Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Eur Respir J 2006; 28: 1195–1203 DOI: 10.1183/09031936.06.00044406 CopyrightßERS Journals Ltd 2006 Long-term outcome in pulmonary arterial hypertension patients treated with subcutaneous treprostinil R.J. Barst*, N. Galie#, R. Naeije", G. Simonneau+, R. Jeffs1, C. Arneson1 and L.J. Rubine ABSTRACT: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is fatal if untreated. Intravenous epoprostenol improves exercise capacity and haemodynamics in PAH, and increases survival in idiopathic PAH (IPAH). To evaluate the effects of subcutaneous (SC) treprostinil, a longeracting prostacyclin analogue, followed by the addition of other PAH therapies if needed, 860 PAH patients treated with SC treprostinil for up to 4 yrs were followed. Survival is reported as Kaplan–Meier estimates. For 332 IPAH patients with baseline haemodynamics, observed survival is also compared with predicted survival using the National Institute of Health formula. Out of the 860 patients, 199 (23%) discontinued due to adverse events, 136 (16%) died, 117 (14%) discontinued due to deterioration, 29 (3%) withdrew consent and 11 (1%) underwent transplantation. In total, 97 patients (11%) switched from SC treprostinil to an alternative prostacyclin analogue; bosentan was added in 105 patients (12%) and sildenafil in 25 (3%). In conclusion, survival was 87–68% over 1–4 yrs for all 860 patients and 88–70% over 1–4 yrs with subcutaneous treprostinil monotherapy. For the idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension subset with baseline haemodynamics (n5332), survival was 91–72% over 1–4 yrs. In contrast, predicted survival was 69–38% over 1–4 yrs. The safety profile for long-term subcutaneous treprostinil was consistent with previous short-term trials with no unexpected adverse events. KEYWORDS: Idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension, prostacyclin analogue, pulmonary arterial hypertension, survival, treprostinil ulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a disease that leads to a progressive increase in pulmonary vascular resistance and right heart failure [1, 2]. In 1980, the National Institute of Health established an idiopathic PAH (IPAH) registry (previously termed primary pulmonary hypertension), which described the characteristics of IPAH and its natural history over a 5-yr period. The median survival was 2.8 yrs, with survival rates of 68, 48, and 34% at 1, 3 and 5 yrs, respectively [3]. Despite therapeutic advances, PAH remains a life-threatening disorder without a cure. In 1995, i.v. epoprostenol was approved by the Food and Drug Association for the treatment of severe IPAH, and was subsequently approved in 2000 for PAH related to the scleroderma spectrum of disease [4, 5]. The first oral therapy, bosentan, an endothelin receptor antagonist, was approved in 2001 [6] and the P prostacyclin analogue treprostinil was approved for continuous subcutaneous (SC) infusion in 2002 [7]. In 2004, the prostacyclin analogue iloprost was approved via inhalation [8], and in 2005 the oral phosphodiesterase inhibitor sildenafil was approved [9]. CORRESPONDENCE R.J. Barst Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons 3959 Broadway BHN 2-255 New York NY 10032 USA Fax: 1 2123421443 E-mail: [email protected] Received: March 30 2006 Accepted after revision: July 25 2006 Treprostinil is a prostacyclin analogue that possesses similar pharmacological actions to epoprostenol, including vasodilatation of pulmonary and systemic arterial vascular beds and inhibition of platelet aggregation [10, 11]. However, epoprostenol therapy is associated with problems due to its short half-life (3– 6 min) [12], necessitating continuous i.v. infusion via a central venous catheter. Treprostinil, unlike epoprostenol, is stable at room temperature and has a neutral pH with an elimination half-life of 4.5 h (with a distribution half-life of approximately For editorial comments see page 1073. This article has supplementary material accessible from www.erj.ersjournals.com EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL AFFILIATIONS *Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, 1 United Therapeutics Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC, and, e University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA. # Institute of Cardiology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. " Erasmus University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium, and + Hospital Antoine Beclere, Clamart, France. VOLUME 28 NUMBER 6 European Respiratory Journal Print ISSN 0903-1936 Online ISSN 1399-3003 c 1195 LONG-TERM SUBCUTANEOUS TREPROSTINIL THERAPY 40 min) [13]. These properties permit the delivery of treprostinil via SC infusion. However, SC treprostinil therapy can be limited by pain at the SC infusion site. A placebo-controlled pilot study, evaluating the safety and efficacy of SC treprostinil infusion in 26 PAH patients [13], found favourable trends in exercise capacity, dyspnoea and haemodynamics. Subsequently, two double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled 12-week studies in a total of 470 patients demonstrated that SC treprostinil therapy improves exercise capacity and haemodynamics [7]. Patients who participated in these controlled studies were eligible to enrol in an open-label extension study. In addition, de novo patients were also eligible to enrol in the open-label study. Subjects who participated in these