Download Network Layer

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

AppleTalk wikipedia , lookup

Zigbee wikipedia , lookup

Distributed firewall wikipedia , lookup

CAN bus wikipedia , lookup

Asynchronous Transfer Mode wikipedia , lookup

Peering wikipedia , lookup

Net bias wikipedia , lookup

IEEE 802.1aq wikipedia , lookup

Piggybacking (Internet access) wikipedia , lookup

IEEE 1355 wikipedia , lookup

Zero-configuration networking wikipedia , lookup

Deep packet inspection wikipedia , lookup

Network tap wikipedia , lookup

Computer network wikipedia , lookup

Multiprotocol Label Switching wikipedia , lookup

Wake-on-LAN wikipedia , lookup

List of wireless community networks by region wikipedia , lookup

Cracking of wireless networks wikipedia , lookup

Airborne Networking wikipedia , lookup

Internet protocol suite wikipedia , lookup

UniPro protocol stack wikipedia , lookup

Recursive InterNetwork Architecture (RINA) wikipedia , lookup

Routing wikipedia , lookup

Routing in delay-tolerant networking wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Customer-Provider Routing Relationships
Advertises to its
neighbors that it
has no paths to any
other destinations
except itself
 The Global Internet consists of Autonomous Systems
(AS) interconnected with each other:



Customer: Stub AS: small corporation e.g. w, y
Customer: Multihomed AS: large corporation (no transit) e.g. x
Provider: Transit AS: backbone provider networks e.g. A, B, C
Group of routers
B
w
All traffic entering
must be destined for
w, all traffic leaving
must have originated
from w
x
A
C
y
Stub AS must be prevented from forwarding traffic between Transit ASs
1
using Selective Route Advertisement Policy Network Layer – part 3
Routing in the Internet
 Two-level routing:
 Intra-AS: administrator is responsible for choice
 Inter-AS: unique standard
Border Gateway Protocol (BGP4)
Allows each
subnet to
advertise its
existence to
the rest of the
Internet
 de facto standard inter-AS routing protocol
in today’s Internet
 provides each AS a means to:
• obtain subnet reachability information
(i.e. via one of its neighboring AS)
• propagate the reachability information to all
routers internal to the AS
• determine “good” routes to subnets based on the
reachability information and on AS
policy.
Network Layer – part 3
2
Internet AS Hierarchy
AS border (exterior gateway) routers
AS interior (gateway) routers
Network Layer – part 3
3
Intra-AS Routing
 Also known as Interior Gateway Protocols (IGP)
 Most common IGPs:
 RIP:
Routing Information Protocol (lower-tier ISPs and
Enterprise networks)
 OSPF:
Open Shortest Path First (upper-tier ISPs)
 IGRP:
Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (Cisco
proprietary)
Network Layer – part 3
4
RIP ( Routing Information Protocol)
 Distance vector algorithm
 Included in (Berkeley Software Distribution) BSD-UNIX
Distribution in 1982
 Distance metric:
 # of hops (max = 15 hops) = (AS < 15 hops in diameter)

Can you guess why?
Hop – no. of subnets traversed along the shortest path from Source Router
to Destination Subnet, including the Destination Subnet.
 Distance vectors: exchange routing updates via Response
Message (also called advertisement) every 30 sec
 Each advertisement: route to up to 25 destination subnets
within the AS, including the sender’s distance from each of
them
Network Layer – part 3
5
Example
RIP (Routing Information Protocol)
z
w
A
x
D
y
B
subnet
C
Routing table in Router D
Destination Subnet
Next Router
...
w
y
z
x
…
A
B
B
-...
Num. of hops to dest.
2
2
7
1
....
Network Layer – part 3
6
Example
RIP (Routing Information Protocol)
z
w
A
x
D
C
…
y
B
Routing table in Router D
Destination Subnet
Next Router
Num. of hops to dest.
w
y
z
x
A
B
B
--
2
2
7
1
...
...
....
Router A has a
shorter path to Z!
(30 secs. later.. D receives an advertisement from Router A )
Destination Subnet
Next Router
Num. of hops to dest.
z
w
x
C
---
4
1
1
...
...
....
Network Layer – part 3
7
Example
RIP (Routing Information Protocol)
z
w
A
x
D
C
…
y
B
Routing table in Router D
Destination Subnet
Next Router
Num. of hops to dest.
w
y
z
x
A
B
A
--
2
2
4
1
...
...
....
Advertisement from Router A
Destination Subnet
Next Router
Num. of hops to dest.
z
w
x
C
---
4
1
1
...
...
....
Router D updates
its entry for
destination Z
Network Layer – part 3
8
Example
RIP: Link Failure and Recovery
If no advertisement is heard after 180 sec --> the
neighbour/link is declared dead
 Modifies routing table - routes via neighbor
invalidated
 new advertisements sent to neighbors
 neighbours in turn send out new advertisements (if
tables changed)
 link failure info quickly propagates to entire net
 poisoned reverse used to prevent ping-pong loops
(infinite distance = 16 hops)
Network Layer – part 3
9
Routing Info Protocol (RIP)
Table processing
 RIP routing tables managed by application-level
process called route-d (daemon)
 advertisements sent in UDP packets, periodically
repeated
Able to manipulate
routing tables within
the UNIX kernel
via UDP,
port 520
Network Layer – part 3
10
OSPF (Open Shortest Path First)
 “Open” means publicly available
 Uses Link-State algorithm
Broadcasts information to
 LS packet dissemination
all not just neighboring
routers
 Topology map at each node
 Route computation using Dijkstra's algorithm
 OSPF advertisement carries one entry per neighbor
router
 Advertisements disseminated to entire AS (via flooding)

