Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Air well (condenser) wikipedia , lookup
Freshwater environmental quality parameters wikipedia , lookup
Water testing wikipedia , lookup
Water quality wikipedia , lookup
Wastewater discharge standards in Latin America wikipedia , lookup
Camelford water pollution incident wikipedia , lookup
History of water supply and sanitation wikipedia , lookup
Presentation outline I. Challenges for Sustainable Development Climate change as a planetary boundary Eco Footprint Environmental Risk and Economy II. Green Economy and Water Status of Water Supply and Demand Green Growth and Decoupling III. Water- Energy-Food (WEF) Nexus Water and Energy Water and Food IV. Water and Economic Effect Water Market ; Current and the future Water Industry and Economic Effects Opportunity for the BIG Business 2 I. Challenges for Sustainable Development Climate change as a planetary boundary problem Planetary boundary Source: Stockholm Resilience Centre Website Kojima Satoshi, “ Challenges for Sustainable Development” ChungAng university Workshop presentation paper, 2015.2.9 Exceeding boundary indicates potential of irreversible catastrophic change of ecosystems. 3 Eco Foot Print; Beyond the limits Korea’s per capita footprint is about 4 times larger than the world average World total footprint is 1.2 times more than the total global surface. Korea WWF(2006) Living Planet Report 2006 Ecological Footprint: Total area of land required to sustainably produce, assimilate foods, energy, and the other materials consumed in a country. 4 Climate Disaster and Economic Cost Science ; Cost of Climate Change will be 1.2 trillion dollar per year. Every Year in the world, 50 Billion Dollar will be paid for the insurance damage Natural Disaster and Loss, 2014 Source: Science, “ Climate Change the greening of Insurance,” 2012.12.24 MuniRe, “Natural catastrophes 2013, Analyses, assessments, positions 2014 issue,” 2015 Report 5 2013, 890 loss had registered with US$ 135bn and insured losses of US$ 35bn. 2013 can be described as a relatively moderate year but still exceeded the ten-year (790) and 30-year (630) average 6 Environmental Risk And Economy World Economic Forum (2014) Most Risk in the future ; - Climate change, Extreme Weather Event, Water Crisis, Unemployment 7 2015 Global Risks Co-Relation Map 8 II. Green Economy and Water In 2011 the United Nations Environment Programme(UNEP) reported, “if nothing changes, humanity will demand 140 billion tons of minerals, ores, fossil fuels and biomass every year by 2050. This is three times our current rate of resource consumption, and far beyond what the Earth can supply. We need to fairly rapidly learn to decouple natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth.” Coping most successfully with resource depletion requires a broad range of strategies. These include ; - improved recycling, the end of our disposable culture, - a return to taking care of things and repairing them - and making investments in renewable energy sources 9 Water Situation Report from WRI and Aqueduct, (2014) Food and Beverage Water in Asia is getting serious ; India, china, Central Asia 10 Agricultural Water in Asia ; central Asia, Northern china, Northern India is most risk countries Mining Water in Asia ; India, Northern China, Vietnam and Central Asia is most risk countries 11 Reasons of Water Shortage - Asymmetric distribution of water - Bad Water quality - Increasing water consumption per capita (Population Increase) 12 Evidence of Decoupling; Gross Domestic Production and Material Productivity, 1980-2010 13 UNEP assumptions Green scenario A: 1-2% of global GDP channeled to green investment. Focus: agriculture, buildings, energy (supply), fisheries, forestry, industry, tourism, transport, waste & water Green scenario B: 2 % of global GDP is invested, prioritizing energy and CC. BAU: 1-2% of global GDP invested across the economy Projected trends in annual GDP growth rate from 2010 to 2050 Source: UNEP Green Economy Report (2011) 14 III. Water- Energy-Food (WEF) Nexus 15 Minimum Consumption per Year ; 2,000 liter, But Population increase 80 Million per year. In 2025, 8 billion people (30 % more than 2000) At present, 900 million people could not access drinking water. In 2025, 34% of total world population(2.7 billion people) will face lack of drinking water Rate of Urbanization (1950), 29.1%/ year, (2007) 49.4%, (2025) 57.2% Water withdraw (1950) 1,480km3 - 2007 3,840 km3 2025, 5000 km3 Population and Water Consumption Map of Water Shortage 16 Water and Energy 20,000 18,000 17,652 16,000 million kW-h 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,230 6,000 5,521 5,131 3,910 3,846 Chemical & Allied Products Oil & Gas Extraction 4,000 2,000 0 Water (Irrigation & Pumping) Petroleum Refining High Priority Electrical & Electronics Food Products Priority