studies received SC treprostinil therapy for up to 4 yrs. The objectives of the present open-label study were to retrospectively analyse the effects of SC treprostinil monotherapy (as well as SC treprostinil therapy with the addition of other PAH therapies if needed) on outcomes in PAH. In a subset of patients with IPAH in whom baseline haemodynamic measurements were available, the current authors also compared observed survival with predicted survival, determined using the formula by D’ALONZO et al. [3] based on the National Institute of Health (NIH) Registry data. METHODS Patients Patients evaluated in these analyses were enrolled in the three placebo-controlled trials of SC treprostinil in PAH [7, 13]. De novo patients were also eligible if they met the following entry criteria: 1) New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II, III or IV; 2) PAH, either idiopathic or associated with connective tissue disease; 3) congenital heart disease; 4) portal hypertension; or 5) HIV. Additional entry criteria included: 1) aged o8 yrs; 2) mean pulmonary artery pressure o25 mmHg; 3) mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure f15 mmHg; 4) pulmonary vascular resistance .3 units (measured or calculated by right heart catheterisation); and 5) 6-min walk distance 50–450 m. Patients had no previous exposure to prostaglandins or their analogues. Background PAH therapies, e.g. anticoagulants, oral vasodilators, cardiac glycosides, diuretics and supplemental oxygen, were administered at the discretion of the treating physicians. Treprostinil was administered as a continuous SC infusion via an ambulatory micro-infusion pump. Patients randomised to treprostinil in a prior controlled study continued receiving treprostinil at the same dose they were receiving at the end of the prior study, with subsequent dose adjustments based on investigator discretion. Patients receiving placebo in previous controlled studies and de novo patients started treprostinil at a dose of 1.25 ng?kg-1?min-1 with dose increases based on PAH signs and symptoms, and side effects. All studies were conducted in accordance with the Amended Declaration of Helsinki in the North America, Europe, Australia and Israel sites. Studies were approved by local ethics review committees. Written informed consent (and assent as indicated) was obtained from all patients (and/or parents). In addition to treatment with chronic SC treprostinil, the use of additional PAH treatments was at the discretion of the treating physicians. Patients continued in the study until one of the following: 1) death; 2) transplantation; 3) initiation of i.v. 1196 VOLUME 28 NUMBER 6 R.J. BARST ET AL. inhaled or oral prostaglandins or their analogues; or 4) an intolerable adverse event (AE). Data on vital status, safety and additional or alternative treatments were collected from June 25, 1998 to December 1, 2003 (data cut-off). Statistical analyses Baseline parameters were recorded at the start of treprostinil treatment. Survival was assessed from the start of treprostinil to death or data cut-off. All treprostinil-treated PAH patients were included in the analyses (intent to treat). The Kaplan– Meier method was used to estimate the proportion of patients surviving at each time point. The date of initial treprostinil dosing was used as the index date for determining survival. Patients were censored if they underwent transplantation or discontinued treprostinil. Survival rates were also estimated for patients treated with SC treprostinil monotherapy, censoring patients when additional PAH treatment was added. A separate analysis of survival was performed for the subgroup of patients with IPAH with available baseline haemodynamics. Expected survival was calculated for each IPAH patient based on the NIH formula [3]. Possible predictors of survival were tested using a proportional hazards model. All variables were fit simultaneously to estimate hazard ratios. Sensitivity analyses were carried out to determine whether patients who discontinued due to AEs differed from the remainder of the cohort with respect to baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, including known PAH risk factors, e.g. PAH aetiology, NYHA class, haemodynamic parameters, or the time from diagnosis to the initiation of SC treprostinil therapy. Safety was evaluated by AEs and laboratory values. Laboratory values were summarised descriptively at baseline and every 6 months thereafter. Baseline was defined as the measurement just prior to the first dose of treprostinil in either the controlled studies or open-label study. AEs were recorded throughout the study. An AE was considered ‘‘treatment emergent’’ if it first occurred or worsened following treprostinil initiation, and ‘‘treatment related’’ if it was considered by the investigator to be possibly or reasonably attributable to treprostinil treatment. RESULTS Patient population In total, 860 patients were included in the analyses. Of these: 653 (76%) patients were female; 711 (83%) were Caucasian; 63 (7%) were Hispanic; 48 (6%) were of African origin; 23 (3%) were Asian; 11 (1%) were other of races; and four (,1%) were Native American. The mean (range) age was 46 (5–84) yrs. In total, 32 (4%) patients were f16 yrs of age and 21 (2%) patients were o75 yrs of age. PAH history at time of enrolment for the 860 patients is summarised in table 1. The initial PAH diagnosis was made an average of 42 months before enrolment. The most common diagnosis for the 860 patients was IPAH (48%; n5412). In total, 13 (2%) patients were HIV positive, with HIV status being unknown for an additional 41 (5%) patients. Patients had been at their current NYHA class for a mean 15 months before enrolment. The majority of patients were NYHA class III (76%; n5654) at baseline. