Download AMHS IP Interoperability Trials

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Cracking of wireless networks wikipedia , lookup

Airborne Networking wikipedia , lookup

Zero-configuration networking wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
IP and AMHS TRIALS- PLANIFICATION STRATEGY
17/05/2010
Aena IP and AMHS Interoperability Trials
INITIAL SITUATION
At the end of 2008, it was initiated an interoperability planning test between
Aena and new ANSPs that have migrated to AMHS or that are planning to
migrate to AMHS in a sort time frame.
First action was the identification of the IP infrastructure to be used.
17/05/2010
Aena IP and AMHS Interoperability Trials
GENERAL STEPS
DESIGN PHASE
1. LAYER 1: Identify the physical infrastructure that will be used.
2. LAYER 3: Agree the network configuration
3. LAYER 7: Agree the AMHS configuration
4. Agree the network test that will be performed.
5. Agree the AMHS test that will be performed.
TEST PHASE
5. Perform some network test to assure the network connectivity.
6. Perform the AMHS trials
MIGRATION PHASE
7. Define coordinated procedures to carry out the migration in a coherent and
compatible manner.
17/05/2010
Aena IP and AMHS Interoperability Trials
CONTACTs AMONG ANSPs
Contact among different ANSP have been initialized in two different forums. In
the EUR-AFI Regions this project was materialized in a Task- Force, under the
umbrella of the AEFMP group ( AEFMP IP-TF).
In the case of the Aena (Spain)-FAA(Argentina) initiative, it has born thanks to
the good relations and understanding between both organizations.
The list of ANSP that have contacts in order to perform trials in short or
medium term are:
EUR REGION
AFI REGION
SAM REGION
AENA - SPAIN
ONDA-MOROCCO
FAA-ARGENTINA
DSNA FRANCE
ENNA-ALGERIA
NAV- PORTUGAL
17/05/2010
Aena IP and AMHS Interoperability Trials
AENA- FAA ARGENTINA PROGRESS
DESIGN PHASE
1.
Identify the physical infrastructure that will be used  DONE
i.
ii.
2.
IP NATIONAL DATA NETWORS
CAFSAT INFRAESTRUCTURE
Agree the network configuration  DONE
i.
IP NATIONAL DATA NETWORS  DONE
ii.
CAFSAT INFRAESTRUCTURE  DONE
3.
Agree the AMHS configuration  ON GOING
4.
Agree the AMHS tests that will be performed  DONE
TEST PHASE
5.
6.
Perform some network test to assure the network connectivity  PARTIALLY DONE.
i.
IP NATIONAL DATA NETWORS  DONE (9th week)
ii.
CAFSAT INFRAESTRUCTURE  DONE
Perform AMHS trials  PENDING
MIGRATION PHASE
7.
Define coordinated procedures to carry out the migration in a coherent and compatible manner
 PENDING
17/05/2010
Aena IP and AMHS Interoperability Trials
AENA(SPAIN)- FAA (ARGENTINA) PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
NAT-PT
BORDER
ROUTER test
IPv6/FR
FR switch
IPv4
AMHS
test
FR switch
FR
infrastructure
NAT-PT
BORDER
ROUTER
test
IP
infrastructure
AMHS test
17/05/2010
AMHS
operational
BORDER
ROUTER
operational
Argentina España
Aena IP and AMHS Interoperability Trials
AENA ( SPAIN)- NAV(PORTUGAL) PROGRESS
DESIGN PHASE
1.
Identify the physical infrastructure that will be used  DONE
Two options depending on the time frame.
i.
ii.
2.
Short Term Solution. Connecting IP NATIONAL DATA NETWORS using a TDMs COMMON
INFRASTRUCTURE.  PARTIALLY DONE.
Long Term Solution. Using the PENs infrastructure.  PARTIALLY DONE.
Agree the network configuration -> ON GOING under the umbrella of the AEFMP IP Task Force (*)
i.
ii.
IP NATIONAL DATA NETWORS
TDM COMMON CAFSAT INFRAESTRUCTURE
3.
Agree the AMHS configuration -> DONE
4.
Agree the AMHS test that will be performed -> DONE
