPractice
PracticeGuidelines
GuidelinesUpdate,
Update,32practice
guidelines
guidelines
that
address
the
management
seizures
are readdressing the management of sickle cellofdisease
(SCD)
are
viewed.
The
recommendations
within
the
3
documents
focus
reviewed. As a result of numerous SCD-related complications,
on
decisionmaking
around
the patientdiminished
with seizures
refractory to
patients
with SCD have
significantly
life expectancy.
first-line
therapy,
the
management
of
patients
with
an
unprovoked
Although most patients will be followed by subspecialty
hemafirst seizure, and options for anticonvulsant drug delivery.
tologists, SCD is fundamentally a “‘disease of emergencies.”’
Status
epilepticus
complicates
to 7%with
of seizures
in the emerEmergency
clinicians
should beup
familiar
the recommenda1
Pagency
department
(ED),
with
a
significant
mortality
rate.
tions around management of acute SCD complications, because
tients
with
ongoing
seizures
demand
immediate
general
resuscifailure to appreciate the nuances of care in these brittle patients
tative and specific therapeutic maneuvers; good evidence exists
may place them at risk for short-term morbidity and mortality. The
to direct clinicians in managing these dangerous presentations.
methodology
these practice
guidelines
varies greatly–from
Stable
seizureofpatients
commonly
seek emergency
care for firstevidencebased
to
expert
opinion–and
thus
must becomplaints
applied to
time seizures, breakthrough seizures, or unrelated
emergency
practice
withanticonvulsant
caution and pragmatism.
that
affect their
ongoing
therapy. High-quality
trials examining issues that arise in the care of these patients
are few; however, consensus-based recommendations offer
PracticetoGuideline
Impact controversial testing and treatguidance
clinicians navigating
• Inscenarios.
the management of acute SCD pain crises, bolus normal
ment
saline is not recommended unless the patient is hypovolemic. In euvolemic
patients,
Practice
Guideline
Impactintravenous hydration should not
• Intravenous
(IV) lorazepam
is first-line
exceed 1.5 times
maintenance
with D5therapy
½ NS. for active seizures. Patients who continue to seize after 2 benzodiazepine
• doses
In the management
of acute
painorcrises,
specific recshould be treated
with SCD
propofol
barbiturates.
ommendations exist with regard to opiate choice and adju• Diagnostic
lumbar puncture is indicated in immunocomprovant medications.
mised patients with an unprovoked first seizure.
• In patients with SCD and suspected infection, criteria exist to
• EEG
monitoring
is indicated
to rule
out nonconvulsive status
identify
candidates
for outpatient
treatment.
epilepticus in patients receiving aggressive therapy for gen• eralized
Separateconvulsive
algorithmsstatus
exist epilepticus.
for the diagnosis and treatment of
stroke in adults and children with SCD.
December
January 2010
2009
Volume 2,
1, Number 1
2
Editor-In-Chief
Editor-In-Chief
Reuben J. Strayer, MD
Reuben Professor
J. Strayer,
MD
Assistant
of Emergency
Medicine, Mount Sinai
Assistant
Emergency
School
of Professor
Medicine, of
New
York, NY Medicine,
Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
Editorial Board
Editorial
BoardMD, FACEP
Andy
Jagoda,
Professor and Chair, Department of Emergency Medicine
Andy Sinai
Jagoda,
MD,
FACEP New York, NY
Mount
School
of Medicine,
Professor and Chair, Department of Emergency Medicine
Erik
MD,ofMS
MountKulstad,
Sinai School
Medicine, New York, NY
Research Director, Department of Emergency Medicine, Advocate
Erik
Kulstad,
MD,
MS
Christ Medical Center, Oak Lawn, IL
Research Director, Advocate Christ Medical Center
Eddy
S. Lang,
MDCM, Medicine,
CCFP (EM),
Department
of Emergency
Oak CSPQ
Lawn, IL
Associate Professor, McGill University, SMBD Jewish General
Eddy
S.
Lang,
MDCM,
CCFP
(EM),
CSPQ
Hospital, Montreal, Canada
Associate Professor, McGill University, SMBD Jewish General
Lewis
Nelson,Canada
MD
Hospital,S.Montreal,
Director, Fellowship in Medical Toxicology, New York City Poison
Lewis
S.
Nelson,
MD Professor, Department of Emergency
Control Center, Associate
Director, Fellowship
in Medical
New York City Poison
Medicine,
NYU Medical
Center,Toxicology,
New York, NY
Control Center, Associate Professor, Department of Emergency
Gregory
M. Press,
RDMS
Medicine, NYU
MedicalMD,
Center,
New York, NY
Assistant Professor, Director of Emergency Ultrasound, Emergency
Gregory
M.
Press,
MD,
RDMS
Ultrasound Fellowship Director, Department of Emergency Medicine,
Assistant Professor,
ofMedical
Emergency
Ultrasound,
University
of Texas atDirector
Houston
School,
Houston,Emergency
TX
Ultrasound Fellowship Director, Department of Emergency Medicine,
Maia
Rutman,
University
of TexasMD
at Houston Medical School, Houston, TX
Medical Director, Pediatric Emergency Services, DartmouthMaia Rutman,
Hitchcock
MedicalMD
Center; Assistant Professor of Pediatric
Medical Director,
Pediatric
Emergency
Services,
Emergency
Medicine,
Dartmouth
Medical
School,DartmouthLebanon, NH
Hitchcock Medical Center; Assistant Professor of Pediatric
Scott
M. Silvers,
MD
Emergency
Medicine,
Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH
Chair, Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic,
Scott M. Silvers,
MD
Jacksonville,
FL
Chair, Department of Emergency Medicine
Scott
Weingart,
MD, FACEP
Mayo Clinic,
Jacksonville,
FL
Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Elmhurst
Scott
Weingart,
MD
FACEP
Hospital Center, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Elmhurst
Hospital Center, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
Prior to beginning this activity, see “Physician CME Information” on
page
7. beginning this activity, see “Physician CME Information” on
Prior to
page 9.