Only In Collaboration 17 18 19 20 21 WATER ENERGY Membrane Other O&M* ~33% Capital ~33% Energy ~33% Thermal (MED) Other 24% Capital 31% Energy 45% * Membrane replacement, Chemicals, Labor, Maintenance 22 23 24 IV. Water and Economic Effect Water Market Situation World Water Market will be increasing from 535 billion dollars (2012) to 689 billion dollars (2018), 865 billion dollars (2025) - World Water Market achieve 3% growth compared to 2013. But - After 2015, Annual yearly growth rate will be expected 5% Average Annual Growth Rate is 402% from 2012 - 2018 Asia, South America, Middle East ·Africa ·Eastern Europe; Market Share is increasing (’10 19% -> ’17 21%) (Unit; billion $ U.S) Region 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 AAGR United States 287.5 289.7 305.7 320.3 328.0 3.4% Western Europe 244.8 254.4 259.0 261.2 265.7 2.1% Japan 100.1 104.0 103.3 106.9 109.1 2.2% Rest of Asia 64.3 71.8 78.0 84.1 91.0 9.1% Mexico 11.70 12.39 12.96 13.48 14.05 4.7% Rest of Latin America 24.8 27.0 28.5 29.8 31.6 6.3% Canada 19.6 20.2 21.0 21.6 22.5 3.5% Australia/New Zealand 12.9 13.3 13.6 14.2 14.7 3.3% Central & E. Europe 12.8 13.2 13.7 14.1 14.7 3.5% Middle East 13.9 16.0 17.5 18.9 20.3 3.5% Africa 8.3 9.5 10.3 11.1 12.0 10.0% Total 801 832 Survey, 2014 864 Source; Environmental Business Journal 2014 Snapshot 896 924 9.7% Size of Market is 5th ; (1) Petro. 1,358 billion $, (2) Automobile 1160 billion $, (3) Electricity 600-800 billion $, (4) IT 600- 650 billion $ (5) Water Market ; 550-600 billion $, (6) Tele Commun. 500-600 Rank of Growth Prospects by Global Geographic Region; 2014 Source; Environmental Business Journal 2014 Snapshot Survey, 2014 26 The Global Environmental Market by Region 2008-2012, $ bil. and Growth Source; Environmental Business Journal 2014 Snapshot Survey, 2014 27 Environmental Market in Asia Pacific (1999-2014) (Unit; billion $ U.S) Source; Environmental Business Journal 2014 Snapshot Survey, 2014 28 Global Environmental Market by Segment 2004- 2014e, ($ bil.) 29 Water and Waste water Markets of 12 “ Best Prospects” countries (2013) 30 World Water Market and Management Situation , 2013 Source; GWI, “World Water Market Situation, 2014”, 2014 31 China Water Market and the Future - Water Supply is relative good and water treatment rate is 41.6% - 500 million people can have service for the water treatment, but water pollution is still problem - Water market (2013), 58 billion dollars. 8.2% Up compared to 2012 - In 2014, 63 billion dollars. 8.4% Up compared to 2013 - In 2018년 ), 91.1 billion dollars will be (AAGR , 9% ) 32 China Water Market and Future 33 Evaluation of Attractive Water Market based on Value Chain by Region Clock wise; Parts, water and Water treatment management, Industry, and Desalination Source; KEB, “ Korean Water Industry and Its Foreign investment Strategy,” 2014.2 34 - 22 countries ; EU (9,) U.S.A (1), Brazil, (2), China (9), Philippines (1) 10 Million Population Served Water Companies 35 NO. Company Country Sale(Mill.) Population (10000) % of Forei gn Busine ss 36 Business Performance Comparison in Value Chain of Water industry, 2012 Source; KEB, “ Korean Water Industry and Its Foreign investment Strategy,” 2014.2 37 Water Industry and Economic Effect ; National Cases Case 1: U.S.A From 2014 to 2023, operating and capital expenditures of the Water Industry in the U.S.A will generate $52 billion per year National economic contribution of $524 billion over the 10 years. - Create approximately 289,000 permanent jobs. Every $1 million in direct spending by the utilities supports 16 jobs throughout all sectors of the economy $1M = 5 Jobs (Direct) + 11 jobs (Indirect and induced) = 16 Jobs (Total) Economic Impact of Utilities Employment Labor Income Output Employment Labor income Output Aggregate Impact over 10 years 2.9 million job-years $189 billion $524 billion Annual Impact 289,000 jobs $52 billion/year $19 billion/year Source; WERF “NATIONAL ECONOMIC & LABOR IMPACTS OF THE WATER UTI LITY SECTOR; EXECUTIVE REPORT,” 2014.9 Case 2: UK The total economic impact of the sector in 2012/13 is estimated to be £15.2 billion. This activity supports 127,000 jobs directly or indirectly. - 4,000 construction jobs, 3,000 jobs in transport and 14,000 jobs in distribution. - 4.5 billion on investing in assets (tackle leakage, flooding, drought.) In 2012/13, companies spent £5 billion on operating expenditure. In 2012/13, the industry took on almost 200 apprentices in a wide range of roles. Well over £1 billion was spent on reducing the risk of sewer flooding. Overall cost on average to consumers for water and sewerage is around £1 a day. Uk Water and Sewage sector economic impact; GVA and jobs Sector TOT. Water & sewage Business Service Other service transport distribution Hotels catering Const. other GVA 15.2 8.7 3 0.6 0.2 0.7 0.2 0.3 1.3 Jobs 127K 42000 34000 