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL R.J. BARST ET AL. TABLE 1 LONG-TERM SUBCUTANEOUS TREPROSTINIL THERAPY Pulmonary arterial hypertension history Subjects n 860 IPAH 412 (48) IPAH associated with Congenital systemic to pulmonary shunts 177 (21) Diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis 72 (8) Thromboembolic disease 49 (6) Portopulmonary hypertension 43 (5) Systemic lupus erythematosus 35 (4) Limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis 28 (3) Mixed connective tissue disease 27 (3) HIV 13 (2) Overlap syndrome 4 (,1) Months since diagnosis 42¡74 HIV No 806 (93) Yes 13 (2) Unknown 41 (5) NYHA functional class at baseline II 128 (15) III 654 (76) IV 78 (9) Months at baseline NYHA functional class 15¡31 Data are presented as n (%) or mean¡SD, unless otherwise stated. IPAH: idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension; NYHA: New York Heart Association. TABLE 2 Patient disposition Subjects Total in previous controlled study 860 205 Randomised to receive placebo in previous study 218 437 (51) Completed# 331 (38) Prematurely discontinued 506 (59) Ongoing as of December 1, 2003 23 (3) Reason for premature discontinuation Death Transplantation Clinical deterioration/rescue therapy Withdrew consent Adverse event 136 (16; 27) 11 (1; 2) 117 (14; 23) 29 (3; 6) 199 (23; 39) Protocol violation 10 (1; 2) Lost to follow-up 4 (,1; 1) Data are presented as n, n (%) or n (% total; % discontinuations). #: transitioned to commercial drug. Patient disposition Patient disposition is summarised in table 2. In total, 860 patients were treated with SC treprostinil, including 423 (49%) who entered from controlled clinical studies and 437 (51%) de novo patients. Of the 423 patients who had previously participated in a controlled clinical study, 205 patients had received treprostinil and 218 patients had received placebo. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL Concomitant PAH medications While all patients were started on SC treprostinil as PAH monotherapy, the addition of other PAH treatments was at the discretion of the treating physician. In total, 98 patients were started on alternative prostacyclin analogues during the study, i.e. i.v. epoprostenol (n584), inhaled iloprost (n58) and oral beraprost (n56). Of these, 97 patients were transitioned off SC treprostinil to the alternative prostacyclin analogue and one patient had inhaled iloprost added during the study. However, it was discontinued after 8 days. In addition, during the study, bosentan was initiated in 12% (105 out of 860) of patients and sildenafil was added in an additional 3% (25 out of 860) of patients. None of the patients were treated with both bosentan and sildenafil in addition to SC treprostinil. 423 (49) Randomised to receive treprostinil in previous study De novo patients As of December 1, 2003, 354 (41%) of the 860 treated patients had remained on treprostinil and 506 (59%) had discontinued (table 2). The mean¡SD duration of exposure for the 354 patients was 135¡41 weeks. Out of the 860 treated patients, 23% (199 out of 860) discontinued due to AEs, 16% (136 out of 860) died, 14% (117 out of 860) discontinued due to deterioration, 3% (29 out of 860) withdrew consent, 1% (11 out of 860) underwent transplantation, 1% (10 out of 860) were withdrawn due to a protocol violation, and ,1% (four out of 860) were lost due to follow-up. The 199 AEs that led to discontinuation were predominantly related to the study drug, i.e. infusion site pain and/or reaction (n5196). However, the dropout rate for site pain (fig. 1) demonstrates that if the patient discontinued treatment with SC treprostinil due to site pain, it was most likely to occur during the first year of treatment (fig. 2). In addition, sensitivity analyses did not demonstrate any significant differences between the patients who dropped out due to site pain versus those who did not. Duration of exposure and changes in mean doses over time Continuous SC treprostinil was administered to 538 (63%) patients, 312 (36%) patients, 135 (17%) patients and 13 (2%) patients for 1, 2, 3 and 4 yrs respectively. As of December 1, 2003, 860 patients had received treprostinil for a total of 1,419 patient-yrs, with exposure of up to 4.5 yrs. The average dose increased from 1.25 ng?kg-1?min-1 at initiation to 26, 36, 42 and 42 ng?kg-1?min-1 at 1, 2, 3 and 4 yrs, respectively. Survival analyses Kaplan–Meier survival rates for the 860 treated patients, including 412 with IPAH and 448 with PAH related to other conditions, were 87, 78, 71 and 68% at 1, 2, 3 and 4 yrs, respectively (fig. 3). Survival rates with SC treprostinil monotherapy, censoring patients when additional targeted PAH therapy was added (130 out of 860 patients, i.e. 15% of the total cohort received additional PAH treatment), were 88, 79, 73 and 70% at 1, 2, 3 and 4 yrs, respectively (fig. 4), and not significantly different than for the entire cohort. In addition, due to the significant drop-out rate due to site pain during the first year of treatment, survival rates were estimated for patients treated with SC treprostinil for o1 yr. Survival rates 90, 82 and 79% at 2, 3 and 4 yrs, respectively (fig. 5). Out of the 412 IPAH patients, baseline haemodynamics were available for 332 patients as follows: mean pulmonary artery pressure 59¡13 mmHg; mean right atrial pressure VOLUME 28 NUMBER 6 1197 c LONG-TERM SUBCUTANEOUS TREPROSTINIL THERAPY R.J. BARST ET AL. 90 90 80 80 Site pain dropout % 100 Site pain dropout % 100 70 60 50 40 30 70 60 50 40 30 20 20 10 10 0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 0 0.0 4.5 0.5 1.0 1.5 Time yrs FIGURE 1. 