Editor’s Note: To read more about this publication and the
background and methodologies for practice guideline developEditor’s Note: To read more about this publication
ment, go to: http://www.ebmedicine.net/introduction
and the background and methodologies for practice
guideline development, http://www.ebmedicine.net/
content.php?action=showPage&pid=107&cat_id=16
| print | SUBSCRIBE | WEBSITE
Current Guidelines For Management Of Seizures In The Emergency Department
Practice Parameter: Evaluating An Apparent Unprovoked First
Seizure In Adults (An Evidence-Based Approach).2
Neurology. 2007;69:1996-2007.
Link to this: http://www.neurology.org/cgi/reprint/69/21/1996 T
his document was developed by a group of neurologists organized by the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) in collaboration with the American Epilepsy Society; the methodology is
adapted from the AAN Clinical Practice Guideline Process Manual.3
The group identified 5 questions based on a literature search from
1966 to 2004, and it was carried out according to explicit criteria. Article inclusion and exclusion criteria are specified and selected details
around the review process are described.
neurodiagnostic evaluation, because it has a substantial yield.
Recommendation 2 (Level B): For an adult with an apparent unprovoked first seizure, the EEG should be considered as part of the
neurodiagnostic evaluation because it has value in determining risk
of seizure recurrence.
For an adult presenting with an apparent unprovoked first seizure, should a brain imaging study (CT, MRI) be routinely ordered?
Recommendation 3 (Level B): For an adult presenting with an apparent unprovoked first seizure, brain imaging studies using CT or
MRI should be considered as part of the neurodiagnostic evaluation.
Evidence was evaluated for quality according to predefined, specified criteria and assigned to 1 of 4 classes (I, II, III, IV). Recommendations were graded at 4 levels: A, B, C, U, based primarily on the
strength of evidence for each question. Level A: established as true;
Level B: probably true; Level C: possibly true; Level U: data inadequate or conflicting. The target provider population is not defined.
The Practice Parameter applies to adults 18 years of age and older
presenting with a first unprovoked seizure (ie, excluding patients with
diagnosed seizure disorders and seizures resulting from an obvious
cause such as trauma and stroke).
For an adult presenting with an apparent unprovoked first
seizure, should blood counts, blood glucose, and electrolyte
panels be routinely ordered?
Recommendation 4 (Level U): There are insufficient data to support
or refute routine recommendation of laboratory tests such as blood
glucose, blood counts, and electrolyte panels for an adult presenting
with an apparent unprovoked first seizure, though they may be helpful in specific clinical circumstances.
The Conflict of Interest statement notes “Drafts of the guidelines have
been reviewed by at least 3 AAN committees, a network of neurologists, Neurology peer reviewers, and representatives from related
fields,” and “The AAN forbids commercial participation in, or funding
of, guideline projects.” The authors report no conflicts of interest.
The following questions and recommendations are abstracted from
the Practice Parameter. To view the original document in its entirety,
click here: http://www.neurology.org/cgi/reprint/69/21/1996
For an adult presenting with an apparent unprovoked first seizure, should lumbar puncture be routinely performed?
Recommendation 5 (Level B): There are insufficient data to support
or refute recommending routine lumbar puncture in the adult initially
presenting with an apparent unprovoked first seizure; however, in
special clinical circumstances (eg, febrile patients), it may be helpful.
In an adult presenting with an apparent unprovoked first seizure,
should toxicologic screening be routinely ordered?
Recommendation 6 (Level B): There are insufficient data to support
or refute a routine recommendation for toxicology screening; however, it may be helpful in specific clinical circumstances. ■
In an adult presenting with an apparently unprovoked first
seizure, should an EEG be ordered routinely?
Recommendation 1 (Level B): For an adult with an apparent unprovoked first seizure, the EEG should be considered as part of the
EM Practice Guidelines Update © 2010
2
ebmedicine.net • January 2010
| print | SUBSCRIBE | WEBSITE
Current Guidelines For Management Of Seizures In The Emergency Department
Clinical Policy: Critical Issues In The Evaluation And Management Of
Adult Patients Presenting To The Emergency Department With Seizures.1
Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2004;43:605-625.
Link to this: http://www.acep.org/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=8820
T
his document was developed by a committee and subcommittee organized and funded by the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP). Panel members are listed; their
affiliations/qualifications are not. The group identified 6 critical questions and utilized an explicit strategy for their literature search and
review. Evidence was evaluated for quality according to predefined
criteria and sorted into 4 classes (I, II, III, or X-fatally flawed). Recommendations were graded based on the strength of evidence for each
question. A: high degree of certainty; B: moderate degree of certainty; C: based on preliminary, inconclusive, or conflicting evidence
or panel consensus. Disclosures were reported for the subcommittee
for this policy. The policy targets clinicians working in hospital-based
EDs. The guidelines presented in the policy apply to adult patients
presenting to the ED with seizures. Pediatric patients are excluded.
Which new-onset seizure patients who have returned to normal
baseline need to be admitted to the hospital and/or started on an
antiepileptic drug?
