Download Full text

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
A NUMBER FIELD WITH INFINITELY MANY NORMAL INTEGRAL BASES
A NUMBER FIELD WITH INFINITELY MANY
NORMAL INTEGRAL BASES
Daniel Eloff
Dept. of Math. and Statistics, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, B.C., Canada V1V 1V7
e-mail: [email protected]
Blair K. Spearman
Dept. of Math. and Statistics, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, B.C., Canada V1V 1V7
e-mail: [email protected]
Kenneth S. Williams
School of Math. and Statistics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5B6
e-mail: [email protected]
(Submitted June 2006-Final Revision July 2007)
ABSTRACT
A cyclic quintic field possessing infinitely many normal integral bases is exhibited. The
bases provided are parametrized by Fibonacci numbers.
1. INTRODUCTION AND MAIN THEOREM
Let K be a finite normal extension of the rational field Q. A normal integral basis of K
is an integral basis for K all of whose elements are conjugate over Q. Now suppose that K is
cyclic of degree d ≥ 2 over Q. Then K possesses a normal integral basis if and only if K is
tamely ramified [3, Corollary, p. 422] or equivalently K has a squarefree conductor [3, p. 175].
If K is a tamely ramified cyclic extension of Q, it follows from results of Newman and Taussky
[4], as well as Thompson [7], that K has a unique (up to order and change of sign) normal
integral basis if and only if d = 2, 3, 4 or 6. Thus if K is a tamely ramified, cyclic, quintic
extension of Q then K has at least two normal integral bases. In this paper we exhibit such a
field K that possesses infinitely many normal integral bases. Indeed we exhibit infinitely many
normal integral bases parametrized by Fibonacci numbers.
We let
f (x) = x5 + x4 − 4x3 − 3x2 + 3x + 1.
It is known that f (x) is irreducible [5, p. 548 (with n = −1)]. Let θ ∈ C be a root of f (x).
Set K = Q(θ). Then K is a cyclic extension of degree 5 over Q [5, p. 548 (with n = −1)]. The
discriminant of K is 114 and its conductor is 11 [2, Théorème 1, p. 76 (with t = −1)]. Thus
K is the unique quintic subfield of the cyclotomic field of 11th roots of unity.
By
of Gaál and Pohst [1, Lemma 2, p. 1690 (with n = −1)] an integral
basis for
a result
2 3
2
3
4
2 3 4
K is 1, θ, θ , θ , ω , where ω = 1 + 2θ − 3θ − θ + θ . Thus 1, θ, θ , θ , θ is an integral
basis for K. The roots of f (x) in cyclic order are
θ, σ(θ) = 2 − 4θ2 + θ4 , σ 2 (θ) = −1 + 2θ + 3θ2 − θ3 − θ4 ,
σ 3 (θ) = −2 + θ2 , σ 4 (θ) = −3θ + θ3 ,
see for example [6, Proposition, p. 217 (with n = −1)].
151
(1.1)
A NUMBER FIELD WITH INFINITELY MANY NORMAL INTEGRAL BASES
We prove the following result, where Fn (n ∈ Z) denotes the n-th Fibonacci number and
Ln (n ∈ Z) denotes the n-th Lucas number.
Theorem: Let K be the cyclic quintic field given by K = Q(θ), where θ5 + θ4 − 4θ3 − 3θ2 +
3θ + 1 = 0. Let σ ∈ Gal(K/Q) ' Z/5Z be given by
σ(θ) = 2 − 4θ2 + θ4 .
Set
αn =
1
1
(25F2n + (−1)n L2n − 2) + (−5F2n + (−1)n L2n )θ
10
2
− 4F2n θ2 + F2n θ3 + F2n θ4 , n ∈ N.
(1.2)
Then αn (n ∈ N) is an integer of K and
αn , σ(αn ), σ 2 (αn ), σ 3 (αn ), σ 4 (αn ) ,
n ∈ N,
(1.3)
is a normal integral basis for K. Moreover the bases (1.3) are distinct in the sense that if, for
some n1 , n2 ∈ N, j1 , j2 ∈ {0, 1, 2, 3, 4}, and ε = ±1, we have
σ j1 (αn1 ) = εσ j2 (αn2 )
then
j1 = j2 , n1 = n2 , and = +1.
2. PROOF OF THEOREM
The congruences
Ln ≡ Fn (mod 2),
L2n ≡ (−1)n 2 (mod 5),
n ∈ N,
follow immediately from the easily proved relations L2n − 5Fn2 = (−1)n 4 and L2n − 5Fn2 =
(−1)n 2. Hence, for n ∈ N, we have
25F2n + (−1)n L2n − 2 ≡ F2n − L2n
≡ 0 (mod 2),
n
n
25F2n + (−1) L2n − 2 ≡ (−1) L2n − 2 ≡ 0 (mod 5),
−5F2n + (−1)n L2n
≡ F2n − L2n
≡ 0 (mod 2).
Thus, for n ∈ N, we can define integers rn , sn and tn by
rn =
25F2n + (−1)n L2n − 2
,
10
sn =
−5F2n + (−1)n L2n
,
2
tn = −F2n .
(2.1)
Hence
−5rn + sn − 15tn = 1,
152
n ∈ N,
(2.2)
A NUMBER FIELD WITH INFINITELY MANY NORMAL INTEGRAL BASES
2
and (as L22n − 5F2n
= 4)
s2n − 5sn tn + 5t2n = 1,
n ∈ N.
(2.3)
Now let
αn = rn + sn θ + 4tn θ2 − tn θ3 − tn θ4 , n ∈ N.
