Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Credit Booms Gone Bust: Monetary Policy, Leverage Cycles, and Financial Crises, 1870-2008 by Moritz Schularick and Alan M. Taylor comments by Carmen M. Reinhart, University of Maryland, CEPR , and NBER Federal Resrve Bank of San Francisco March 5, 2010 Highlights of the results Credit booms often end in tears—indeed credit booms help predict financial crises. In effect credit is the more robust predictor of financial crisis after WWII. The output costs of crises have remained large in the post war period and their inflationary consequences are greater. Reactions (Part I) This is a very promising line of research, which is grounded in solid stylized facts. This paper makes contributions along three dimensions: 1. Bringing the very relevant pre-war experience of advanced economies to bear on the stylized facts. 2. Doing a horserace between a “monetarist” model and a “credit-augmented monetarist” model of financial crises prediction. (I would argue these predict different types of crisis) 3. Suggesting (although in my view not presenting sufficient evidence) that credit introduces its own shocks and it is not merely an amplifier as in the financial accelerator BGG model. The paper also provides food for thought on possible implications for the conduct of monetary policy and early Reinhart and Rogoff 3 warnings of financial crises (more on this later) Some past and ongoing examples of credit surges ahead of financial crises… Norway: Domestic Private Credit, 1900-2004 (Amount outstanding at year-end as a percent of GDP) 180 160 140 120 100 First year of banking crises (black lines) 80 60 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 Reinhart Reinhart andand Rogoff Rogoff (2010) 1980 1990 2000 5 Ireland Banking Survey: Domestic Credit and Banking Crises, 1970-2008 (credit outstanding at end-of-period as a percent of GDP, 4-quarter moving average) 200 First year of the banking crisis 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 Reinhart (2010) 1995 2000 2005 United Kingdom Banking Survey: Domestic Credit and Banking Crises, 1970-2008 (credit outstanding at end-of-period as a percent of GDP, 4-quarter moving average) First year of banking crises (black lines) 190 170 150 130 110 90 Coverage of domestic credit series expanded 70 50 30 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 Reinhart (2010) 1995 2000 2005 Colombia Banking Survey: Domestic Credit and Banking Crises, 1970-2008 (credit outstanding at end-of-period as a percent of GDP, 4-quarter moving average) 50 The 1998 banking cisis was associated with the worst recession recorded. 45 First year of the banking crises (black lines) Coverage of domestic credit series expanded 40 35 30 25 20 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 Reinhart (2010) 1995 2000 2005 Malaysia Banking Survey: Domestic Credit and Banking Crises, 1970-2008 (credit outstanding at end-of-period as a percent of GDP, 4-quarter moving average) First year of the banking crises (black lines) 160 140 120 100 80 Domestic credit aggregate expanded coverage 60 40 20 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 Reinhart (2010) 1995 2000 2005 Reactions (Part II) or what is missing I. A selective chronology pertinent to the credit cycle for the countries under study. Financial liberalization (importantly including the lifting of capital account restrictions-more on this later) Highlights from financial innovation (securitization of mortgages, for example). This may prove invaluable in identifying “credit-specific shocks” and a role beyond the amplifier effect. It will also help parse the post-war period into finer subperiods and help the interpretation of some of the main results. THERE IS MASSIVE FINANCIAL REPRESSION DURING 10 1946-EARLY 1980S Reactions (Part II) or what is missing II. The “external connection” of the domestic credit cycle International capital flows “bonanzas” and external debt surges prior to crises The “sudden stop” problem a la Calvo It may help in understanding the magnitudes of the booms and subsequent busts (over an beyond differences in pre war and post war monetary policy responses. Also why countries with very different monetary frameworks have experienced similar cycles (remember UK-Ireland slides) Financial liberalization and the sequencing of crises Reinhart-Rogoff, 2008c no clear sequence of domestic versus external default Diaz-Alejandro's "goodby financial repression, hello financial crash" stock and real estate market crashes--economic slowdown begins Financial Liberalization Beginning of banking crisis Currency crash Inflation picks up Peak of banking crisis (if no default) Default on external and/or domestic debt Inflation crisis worsens Peak of banking crisis (if default occurs) Kaminsky-Reinhart "twin crises" Capital controls introduced or increased around this time Reinhart and Rogoff (2009) 12 Banking crises and capital mobility, 1800-2008 High 1 Capital Mobility and the Incidence of Banking Crisis: All Countries, 18002007 Share of Countries in Banking Crisis, 3-year Sum (right scale) 0.9 1914 0.8 0.6 20 0.5 Percent Ind ex 30 25 0.7 Capital Mobility (left scale) 0.4 0.3 35 15 1825 1980 1860 10 0.2 1945 0.1 1918 Low 0 5 0 1800 1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Reinhart and Rogoff (2009) Gross External Debt as a Percent of GDP: Averages for Selected 59 Countries, 2003-2009 (in percent) -30 Debt-to-GDP ratio Change in debt-to-GDP ratio, 2003-2009 -10 10 30 50 0 50 100 150 200 250 Europe-Advanced Europe-Emerging United States Australia & Canada Asia-Emerging Former Soviet Union Increased indebtedness Japan Africa Asia (ex. Hong Kong) Latin America Deleveraging Advanced economies Emerging markets Reinhart and Rogoff 14 United States: Private Capital Inflows from the United Kingdom and Banking Crises, 1865-1914 (capital flows as a percent of exports) 30 Banking crises (black lines) 25 20 15 10 5 0 1865 1870 1875 1880 1885 1890 Reinhart and Rogoff (2010) 1895 1900 15 15 Final thoughts on policy The paper also provides food for thought on possible implications for the conduct of monetary policy and early warnings of financial crises. If there is a greater emphasis or awareness of the behavior of credit aggregates—should old and discarded tools of monetary policy (in advanced economies) be revived? Margin requirements to dampen booms and asset bubbles? Ceilings on certain types of credit? Countercyclical reserve requirements? More heavy-handed enforcement of regulation and supervision? Reinhart and Rogoff 16