Recommendation 6 (Level C): Patients with a normal neurologic
examination can be discharged from the ED with outpatient follow-up.
Recommendation 7 (Level C): Patients with a normal neurologic
examination, no comorbidities, and no known structural brain disease
do not need to be started on an antiepileptic drug in the ED.
What are effective phenytoin or fosphenytoin dosing strategies
for preventing seizure recurrence in patients who present to
the ED after having had a seizure with a subtherapeutic serum
phenytoin level?
Recommendation 8 (Level C): Administer an intravenous or oral
loading dose of phenytoin or intravenous or intramuscular fosphenytoin, and restart daily oral maintenance dosing.
What laboratory tests are indicated in the otherwise healthy
adult patient with a new-onset seizure who has returned to a
baseline normal neurologic status?
Recommendation 1 (Level B): Determine a serum glucose and sodium level on patients with a first-time seizure with no comorbidities
who have returned to their baseline.
Recommendation 2 (Level B): Obtain a pregnancy test if a woman
is of childbearing age.
Recommendation 3 (Level B): Perform a lumbar puncture, after
a head computed tomography (CT) scan, either in the ED or after
admission, on patients who are immunocompromised.
What agent(s) should be administered to a patient in status
epilepticus who continues to seize after having received
benzodiazepine and phenytoin?
Recommendation 9 (Level C): Administer 1 of the following agents
intravenously: “high-dose phenytoin,” phenobarbital, valproic acid,
midazolam infusion, pentobarbital infusion, or propofol infusion.
When should EEG testing be performed in the ED?
Recommendation 10 (Level C): Consider an emergent EEG in
patients suspected of being in nonconvulsive status epilepticus or in
subtle convulsive status epilepticus, patients who have received a
long-acting paralytic, or patients who are in a drug-induced coma. ■
Which new-onset seizure patients who have returned to a
normal baseline require a head CT scan in the ED?
Recommendation 4 (Level B): When feasible, perform a neuroimaging of the brain in the ED on patients with a first-time seizure.
Recommendation 5 (Level B): Deferred outpatient neuroimaging
may be used when reliable follow-up is available.
EM Practice Guidelines Update © 2010
© 2004 American College of Emergency Physicians® (ACEP). Reprinted with permission from ACEP. All rights reserved.
3
ebmedicine.net • January 2010
| print | SUBSCRIBE | WEBSITE
Current Guidelines For Management Of Seizures In The Emergency Department
EFNS Guideline On The Management Of Status Epilepticus.4
European Journal of Neurology. 2006;11:577-581.
Link to this: http://www.efns.org/fileadmin/user_upload/guidline_papers/EFNS_guideline_2006_management_of_status_epilepticus.pdf
T
his document was developed by a task force comprised of 7
neurologists organized by the European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS), a consortium comprised of 43 European
national neurological societies based in Austria. The development
process was carried out in accordance with a preparation document
generated by the EFNS in 2004.5 The group designated a single member to carry out the literature search according to reported parameters.
Evidence was evaluated for quality based on criteria specified in the
preparation document and sorted into 4 classes (I, II, III, IV). Recommendations were graded (A-established as effective; B-probably effective; C-possibly effective, GPP - the opinion of the panel reported as
good practice points "where there was a lack of evidence but consensus was clear") based on the strength of evidence for each question.
Initial pharmacological treatment of generalized convulsive
status epilepticus (GCSE)
Recommendation 2 (Level A): Treat partial status epilepticus and
GCSE with lorazepam 4 mg IV; repeat in 10 minutes if seizures persist. Phenytoin 15 to 18 mg/kg or equivalent fosphenytoin is recommended "if necessary." An alternate regimen is diazepam 10 mg IV
followed by phenytoin 15 to 18 mg/kg or equivalent fosphenytoin;
repeat diazepam in 10 minutes if seizures persist.
Pharmacological treatment for refractory GCSE and subtle
status epilepticus
Recommendation 3 (Level GPP): Infuse anesthetic doses of midazolam, propofol, or barbiturates titrated against an EEG burst suppression pattern. Initiate treatment with non-sedating antiepileptic
agents simultaneously. Thiopental: 100 to 200 mg bolus over 20
seconds with 50 mg boluses every 2 to 3 minutes until seizures are
controlled, then infusion 3 to 5 mg/kg/hr. Pentobarbital: 10 to 20 mg/
kg bolus followed by an infusion of 0.5 to 3 mg/kg/hr. Midazolam: 0.2
mg/kg bolus followed by an infusion of 0.1 to 0.4 mg/kg/hr. Propofol:
2 mg/kg bolus followed by an infusion of 5 to 10 mg/kg/hr.
A funding source is not identified. Panelists' conflicts of interest were
reported as none declared. The target is identified as adults with status
epilepticus "in critical care situations." Debate around the definition of
status epilepticus is described; studies on patients with seizures lasting 5, 10, and 30 minutes were included. Recommendations in this
document are reported in narrative style; those recommendations that
pertain to emergency medicine are summarized here.
Pharmacological treatment for non-convulsive status epilepticus
(NCSE)
Recommendation 4 (Level GPP): Ongoing NCSE is less dangerous than GCSE; therefore, non-anesthetizing anticonvulsants may be
tried initially. Phenobarbital: 20 mg/kg IV. Valproic acid: 25 to 45 mg/
kg IV infused at a maximum rate of 6 mg/kg/min. ■
General initial management
Recommendation 1 (Level GPP): Support airway and ventilation;
monitor blood pressure and ECG waveform; perform blood gas analysis; supplement glucose and thiamine as required; measure serum
antiepileptic drug levels, electrolytes (including magnesium), blood
counts, hepatic and renal function tests. Identify and treat the underlying cause.