(2.4)
Clearly αn is an integer of K. By (1.1) the conjugates of αn (n ∈ N) over Q are
σ(αn ) = (rn + 2sn − 3tn ) − 3tn θ + (−4sn + 9tn )θ2 + tn θ3 + (sn − 2tn )θ4 ,
σ 2 (αn ) = (rn − sn + 5tn ) + (2sn − 6tn )θ + (3sn − 6tn )θ2 + (−sn + 3tn )θ3
+ (−sn + 2tn )θ4 ,
σ 3 (αn ) = (rn − 2sn + 9tn ) + tn θ + (sn − 6tn )θ2 + tn θ4 ,
σ 4 (αn ) = (rn + 4tn ) + (−3sn + 8tn )θ − tn θ2 + (sn − 3tn )θ3 .
Using MAPLE, together with (2.2) and (2.3), we obtain
disc({αn , σ(αn ), σ 2 (αn ), σ 3 (αn ), σ 4 (αn )})
= 114 (−5rn + sn − 15tn )2 (s2n − 5sn tn + 5t2n )4 = 114 = disc(K),
so that for all n ∈ N
αn , σ(αn ), σ 2 (αn ), σ 3 (αn ), σ 4 (αn )
(2.5)
is a normal integral basis for K.
Finally we show that the infinitely many normal integral bases in (2.5) are all distinct.
Suppose that m(∈ N) and n(∈ N) are such that
αm , σ(αm ), σ 2 (αm ), σ 3 (αm ), σ 4 (αm )
= ± αn , σ(αn ), σ 2 (αn ), σ 3 (αn ), σ 4 (αn ) .
Then
αm = ±σ j (αn ) for some j ∈ {0, 1, 2, 3, 4} .
If j = 0 then αm = ±αn and so, by (2.4), we have
rm + sm θ + 4tm θ2 − tm θ3 − tm θ4
= ±(rn + sn θ + 4tn θ2 − tn θ3 − tn θ4 ).
Equating coefficients of θ3 , we obtain tm = ±tn . Appealing to (2.1), we deduce F2m = ±F2n ,
so that F2m = F2n and m = n.
Next we show that if j 6= 0 then tn = 0, which is impossible for n > 0 as tn = −F2n .
If j = 1 then αm = ±σ(αn ) and we have
rm + sm θ + 4tm θ2 − tm θ3 − tm θ4
= ±((rn + 2sn − 3tn ) − 3tn θ + (−4sn + 9tn )θ2 + tn θ3 + (sn − 2tn )θ4 ).
153
A NUMBER FIELD WITH INFINITELY MANY NORMAL INTEGRAL BASES
Equating coefficients of θ3 , we obtain −tm = ±tn , so by (2.1) we have F2m = ∓F2n and thus
F2m = F2n and m = n. Hence
rn + sn θ + 4tn θ2 − tn θ3 − tn θ4
= −(rn + 2sn − 3tn ) + 3tn θ − (−4sn + 9tn )θ2 − tn θ3 − (sn − 2tn )θ4 .
Equating coefficients of θ and θ2 , we have sn = 3tn and 4tn = 4sn − 9tn , so tn = 0.
If j = 2 then αm = ±σ 2 (αn ) and we have
rm + sm θ + 4tm θ2 − tm θ3 − tm θ4
= ±((rn − sn + 5tn ) + (2sn − 6tn )θ + (3sn − 6tn )θ2
+ (−sn + 3tn )θ3 + (−sn + 2tn )θ4 ).
Equating coefficients of θ3 and θ4 , we obtain −sn + 3tn = ±(−tm ) = −sn + 2tn so tn = 0.
If j = 3 then αm = ±σ 3 (αn ) and we have
rm + sm θ + 4tm θ2 − tm θ3 − tm θ4
= ±((rn − 2sn + 9tn ) + tn θ + (sn − 6tn )θ2 + tn θ4 ).
Equating coefficients of θ3 , we obtain tm = 0.
If j = 4 then αm = ±σ 4 (αn ) and we have
rm + sm θ + 4tm θ2 − tm θ3 − tm θ4
= ±((rn + 4tn ) + (−3sn + 8tn )θ − tn θ2 + (sn − 3tn )θ3 ).
Equating coefficients of θ4 , we obtain tm = 0.
This completes the proof.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors wish to thank the referee whose suggestions shortened and improved the
paper.
REFERENCES
[1] I. Gaál and M. Pohst. “Power Integral Bases in a Parametric Family of Totally Real
Cyclic Quintics.” Math Comp. 66 (1997): 1689-1696.
[2] S. Jeannin. “Nombre de Classes et unités Des Corps de Nombres Cycliques Quintiques
d’E. Lehmer.” J. Théor. Nombres Bordeaux 8 (1996): 75-92.
[3] W. Narkiewicz. Elementary and Analytic Theory of Algebraic Numbers. Second Edition,
Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1990.
[4] M. Newman and O. Taussky. “On a Generalization of the Normal Basis in Abelian
Algebraic Number Fields.” Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 9 (1956): 85-91.
[5] R. Schoof and L. Washington. “Quintic Polynomials and Real Cyclotomic Fields with
Large Class Numbers.” Math. Comp. 50 (1988): 543-556.
[6] B. K. Spearman and K. S. Williams. “Normal Integral Bases for Emma Lehmer’s Parametric Family of Cyclic Quintics.” J. Théor. Nombres Bordeaux 16 (2004): 215-220.
[7] R. C. Thompson. “Normal Matrices and the Normal Basis in Abelian Number Fields.”
Pacific J. Math. 12 (1962): 1115-1124.
AMS Classification Numbers: 11R20
zzz
154
Related documents