Download Susceptibility of North American wild ungulates to foot-and-mouth disease virus: initial findings

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Sociality and disease transmission wikipedia , lookup

Infection wikipedia , lookup

Germ theory of disease wikipedia , lookup

Childhood immunizations in the United States wikipedia , lookup

Infection control wikipedia , lookup

Chickenpox wikipedia , lookup

Hepatitis B wikipedia , lookup

Transmission (medicine) wikipedia , lookup

Globalization and disease wikipedia , lookup

West Nile fever wikipedia , lookup

Henipavirus wikipedia , lookup

Marburg virus disease wikipedia , lookup

Sarcocystis wikipedia , lookup

Multiple sclerosis research wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Appendix 23
Susceptibility of North American wild ungulates to foot-and-mouth disease virus:
initial findings
Jack Rhyan1*, Moshe Shalev2, Thomas Gidlewski1, Matt McCollum1, Gordon Ward2, Ming Deng2,
Thomas McKenna2, and Mo Salman3
1
National Wildlife Research Center, 4101 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80521, USA
2
Plum Island Animal Disease Center, Greenport (Long Island), New York, 11944, USA
3
Animal Population Health Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523,
USA
Abstract:
The only known occurrence of foot-and-mouth disease in wildlife in the United States occurred
in 1924 when the infection was transmitted from cattle to mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus)
sharing common pasture. In an experimental infection in the 1970’s, white-tailed deer
(Odocoileus virginianus) were susceptible to infection and capable transmitters of the virus to
cattle. The susceptibility and transmission capability of other wild North American ungulates
are unknown. This report provides preliminary results of experimental infections of North
American bison (Bison bison), elk (Cervus elaphus nelsoni), pronghorn (Antilocapra
americana) and mule deer.
A total of 6 bison, 8 elk, 12 pronghorn, 14 mule deer, and 20 cattle were included in a series
of experiments conducted at Plum Island Animal Disease Center (PIADC), New York, USA.
Following intraepithelial tongue inoculation with O1 Manisa FMD virus, disease development
was monitored in inoculated and contact animals. Intra and interspecies transmission studies
were conducted between the wildlife species and cattle. Specimens were collected throughout
the studies for routine laboratory testing including serology, virus isolation, and PCR. Animals
were euthanized, followed by necropsy and histopathology.
Clinical disease occurred in all inoculated animals as well as all contact-exposed bison,
pronghorn, and mule deer. Clinical disease, however, did not occur in contact-exposed elk or
in cattle exposed to inoculated elk. Only one contact elk showed serologic evidence of FMD
virus infection. Lesions affected oral cavities and feet of all species. Oral lesions were mild in
pronghorn and elk, and severe in bison cattle, and mule deer. Foot lesions were mild in elk
and severe in the other species. Myocarditis was seen in the bison and mule deer. Intra and
interspecies transmission occurred in all species except elk. Results of these studies indicate
the susceptibility and transmission capability of three of the four wild ungulate species
examined. Additionally, the severity of lesions in these species suggests that in a natural
outbreak, mortality could be high. Results also indicate some resistance of elk to transmission
and severe clinical signs from O1 Manisa.
Further studies to evaluate vaccine efficacy in
bison and white-tailed deer are planned.
Introduction:
An outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease has only occurred once in wildlife in the United States.
That occurrence was in 1924 when the infection was transmitted from cattle to mule deer
sharing common pasture in the Stanislaus National Forrest in California (Keane, 1927). In the
1970’s, experimentally-infected white-tailed deer were shown to be susceptible to infection
and capable transmitters of the virus to cattle (McVicar et al., 1974). Little information is
available on the susceptibility and transmission capability of other wild North American
ungulates. Natural infection has occurred in European bison (Bison bonasus) (Folmer, 1939;
Jaczewski, 1959; Jaczewski, 1960; Podgurniak, 1967), North American bison (Folmer, 1939;