EM Practice Guidelines Update © 2010
4
ebmedicine.net • January 2010
| print | SUBSCRIBE | WEBSITE
Current Guidelines For Management Of Seizures In The Emergency Department
Editorial Comment
The patient in status epilepticus presents an immediate resuscitative
challenge to the emergency clinician, as efforts to terminate seizures
must be carried out simultaneously with measures to support the
airway, breathing, and circulation as well as diagnostic maneuvers directed at identifying dangerous underlying disorders. Emergency providers should not be distracted by definitions of status epilepticus that
vary across sources and treat as status epilepticus any patient who
arrives seizing or any patient who has a seizure in the ED that does
not self-terminate or respond to initial therapies. When confronted
with a patient in status epilepticus who does not respond to benzodiazepine treatment, the clinician should consider underlying causes
that require specific therapies, such as hypoglycemia, hyponatremia,
eclampsia, and toxic exposures amenable to antidotes (eg, isoniazid, heterocyclic antidepressants, cyanide, carbon monoxide). Most
patients with refractory status should be intubated and started on a
barbiturate or propofol infusion with or without high-dose phenytoin
and/or intravenous valproate. Hypotension should be anticipated and
managed in these cases.
Another AAN Practice Parameter published in the same issue as the
guideline abstracted here looked specifically at the utility of brain CT
in the ED in various populations of patients who present with seizure.6 Their conclusions are similar to the recommendations made in
the abstracted report on evaluating the first seizure; in addition, the
panel makes a class II recommendation that patients who present
with chronic seizures are more likely to have an abnormal brain CT if
there is an abnormal neurologic examination, a predisposing history
of neurologic disease, or a focal seizure onset.
The EEG provides important information regarding prognosis and
seizure classification; however, it is not required in the ED when
dangerous etiologies of seizure have been ruled out and the patient
has returned to clinical baseline. The chief indications for performing
an emergent EEG are to assess the patient paralyzed and intubated
for status epilepticus, and to rule out nonconvulsive status epilepticus
in the patient with altered mentation, especially in patients who do
not return to baseline after a generalized seizure. The emergency
clinician is not compelled to initiate anticonvulsant therapy in uncomplicated cases; however, this decision is ideally made in collaboration
with the neurologist who will see the patient in follow-up.
If the seizure has terminated and ABCs are stable, the emergency
clinician must determine whether the patient had a seizure or another episodic disorder such as syncope or complex migraine. If a
presumptive diagnosis of seizure is made in a patient not known for
seizures, management is directed at finding dangerous and reversible causes. A non-contrast brain CT is indicated in most patients
with first seizure to rule out structural causes. In younger patients
where radiation concerns are more prominent, MRI is an alternative.
Although laboratory studies are of low yield in patients whose symptoms have resolved, serum chemistry analysis in the ED is prudent.
Lumbar puncture should be performed on immunocompromised
patients and patients for whom central nervous system infection is a
significant concern. Although toxicologic causes of seizures can be
life-threatening, undirected toxicology testing such as a urine drug
screen is unlikely to alter ED management. It is worth special mention that alcohol-related or alcohol-withdrawal seizure is a diagnosis
of exclusion; alcoholics are at particular risk for several other dangerous causes of seizures.
EM Practice Guidelines Update © 2010
Although fosphenytoin can be infused more quickly than phenytoin, it
does not work faster or cause fewer adverse effects than phenytoin
and should not be routinely used in place of its much less expensive
parent.7,8 Fosphenytoin is preferred in cases where the patient cannot complain of pain if extravasation occurs (eg, a comatose patient)
or when intramuscular delivery is required. In patients who will not
be quickly discharged from the department, oral phenytoin loading
is underutilized; in uncomplicated patients at low risk for immediate
recurrent seizure, oral loading is effective and offers benefits of convenience, cost, and safety.8,9 ■
5
ebmedicine.net • January 2010
| print | SUBSCRIBE | WEBSITE
Current Guidelines For Management Of Seizures In The Emergency Department
References
1.
5.
American College of Emergency Physicians. Clinical policy: Critical issues in the
evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with seizures. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;43:605-625. (Systematic review)
2.
Krumholz A, Wiebe S, Gronseth G, Shinnar S, Levisohn P, Ting T, et al. Practice parameter: Evaluating an apparent unprovoked first seizure in adults (an
evidence-based review): Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the
American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society. Neurology.
2007;69:1996-2007. (Systematic review)
3.
Quality Standards Subcommittee and the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment
Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Clinical Practice Guideline
sus document)
Process Manual. St. Paul, MN: American Academy of Neurology; 2004. (Textbook)
4.
Brainin M, Barnes M, Baron J-C, Gilhus N, Hughes R, Selmaj K, et al. Guidance
for the preparation of neurological management guidelines by EFNS scientific task
forces – revised recommendations 2004. Eur J Neurol. 2004;11:577-581. (Consen-
Meierkork H, Boon P, Engelsen B, Göcke K, Shorvon S, Tinuper P, et al. EFNS
guideline on the management of status epilepticus. Eur J Neurol. 2006;13:445-450.
(Systematic review)
6.
Harden C, Huff J, Schwartz T, Dubinsky R, et al. Reassessment: Neuroimaging in
the emergency patient presenting with seizure (an evidence-based review): Report
of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American
Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2007;69:1772-1780. (Systematic review)
7.