(*) AEFMP is a Regional Plan composed of: Algeria, Spain, France, Morocco and Portugal.
17/05/2010
Aena IP and AMHS Interoperability Trials
AENA (SPAIN)- NAV (PORTUGAL) PROGRESS
TEST PHASE
5.
6.
Perform network tests to assure the network connectivity  ON GOING.
i.
IP NATIONAL DATA NETWORS  ON GOING
ii.
PENs INFRAESTRUCTURE  Not yet Available.
Perform AMHS trials  PARTIALLY DONE
Three different phases defined.
i.
First phase: Performing AMHS trials in a local environment.  DONE
ii.
Second phase: Performing AMHS trials using the interconnection of both national IP
networks, Medium term solution  PENDING.
iii.
Third phase: Performing AMHS trials using the PENs infrastructure  PENDING.
MIGRATION PHASE
7.
Define coordinated procedures to carry out the migration in a coherent and compatible manner
 PARTIALLY DONE
17/05/2010
Aena IP and AMHS Interoperability Trials
AENA(SPAIN)- NAV (PORTUGAL) SHORT TERM PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
QSIG/R2
QSIG/R2
QSIG/R2
QSIG/R2
Data applications:
OLDI, AMHS, RADAR
17/05/2010
Aena IP and AMHS Interoperability Trials
AENA(SPAIN)- NAV (PORTUGAL) LONG TERM PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
AEFMP
TECH
WSG
BARCELONA
LISBOA
MADRID
FARO
SEVILLA
17/05/2010
Aena IP and AMHS Interoperability Trials
AENA (SPAIN)- DSNA (FRANCE)- ONDA (MOROCCO)-ENNA (ALGERIA)
AEFMP
PROGRESS
TECH
WSG
DESIGN PHASE
1. Identify the physical infrastructure that will be used  DONE
2. Agree the network configuration  DONE
3. Agree the AMHS configuration  PARTIALLY DONE
4. Agree the AMHS test that will be performed  DONE
TEST PHASE  AGREEDED
5. Perform network test to assure the network connectivity
6. Perform AMHS trials
MIGRATION PHASE  AGREEDED
7. Define coordinated procedures to carry out the migration in a coherent and
compatible manner.
17/05/2010
Aena IP and AMHS Interoperability Trials
AENA(SPAIN)- DSNA (FRANCE) MEDIUM AND LONG TERM PHYSICAL
AEFMP
INFRASTRUCTURE
TECH
WSG
BARCELONA
Potentially
ATHIS
Aix-en
Provence
Potentially
MADRID
Potentially
BOURDEOS
17/05/2010
Aena IP and AMHS Interoperability Trials
BARCELONA
AENA(SPAIN)- ONDA (MOROCCO) PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
NAT-PT
BORDER
ROUTER test
IPv6/F
R
FR switch
IPv4
AMHS
test
FR switch
F.R.
infrastructure
NAT-PT
BORDER
ROUTER
test
AMHS
operational
IP
infrastructure
AMHS test
17/05/2010
BORDER
ROUTER
operational
Morocco Spain
Aena IP and AMHS Interoperability Trials
AEFMP
TECH
WSG
AENA(SPAIN)- ENNA (ARGELIA) PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
NAT-PT
BORDER
ROUTER test
IPv6/F
R
IPv4
AMHS
test
IPv6/FR
64kbps
BORDER LL
ROUTER
test
AMHS
operational
BORDER
ROUTER
operational
AMHS test
17/05/2010
Algeria Spain
Aena IP and AMHS Interoperability Trials
AEFMP
TECH
WSG
Low level protocols
AENA (SPAIN)- DSNA (FRANCE)- ONDA (MOROCCO)-ENNA (ALGERIA)- NAV (PORTUGAL)
MTA server
T CP
IPv4
IPv4/IPv6
TCP/IPv4
BORDER
ROUTER
1.The low level protocol used in the communications stack by the members of the AEFMP group will be TCP/IP.
2.
IPv4 protocol will be used by the application because it is the commercialized version by the COTs providers nevertheless
the international IP connectivity will be made using IPv6.
3.
ONDA and ENNA have formally requested to Eurocontrol a range of IPv6 address.
4.
ONDA has been assigned an operational IPv6 address and a Pre-operational IPv6 address (for tests).
5.
The connectivity solution will be partially supported by PENs, in long term for those countries where the PENs infrastructure
will be available. In short and in medium term bilateral agreements will be done to performing AMHS trials.
