Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Zero-configuration networking wikipedia , lookup
Computer network wikipedia , lookup
Wireless security wikipedia , lookup
Distributed firewall wikipedia , lookup
Cracking of wireless networks wikipedia , lookup
Airborne Networking wikipedia , lookup
Network tap wikipedia , lookup
Lecture Optical Communications Outlook Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dipl.-Wirt.-Ing. Stephan Pachnicke Overview • Next generation access networks • Functional and structural convergence of fixed and mobile networks • Conclusion 2 11 - Trends Traffic Growth in the Internet DE-CIX GlobalPeer • Exponential growth of the bandwidth with approx. 30% p.a. • Drivers are new services such as IP-TV, Cloud, … 3 11 - Trends 1 Access Network Technologies Fiber-to-the-Home 10G-EPON, XG-PON Fiber-to-the-Curb ADSL Copper ISDN Year • DSL-based technology cannot be scaled to higher data rates • • VDSL2 ~100 Mbit/s with reach of ~550-850 m G.fast (Vectoring) ~150 Mbit/s, ~250 m reach Fiber-to-the-Curb • Solution: fiber based systems, passive optical networks (PON) 4 11 - Trends System Architecture (FTTx) Point-to-point CO GPON TDMA-PON Passive splitter CO NG-PON2 WDM-PON WDM Mux/Demux CO Acronyms: + Physical layer p2p connection + High reach (approx. 80 km) + Aggregate bit rate/fiber = end user bit rate – N fibers in the CO – N transceivers in the CO + 1 fiber in the CO + 1 transceiver in the CO – Shared multipoint connection – Lower reach (approx. 10 km) – Aggregate bit rate/fiber = N x end user bit rate + Physical layer p2p connection + Medium reach (approx. 40 km) + 1 fiber in the CO + 1 transceiver in the CO + Aggregate bit rate/wavelength = end user bit rate CO=Central office; TDMA=Time Division Multiple Access; WDM=Wavelength Division Multiplex GPON=Gigabit capable passive optical networks; NG-PON2=Next Generation–PON2 5 11 - Trends WDM-PON Challenges Customer Premises Central Office Challenges Solutions • Integration of multi-channel transmitters and receivers • Photonic integrated circuit (PIC) (& driver array) • Low-cost tunable laser • Development of a novel (wavelength) tunable tranceiver module with centralized control SFP+ 6 11 - Trends 2 Transmission System Setup OLT ONU AWG (G.698.3) SFP (L-Band) 1GBE . . . L-Band (RX) RN L-Band C-Band (TX) CPE (with T-SFP+) . . . C-Band VOA Fiber AWG (G.698.3) 90% SFP (L-Band) 1GBE C-Band AWG 10% L/C Splitter Wavelength Controller CPE (with T-SFP+) OLT: optical line terminal; RN: remote node; ONU: optical network unit; VOA: Variable Optical Attenuator; AWG: arrayed waveguide grating CPE: Customer Premises Equipment 7 11 - Trends Field Trial WDM-PON (2014) • Two different fiber routes (looped back to central office) • 15 km – red (approx. 7 dB attenuation) – Gmunden to Olsdorf • 25 km – orange (approx. 11 dB attenuation) – Gmunden to Laakirchen 8 11 - Trends Results S. Pachnicke, et al, OFC, Los Angeles, 2015. 9 11 - Trends 3 Automatic Wavelength Control 194,9 Frequency [THz] 194,8 194,7 194,6 194,5 194,4 0 10 20 30 Phase 1 (Power Feedback) 40 50 Time [s] 60 70 80 90 100 Phase 2 (Wavelength & Power Feedback) On turn-on the ONU automatically tunes to the wavelength, which is equivalent to the AWG port it is attached to (considering the wavelength and power feedback it receives from the centralized controller) 10 11 - Trends Long Term Stability Long-term wavelength stability is achieved by the closed-loop wavelength control provided by the central office 11 11 - Trends Convergence of Fixed and Mobile Networks 12 11 - Trends 4 Increase of Mobile Traffic Quelle: Cisco VNI Mobile, 2015 • Global mobile traffic will reach 24.3 EB/month in 2019 • Bandwidth growth of approx. 57% p.a. 13 11 - Trends Fixed-Mobile Convergence (FMC) NID / RGW Universal Access Gateway UAG Carrier Ethernet Switch / Aggregator U E eNB NFV Access- and aggregation network Server WiFi AP Low-Latency Cross-Connect eNB ONU Small Cell RRU ONU RRU ONU RRU ONU WDM-PON OLT Mobile Fronthaul Shared use of the infrastructure by fixed and mobile networks 14 11 - Trends Advantages Use of a shared infrastructure for fixed and mobile networks: • Improved QoE for the end user (e.g. seamless handover between WiFi/LTE) • Reduced costs and lower energy consumption Differentiation into • • 15 Functional convergence wrt. required functions in fixed and mobile networks • Enhanced control (improved offloading, seamless handover between fixed and