* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Investments in Human Capital: The People Based Economy Kevin M. Murphy
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Investments in Human Capital: The People Based Economy Kevin M. Murphy The University of Chicago January 11, 2012 U.S. Real Per Capita GDP 1889-2010 Log of Real Per Capita GDP 10.75 10.25 9.75 9.25 8.75 8.25 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 Where Does Growth Come From? • There are three primary sources of growth • Investment in physical capital • Investment in human capital • Improvements in technology (knowledge) • Primary goals of policy should be to • Maintain the incentive for physical investment • Provide an environment that fosters the growth of human capital • Provide rewards for innovation How do People Fit into the Economic Picture? • People are important as both inputs and outputs • Human capital is our most important input • Accounts for roughly 65 percent of our productive capacity • With increasingly mobile capital and technology, countries will be increasingly defined by their human capital • The production and maintenance of human capital is our most important output • Education • Healthcare • On the job training Human Capital has Been at the Center of Some of the Most Important Economic Developments of Our Lifetimes • Increases in the return to education and skills have revolutionized labor markets and society • Increased human capital is essential for taking advantage of new technologies and innovations • Technological changes have increased the value of education outside of the workplace as well The Rising Importance of Education (Based on Becker & Murphy 2007) Education Wage Premiums 2.3 Relative Wage 2.1 College Graduates 1.9 Graduate School 1.7 1.5 1.3 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 Education Premiums by Gender 1.8 Relative Wage 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 Women Men 1.3 1.2 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 Education Premiums by Race 1.8 Relative Wage 1.7 1.6 1.5 Blacks Whites 1.4 1.3 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 Overall Rise in Wage Inequality for Men Indexed Real Wage (1967=100.0) 180.0 160.0 10th Percentile 50th Percentile 140.0 90th Percentile 120.0 100.0 80.0 1966 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 Wage Growth by Percentile 1968-2004 0.60 Real Wage Growth 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 5 15 25 35 45 55 Percentile 65 75 85 95 Explaining Changes In Education Returns Using Supply & Demand • Growth in the college premium can be explained by a very simple model • Model based on Katz-Murphy 1992 • The model: • Demand grows steadily over time driven by techincal change and new capital investment • Fluctuations in supply cause education premiums to fluctuate • Supply grows faster than demand premium falls • Demand grows faster than supply premium rises Supply Growth & Relative Wages 2.20 2.00 Actual Wage Ratio Predicted Wage Ratio 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1963 1973 1983 1993 2003 The Supply Response • Growth in the college premium has generated a predictable response – more people have gone on to college • But many students (particularly men) are poorly prepared for college Wage Ratios & College Enrollment 0.50 1.8 Attendance Wage Ratio 1.7 1.6 0.45 1.5 0.40 1.4 0.35 1965 1975 1985 1995 1.3 2005 Wage Ratio Fraction of 20-25 Yr. Olds with Some College 0.55 FRACTION OF 30- TO 34-YEAR-OLDS WITH COLLEGE EDUCATION, UNITED STATES, BY SEX