Download Securing IPv6 Backbones

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Wake-on-LAN wikipedia , lookup

Multiprotocol Label Switching wikipedia , lookup

Peering wikipedia , lookup

Cracking of wireless networks wikipedia , lookup

Net bias wikipedia , lookup

SIP extensions for the IP Multimedia Subsystem wikipedia , lookup

Net neutrality law wikipedia , lookup

Zero-configuration networking wikipedia , lookup

Deep packet inspection wikipedia , lookup

Juniper Networks wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Practical IPv6 Filtering
Ben Eater
[email protected]
Copyright © 2003 Juniper Networks, Inc.
www.juniper.net
1
IPv4/IPv6 Feature Parity
• Features and tools will lag
•Vendors need to figure out what will be useful before
committing engineering resources
•Not everything published in an RFC will get
implemented
•Early adopters like DREN are instrumental in guiding
this process
• Once basic IPv6 forwarding is implemented,
most other features can be easily added
• Filtering (and features that rely on it) presents
additional challenges
Copyright © 2003 Juniper Networks, Inc.
www.juniper.net
2
Filtering IPv6
• Filtering is required to implement many security
mechanisms
•Simple accept/discard actions
•Selecting traffic to monitor/log/count/mirror
•Rate limiting
•Policy route, QoS handling, others…
• Filtering IPv6 traffic presents some challenges.
Copyright © 2003 Juniper Networks, Inc.
www.juniper.net
3
Filtering IPv6 in Software
• Pros
•Very easy to do
• Cons
•Lack of predictable performance
•Impossible to use in high-bandwidth applications
•Lack of headroom can allow attacks to exhaust
limited CPU resources even in lower bandwidth
applications
Copyright © 2003 Juniper Networks, Inc.
www.juniper.net
4
Filtering IPv6 in Hardware
• Pros
•Predictable performance
•Performance under load (or during an attack)
• Cons
•Most (but not all) existing equipment will need totally
new hardware to support IPv6
•State of the art in hardware-based filtering evolved
with IPv4 in mind.
Copyright © 2003 Juniper Networks, Inc.
www.juniper.net
5
IPv4 Filtering Assumptions
• To filter on any field in the L3/L4 header:
•Look at a fixed offset into the packet
•Match based on the bits you find at that offset
• This model breaks in the presence of IP options
• Most (all?) network operators drop all IP-option
packets anyway
Copyright © 2003 Juniper Networks, Inc.
www.juniper.net
6
IPv6 Filtering
• IPv6 uses extension headers
• An arbitrary number of extension headers can
be chained together
• Header fields are no longer always in the same
place
• Hardware filtering technology designed for IPv4
can’t cope
Copyright © 2003 Juniper Networks, Inc.
www.juniper.net
7
So what can current HW do?
• The IP header is always in the same place
•Source address
•Destination address
•Class of service
•Flow label
•Packet length
•Next header
Copyright © 2003 Juniper Networks, Inc.
www.juniper.net
8
So what can current HW do?
• If there are no other extension headers
•TCP, UDP, ICMP, ESP, AH, etc. header will be next
•These headers are now in a predictable location
• If there are other extension headers
•There is no way to find the TCP, UDP, or ICMP header.
•What do we do?
– Permit the packet
– Drop the packet
Copyright © 2003 Juniper Networks, Inc.
www.juniper.net
9
Extension Headers
• Hop-by-Hop Options Header
•Used for router alert.
•Specified as an IP option in IPv4
•Not widely used in IPv4
• Routing Header
•Used for source routing
•Not widely used in IPv4
Copyright © 2003 Juniper Networks, Inc.
www.juniper.net
10
Extension Headers
• Fragment Header
•IPv6 fragmentation is only done by the sending node
•Sender really should use PMTU discovery
•Effective PMTU discovery obviates fragmentation
• Destination Options Header
•Only defined option is padding the packet to a 64-bit
boundary
Copyright © 2003 Juniper Networks, Inc.
www.juniper.net
11
Drop packets with Extension Headers?
• IPv4 IP-Options packets
•Require extra processing by routers
•Can’t be filtered in hardware
•None of the defined options are widely used
•Most network operators simply drop them
• IPv6 Extension headers
•Doomed to a similar fate?
Copyright © 2003 Juniper Networks, Inc.
www.juniper.net
12
Practical filtering of IPv6
• Near Term
•Network operators will drop all packets with extension
headers
•Normal filtering is possible
• Longer Term
•A “killer app” would be required to rejuvenate interest
in using extension headers
•Barring this, I don’t see how extensive effort would be
expended to support extension headers
Copyright © 2003 Juniper Networks, Inc.
www.juniper.net
13
Thank you!
[email protected]
Copyright © 2003 Juniper Networks, Inc.
www.juniper.net
14