12000 2800 14000 4400 4000 15000 (ℒ bn) Source; Deloitt, UK, “Tapping into growth: Economic impacts of water and sewage sector in UK. “ 2014.9 Case 3: India, In 2010, 800 million people worldwide were without improved access to water and 2.5 billion people were without access to sanitation ; World Bank and the Country Evaluation Analysis (CEA) uses Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs). DALYs measure the years of healthy life lost to illness and premature mortality, with a weighting function that adjusts for the impacts of death and illness at different ages. (Marie, etc. 2014) India, uncontrolled pumping of groundwater for irrigation has led to unsustainable exploitation rates. Almost 60% of Indian districts are facing groundwater problems either quality and/or quantity, overdraft in the west. 40 Case 4: Africa, Latin America Africa and Latin America stand to gain the equivalent of 5% or more of their annual GDP Economic benefit of providing universal access to Brazil, Russia, India and China would amount to more than USD125 billion per annum, about 1% of their joint 2010 GDP. 41 (Shah, 2013) have shown that between 2002 and 2008, - water loss; about 109 cubic km of water, decline water table ; 3-5 cm per annum Costs of Water Degradation as per cent of GDP 42 Benefit of achieving MDG gains amount to more than USD 56 billion per annum between now and 2015 Achieving universal access generate USD220 billion annually. (Left Table) Providing universal access to water for all poorly-serviced populations will cost at least USD175 billion(low cost tech.) until 2050 Additional USD550 billion require for universal access to sanitation (Right Table) until 2050 Absolute annual economic gains per region (in million USD2010) Capital cost range for improved access to water supply and sanitation Source; Marie-Agnes Jouanjean, Josephine Tucker, Dirk Willem te Velde, “ Understanding the effects of resource degradation on socio-economic outcomes in developing countries,“ 2014.3 43 Water Industry and Economic Effect ; A Country Cases Case 1. Philippines Angat Project – K water ; - 218 MW Capacity, - Total Investment ; 469 Million US $ - Performance; Most of Supply for the Philippines Electricity and water Case 2. Pakistan patrind Project – K water ; - 150 MW Capacity, - Total Investment ; 436 Million US $ - Performance; First PPP Electricity and Water Project Source, : Ko jaemyung, “ ODA Strategy Seminar,” 2015.2.12 44 Case 3; Philippines Jalaur River Multipurpose, USD 208 Million - Increase irrigation, productivity, regional tourisim, etc - Hire local people Source, : Ko jaemyung, “ ODA Strategy Seminar,” 2015.2.12 45 Case 4; GMS (Greater Mekong Subregion, 4200 Km) Source, : Ko jaemyung, “ ODA Strategy Seminar,” 2015.2.12 46 Opportunity for the BIG Business Improved water supply/sanitation/management boost up economic growth And Contributes to poverty reduction. - Poor countries enjoyed annual average growth of 3.7%. (SIWI, 2007) Economic growth is boosted when water storage capacity is improved. Investing in water; increase production& productivity within economic sectors. Economic benefits of improved water supply/sanitation> investment costs Water Industry is BIG industry in the future such as ; 1. Drinking Water (10% of Global Demand) ; - Smart Water Grid , Prevention of Leaking, Saving 2. Industrial water (20% of Global Demand) ; Water Saving Technology 3. Agricultural Water (70% of Global Demand) ; Irrigation 4. Common Area; - Low Cost Desalination. - Small and Medium Scale Dam Contruction, Large Hydro, - Waste Water treatment - Water Saving Plant - Water Collection System in Urban Area 47 References Deloitte, Water/UK, “ Tapping into growth; economic Impact of the Water and sewage sector in the UK,“ 2014.3 Frontier Economic, HSBC, “ Exploring the links between water and economic growth ; A report prepared for HSBC by Frontier Economics: Executive Summary,” June 2012. Global Water Partnership, “Water in the Green Economy, “ PERSPECTIVES PAPER, 2012.6 KIM, Jeongin, Chang Sukwon “ Water-energy-Food Nexus,” K-Water policy Forum presentation paper, 2013.11 KIM, Jeongin, “Green Growth Main Features and Key Progress: Green Growth Policy of Korea,” IETC, CIFAL, 2013.4.4 KIM, Jeongin,, “ Energy Self-Reliance Village in Korea,” KIM, Jeongin,, “Resource Constraints in ASIA and It’s Impact ,” BASF Asia-Pacific Region workshop, 2 Marie-Agnes Jouanjean, Josephine Tucker, Dirk Willem te Velde, “ Understanding the effects of resource degradation on socio-economic outcomes in developing countries,“ 2014.3 SEI, “Understanding Nexus,” 2012.10 Shah, M., “ Water: Towards a Paradigm Shift in the Twelfth Plan,” Special Article, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol 03. 2013 www.gwptoolbox.org www.odi.org 48 Thank you for your kind attention [email protected] Source : United Nations ESCAP Report 49