Coplin W, Rhoney D, Rebuck J, Clements E, Cochran M, O’Neil B, et al. Randomized evaluation of adverse events and length-of-stay with routine emergency department use of phenytoin or fosphenytoin. Neurol Res. 2002;24:842-848. (Prospective, randomized; 256 patients)
8.
Swadron S, Rudis M, Azimian K, Beringer P, et al. A comparison of phenytoin-loading techniques in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2004 11:244-252.
(Prospective, Randomized; 45 patients)
9.
Osborn H, Zisfein J, Sparano R. Single-dose oral phenytoin loading. Ann Emerg
Med. 1987;16:407-412. (Prospective, 44 patients)
To write a letter to the editor, email Reuben Strayer, MD, Editor-In-Chief, at:
[email protected]
Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of this publication. Mention of products
EM Practice Guidelines Update (ISSN Online: 1949-8314) is published monthly
(12 times per year) by EB Practice, LLC, 5550 Triangle Parkway, Suite 150
Norcross, GA 30092
Telephone: 1-800-249-5770 or 1-678-366-7933; Fax: 1-770-500-1316
Email: [email protected] Website: www.ebmedicine.net
guide and is intended to supplement, rather than substitute, for professional judgment.
or services does not constitute endorsement. This publication is intended as a general
It covers a highly technical and complex subject and should not be used for making
specific medical decisions.
The materials contained herein are not intended to establish policy, procedure, or
standard of care. EM Practice Guidelines Update is a trademark of EB Practice, LLC.
CEO: Robert Williford
Copyright © 2010 EB Practice, LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this publication
President and Publisher: Stephanie Ivy
may be reproduced in any format without written consent of EB Practice, LLC. This
Associate Editor: Dorothy Whisenhunt
publication is intended for the use of the individual subscriber only and may not be
Associate Editor and CME Director: Jennifer Pai
copied in whole or part or redistributed in any way without the publisher’s prior written
Director of Member Services: Liz Alvarez
permission — including reproduction for educational purposes or for internal distribution
Marketing and Customer Service Coordinator: Robin Williford
EM Practice Guidelines Update © 2010
within a hospital, library, group practice, or other entity.
6
ebmedicine.net • January 2010
rapped For Time?
| print | SUBSCRIBE | WEBSITE
| WEBSitE
print
SUBSCriBE
you can get summaries|for
an entire |year
of Emergency Medicine
Practice and Pediatric Emergency
ine Practice articles in one engaging, easy-to-read resource.
Current Guidelines For Management Of Seizures In The Emergency Department
Strapped For Time?
Physician CME information for EM Practice Guidelines Update
missed an issue or need a quick resource to get you up to date, the Evidence-Based Practice Recomations Compendium is for you. In this concise, patient-care focused resource, we’ve compiled the key
and references from our complete archives for 2009 for both Emergency Medicine Practice
ediatric Emergency Medicine Practice.
To take the CME test, visit: www.ebmedicine.net/cme
Now you can get summaries for an entire
he Evidence-Based
Practice
Recommendations
Compendium,
youand
benefit from:
year of
Emergency
Medicine
Practice
Pediatric
Emergency
Medicine Practice articles
cise summaries
that save you
time
ctice recommendations
on a broad rangeeasy-to-read
of topics -- from neurological
in one engaging,
resource.emergencies
Date of Original Release: January 1, 2010. Date of most recent review: December 1, 2009. Termination
date: January 1, 2013.
Accreditation: This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essentials and
Standards of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the sponsorship of EB Medicine. EB Medicine is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for
physicians.
rauma to infectious diseases and more
gnosis and treatment recommendations that help improve patient care
If you
missed
aninformation
issue or about
need
quick
inent references
that include
detailed
theastudy,
such as the type of
dy and the number
of patients
resource
to get you up to date, the
ck, easy-to-read pearls of wisdom -- as well as pitfalls to avoid
Evidence-Based Practice Recommendations
Compendium
is for you. In
this concise,
he Evidence-Based
Practice Recommendations
Compendium,
you receive
aries for all ofpatient-care-focused
our 2009 articles for both Emergency
Medicine
Practice
resource, we’ve and
tric Emergency Medicine Practice in one concise resource!
compiled the key points and references
www.ebmedicine.net/PRC,
call 1-800-249-5770,
complete and
(or
from our complete
2009 or
archives
formail
both
he reply card below to order today!

Emergency Medicine Practice and Pediatric
Emergency Medicine Practice.
Credit Designation: EB Medicine designates this educational activity for a maximum of 12 AMA PRA
Category 1 Credits™ per year. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their
participation in the activity.
Needs Assessment: The need for this educational activity was determined by a survey of practicing
emergency physicians and the editorial board of this publication; knowledge and competency surveys; and
evaluation of prior activities for emergency physicians.
Plus,
with
EvidenceWith
thethe
EvidenceBased
Practice
RecomBased
Practice
mendations
CompenRecommendations
dium,Compendium,
you receive 4 AMA
PRA
Category
1
you
receive
4 AMA
TM
absolutely1 free!
Credits
PRA
Category
CreditsTM absolutely free!
Target Audience: This enduring material is designed for emergency medicine physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and residents.
Goals: Upon completion of this article, you should be able to: (1) demonstrate medical decision-making
based on the strongest clinical evidence; (2) cost-effectively diagnose and treat the most critical ED presentations; and (3) describe the most common medicolegal pitfalls for each topic covered.
