Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
RAMP: Reconfigurable Architecture and Mobility Platform Presenter: Shao-Hsiu Hung Date: 5th.Dec.2005 1 Outline Motivations Reconfigurable Architecture and Mobility Platform Testbed implementation and experiment results Summary and future work 2 Motivations The existence of many incompatible wireless systems will last in the near future IP mobility protocols, 3GPP, 3GPP2 IP-based but not compatible How to achieve universal roaming is a big challenge A universal common core network Reconfigurable core network Reconfigurable mobility management – RAMP 3 Review of IP Mobility Management Macro-mobility Mobile IP (MIP) Micro-mobility Tunnel-based Hierarchy Mobile IP (HMIP) Host-specific-route-based HAWAII Fast Link Layer Inter-domain Handoff (FLIH) – cross-layer design, distributed location tracking with broadcast-based strategy 4 Generic IP Mobility Architecture HA INTERNET FA/GW FA/GW 5 Main Requirements of RAMP With RAMP, both the network and the mobile node can choose their most desirable mobility management protocol The mobile node can change its mobility protocol at anytime Standard IP protocol and IP routing should not be changed RAMP-unaware network nodes should continue to work with original IP protocols Mobile nodes in the same domain can use different mobility management protocols 6 RAMP Architecture Components Mobile Node (MN) – collocated with mobile host Network Node (NN) – collocated with each router Messages RAMP Header + Supported Mobility Protocols + Advertisement RAMP Header + Original Mobility Management Messages RAMP Header 0 8 Message Type Mobility Type 16 31 Total Length Lifetime MN Home Address 32 bits 7 Relation between RAMP and IP Protocol Stack Application Layer TCP/UDP IP RAMP Link Layer PCN/PCN-C Physical Layer 8 NN Architecture .. Mobility Management Module n Network Node (NN) Mobility Management Module 2 Mobility Management Module 1 (MMM1) Mobility Management Controller (MMC) MN information Database (MID) Mobility Register (MR) Platform Registrar (PR) Platform Controller (PC) Platform Controller Notifier (PCN) 9 MN Architecture .. Mobility Management Module-Client n Mobile Node (MN) Mobility Management Module-Client 2 Mobility Management Module-Client 1 (MMM-C1) Mobility Management Controller (MMC) Mobility Register (MR) Platform Controller-Client (PC-C) Platform Registrar-Client (PR-C) Mobility Selector (MS) Platform Controller Notifier-Client (PCN-C) 10 Processing Flow (MN) RAMP Advertisement RAMP header Advertisement of MMM 1 Advertisement of MMM 2 …… Advertisement of MMM n ... 1. User Input Mobility Selector (MS) 2. Platform Controller-Client (PC-C) 3. 4. 5. Mobility Management Module-Client x (MMM-C x) RAMP MN 6. RAMP header Registration request of MMM x RAMP Registration Request Send to other RAMP Network Node(s) 11 Processing Flow (NN) RAMP Registration Request RAMP header Registration request of MMM x ... 1. MN Information Database (MID) 2. Platform Controller (PC) 3. 4. 5. Mobility Management Module x (MMM x) RAMP NN 6. RAMP header Registration request of MMM x RAMP Registration Request Send to other RAMP Network Node(s) 12 Testbed Architecture HA CN Micro-Domain1 (HMIP, HWI, FLIH) FA1/GW1 Host1 GW4 GW7 MN FA2/GW2 Host2 GW3 AP1 Micro-Domain2 (HWI, FLIH) AP2 GW8 AP3 GW5 GW9 GW6 GW10 AP4 AP5 GW11 GW12 AP6 MN 13 Experiment 1: Reconfiguration Pkt. Delay (ms) Domain1 1 2 3 Domain 2 4 5 6 Domain 1 5 4 3 2 1 2 Domain 2 3 4 5 6 Pkt. Sequence HMIP FLIH HAWAII 14 Experiment 2: Co-existence MN1 MN2 AP 1 AP 2 AP 3 AP 2 AP 1 MN1 (using HAWAII) MN2 (using FLIH) MN1 AP 2 AP 1 AP 2 AP 3 AP 3 MN2 AP 1 AP 2 AP 3 AP 1 AP 2 AP 3 AP 1 AP 2 AP 3 15 Summary RAMP is a first step toward a reconfigurable core network to support the universal roaming RAMP architecture achieves re-configurability for various mobility management protocols RAMP architecture is realized without changing standard IP protocols and applications RAMP-unaware nodes are not affected A new direction for the integration of heterogeneous wireless networks 16 Future Work Security, QoS and other potential issues Reconfigurable core network Integration with cellular systems 17 Publication Jyh-Cheng Chen, Jui-Hung Yeh, Yi-Wen Lan, Li-Wei Lin, Fu-Cheng Chen, Shao-Hsiu Hung, “RAMP: Reconfigurable Architecture and Mobility Platform”, in Proc. of GLOBECOM 2005, St. Louis, USA, 2005 18