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 Time yrs Kaplan–Meier time to discontinuation due to site pain in 860 FIGURE 2. Kaplan–Meier estimate of time to discontinuation due to site pain in subcutaneous treprostinil-treated pulmonary arterial hypertension patients. 196 patients who discontinued subcutaneous treprostinil. The time to discontinua- Discontinuation estimates (95% confidence intervals) were 83% (81–86) at 1 yr, tion estimates (95% confidence intervals) were 34% (27–40) at 1 yr, 9% (6–14) at 2 75% (72–78) at 2 yrs, 70% (66–74) at 3 yrs and 67% (62–72) at 4 yrs. The number yrs and 1.5% (0.4–4) at 3 yrs. The numbers of patients at risk were 66, 18, 3 and 0 at patients at risk were 538, 312, 135 and 13 at 1, 2, 3 and 4 yrs, respectively. 1, 2, 3 and 4 yrs, respectively. 10¡5 mmHg; and cardiac index 2.2¡0.7 L?min-1?m-2. Baseline clinical characteristics and demographics for these 332 IPAH patients are shown in table 3. Observed survival rates for the 332 IPAH patients were 91, 82, 76 and 72% at 1, 2, 3 and 4 yrs, respectively. In contrast, expected survival rates (calculated for each patient based on the NIH formula) were 69, 56, 46, and 38% at 1, 2, 3 and 4 yrs, respectively (fig. 6). Predictors of survival Complete baseline demographic and clinical characteristics and haemodynamics were available in 432 PAH patients. Although the associations of both mixed venous oxygen saturation and pulmonary vascular resistance with survival were statistically significant (p50.01, hazard ratio (95% confidence) 0.98 (0.96–0.99); and p50.04, 1.03 (1.002–1.05), respectively), the magnitude of these associations was small. However, in the IPAH subset (baseline parameters available in 265 patients), the association between NYHA class and survival was significant statistically and in magnitude (NYHA class IV versus NYHA class III p50.001, 5.35 (1.96– 14.56); and NYHA class IV versus NYHA class II p50.002, 8.74 (2.23–34.21)). Survival rates were highest for NYHA class II patients (n5128) at study entry, with survival rates of 91, 84, 79 and 74% at 1, 2, 3 and 4 yrs, respectively. Survival rates for NYHA class III patients (n5654) were 88, 79, 72 and 70% at 1, 2, 3 and 4 yrs, respectively; while survival rates for NYHA class IV patients (n578) were 71, 62 and 52% at 1, 2 and 3 yrs, respectively (fig. 7). 90 90 80 80 70 70 60 Survival % Survival % 100 100 60 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 20 10 10 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 Time yrs Time yrs FIGURE 4. FIGURE 3. Observed survival with subcutaneous treprostinil monotherapy. Observed survival in 860 subcutaneous treprostinil-treated Patients were censored when additional pulmonary arterial hypertension therapies pulmonary arterial hypertension patients. Survival estimates (95% confidence were initiated. Survival estimates (95% confidence intervals) were 88% (85–90) at 1 intervals) were 87% (84–89) at 1 yr, 78% (75–81) at 2 yrs, 71% (67–75) at 3 yrs and yr, 79% (76–82) at 2 yrs, 73% (69–77) at 3 yrs and 70% (64–74) at 4 yrs. The 68% (63–73) at 4 yrs. The numbers of patients at risk were 538, 312, 135 and 13 at numbers of patients at risk were 859, 525, 298, 118 and 11 at 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 yrs, 1, 2, 3, and 4 yrs, respectively. respectively. 1198 VOLUME 28 NUMBER 6 EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL R.J. BARST ET AL. LONG-TERM SUBCUTANEOUS TREPROSTINIL THERAPY 100 Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension patients# TABLE 3 90 Survival % 80 70 Subjects 332 60 Age yrs 45¡15 Sex 50 40 Male 74 (22) Female 258 (78) 30 Months from diagnosis 20 NYHA functional class at baseline 10 0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 Time yrs 28¡45 II 53 (16) III 262 (79) IV 17 (5) Months at baseline NYHA functional class 13¡21 Ppa mmHg 59¡13 Pra mmHg FIGURE 5. Observed survival for 538 patients who were treated with 10¡5 CI L?min-1?m-2 2.2¡0.7 subcutaneous treprostinil for o1 yr. Survival estimates (95% confidence intervals) were 90% (86–92) at 2 yrs, 82% (77–86) at 3 yrs and 79% (73–83) at 4 yrs. The Data are presented as n, mean¡SD or n (%). NYHA: New York Heart numbers of patients at risk were 538, 312, 135 and 13 at 1, 2, 3 and 4 yrs, Association; Ppa: mean pulmonary artery pressure; Pra: mean right atrial respectively. pressure; CI: cardiac index. # : idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension patients with baseline haemodynamic parameters. Adverse events A total of 168 patients died during the study or within 30 days of study discontinuation. One death was attributed to treprostinil by the investigator. The cause of this death was reported as progressive PAH. The patient had been receiving treprostinil for 1,123 days and was receiving 45 ng?kg-1?min-1 at the time of death. A total of 415 patients had at least one serious AE, with 62 (7%) having a serious AE attributable to treprostinil. Overall, the reported serious AEs were typical