6.
Be aware about the amount of traffic exchanged and use this data for estimating the network resources required by the
AMHS.
17/05/2010
Aena IP and AMHS Interoperability Trials
AEFMP
TECH
WSG
AEFMP
TECH
WSG
AMHS Addressing
AENA (SPAIN)- DSNA (FRANCE)- ONDA (MOROCCO)-ENNA (ALGERIA)- NAV (PORTUGAL)
1.
Is recommended to adopt the CAAS addressing scheme by the AEFMP members.
2.
Is agreed to use the AMC facility in support of the AMHS implementation, according with the EANPG conclusion.
3.
Use the information of how to announce minor and mayor changes in the AMHS addressing scheme that is named “Outline
of proposed procedures for coordination between ICAO AMHS MD Register and AMC” included in the doc. “11WP27 Inter-regional co-ordination activities”.
State
Name
AMHS Address Specification
Nationality
Letters
Country
name
ADMD name PRMD name
Address
scheme
Organisation
name
(CAAS only *)
Algeria
DA
XX
ICAO
DA
CAAS
DAAA
Canary Islands (Spain)
GC
XX
ICAO
AENA
CAAS
France
LF
XX
ICAO
FRANCE
CAAS
Morocco
GM
XX
ICAO
GM
CAAS
see Table AENA
see Table
FRANCE
GMMM
Portugal (Madeira & Açores)
LP
XX
ICAO
CAAS
see Table
Spain
GE
XX
ICAO
AENA
CAAS
see Table AENA
LE
XX
ICAO
AENA
CAAS
see Table AENA
17/05/2010
Aena IP and AMHS Interoperability Trials
AMHS Routing
AEFMP
TECH
WSG
AENA (SPAIN)- DSNA (FRANCE)- ONDA (MOROCCO)-ENNA (ALGERIA) - NAV (PORTUGAL)
1.The short term proposal is to implement, as minimum, the current CIDIN routing/topology.
2.According with the current PENs implementation, a fully meshed topology will be possible in the Eur Region in
medium term. As consequence, the topology among some members of the AEFMP will be “theoretically” fully meshed,
in medium term.
3.In long term a different topology can be implemented among the AEFMP’s members. In order to choose the best
one, it is needed to be aware about the real exchanged traffic.
17/05/2010
Aena IP and AMHS Interoperability Trials
Tests
1.
AENA (SPAIN)- DSNA (FRANCE)- ONDA (MOROCCO)-ENNA (ALGERIA) - NAV (PORTUGAL)
A network infrastructure has to be agreed to perform the AMHS trials.
AEFMP
TECH
WSG
2.
It is strongly recommended to perform interoperability trials as are collected in the Eur AMHS Manual, appendix E
(bilateral and trilateral, if possible).
3.
Additionally some conformance test could be performed, the test cases could be expanded based on bilateral
agreements.
AMHS CONFIGURATION
TCP/IP AMHS Parameters
IP Address
Item
RECOMENDED VALUE
tbd
TCP-port
102
REFERENCE
Appendix C Configuration
Parameters
Appendix C Configuration
Parameters
X.400 and Upper Layer Parameters
Item
PSAP
RECOMENDED VALUE
MTA -Location Indicator of the MTA
location - specific number of the
MTA
ICAO- Location Indicator of the MTA
location - specific number of the
MTA
not used not
SSAP
not used not
Protocol type
X.400/1988
MTA Name
MTA Password
Connection

permanent

Dynamic
Maximum number of simultaneous P1 5
associations
5
Incoming
5
Outgoing
Monologue
Dialogue mode
Type of associations

8.2.3 Default values for international MTA passwords
Appendix F
3.2 Configuration Upper Layers
Appendix F
3.2 Configuration Upper Layers
Appendix F
3.2 Configuration Upper Layers
5.2 General requirements
5.2.5.
5.2 General requirements.
5.2.2.
Appendix B
J.1 Introduction
monologue

two-way-alternate
Minimum message size support
17/05/2010
REFERENCE
8.2.2 Default values for international MTA names
2Mbytes
Appendix F
F.2.4.3
Aena IP and AMHS Interoperability Trials
Thanks for your
attention
17/05/2010
Aena IP and AMHS Interoperability Trials