Carried in OSPF messages directly over IP (rather than TCP or
UDP with upper-layer protocol of 89
OSPF Protocol Functionalities: reliable data transfer, link-state broadcast, check for
Network Layer – part 3
11
links operability, extraction of neighboring router’s database of network-wide link state
OSPF advanced features (not in RIP)
Allow only trusted
routers
 Security: all OSPF messages authenticated (to prevent
malicious intrusion)
 Multiple same-cost paths allowed (only one path in RIP)
 Integrated uni- and multicast routing support:

Multicast OSPF (MOSPF) uses same topology data base as
OSPF
 Hierarchical OSPF in large domains.
Most significant advancement! Has the ability to structure an
autonomous system hierarchically
Network Layer – part 3
12
Hierarchical Open Shortest Path First
(OSPF)
Network Layer – part 3
13
Hierarchical OSPF
 Two-level hierarchy: local area, backbone.
 Link-state
advertisements are sent only within an area
 each node has detailed area topology; only know
direction (shortest path) to nets in other areas.
 Each area runs its own OSPF link-state routing algorithm
 Area border routers: responsible for routing packets
outside the area.
 Backbone routers: run OSPF routing limited to
backbone.
 Boundary routers: connect to other ASs.
Network Layer – part 3
14
IGRP (Interior Gateway Routing Protocol)
 CISCO proprietary; successor of RIP (mid 80s)
 Uses the Distance Vector algorithm, like RIP
 several cost metrics (delay, bandwidth, reliability,
load, etc.)
 uses TCP to exchange routing updates
 Loop-free routing via Distributed Updating Alg.
(DUAL) based on diffused computation
Network Layer – part 3
15
Router Architecture Overview
Two key router functions:
 run routing algorithms/protocol (RIP, OSPF, BGP)
 switching datagrams from incoming to outgoing link
Physical layer
functions
Data link layer
functions
Lookup &
forwarding
functions
computes routing
tables, performs
Network management
functions
Network Layer – part 3
16
Input Port Functions
Physical layer:
bit-level reception
Data link layer:
e.g., Ethernet
see chapter 5
Decentralized switching:
 given datagram dest., lookup output port
using routing table in input port memory
 goal: complete input port processing at
'line speed'
 queuing: happens if datagrams arrive
faster than forwarding rate into switch
fabric
Network Layer – part 3
17
Input Port Queuing
Slot for Green packet is
free, but there is HOL
blocking, so Green
packet will have to wait
 Fabric slower than input ports combined -> queueing
may occur at input queues
 Head-of-the-Line (HOL) blocking: queued datagram
at front of queue prevents others in queue from
moving forward
 queueing delay and loss due to input buffer overflow!
Network Layer – part 3
18
Three types of switching fabrics
Like shared memory
multiprocessors
No routing processor; 1 packet at a time
2n buses that connect n input
ports to n output ports
Network Layer – part 3
19
Switching Via Memory
First generation routers:
 packet copied by system's (single) CPU
 speed limited by memory bandwidth (2 bus
crossings per datagram)
Input
Port
Workstation’s
Memory
Output
Port
System Bus
Modern routers:
 input port processor performs lookup, copy into
memory
 Cisco Catalyst 8500
Network Layer – part 3
20
Switching Via Bus
 datagram from input port memory
to output port memory via a shared bus
 bus contention: switching speed limited
by bus bandwidth
 1 Gbps bus, Cisco 1900: sufficient speed
for access and enterprise routers (not
regional or backbone)
Network Layer – part 3
21
Switching Via An Interconnection Network
 overcome bus bandwidth limitations
 Banyan networks, other interconnection nets
initially developed to connect processors in
multiprocessor
 Other Advanced design: fragmenting datagram
into fixed length cells, switch cells through the
fabric.
 Cisco 12000: switches 60 Gbps through the
interconnection network
Network Layer – part 3
22
Output Ports
 Buffering required when datagrams arrive from
the fabric faster than the transmission rate
 Scheduling discipline chooses among queued
datagrams for transmission
Network Layer – part 3
23
It is more
advantageous
to mark a
packet before
the buffer is
full in order to
provide a
congestion
signal to the
sender
Output port queueing
 buffering when arrival rate via switch exceeeds
ouput line speed
 queueing (delay) and loss due to output port
buffer overflow!
Network Layer – part 3
24
END OF SESSION
Network Layer – part 3
25
IPv6
 Initial motivation: 32-bit address space
completely allocated by 2008.
 Additional motivation:
 header
format helps speed processing/forwarding
 header changes to facilitate QoS
 new anycast address: route to best of several
replicated servers
 IPv6 datagram format:
 fixed-length
40 byte header
 no fragmentation allowed
Network Layer – part 3
26
IPv6 Header (Cont)
Priority: identify priority among datagrams in flow
Flow Label: identify datagrams in same flow.
(concept of flow not well defined).
Next header: identify upper layer protocol for data
Network Layer – part 3
27
Other Changes from IPv4
 Checksum: removed entirely to reduce
processing time at each hop
 Options: allowed, but outside of header,
indicated by Next Header field
 ICMPv6: new version of ICMP
 additional
message types, e.g. ''Packet Too
Big''
 multicast group management functions
Network Layer – part 3
28
Transition From IPv4 To IPv6
 Not all routers can be upgraded
simultaneously
 no
flag days
 How will the network operate with mixed IPv4
and IPv6 routers?
 Two proposed approaches:
 Dual
Stack: some routers with dual stack (v6,
v4) can translate between formats
 Tunneling: IPv6 carried as payload in IPv4
datagram among IPv4 routers
Network Layer – part 3
29
Dual Stack Approach
Network Layer – part 3
30
Tunneling
IPv6 inside IPv4 where needed
Network Layer – part 3
31