Download ONTARGET Risk factors and outcomes associated with nonadherence

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Transtheoretical model wikipedia , lookup

Fetal origins hypothesis wikipedia , lookup

Epidemiology of metabolic syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Adherence (medicine) wikipedia , lookup

Management of multiple sclerosis wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
ONTARGET
Risk factors and outcomes associated with nonadherence
Background
•
•
•
•
ONTARGET compared the efficacy of the ARB telmisartan, the ACE
inhibitor ramipril, and combination therapy with both agents for reducing
cardiovascular risk in 25,620 patients with CHD or diabetes plus 2 additional
risk factors for vascular events
In the main study analysis, telmisartan was noninferior to ramipril for the
primary composite endpoint of CV death, MI, stroke, or HF hospitalization
and for the secondary endpoint of CV death, MI, or stroke
Throughout ONTARGET, there was a continuous increase in the proportion
of patients who permanently discontinued treatment. After 72 months of
follow-up, 4629 patients (18.6%) had discontinued treatment
The objective of the current analysis was to identify patient characteristics
associated with nonadherence and to assess the effect of nonadherence on
outcomes and the effect of CV outcomes on adherence
ONTARGET
Risk factors and outcomes associated with nonadherence
Risk of Discontinuation of Medication is Increased After a Nonfatal Primary Event
ONTARGET
Risk factors and outcomes associated with nonadherence
Key Findings
• Increasing age, female sex, black race, physical inactivity, smoking
status, diabetes, and depression were significantly associated with
nonadherence
• The strongest factor associated with premature permanent drug
cessation was the occurrence of a nonfatal event during trial follow-up
• Compared with patients who remained on treatment, patients who
stopped were
– 29% more likely to reach the primary endpoint of CV death, MI, stroke, and
HF hospitalization
– 38% more likely to reach the secondary endpoint of CV death, MI, or stroke
ONTARGET
Risk factors and outcomes associated with nonadherence
Conclusions
•
•
ONTARGET revealed a deleterious “nonadherence-event” cycle, in which
stopping study medications increased CV events, leading to increased
morbidity, less trust in therapy, and further nonadherence*
Interventions that promote treatment adherence are needed for patients at
high risk of nonadherence and for all patients immediately after a CV event
Caveats
•
•
The strongest predictors of premature cessation were the occurrences of
clinical events during the trial. Patients who experience events are at a
heightened risk of recurrent event and, therefore, it is unclear that treatment
cessation led to recurrent events or was just associated with sicker patients.
Additional analyses showing consistency in patients with no preceding
hospitalization or CV event as well as a description of reasons for treatment
cessation would strengthen the overall findings.
*Patients in a trial may stop therapy prematurely for many reasons, including related adverse events or acute illness
where treatment cessation may be medically indicated. Thus while drug discontinuation may be followed shortly by
a clinical event, suggesting a temporal association, establishing a true causal relationship may be difficult.