Hediger, 1940), and hybrids (Bison bonasus X Bison bison) (Folmer, 1939) in European zoos;
however, the reports of FMD in North American bison are little more than anecdotes.
Naturally occurring (Cohrs and Weber-Springe, 1939) and experimental infection (Forman and
Gibbs, 1974; Forman et al., 1974; Gibbs et al., 1975) of foot-and-mouth disease in red deer
(Cervus elaphus elaphus) have been reported. We have found no reports of FMD in North
153
American elk or pronghorn. This report provides preliminary results of experimental infections
of North American bison, elk, pronghorn, and mule deer.
Materials and Methods:
In all species, animals received intraepithelial tongue and intramuscular inoculation with O1
Manisa FMD virus. The inoculating dose used in all species was 10,000 bovine tongue infective
doses (BTID). Concurrent with inoculation of the wildlife species in each study, one bovine
steer was inoculated and exposed to a contact steer. When clinical evidence of FMD was
observed in the contact-exposed wildlife and cattle, these animals were moved to rooms
containing unexposed cattle and wildlife for inter and intraspecies transmission studies. In the
bison study, cattle were exposed to FMDV infected bison 5 days after the bison developed
clinical signs of disease due to logistical reasons. In all other studies, infected and contact
animals were placed together immediately following development of clinical signs of FMD.
Following inoculation and exposure, disease development was monitored in inoculated and
contact animals. Specimens were collected throughout the studies for routine laboratory
testing including serology, virus isolation, and PCR. At various time points throughout the
studies, animals were euthanized followed by necropsy and histopathology. Numbers of
animals inoculated and contact-exposed (Table 1) varied between experiments.
Table 1. Numbers of inoculated and contact-exposed wildlife and cattle in the experiments
Experiment
Inoc Cattle
Inoc Wildlife
Contact Cattle
Contact Wildlife
Bison
1
1
3
5
Elk
1
3*
3
6*
Pronghorn
1
2
5
8
Mule Deer
1
2
5
12
*One elk was contact-exposed and later inoculated.
Results:
Clinical evidence of FMD infection occurred in all inoculated wildlife and cattle and in all
contact-exposed bison, pronghorn, and mule deer. Clinical disease, however, did not occur in
animals in contact with either inoculated or contact-exposed elk. Neither did clinical disease
occur in elk exposed to FMD-infected cattle. Cattle exposed to infected pronghorn and mule
deer developed disease. Two cattle exposed to bison 5 days after the bison developed clinical
signs of FMDV infection failed to develop disease.
Bison routinely developed fever, lameness, inappetence, chewing movements, and ptyalism.
Physical examination revealed numerous small vesicles and erosions affecting tongue, gingiva,
muzzle, coronary bands, and interdigital skin. Inoculated elk developed transient fever,
minimal ptyalism, mild lameness, and mild tongue and foot lesions. Pronghorn and mule deer
were similar in clinical signs which included fever, depression, transient inappetence, and
severe lameness. One difference in deer and pronghorn was that pronghorn developed only
minimal oral lesions whereas mule deer acutely developed numerous small oral vesicles
particularly on the dorsal surface of the tongue. These rapidly progressed to erosions and
subsequently healed.
At necropsy, lesions affected oral cavities and feet of all species. Oral lesions were mild in
pronghorn and elk, and severe in bison cattle, and mule deer. Foot lesions were mild in elk
and severe in the other species. Myocarditis was seen in the bison and mule deer. Ulcers
were noted on the pillars of the rumen in one or more animals from each species.
Histopathologic findings in bison, elk, and pronghorn were typical of FMD lesions in domestic
species consisting acutely of vesicles progressing to erosions. In time, erosions healed or, in
some cases, ulcerated. In animals of all species necropsied 6 weeks post inoculation or
exposure, oral lesions were healed. Chronic foot lesions occurred in all species and usually
consisted of concentric hoof wall deformities. Histopathologic and microbiologic results for
mule deer are pending.
154
Clinical evidence of intra and interspecies transmission occurred in all species except elk.
