Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
VERMONT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LEADERS Vermont Health Information Technology Plan (VHITP) Educational Presentation Personal Health Records (PHR) Overview / Strategies VITL Board Meeting May 23, 2007 1 Agenda • Personal Health Records – – – – What are they? Why are we talking about them now? What are the types of PHRs? How do they affect patients? Practitioners? VITL? • Implementation Strategy – PHRs in the context of thinking about HIEN strategy – Implementation strategy in the VHITP – A three-step process 2 Personal Health Record (PHR) • The idea behind the personal health record (PHR) is that the more consumers know about their health, the more control they will take over it and the healthier they will be. • PHRs also encourage consumers to collect and share more health-related information with each of their providers. • For this reason, healthcare providers, employers, insurers, vendors, and the federal government are all interested in promoting PHRs. • Consumers will hear much more about the personal record in the months and years ahead. Courtesy: AHIMA Personal Health Record Practice Council. "Helping Consumers Select PHRs: Questions and Considerations for Navigating an Emerging Market." Journal of AHIMA 77, no.10 (November-December 2006): 50-56. 3 What is a PHR? • No standard definition • AHIMA proposed a PHR definition in 2005: – “The personal health record (PHR) is an electronic, universally available, lifelong resource of health information needed by individuals to make health decisions. Individuals own and manage the information in the PHR, which comes from healthcare providers and the individual. The PHR is maintained in a secure and private environment, with the individual determining rights of access. The PHR is separate from and does not replace the legal record of any provider.” 4 Types of PHRs • • • • Paper PC Internet Hybrid • • • • • • • Employer Insurer Provider Public Health Government Independent for-profit Independent non-profit 5 Questions • Content – Demographics, insurance, advance directives, donor, medications, allergies, problem lists, events, hereditary, immunizations, etc. • Interoperability – Connected? Standalone? • Ownership – Privacy policies? • Access – Privacy and Security? • Portability – Usability? • Cost – Business model? 6 HIENs and PHRs • • • • • • Operator Education Policy Oversight or Rating Convener Data Exchange 7 High-level Strategy When opportunities arise, how do we evaluate their priority for us? How do we develop strategy? 8 Step 1: Evaluating Themes Disease Mgmt Personal Health Records Electronic Health Records Sustainability Broad Use Consistent with VHITP Objectives and Principles Quality Improvement Efficiency Public Image 9 Step 2: Utilize VITL Infrastructure Disease Mgmt Personal Health Records Electronic Health Records CDR EMPI Security Normalization Auditing Interfacing 10 Architecture Web-based Patient Portal Topical Registry or Application Data Mgmt System Message Hub Internet Web-based Provider Portal Central Infrastructure Originating System View Integration Engine Message Hub Interface Engine EMR/ PMS HL7 Internet Support for HL7, X12, NCPDP Formats Central Services HL7 Data Locator Service Web Services Terminology Service LDAP Security Service HL7 Doc Locator Service HL7 or SQL Data Service Terminology DB Rights Registry Doc Shared and/ Registry/ EMR or or Repository Warehouse Rx HL7 Patient Locator Service Medicaid Lab SQL Note: Presence of centralized or distributed data will vary based on project/subject matter and not participant. Payer MPI Clinical Data Repository 11 Step 3: Implementation Strategy • Environment Analysis (is the service being met already? Are organizations prepared to offer the service?) • Strategic Development • Priorities • Future business • Revenue/Expenses Analysis (ROI) • Feasibility • End user feedback 12 Potential Strategy • Project Review Committee • Use the three stage process – Identify priority areas – Select strategic pilots that best exercise the architecture (both technical and non-technical) – Over time we can adjust focus 13