Download IP in the backbone

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
IP over networks
Heikki Almay
Kari Melkko
Risto Mononen
IP seminar 28.9.1998
ipbb.PPT / 28.9.1998 / Risto Mononen page: 1
IP in the backbone
•
“IP over anything” rule guarantees the
connectivity
•
Link-layer specific encapsulation and
possibly connection setup needed
•
•
Common link-layers: LAPF, AAL5, PPP
•
Routers have several IP interfaces with
possibly different physical media
PDH, SDH or WDM transmission path in the
bottom
ipbb.PPT / 28.9.1998 / Risto Mononen page: 2
Eg. Cisco 12000 Series
•
•
Quotes from http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/733/12000/gsrfs_ds.htm:
•
Supports a combination of IP over SONET/SDH and ATM interfaces, including other
high-speed media:
The Gigabit Switch Router (GSR) delivers scalable IP forwarding and services
performance in a carrier-class platform, enabling high-speed IP backbones to scale
to OC-3 (155 Mbps), OC-12 (622 Mbps), and OC-48 (2.4 Gbps) facilities.
•
•
•
•
Four-port OC-3/STM-1 IP over SONET/SDH
One-port OC-12/STM-4 IP over SONET/SDH
One-port OC-12/STM-4 ATM
Future line cards, including:
•
•
•
•
Four-port OC-3/STM-1 ATM
Four-port OC-12/STM-4 IP over SONET/SDH
One-port OC-48/STM-16 IP over SONET/SDH
Gigabit Ethernet
ipbb.PPT / 28.9.1998 / Risto Mononen page: 3
Frame Relay
•
•
•
Variable size frames over PCM links
LAPF / HDLC framing
"Streamlined X.25 / LAPB":
•
•
•
•
outband signalling
layer 2 multiplexing
end-to-end flow and error control above LAPF
hop-by-hop FCS checking to drop corrupted frames
Application
Application
TCP/IP
TCP/IP
LAPF - - - - - - - - - - LAPF - - - - - - - - - - - - LAPF
PHY
PHY
PHY
End node
Switching node
End node
ipbb.PPT / 28.9.1998 / Risto Mononen page: 4
Multiprotocol over FR
•
Routing mode
•
•
need layer 3 NLPID
IP NLPID is 0xCC
save 48 bits over bridging
•
Bridging mode
•
•
•
•
encapsulate whole MAC frame
NLPID 0x80 + SNAP define (LAN)
protocol
FR level fragmenting
Complicated ARP
•
•
Usually DLCI has only local significance
Frame Relay network provides a
method for obtaining the correct DLCIs
ipbb.PPT / 28.9.1998 / Risto Mononen page: 5
•
Encapsulated IP packet:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
flag 0x7E
Q.922 address (DLCI)
Control 0x03
NLPID 0xCC
IP Datagram
FCS
flag 0x7E
IP over ATM
•
“IP over ATM: A Framework Document" [RFC1932]
•
LLC/SNAP encapsulation is default
CLIP and LANE
•
TULIP strips IP header
need end-to-end ATM
•
TUNIC strips layer 4 header
replace TCP port based multiplexing with VC multiplexing
•
"Multiprotocol Encapsulation over ATM Adaptation Layer 5" [RFC1483]
•
•
•
MPLS work lead to new draft 1998
Working technology in single LIS (IP subnet)
Routing between LISes ongoing work
ipbb.PPT / 28.9.1998 / Risto Mononen page: 6
IP over SONET/SDH and WDM
•
•
ANSI and ITU-T flavors of synchronous links
"PPP over SONET/SDH" [RFC1619]
•
•
•
•
octet synchronous HDLC encapsulation
add scrambling 1998
scales up to OC-48/STM-16/2.5 Gb/s
WDM will provide huge bandwidth > OC-48
•
Lucent's Simplified Data Link (SDL) delineation proposal
variable length frames
header CRC
payload CRC
hunt for SONET H4 byte (?) and/or correct header CRC
add QoS and multiplexing to get “ATM lite”
ipbb.PPT / 28.9.1998 / Risto Mononen page: 7
IP switching
•
Industry suggestions
•
data driven
Ipsilon Flow Management Protocol (IFMP), Cell Switch Router (CSR)
snoop packets to find a flow
•
control (topology) driven
Tag Switching, Aggregate Route-Based IP Switching (ARIS), IP Navigator
routing updates and RSVP messages trigger VC setup
•
•
•
•
ATM Forum: MPOA/NHRP
IETF: RSVP, MPLS
Traditional Internet: connectionless datagram forwarding
(IP) Switching is always connection oriented and needs signalling: RSVP, LDP, SS7,
PNNI, …
•
Internet wants all the switching goodies with new names
ipbb.PPT / 28.9.1998 / Risto Mononen page: 8
DiffServ
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Last pure stateless attempt?
Take IP header TOS bits in use
Priority queuing enhances QoS
Still best-effort inside each “class”
CAC or pricing to protect backbone?
Interoperate with RSVP in enterprise net and ATM in backbone
Van Jakobson's research http://www-nrg.ee.lbl.gov/
•
Research projects with their own web pages include:
CBQ (Class-Based Queueing, including link-sharing);
ECN (Explicit Congestion Notification);
RED gateways (Random Early Detection Gateways);
SRM (Scalable Reliable Multicast);
the VINT project, based on the UCB/LBNL Network Simulator ns ( ns-1, ns-2)
Adaptive Web Caching ;
ipbb.PPT / 28.9.1998 / Risto Mononen page: 9
Related documents