of patients with PAH and included heart failure (14%; n5122), pulmonary hypertension (9%; n576), syncope (4%; n538), pneumonia (4%; n537) and dyspnoea (3%; n528). Serious AEs attributable to treprostinil included site infection (n59), systemic hypotension (n58), site pain (n57), dyspnoea (n54), syncope (n54) and heart failure (n54). The AEs experienced by the study patients are shown in table 4. The most frequently reported AEs were infusion site pain in 792 (92%) patients and site reaction in 700 (81%) patients. Infusion site reactions were defined as any local AE other than pain, bleeding or bruising at the infusion site and were most often erythema, swelling, induration or rash. There were no reported episodes of catheter-related sepsis. Other less frequently observed treatment-related site events were bleeding/bruising in 170 (20%) patients and infection in 35 (4%) patients. Treatment-related events leading to a dose reduction in o1% of patients were: diarrhoea (6.6%; n557); headache (6.3%; n554); nausea (6.2%; n553); vomiting (2.7%; n523); pain (2.4%; n521); vasodilatation (2.4%; n521); dizziness (2.3%; n520); jaw pain (1.7%; n515); systemic hypotension (1.6%; n514); and anorexia (1.0%; n59). All treatment-emergent AEs reported in o10% of the 860 patients were well-characterised side effects of prostacyclin and its analogues, e.g. diarrhoea (42%; n5365), nausea (27%; 100 90 80 Survival % Clinical laboratory values All mean chemistry, haematology, coagulation and urinalysis values were within normal ranges throughout the 4 yrs of treatment. 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 Time yrs FIGURE 6. Observed survival (–––) in 332 subcutaneous treprostinil-treated IPAH patients (with baseline haemodynamic parameters available) versus predicted The treatment-related events rated as severe in intensity for o1% of patients were: headache (1.7%; n515); pain (1.4%; n512); diarrhoea (1.3%; n511); and nausea (1.2%; n510). Headache was the only treatment-related AE, other than site events, that led to discontinuation for five (0.6%) patients. survival (- - -) by the National Institute of Health equation. Survival estimates (95% EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL VOLUME 28 NUMBER 6 confidence intervals) were 91% (87–94) at 1 yr, 82% (76–86) at 2 yrs, 76% (69–81) at 3 yrs and 72% (65–78) at 4 yrs versus predicted survival rates of 69, 56, 46 and 38% at 1, 2, 3 and 4 yrs, respectively. The numbers of patients at risk were 231, 149, 82 and 10 at 1, 2, 3 and 4 yrs, respectively. 1199 c LONG-TERM SUBCUTANEOUS TREPROSTINIL THERAPY R.J. BARST ET AL. 100 hospitalisation and two (0.2%) reporting thrombocytopaenia as a severe event; all events resolved. One out of the six patients had PAH associated with portopulmonary hypertension. This patient reported a single, mild episode of thrombocytopaenia, which resolved in 31 days. 90 80 Survival % 70 60 Renal (n512) and hepatic failure (n53) were infrequent and appeared not to be associated with treprostinil. 50 40 30 20 10 0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 Time yrs FIGURE 7. Observed survival in 860 subcutaneous treprostinil-treated pulmonary arterial hypertension patients, based on the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class at time of treprostinil initiation. NYHA class II: - - -; NYHA class III: ? ? ? ?; NYHA class IV: –––. Survival rates for 128 NYHA class II patients (95% confidence intervals (CI)) were 91% (84–95), 84% (75–90), 79% (68– 86) and 74% (62–83) at 1, 2, 3 and 4 yrs, respectively. Survival rates for 654 NYHA class III patients (95% CI) were 88% (85–91), 79% (75–82), 72% (67–76) and 70% (64–75) at 1, 2, 3 and 4 yrs, respectively. Survival rates for 78 NYHA class IV patients (95% CI) were 71% (58–81), 62% (48–73) and 52% (36–66) at 1, 2 and 3 yrs, respectively. The number of patients at risk in NYHA class II was 91, 59, 34, and 5 at 1, 2, 3 and 4 yrs, respectively; NYHA class III was 409, 230, 96 and 8 at 1, 2, 3 and 4 yrs, respectively; and NYHA class IV was 38, 23, 2 and 0 at 1, 2, 3 and 4 yrs, respectively. n5235), headache (25%; n5214), jaw pain (23%; n5195), pain (16%; n5139), vasodilatation (13%; n5115), anorexia (10%; n589) and rash (10%; n588). Delivery system complications were reported in 255 (30%) out of the 860 patients. These complications were most often due to pump malfunction, which was reported in 222 (26%) out of the 860 patients, or infusion set complications which were reported in 74 (9%) of the study patients. Pump failures were managed by correcting the alarm condition and/or substituting the backup pump, with no reported incidences of clinically significant deterioration occurring in association with the drug delivery system malfunction. Overdoses were reported due to programming errors (n53), accidental bolus infusions (n54), concentration increases without rate decreases (n56), and infusion set replacement following catheter dislodgement (n51). Haemorrhagic events not related to the infusion site were epistaxis (2%), ecchymosis (1%), haemoptysis (1%) and haemorrhage (,1%). These events did not appear to be related to the treprostinil dose. One patient was hospitalised for gastrointestinal haemorrhage and one patient for epistaxis. Both of these events resolved without sequelae. These were the only haemorrhagic events rated as severe in intensity. The gastrointestinal haemorrhage was the only haemorrhagic event leading to discontinuation. Thrombocytopaenia was