Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
SAS application:PEST 4 for sequential clinical trials Tatsuru Matsushita Sequential Clinical Trials • • • • • Prove efficacy of a drug Observe its action in human subjects Need to minimize the number of patients Reduce the number by testing bit by bit Hence, ‘sequential’ clinical trials Triangular design • Stop trial as soon as efficacy is proved, or non-efficacy is established Simulation condition • Specifying the way to generate patients data Single simulation • Simulating the trial using random data • Assuming the drug has planned efficacy CONTINUE the study - no boundary has yet been crossed Estimated sample size • Necessary number of patients for various efficacy of the drug Variable(s) plotted against theta : Med(n*) P90(n*) 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 -2 -1 Variables plotted: 0 theta Med(n*) 1 2 P90(n*) Various aspects of SAS • Use 150 SAS/AF frame/scl entries • Convert C code into SAS procedure using SAS/TOOLKIT • Use PROC LOGISTIC, PROC PHREG, and PROC IML Summary • Sequential method in clinical trials has potential to reduce the number of patients. • Simulation facility enables to test and refine trial designs without recruiting patients • By specifying recruitment schedule the probability of reaching a firm conclusion can be estimated in survival type trials • Various SAS modules, procedures are used Table 1. Results from multiple simulation Simulation of <C:\HOME\MY DOCUMENTS\SEUGI2002\BINARY> Number of simulations = 10000 Value of theta in simulation = 1.09861 Coverage probability of confidence intervals = 0.95 Continuous analysis Boundary crossed : upper lower Final p-value : count (prop.) 8960 (89.6 %) 1040 (10.4 %) count (prop.) p <= alpha & E superior p > alpha p <= alpha & E inferior 8960 (89.6 %) 1037 (10.4 %) 3 ( 0.0 %) Terminal statistics _____________________________________________________________ Z V # INTERIMS _____________________________________________________________ median 6.13333 5.28889 9.00000 P90.0 7.50000 8.63923 15.00000 mean 5.95667 5.54668 9.55890 std dev. 1.64783 2.17149 3.74456 _____________________________________________________________ Sample sizes at termination _____________________________________________________________ NE NC N _____________________________________________________________ median 45.00000 45.00000 90.00000 P90.0 75.00000 75.00000 150.00000 mean 47.84350 47.85350 95.69700 std dev. 18.76909 18.75931 37.46992 _____________________________________________________________ Success rates (weighted averages) _____________________________________________________________ E C Overall _____________________________________________________________ average 0.49903 0.24991 0.37446 std error 0.00072 0.00063 0.00049 _____________________________________________________________ Table 2. Design Properties theta/theta_r -1.50 -1.00 -0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 p(con) p(exp) 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.06 0.10 0.16 0.25 0.37 0.50 0.63 E(n*) 53.73 61.26 72.89 95.17 118.42 91.91 57.25 Med(n*) 49.66 56.29 66.21 85.79 114.22 84.54 51.11 P90(n*) 71.65 84.87 106.46 149.45 176.85 143.73 85.28 Table 3. Simulation runs assuming non efficacy of the drug Simulation of <C:\HOME\MY DOCUMENTS\SEUGI2002\BINARY> Number of simulations = 10000 Value of theta in simulation = 0.00 Coverage probability of confidence intervals = 0.95 Continuous analysis Boundary crossed : upper lower Final p-value : count (prop.) 238 ( 2.4 %) 9762 (97.6 %) count (prop.) p <= alpha & E superior p > alpha p <= alpha & E inferior 239 ( 2.4 %) 9491 (94.9 %) 270 ( 2.7 %) Terminal statistics _____________________________________________________________ Z V # INTERIMS _____________________________________________________________ median -0.27 1.74 4.00 P90.0 1.84 2.96 7.00 mean -0.00 1.92 4.13 std dev. 1.40 0.77 1.76 _____________________________________________________________ Sample sizes at termination _____________________________________________________________ NE NC N _____________________________________________________________ median 20.00 20.00 40.00 P90.0 34.00 34.50 70.00 mean 21.06 21.08 42.14 std dev. 8.99 9.00 17.88 _____________________________________________________________ Success rates (weighted averages) _____________________________________________________________ E C Overall _____________________________________________________________ average 0.25 0.25 0.25 std error 0.00 0.00 0.00 _____________________________________________________________ Table 4. Simulation which runs out of patients Simulation of <C:\HOME\MY DOCUMENTS\SEUGI2002\SURVIVAL> Number of simulations = 1000 Value of theta in simulation = 0.92 Coverage probability of confidence intervals = 0.95 Continuous analysis Boundary crossed : upper lower Final p-value : count (prop.) 701 (70.1 %) 70 ( 7.0 %) count (prop.) p <= alpha & E superior p > alpha p <= alpha & E inferior 799 (79.9 %) 201 (20.1 %) 0 ( 0.0 %) Terminal statistics _____________________________________________________________ Z V # INTERIMS _____________________________________________________________ median 7.05 7.72 6.00 P90.0 8.57 10.20 9.00 mean 6.68 7.55 6.35 std dev. 2.14 2.16 1.90 _____________________________________________________________ Sample sizes at termination _____________________________________________________________ NE NC N _____________________________________________________________ median 55.00 55.00 110.00 P90.0 56.00 56.00 110.00 mean 54.98 54.96 109.94 std dev. 1.22 1.12 1.09 _____________________________________________________________ Number of events at termination _____________________________________________________________ # EVENTS _____________________________________________________________ median 31.00 P90.0 41.00 mean 30.49 std dev. 8.62 _____________________________________________________________