Detach lower portion and return, or phone 1-800-249-5770, or fax your order to 1-770-500-1316.
Objectives: Upon completion of this article, you should be able to: (1) Describe the pharmacologic approach to ongoing seizures not responsive to initial benzodiazepine therapy; (2) Identify the diagnostic
workup routinely indicated in the unprovoked first seizure; (3) Identify the indications for EEG monitoring in
the emergency department.
Emergency
Practice and Pediatric
EM Practice subscribers
WithMedicine
the Evidence-Based
Practice Recommendations
Compendium,
save $50
off
the
regular
price
of
$149
when
you
order within 30 days
you benefit from:
Return this order card to lock in your exclusive discounted rate of just $99 for Evidence-Based Practice
Recommendations Compendium. You also receive 4 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits TM at no extra charge!
Discussion of Investigational Information: As part of the newsletter, faculty may be presenting investigational information about pharmaceutical products that is outside Food and Drug Administration-approved
labeling. Information presented as part of this activity is intended solely as continuing medical education
and is not intended to promote off-label use of any pharmaceutical product.
• Concise summaries that save you time
• Practice recommendations
on a broad range of topics —
Name: ___________________________________________________________
osed (payable to EB Medicine)
from neurological emergencies
to trauma to infectious diseases
Address: _________________________________________________________
o Mastercard o American Express
________________________________________________________________
and
more
______________________________________ Exp. ______
City, State, Zip: ___________________________________________________
• Diagnosis and treatment
recommendations that help improve
: _________________________________________________
E-mail address: ___________________________________________________
patient
care
Promotion Code: P1AAA
• Pertinent references that include detailed information about
Send to: EB Medicine  5550 Triangle Pkwy, Ste 150 Norcross, GA 30092. Or fax to: 770-500-249-5770.
Or visit: www.ebmedicine.net/PRC and enter Promotion Code P1AAA1-800-249-5770Outside the U.S.: 1-678-366-7933
the study, such as the type of study and the number of patients
• Quick, easy-to-read pearls of wisdom — as well as pitfalls
to avoid
Faculty Disclosure: It is the policy of EB Medicine to ensure objectivity, balance, independence, transparency, and scientific rigor in all CME-sponsored educational activities. All faculty participating in the planning
or implementation of a sponsored activity are expected to disclose to the audience any relevant financial relationships and to assist in resolving any conflict of interest that may arise from the relationship. Presenters
must also make a meaningful disclosure to the audience of their discussions of unlabeled or unapproved
drugs or devices.
In compliance with all ACCME Essentials, Standards, and Guidelines, all faculty for this CME activity were
asked to complete a full disclosure statement. The information received is as follows: Dr. Glassberg, Dr.
Strayer, and their related parties reported no significant financial interest or other relationship with the
manufacturer(s) of any commercial product(s) discussed in this educational presentation.
Method of Participation: Current, paid subscribers of Emergency Medicine Practice and EM Practice
Guidelines Update who read this EM Practice Guidelines Update CME article and complete the online CME
Evaluation survey at www.ebmedicine.net/CME are eligible for up to 1 hour of Category 1 credit toward
the AMA Physician’s Recognition Award (PRA). Results will be kept confidential. CME certificates may be
printed directly from the website to each participant scoring higher than 70%.
Emergency Medicine Practice and Pediatric EM Practice subscribers:
Save $50 off the regular price of $149
when you order within 30 days
Hardware/Software Requirements: You will need a PC or Macintosh to access the online archived articles
and CME testing. Adobe Reader is required to view the PDFs of the archived articles. Adobe Reader is
available as a free download at www.adobe.com.
Visit www.ebmedicine.net/PRC or call 1-800-249-5770
and use Promotion Code P1AAA.
EM
2010
EM Practice
Practice Guidelines
Guidelines Update
Update ©
© 2009
Additional Policies: For additional policies, including our statement of conflict of interest, source of funding, statement of informed consent, and statement of human and animal rights, visit:
http://www.ebmedicine.net/policies
17
ebmedicine.net
• January 2010
ebmedicine.net
• November
2009
|| print
| WEBSitE
print | |SUBSCRIBE
SUBSCriBE| WEBSITE
CurrentPositional
GuidelinesVertigo
For Management
Of Seizures
Benign Paroxysmal
And Acute Otitis
ExternaInInThe
TheEmergency
ED: CurrentDepartment
Guidelines
Want to receive EM Practice Guidelines Update free?
Subscribe to Emergency Medicine Practice and you’ll receive EM Practice Guidelines Update at no additional charge! Plus, you
receive all the benefits of Emergency Medicine Practice:
• A chief-complaint focus: Every issue starts with a patient complaint — just like your daily practice. You’re guided step-by-step
in reaching the diagnosis — often the most challenging part of your job.
•
An evidence-based medicine approach: The degree of acceptance and scientific validity of each recommendation is assessed
based on strength of evidence.
Years
Evidence-B
ased Appro
ach
To Diagnos
is
Of Aneurys And Management
ma
Hemorrhag l Subarachnoid
e In The Em
ergency
Departmen
t
Improving Patien
t Care
July 2009
Authors
Volume 11,
Lisa E. Thoma
Number 7
s, MD
Department
of Emerge
Hospital &
ncy
Massachusetts Medicine, Brigham
& Women
Jonathan
General Hospita
’s
Edlow, MD
l, Boston,
Vice Chair,
MA
Department
Beth Israel
of Emerge
Deaconess
ncy
Medicine,
Medical Center;Medicine
Harvard Medica
Associate
l School,
Joshua N.