mobile networks) • Use of virtualized functions on a shared NFV server (e.g. for universal authentication functionality, universal data path management, …) Structural convergence wrt. the infrastructure • Shared use of network infrastructure (e.g. PON network for FTTH & dedicated wavelengths for mobile fronthaul) • Consolidation of network nodes 11 - Trends 5 Functional Convergence Management / Control SDN UAG / OpenFlow GbE / 10GbE Carrier Ethernet Switch / Aggregator eNB NFV Aggregation Server Network WiFi AP IP / MPLS SDN / OpenFlow VNF 1 Access and Backbone LER VNF 2 VNF 3 SDN / OpenFlow BBUH Low-Latency Cross-Connect Sync Timing WDM-PON OLT RRU ONU Mobile RRU ONU RRU ONU Fronthaul Content Cache Mobile EPC uAAA Perform. Interface Monitor Select Enhanced control & virtualization functions (SDN/OpenFlow Controller, NFV-Server) 16 11 - Trends NFV & SDN Network Function Virtualization (NFV) Software Defined Networking (SDN) Cache Firewall Router App App App API’s Rework of network applications to run on arbitrary hardware, independent of custom networking hardware 17 Forwarding plane is programmable in real time by independently developed software 11 - Trends Network Function Virtualization (NFV) Traditional Network Appliances Message Router CDN DPI Firewall Carrier Grade NAT Tester/QoE Monitor SGSN/GGSN PE Router BRAS RAN Controller Virtualized Network Functions Session Border WAN Controller Acceleration Standard, high-volume servers Standard, high-volume storage Standard, high-volume switches Use of commodity hardware (e.g. blade server), software-based network functions, faster innovation cycle 18 11 - Trends 6 Examples of NFV Implementations Mobile Networks • Virtual EPC (vEPC), Centralized RAN (C-RAN) Residential Customers • Virtual Home Gateway (vHG) Business Customers • Virtual Customer Premises Equipment (vCPE) First use in mobile networks then for residential and business customers 19 11 - Trends Advantages of NFV Physical Network Hybrid Network Virtual Network Scope Functions tied to hardware Selective functions virtualized with gradual introduction of orchestration Orchestration across virtualized functions Operations Slow, manual service creation Gradual transition, benefits expand as scope of virtualization grows Automated real-time service creation Cost CAPEX-heavy, over-provisioning Initial impact may be limited, because functions are virtualized in isolation OPEX-heavy, licensebased model Innovation Cycle Innovation tied to both hardware and software Impact depends on which functions are virtualized Software and hardware become independent Source: It is crucial to find the right way to a fully virtualized network 20 11 - Trends Example: Double Attachment SDN Controller Network Assistance for Access Selection and Utilization Control Plane UE WiFi AP Changing (Inter-AP Handover) WiFi AP WiFi AP Double Attachment Interface Changing (Inter-system Handover) SDN-API Northbound uAAA U E U E Interface Selection Access- and aggregation network UAG LTE-EPC Performance Monitoring U E Content Cache SDN: Software-defined networking, uAAA: universal Authentication, Authorization and Accounting, UAG: universal access gateway, EPC: evolved packet core; UE: user equipment • User Equipment (UE) authenticates via uAAA in mobile and WiFi networks • UE can be attached via different paths at the same time (double attachment) • Centralized network control steers traffic (offloading) 21 11 - Trends 7 Example: Centralized-RAN Management / Control SDN UAG / OpenFlow GbE / 10GbE Carrier Ethernet RRU ONU RRU ONU RRU ONU Switch / Aggregator NFV Aggregation WiFi AP IP / MPLS SDN / OpenFlow VNF 1 Access and Server Network Backbone LER VNF 2 VNF 3 SDN / OpenFlow BBUH Low-Latency Cross-Connect Sync Timing WDM-PON OLT RRU ONU Mobile RRU ONU RRU ONU Fronthaul Content Cache Mobile EPC uAAA Perform. Interface Monitor Select Use of BBU hoteling. Advantages by • Sharing of the same BBU for serving a business area in day time • and a residential area during night 22 11 - Trends Conclusions • Bit rates in access networks will increase exponentially in the next years • Fiber-to-the-Home systems will be the only long-term solution • Especially WDM-PON systems are promising due to their high bandwidth and low latency • Fixed- and mobile networks will converge in the future • NFV & SDN will allow flexible reconfiguration of the network and realization of network functions in software 23 11 - Trends 8