* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download senesky_law_ee290
Transmission line loudspeaker wikipedia , lookup
Electrical substation wikipedia , lookup
Chirp spectrum wikipedia , lookup
Variable-frequency drive wikipedia , lookup
Distribution management system wikipedia , lookup
Two-port network wikipedia , lookup
Wien bridge oscillator wikipedia , lookup
Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Alternating current wikipedia , lookup
Integrating ADC wikipedia , lookup
Buck converter wikipedia , lookup
Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup
Phase-locked loop wikipedia , lookup
Switched Capacitor Circuits for DC-DC Conversion Chi Law Matthew Senesky Nov. 25, 2003 1 Motivation • Pro – No magnetic elements – Possible IC implementation • Con – Control difficult – Lower power applications • More info in Bill and Eddie’s talk 2 Switched Cap Basics • Global assumptions (for this presentation) – Circuits are made exclusively from caps, simple switches and sources – Two phase operation with D=0.5 – Constant frequency 3 Fibonacci 5:1 Converter 4 Ideal Capacitor Voltages • No-load analysis • Goal is to find a consistent set of cap voltages, determine ideal conversion ratio, understand operation • In steady-state, no current flow, so voltages are constant • Resistance of switches (transistors) is not considered in this part of analysis 5 Conversion Ratio Analysis Phase 1: VC2, VC4: Since VC4 || VC2 in Phase 2, VC4=VC2=Vout VC3: By looking at Phase 1, VC3 = VC2 + VC4 = 2Vout VC1: By looking at Phase 2, VC1 = VC2 + VC3 = 3Vout Phase 2: Vg: By looking at Phase 1, Vg = VC1 + VC3 =5Vout Thus conversion ratio is 5:1 Note that we have a descending order of Fibonacci number conversion ratio 6 Ideal Currents • “Piecewise constant” model • Assume: – Current source load – Periodic steady-state operation – Average power balance at input and output (100% efficiency) – Large caps, so approximately constant voltages – Must maintain charge balance 7 Current Analysis Phase 1: Phase 2: IC1: Assume power balance between input and output. Since C1 is not connected to the source in Phase 2 IC1 = 2Iin in Phase 1. IC3: IC3 = IC1 = 2Iin in Phase 2. IC2: Apply KCL to Phase 1, IC2 = IC1 + IC3 = 4Iin IC4: Need It=5Iin. By KCL on both phases IC4 = Iin 8 Output Resistance • Need to determine output resistance of circuit to find output voltage and efficiency • Case 1: fast switching, only R’s matter – Currents are piecewise DC • Case 2: slow switching, only C’s matter – Currents are impulses, get step V changes 9 Fast vs. Slow Switching vo due to currents iR v2 v1 iC io vo Currents io 10 Fast Switching vo due to currents As iR approaches io, output resistance approaches R iR v2 v1 iC io vo Currents io 11 Slow Switching vo due to currents As iC approaches io, output resistance approaches 0.25T/C iR v2 v1 iC io vo Currents io 12 Fibonacci 5:1 Converter 13 Fibonacci ROC Analysis Phase 1: Assuming the output impedance is dominated by capacitors, CΦ1=((C1+C3)||C2)+C4 CΦ2=((C1||C3)+C2)+C4 Phase 2: The total capacitance is the average of the two phases, Ct= (CΦ1+CΦ2)/2 ROC = 0.25T/Ct 14 Fibonacci ROR Analysis Phase 1: Assuming the output impedance is dominated by resistors, ROR_Φ1: ((R1+R2)||R3+R4+R5)||R6 Phase 2: ROR_Φ2: ((R1+R2+R3)||R4)+R5 The total output impedance is the average of the two phases, ROR = (ROR_Φ1+ROR_Φ2)/2 15 Fibonacci Results • Assume all switch R’s are equal, all C’s are equal • ROC=0.25T/(2.08C) • ROR=2.2R • Results for R=1Ω, C=1μF, ƒsw=5 kHz (slow), 500kHz (fast) Simulation Hand calculation Slow switching Fast switching 16 Design Strategy • Optimize ROC and ROR independently for a given area to find component ratios • Optimize ROC+ROR for a given area to find ratio of R to C • Choose switching frequency where ROR=ROC Rout Simulation Hand calculation fsw 17