Boston, MA Professor of
Goldstein,
Instructor
MD, PhD,
in Surgery
FAAEM
(Emergency
School, Departm
Medicine),
General Hospita ent of Emergency
Harvard Medica
Medicine,
l, Boston,
Massachusetts l
MA
Peer Review
ers
You walk into
a crowded
Your first patien
evening shift
in the emerg
her head, compl t is a middle-aged
woman lying ency department (ED).
with her hands
about a subara aining of the “wors
t heada
noncontrast chnoid hemorrhage (SAH che of her life.” You clutching
head compu
are worried
E. Bradshaw
says that her
ted tomography ). You treat her pain
Bunney,
Associate
MD, FACEP
and order
headache is
Professor,
(CT), which
a
kids. Does
Residency
Emergency
is negative.
Director, Departm
Medicine,
she really needbetter and that she needs
She now
Chicago,
University
ent of
to stay for
IL
to go home
of Illinois
at Chicago
an LP, which a lumbar puncture
to pick up
Neal Little,
,
(LP)?
her
is also negati
need any additi
MD, FACEP
Adjunct Clinical
ve. Can she She eventually agrees
onal worku
Assistant
Medicine,
go home now?
p?
Professor,
While you
University
Department
are
Does she
of Michiga
thinking about
of Emerge
n Medical
migraine arrive
CME Objecti
ncy
School, Ann
this,
ves
Arbor, MI
lasted 12 hours s complaining of sudde another patient with
Upon comple
a
tion
histor
n-ons
of this article,
y of
et, severe heada
1. Describ
SAH? After . Is this headache her
you should
e the
che
be able to:
usual migra
further histor
discuss the classic presentation
ine or could that has
and you obtain
of an SAH
wide spectru
y is obtain
2.
Describ
as
m of present
well as
this
ed,
e the diagnos
ation.
some clearin a CT, which is norma you are concerned about be an
tic approac
having an
h to a patient
SAH.
g
l.
3. Identify
suspected
it may have of red blood cells (RBC You perform an LP, which an SAH
the major
of
limitations
been a traum
modalities.
s) from tube
shows
in interpre
pondering
ting the diagnos
1 to tube 4,
4. Discuss
this, the lab atic tap, but how can
general principle
tic
you be sure? and you think
the ED.
calls to say
diagnosis of
s of acute
SAH manage
there is xanth
Just as you
5. Identify
SAH. After
ment in
common
are
ochromia.
should you
calling for
pitfalls in
You
neurosurgic
do in the ED
the diagnos
is of SAH.
al consultation make the
to treat this
Date of original
patient?
, what else
release: July
Date of most
1, 2009
recent
Editor-in-Ch
Andy Jagoda, ief
MD, FACEP
Professor
and Chair,
Department
of Emergen
cy
Sinai School Medicine, Mount
of Medicine
Director, Mount
; Medical
Sinai Hospital,
York, NY
New
Editorial
Chattano
oga, TN
Michael A.
Gibbs,
Chief, Departm MD, FACEP
ent of Emergen
Medicine,
cy
Maine Medical
Portland,
Center,
ME
Charles V.
Pollack, Jr.,
FACEP
MA, MD,
Chairman,
Department
Emergency
of
Medicine
Termination review: April 27,
2009
date: July
1, 2012
Medium:
Prior to beginni
Print and
online
ng this activity,
see “Physic
Information”
ian CME
on page 27.
University
Medical Center,
Nashville
, TN
Internationa
Steven A.
, Pennsylv
Hospital,
Godwin,
Universit
ania Jenny Walker,
Board
l Editors
MD, FACEP
MD, MPH,
Health System, y of Pennsylv
Assistant
William J.
Assistant
MSW
Professor
ania
Peter Camero
Brady, MD
Philadelp
Professo
and Emergen
Medicine
hia, PA
n, MD
Professor
Family Medicine r; Division Chief,
Residenc
cy Michael S. Radeos,
Chair, Emergen
of
y Director,
University
, Departm
and MedicineEmergency Medicine
of Commun
cy Medicine
MD, MPH
Assistant
of Florida
ent
Monash Universit
ity and Preventiv
,
Professor
HSC,
Jacksonv
Emergency Vice Chair of
Medicine,
of Emergen
y; Alfred Hospital,
Medicine,
ille, FL
Melbourn
e
Medicine,
Mount Sinai
cy
Weill
e, Australia
of Virginia
University
Center, New
Medical
Gregory
Cornell UniversitMedical College
School of
L. Henry,
York, NY
Amin Antoine
of
Medicine,
Charlotte
y, New York,
MD, FACEP
CEO, Medical
sville, VA
Kazzi, MD,
Ron M. Walls,
NY.
Robert L.