reported as a treatment-related event in six (0.7%) patients with one (0.1%) patient requiring 1200 VOLUME 28 NUMBER 6 DISCUSSION In the present study, the observed survival rates over 1–4 yrs were 87–68% for the entire cohort of 860 PAH patients treated with SC treprostinil. Survival rates with SC treprostinil monotherapy were 88–70% over 1–4 yrs, which is not significantly different than for the entire cohort, or for the cohort of patients excluding those who received combination therapy, in whom survival rates were 84–63% over 1–4 yrs (data not shown). For the IPAH patients, observed survival rates over 1–4 yrs were 91–72% compared with predicted survival rates of 69–38% [3]. Survival was also evaluated in this study by NYHA class at treatment initiation. This analysis was performed because poor survival has been associated with NYHA class in various studies, e.g. IPAH patients from the NIH Registry, IPAH patients treated with i.v. epoprostenol, and IPAH patients treated with oral bosentan [3, 14–16]. Historically, survival for NYHA class III and IV patients from the NIH Registry was 32 and 6 months, respectively [3]. The results of the present study were consistent with the NIH Registry with improved survival rates for patients who were NYHA class II (n5128) at study entry (observed survival was 91, 84, 79 and 74% at 1, 2, 3 and 4 yrs, respectively) versus NYHA class III (88, 79, 72 and 71% at 1, 2, 3 and 4 yrs, respectively; n5654) or NYHA class IV (71, 62 and 52% at 1, 2 and 3 yrs, respectively; n578). Observational studies have demonstrated a survival benefit in IPAH with warfarin [17, 18], and with chronic calcium-channel blockers in the small subset of IPAH patients who demonstrate acute pulmonary vasoreactivity [19]. In the 12-week randomised open-label trial of 81 NYHA class III and IV IPAH patients, survival was improved in patients treated with i.v. epoprostenol compared with patients treated with conventional therapy alone [4]. Since that study, several observational studies have confirmed a long-term survival benefit in NYHA class III and IV IPAH patients treated with i.v. epoprostenol when compared with either historical controls or predicted survival based on the NIH Registry equation [14, 15]. In a recently published review from 1992–2002, survival rates were reported for IPAH patients treated with conventional therapy alone versus i.v. epoprostenol plus conventional medical therapy. The 1, 2 and 3 yr survival rates were 72, 53 and 48%, respectively, for patients who did not receive i.v. epoprostenol versus 82, 74 and 62%, respectively, for patients who did receive i.v. epoprostenol [2]. The observed and predicted survival rates from the observational epoprostenol studies are similar to the observed and predicted survival rates for the IPAH patients in the present study. However, lifethreatening AEs associated with i.v. epoprostenol, such as sepsis and drug interruption, are unlikely to occur with SC treprostinil. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL R.J. BARST ET AL. TABLE 4 LONG-TERM SUBCUTANEOUS TREPROSTINIL THERAPY Adverse events Subjects Serious adverse events Heart failure Pulmonary hypertension Syncope Pneumnoia Dyspnoea Serious adverse events attributable to treprostinil Site infection Systemic hypotension Site pain Dyspnoea Syncope Heart failure Adverse events Infusion site pain Site reaction Bleeding/bruising Infection Treatment-related events Headache Pain Diarrhoea Nausea Treatment-related events leading to dose reduction Diarrhoea Headache Nausea Vomiting Pain Vasodilatation Dizziness Jaw Pain Systemic hypotension Anorexia Prostacyclin-related effects Diarrhoea Nausea Headache Jaw pain Pain Vasodilation Anorexia Rash Delivery system complications Pump malfunction Infusion set complications Overdose Programming error Accidental bolus Concentration increase without rate decrease Infusion set replacement following catheter dislodgement Haemorrhagic events Epistaxis Ecchymosis Haemoptysis Haemorrhage Thrombocytopenia Thrombocytopenia-related hospitalisation Severe thrombocytopenia Renal failure Hepatic failure Data are presented as n or n (%). EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL 860 415 (48) 122 (14) 76 (9) 38 (4) 37 (4) 28 (3) 62 (7) 9 (1) 8 (1) 7 (1) 4 (,1) 4 (,1) 4 (,1) 792 700 170 35 (92) (81) (20) (4) 15 12 11 10 (2) (1) (1) (1) 57 (7) 54 (6) 53 (6) 23 (3) 21 (2) 21 (2) 20 (2) 15 (2) 14 (2) 9 (1) 365 (42) 235 (27) 214 (25) 195 (23) 139 (16) 115 (13) 89 (10) 88 (10) 255 (30) 222 (26) 74 (9) 3 (,1) 4 (,1) 6 (1) 1 (,1) 14 (2) 11 (1) 10 (1) 1 (,1) 6 (1) 1 (,1) 2 (,1) 12 (1) 3 (,1) Subsequently, MCLAUGHLIN et al. [16] reported improved survival in 169 IPAH patients treated with oral bosentan. The 1, 2 and 3 yr observed survival rates were 96, 89 and 86%, respectively, compared with NIH predicted survival rates of 69, 57 and 48%, respectively. In addition, survival in IPAH patients treated with first-line bosentan has been compared with first-line i.v. epoprostenol [20]. Thus, while these survival rates are similar to those with SC treprostinil reported in the present study, clinical trials cannot be directly compared with each other (table 5). More recently, PROVENCHER et al. [21] reported that in an IPAH cohort treated with bosentan, many patients required the addition of another targeted PAH therapy during long-term follow-up. In addition, OPITZ et al. [22] also reported the need to add another PAH therapy in a cohort of IPAH patients