Laboratory evidence of FMDV infection (virus isolation, PCR, or detection of 3ABC
nonstructural protein) was found in all inoculated bison, elk, pronghorn, and cattle and in all
contact-exposed bison, and pronghorn. Only one contact-exposed elk developed antibody to
virus nonstructural protein (3ABC) serving as serologic evidence of FMD virus infection.
Although bison exposed to FMDV-infected bison contracted FMD, 2 cattle exposed later to
infected bison developed neither clinical nor laboratory evidence of infection. FMD virus was
not isolated from tissues or oropharyngeal fluids of bison, elk, or pronghorn past 28 days post
inoculation or exposure.
Discussion:
Results of these studies indicate the susceptibility and transmission capability of three of the
four wild ungulate species examined. Interspecies infection between wildlife and cattle
occurred with all species except elk. The failure of 2 cattle to develop FMD after contact with
infected bison is likely due to the late exposure which missed the initial period of intense virus
shedding.
The severity of lesions in bison, pronghorn and mule deer suggests that in a natural outbreak,
mortality could be high due to lameness resulting in increased predation. Such was the case
in natural outbreaks of FMD in European bison in preserves (Podgurniak, 1967) and in mule
deer in California (Keane, 1927). Results also indicate some resistance of elk to transmission
and severe clinical signs from O1 Manisa infection. These results are consistent with findings
in experimentally-infected conspecific red deer (Gibbs et al., 1975). Further studies to
evaluate vaccine efficacy in bison and white-tailed deer are planned.
Authors’ Conclusions:
•
Bison, pronghorn, and mule deer, but not elk are highly susceptible to O1 Manisa
FMDV infection.
•
In nature, FMD infection in bison, pronghorn and mule deer would likely result in
significant mortality.
•
The findings are limited due to the small sample size of these experiments.
Authors’ Recommendation:
•
Vaccine development applicable to wildlife is needed.
Acknowledgements:
The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the animal caretakers at PIADC and
at the Colorado State University – Animal Population Health Institute (APHI) and USDA APHIS
Wildlife Research Facility in Fort Collins, Colorado, Samia Metwally, Louis Rodriquez, Sherrilyn
H. Wainwright, Anthonio Ramirez, Charles Mebus, He Wang, and Ming-Tsung Yeh.
References:
Cohrs, P. & Weber-Springe. 1939. Maul- und klauenseuche beim reh und hirsch. Deutsche
tierarztliche Wochenschrift 47: 97 – 103.
Folmer, C.J. 1939. Aphtae episooticae among wisents (Bison bonasus L.) and the cross-bred
wisents (Bison bonasus L. X Bison bison) of the Royal Zoological Society “Natura Artis
Magistra” at Amsterdam in the autumn of 1937. Bijd. Dierk. 27: 53-60.
Forman, A.J. & Gibbs, E.P.J. 1974. Studies with foot-and-mouth disease viru in British deer
(red, fallow, and roe). 1. Clinical disease. J. Comp. Pathol. 84: 215 – 220.
Forman, A.J. & Gibbs, E.P.J., Baber, D.J., Herniman, K.A.J., & Barnett, I.T. 1974.
Studies with foot-and-mouth disease viru in British deer (red, fallow, and roe). II. Recovery of
virus and serological response. J. Comp. Pathol. 84: 221 – 229.
155
Gibbs, E. P. J., Herniman, K. A. J., Lawman, M. J. P. , & Sellers, R.F. 1975. Foot-andmouth disease in British deer: transmission of virus to cattle, sheep, and deer. Vet. Rec. 96:
558-563.
Hediger, H. 1940. Uber maul und klauenseuche bei zootieren. Zool. Garten 12: 291-299.
Jaczewski, Z. 1959. Spostrezenia z zakresu opieki weterynaryjnej w rezerwatach zubrow w
latach 1952-1954. Roezn. Nauk. Roin. 2: 297-318.
Jaczewski, Z. 1960. Beobachtungen bei der maul – und klauenseuche in polnischen
wisentreserwaten. Z. Jagdwiss. 3: 100-107.
Keane, C. 1927. The outbreak of foot and mouth disease among deer in the Stanislaus
National Forest. Monthly Bulletin of the California State Dept of Agriculture 16: 216-226.
McVicar, J.W., Sutmoller, P., Ferris, D.H., & Campbell, C.H. 1974. Foot-and-mouth
disease in white-tailed deer: clinical signs and transmission in the laboratory. Proc of 78th
Annual Meeting U.S. Anim. Health Assoc. pp. 169 – 180.
Podgurniak, Z. 1967. Pathological lesions in the European bison caused by foot and mouth
disease in Polish reservations. ACTA Therolog. 30: 445-452.
156