Associate
FAAEM
Rogers,
MD
Assessment, Practice Risk
Professor
Peter DeBlieux
Professo
FAAEM, FACP MD, FACEP,
and Vice
Chair, Departm
r and Chair,
, MD
of Emergen Inc.; Clinical Professo
Professo
ent of Emergen
of Emergen
Department
Assistant
cy
Medicine,
r of
cy
Professor
cy
of Michigan Medicine, Universit r
Universit
LSU Health Clinical Medicine
and Women’s Medicine, Brigham
of
Medicine
Irvine; American y of California
, Ann Arbor,
y
,
, The UniversitEmergency
Hospital,Harvard
,
MI
Director of Science Center;
Medical School,
University,
John M. Howell,
Maryland
Lebanon
y of
Emergen
Beirut,
School of
Boston,
cy Medicine
Services,
MD,
Medicine
FACEP
Clinical Professo
Baltimore,
MA
Scott Weingar
University
,
Hugo Peralta,
MD
Hospital,
Orleans,
r of Emergen
t, MD
Medicine,
New
MD
LA
Assistant
Alfred Sacchet
George Washing cy
Chair of Emergen
Professo
University,
ti, MD, FACEP
Wyatt W.
r of Emergen
Medicine
ton
Assistant
Washington,
Hospital Italiano, cy Services,
Decker, MD
,
Elmhurs
cy
Clinical
of
Academic
DC;Director
t Hospital
Chair and
Center, Mount
Professo
Buenos Aires,
Department
Argentina
Affairs, Best
Associate
Sinai School
Inc, Inova
of Emergen r,
Professor
Emergency
Medicine
Thomas Jefferson
Fairfax Hospital,Practices,
cy Medicine
of
of
, New York,
Medicine,
Maarten
Church, VA
,
College of
Mayo Clinic
Falls
NY
University,
Simons,
Philadelp
Research
Medicine,
MD, PhD
hia, PA
Emergency
Rocheste
Editors
Medicine
Francis M.
r, MN Keith A. Marill,
Scott Silvers,
Director, OLVG
Residenc
MD
Fesmire
Assistant
Nicholas
y
MD, FACEP
Director, Heart-St , MD, FACEP
Hospital,
Medical Director,
Professor,
Genes,
Amsterdam,
Department
Emergency
Chief Resident MD, PhD
The Netherla
Erlanger Medical roke Center,
Department
Emergency
of
Medicine,
nds
,
of
Mount
General Hospital,
Medicine,
Massachusetts
Center; Assistan
Emergency
Sinai
Professor,
Jacksonv
Mayo Clinic,
Medicine
UT College
t
ille, FL
School, Boston, Harvard Medical
Residenc
New York,
of Medicine
y,
NY
MA
,
Corey M.
Slovis, MD,
Lisa Jacobso
Accreditation:
FACP, FACEP
Professor
n, MD
This activity
Chief Resident
and Chair,
(ACCME)
has been
of Emergen
Department
through the
of Medicine , Mount Sinai School
cy Medicine
Thomas,
sponsorship planned and impleme
, Emergen
Dr.
, Vanderb
of EB Medicin
nted
Residenc
ilt
discussed Edlow, Dr. Bunney,
y, New York, cy Medicine
e. EB Medicin in accordance with
Dr. Little,
in this educatio
NY
the Essentia
and
e is
•
Diagnosis and treatment recommendations solidly based in the current literature.
•
Abundant clinical pathways, figures, and tables: You’ll find reliable solutions quickly. The easy-to-read format delivers solid
information appropriate for real-time situations.
•
Unlimited online access: Search and access each monthly issue of Emergency Medicine Practice since inception in June 1999 — plus print and read
each new issue before it even hits the mail.
•
All the CME you need at no extra charge: Earn up to 48 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™, 48 ACEP Category 1, AAFP Prescribed, or AOA Category 2B
credits over the coming year-plus up to 144 credits from the online repository of articles!
their related
accredited
parties report
by the ACCME ls and Standar
tion. Dr. Goldste
ds of the
no significa
to provide
in has received
Accreditation
nt financia
continuing
consulti
l interest or
medical educatio Council for Continu
other relations
Practice did ng fees from Genente
ing Medical
hip with the n for physicians.
not receive
ch
Faculty DisclosEducation
any commer and CSL Behring.
manufacturer(s)
Commercial
cial support
ure: Dr.
of any commer
Support:
.
cial
This issue
of Emergen product(s)
cy Medicin
e
nal presenta
Subscribe to Emergency Medicine Practice today and receive EM Practice Guidelines Update at no additional charge! Or, subscribe to
EM Practice Guidelines Update only at the discounted rate below. To subscribe, complete the order form below and mail or fax it to EB Medicine,
or visit www.ebmedicine.net/subscribe.
Do you like what you’re reading?
Then ask a colleague to become a subscriber too — at this special introductory rate: Just $279 for a full year (12 issues) of Emergency Medicine Practice.
Plus, you receive 3 free issues for each colleague you refer. Emergency Medicine Practice subscribers receive EM Practice Guidelines Update FREE!
Please choose your subscription preference
Name of new subscriber: ____________________________________________________
1-Year subscription to Emergency Medicine Practice, includes
EM Practice Guidelines Update - $279 (a $50 savings)
Address line 1: ___________________________________________________________
1-Year subscription to EM Practice Guidelines Update - $99
Address line 2: ___________________________________________________________
Please choose a payment option
City, State, Zip: ___________________________________________________________
Check enclosed (payable to EB Medicine)
Charge my:
Visa
MC
AmEx: ________________________________________ Exp: _____
Signature: _______________________________________________________________________
Email: __________________________________________________________________
Colleague’s name who referred you: __________________________________________
Bill me
Promotion Code: ISSUEG
Send to: EB Medicine / 5550 Triangle Pkwy, Ste 150 / Norcross, GA 30092. Or fax to: 770-500-1316.
Or visit: www.ebmedicine.net/subscribe and then enter Promo Code ISSUEG in your cart. Or call: 1-800-249-5770 or 678-366-7933.
EM Practice
Practice Guidelines
Guidelines Update
Update ©© 2009
2010
EM
8 8
ebmedicine.net
• January 2009
2010
ebmedicine.net
• November