treated with first-line inhaled iloprost. Both studies are not inconsistent with the observations made in the present study. In the SC treprostinil 12-week randomised clinical trials, although 84% of patients receiving the active drug reported site pain, 27% of patients receiving placebo also reported site pain. Site pain is a major drawback with SC treprostinil therapy. In this open-label extension study, 23% of the patients discontinued due to AEs, with 98% of discontinuations due to site pain. However, almost 70% of these dropouts occurred within the first year. For those patients who remained on SC treprostinil for 1 yr, survival rates were 90–79% at 2–4 yrs. For the majority of patients, long-term SC treprostinil therapy was well tolerated in patients who had minimal site pain. Prostacyclin-related side effects were controlled by dose adjustment, and no clinically significant changes in laboratory values were observed. The longer half-life of treprostinil makes an exacerbation of PAH symptoms resulting from abrupt cessation of drug less likely to occur with treprostinil than with epoprostenol. In addition, serious complications associated with a continuous i.v. infusion, e.g. sepsis or thromboembolic events, are unlikely to occur with a SC infusion treatment. In 2004, treprostinil was also approved by the Food and Drug Association for continuous i.v. administration, an alternative option for patients intolerant to SC treprostinil as well as an alternative to i.v. epoprostenol. Potential advantages of i.v. treprostinil over i.v. epoprostenol include better stability, easier drug preparation and longer duration of activity [23, 24]. There are several important limitations to the current observational study. The use of the NIH Registry equation as opposed to a parallel placebo-treated or historical control group is a significant limitation. The NIH equation is based on data from the 1980s and background practice patterns have changed over the past 20 yrs. In addition, the 23% discontinuation rate during the study due to AEs (predominantly site pain) cannot exclude a selection bias. However, analysing the patients who dropped out due to site pain versus those who did not, did not demonstrate any significant differences between the two groups with respect to known PAH risk factors, such as NYHA class, PAH aetiology or haemodynamic parameters at the time of SC treprostinil initiation. Additional limitations in the present observational study include the doses of treprostinil the patients received were lower than the overall current doses patients receive. Whether higher doses may have affected outcome remains to be studied. In addition, with VOLUME 28 NUMBER 6 1201 c LONG-TERM SUBCUTANEOUS TREPROSTINIL THERAPY TABLE 5 R.J. BARST ET AL. Baseline characteristics of survival and predicted survival in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension patients treated with i.v. epoprostenol, oral bosentan or subcutaneous (SC) treprostinil based on the National Institute of Health Registry i.v. epoprostenol#,e Oral bosentan",## SC treprostinil+ i.v. epoprostenol1,"" Oral bosentan1,"" Ppa mmHg 61¡13 57¡16 59¡13 59¡15 57¡15 Pra mmHg 14¡6 10¡6 10¡5 10¡5 10¡5 1.8¡0.6 2.4¡0.8 2.2¡0.7 2.1¡0.6 2.2¡0.6 15 (9) 53 (16) III 75 (46) 139 (82) 262 (79) 83 (100) 83 (100) IV 87 (54) 15 (9) 17 (5) 88, 59 96, 69 88, 69 93++ 95++ 80, 56 ++ 87++ ++ CI L?min-1?m-2 NYHA class I/II Survival rates yrs 1 2 76, 46 89, 57 89 3 63, 35 86, 48 74, 46 78 82++ 4 yrs 56, NA NA 69, 38 NA NA Data are presented as mean¡SD, n (%). For survival rates data are presented as % observed, % predicted, unless otherwise stated. Ppa: mean pulmonary artery pressure; Pra: mean right atrial pressure; CI: cardiac index; NYHA: New York Heart Association; NA: not available. #: n5162; ": n5169; +: n5332; 1: n583; e: from reference [14]; ## : from reference [16]; "" : from reference [20]; ++ : % observed. either bosentan or sildenafil initiated in 15% of patients, the current study cannot adequately address the effects of SC treprostinil monotherapy on survival in PAH. In conclusion, having multiple therapeutic options available for pulmonary arterial hypertension patients should improve the efficacy in treating pulmonary arterial hypertension. The selection of an ‘‘optimal’’ medical regimen for an individual patient should be based on a risk–benefit assessment of all treatment options available. While subcutaneous treprostinil may not be the drug of first choice for most pulmonary arterial hypertension patients, having subcutaneous treprostinil as a therapeutic option may improve outcome in pulmonary arterial hypertension. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank the following investigators for their contributions. R. Bourge (Birmingham, AL, USA); D. Ross and S. Shapiro (Los Angeles, CA, USA); R. Channick (San Diego, CA, USA); T. DeMarco (San Francisco, CA, USA); R. Doyle (Stanford, CA, USA); R. Oudiz (Torrance, CA, USA); D. Badesch (Denver, CO, USA); D. Ivy (Denver, CO, USA); C. Lawrence (Atlanta, GA, USA); S. Rich (Chicago, IL, USA); B. deBoisblanc (New Orleans, LA, USA); J. Wirth (Portland, ME, USA); S. Gaine (Baltimore, MD, USA); A. Waxman (Boston, MA, USA); M. Rubenfire (Ann Arbor, MI, USA); M. McGoon (Rochester, MN, USA); V. Tapson (Durham, NC, USA); R. Schilz and A. Arroliga (Cleveland, OH, USA); J. Edleman (Portland, OR, USA); S. Murali (Pittsburgh, PA, USA); N. Hill (Providence, RI, USA); I. Robbins (Nashville, TN, USA); A. Frost (Houston, TX, USA); F. Shardonofsky (Houston, TX, USA); G. Elliott (Salt Lake City, UT, USA); D. Zwicke (Milwaukee, WI, USA); A Keogh (Sydney, Australia); M. Kneussl (Wein, Austria); M. Delcroix (Leuven, Belgium); D. Langleben (Montreal, Canada); J. Granton (Toronto, Canada); D. Ostrow (Vancouver, Canada); M. Hoeper (Hannover, Germany); N. Berkman (Jerusalem, Israel); M. Kramer 1202 VOLUME 28 NUMBER 6 (Petach Tikvah, Israel); I. Ben-Dov (Tel-Hashomer, Israel); J. Sandoval (Mexico City, Mexico); A. Boonstra Amsterdam, the Netherlands); A. Torbicki (Warsaw, Poland); M. GomezSanchez (Madrid, Spain); J. Pepke-Zaba (Cambridge, UK); C. Black, S. Gibbs and D. Kiely (London, UK); T. Higenbottam (Sheffield, UK); A. Peacock (Glasgow, UK); P. Corris (Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK). REFERENCES 1 Proceeding of the 3rd World Symposium on Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Venice, Italy, June 23-25, 2003. JACC 2004; 43: Suppl. 12, 1S–90S. 2 Diagnosis and management of pulmonary arterial hypertension: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2004; 126: S1–S92. 3 D’Alonzo GE, Barst RJ, Ayres SM, et al. Survival in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Results from a national prospective registry. Ann Intern Med 1991; 115: 343–349. 4 Barst RJ, Rubin LJ, Long WA, et al. A comparison of continuous intravenous epoprostenol (prostacyclin) with conventional therapy for primary pulmonary hypertension. The Primary Pulmonary Hypertension Study Group. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 296–302. 5 Badesch DB, Tapson VF, McGoon MD, et al. Continuous intravenous epoprostenol for pulmonary hypertension secondary to the scleroderma spectrum of disease. A randomized controlled trial. Ann Int Med 2000; 132: 425–434. 6 Rubin LJ, Badesch DB, Barst RJ, et al. Bosentan therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 896–903. 7 Simonneau G, Barst RJ, Galiè N, et al. Continuous subcutaneous infusion of treprostinil, a prostacyclin analogue, in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 165: 800–804. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL R.J. BARST ET AL. LONG-TERM SUBCUTANEOUS TREPROSTINIL THERAPY 8 Olschewski H, Simonneau G, Galie N, et al. Inhaled iloprost for severe pulmonary hypertension. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 322–329. 9 Galie N, Ghofrani HA, Torbicki A, et al. Sildenafil citrate therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 2148–2157. 10 Steffen RP, de la Mata M. The Effects of 15Au81, a chemically stable prostacyclin analogue, on the cardiovascular and rennin-angiotensin systems of anesthetized dogs. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 1991; 43: 277–286. 11 McNulty MJ, Sailstad JM, Steffen RP. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prostacyclin analogue 15AU81 in anesthetized beagle dog. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 1993; 43: 159–166. 12 Epoprostenol package insert. GlaxoWellcome, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. May, 1998. 13 McLaughlin VV, Gaine SP, Barst RJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of treprostinil: an epoprostenol analogue for primary pulmonary hypertension. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2003; 41: 293–299. 14 McLaughlin VV, Shillington A, Rich S. Survival in primary pulmonary hypertension: the impact of epoprostenol therapy. Circulation 2002; 106: 1477–1482. 15 Sitbon O, Humbert M, Nunes H, et al. Long-term intravenous epoprostenol infusion in primary pulmonary hypertension: prognostic factors and survival. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 780–788. 16 McLaughlin VV, Sitbon O, Badesch DB, et al. Survival with first-line bosentan therapy in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2005; 25: 244–249. 17 Fuster V, Steele PM, Edwards WD, et al. Primary pulmonary hypertension: natural history and the importance of thrombosis. Circulation 1984; 70: 580–587. 18 Rich S, Kaufmann E, Levy PS. The effect of high doses of calcium-channel blockers on survival in primary pulmonary hypertension. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 76–81. 19 Sitbon O, Humbert M, Jais X, et al. Long-term response to calcium channel blockers in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circulation 2005; 111: 3105–3111. 20 Sitbon O, McLaughlin VV, Badesch DB, et al. Survival in patients with class III idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension treated with first-line oral bosentan compared with an historical cohort of patients started on i.v. epoprostenol. Thorax 2005; 60: 1025–1030. 21 Provencher S, Sitbon O, Humbert M, Cabrol S, Jais X, Simonneau G. Long-term outcome with first-line bosentan therapy in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 589–595. 22 Opitz CF, Wensel R, Winkler J, et al. Clinical efficacy and survival with first-line inhaled iloprost therapy in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 1895–1902. 23 Tapson VF, Gomberg-Maitland M, et al. Safety and efficacy of intravenous treprostinil for pulmonary arterial hypertension: a prospective, multicenter, open-label 12-week trial. Chest 2006; 129: 683–688. 24 Gomberg-Maitland M, Barst RJ, Benza R, et al. Transition from intravenous epoprostenol to intravenous treprostinil in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 172: 1586–1589. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL VOLUME 28 NUMBER 6 1203