Download Quasars and Active Galactic Nuclei

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Quasars and Active Galactic Nuclei
Type 2
Just narrow emission lines
Seyfert Galaxies
• Carl Seyfert, 1940’s
• Spirals
• Very bright unresolved nucleus
• Strong emission lines
• High ionization states
• Broad lines = large internal velocity dispersion
• 10,000 km/s
N+
O++
O+
Type 1
Broad + narrow
emission lines
Fe+6
Ne+4
3
2
1
NGC 1097
H
Gemini J-band image
+ diffraction ring??
H
H
H energy levels
Quasars
• Luminosity = (apparent brightness) x distance2
• Apparent brightness:
• Discovered quasars from their radio emission.
Orion
nebula
Radio
position
3C 273
• But… which object???
Apparent brightness 
redshift = 0
Quasar
3C 273
Redshift = 0.158
Parkes, Australia … 210’ radio
telescope.
• Distance: Now measure optical spectrum
Wavelength 
• Doppler shift of wavelength of light
 velocity of recession (redshift) due to expansion of Universe.
 huge distance  huge luminosity!
1
Classification
• Quasar = Quasi Stellar Radio Source
• QSO = Quasi Stellar Object
• radio-quiet
• 1000’s of times more numerous than Quasars
Active
Galactic
Nuclei
(AGN)
• Blazars (or BL Lac objects)
•
bright continuum source, but no emission lines
• Seyfert Galaxies
• Types 1 and 2
• Radio galaxies
• etc
Visible
X-ray
Radio
Cygnus A
Blackbody
Defining feature = non-thermal continuum
• Strong in Quasars, QSOs
• Weaker in Seyferts, radio galaxies
Measured Properties
Rapid brightness changes
(weeks, days. hours).
[CO Fig. 28.16]
QSOs are most
luminous objects
in universe on
107 yr timescales.
Not
detectable
[CO Fig. 28.19]
3C 273
Time 
 Size = light-weeks,
light-days, light-hours.
In centers of
galaxies
HST images
2
Most Quasars Lived and Died Long Ago
Star Formation Rate Density 
5.9
 time
2.2 1.6
0.8 Gyr since Big Bang
Hopkins & Beacom
2006, ApJ, 651,
142
 time
[CO Fig 28.17]
Number of Quasars
per unit volume
3.3
Rate at which stars are
formed in galaxies.
(corrected for reddening)
Observations show:
QSO
density
•
•
•
•
 time
 time
huge luminosity
from a tiny volume
at centers of galaxies
happened early in history of galaxies
What are they?
• Gas, stars fall into 106-108 Msun black hole.
• Grav. energy is released
[Fig 28.23]
[Fig 28.24]
[Fig 28.25]
•
•
•
•
•
Black hole
Accretion disk
Broad emission-line region
Obscuring torus
Narrow emission-line region
3
Viewing Angle Effects
Blazar or “BL Lac” object:
• Special-relativistic beaming
Continuum made vastly brighter .
• So only continuum is seen,
Type 1:
3
2
[Fig 28.25]
Broad + narrow emission lines
+ non-thermal continuum
1
Type 2:
Just narrow emission lines
The Source of the
Luminosity:
• Matter falls onto
accretion disk.
[Fig 26.17]
Accretion disk +
Black Hole Black Hole + Jets
4
Notation:
No G, no c
Spinning Black Holes
dd cross term  “frame dragging”
Kerr metric (1963)
where
J = Angular Momentum
Maximal spin: Jmax = M2
•
•
[CO 17.22]
(or = GM 2/c2 in CO units)
Usually ~ the case.
Then Event Horizon in equatorial plane is at
“Static limit”
Frame-dragging  c
Ergosphere
r=M

Infalling particle with no angular momentum:
r = 2M
[TW2, pg. F-14]
E/m
r = M+(M 2-a2)1/2
Remaining energy
(rest radiated away)
(unrealistic case with unstable
orbits, but gives an estimate
of available energy)
r/M
Both plots for equatorial plane only
The Special Case of Kerr (Rotating) Black Holes:
Direct Magnetic Coupling by the BZ Effect
BZ
PC
7
•
•
•
BP
Blandford
(2001; 2003)
Accreting plasma presses magnetic field onto Kerr hole
Magnetic field lines temporarily thread Kerr hole
Field extracts rotational energy and angular momentum
from hole
LBZ ~ 1046 erg s 1 m9 m j 2
 BZ  ?????
( From Meier & Nakamura
http://www.atnf.csiro.au/education/workshops/jaunceyfest/Talks/19.Da
vidMeier/Meier_DJ65.ppt)
Blandford & Znajek (1977)
5
Accretion Disks
Disk material loses energy
by black body radiation
Accretion
disk
L( r )  T ( r )4  2r dr 
[CO pgs. 661-665]
T ( r )  r 3 / 4
 total radiation = sum of black bodies.
•
Well-studied phenomena in
local binary star systems
•
Angular momentum 
material cannot fall directly
onto central mass.
Binary stars  “thin” accretion
disks
•
•
Material works its way in
toward center due to viscosity.
For QSO: Material eventually
falls into Black Hole
•
r
hotter
cooler
5
[Fig. 18.13]
4
Luminosity 
•
“cataclysmic variables”
log T (K) 
•
[Fig. 18.14]
From innermost stable orbit
log r 
log  (nm) 
Binary star results, but QSOs are similar.
Iron K profiles
X-ray emission line.
From inner electron shell.
Actual data
Colors indicate
wavelength shift
Changing inclination
Schwarzschild
Redshifted
Blueshifted
Frequency 
Wavelength
Fabian et. Al., 2000, PASP, 112, 1145
Kerr
Line of sight
Rotating vs. non-rotating
6
Continuum Source
Thermal
radiation
from dust
X-rays from
“inverse Compton scattering”
Thermal ra
d. from dis
k
Log  F 
Cloud of relativistic electrons
Thermal
radiation
from disk
X-rays from
“inverse
Compton
scattering”
Synchrotron
radiation
from jet
[Fig. 28.23]
[Fig. 28.4]
Log frequency 
Energetics
• Accretion rate & luminosity.
• mass falls into black hole:
Ldisk  
• Eddington limit.
• Radiation pressure = gravity:
.
dM 2
c  M c 2
dt
LEdd
GmM BH
m 
4r 2
4r 2
absorption
cross-section
  0 .1
.
M  1  10 M yr-1
Luminous QSOs:
L ~ LEdd
Seyferts, Radio Galaxies:
L << LEdd
7
Related documents