Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
High Quality Renal Transplantation: Efficiency Counts David R. Holt, M.D., F.A.C.S. Susan Hou, M.D. David Hatch, M.D. Claudia Peano, M.D. Dadi Ding, R.N. Billie Kostro, R.N. Mary Kay Larson, R.N. Anita Pakrasi, R.N. Laura Michalski, Pharm. D. Opportunity Statement Although the renal transplant program enjoyed good results with regard to rejection and survival rates, it was felt the quality of the program could be maintained while shortening the initial hospital stay and decreasing costs. Goal: To establish a protocol for postoperative care and immunosuppression which would decrease the initial length of stay and costs for transplantation Most Likely Causes Previous protocol for induction immunosuppression required hospitalization for infusion Special laboratory tests were necessary for monitoring induction immunosuppression adding costs Initial kidney function monitoring and patient follow up were performed on an inpatient basis Implementation New induction immunosuppression protocol was devised making use of alternative immunosuppressive medications Postoperative protocol modified to make more use of homecare nursing – – Clinical follow up of patient Laboratory blood draws Results-Length of Stay Average Length of Stay for DRG 302: Kidney Transplant Pre_Implementation Implementation 15 Length of Stay Mean = 10.6 days 10 Mean = 6.2 days 5 0 r2 r3 r4 r1 r2 r3 r4 r1 r2 r3 r4 r1 tr 1 t t t t t t t t t t t t Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 0000 00 00 01 0101 0102020202 03CY CY CY CY CY CY CY CY CY CY CY CY CY Quarter Results-Cost Average Quarterly Direct Cost for DRG 302: Kidney Transplant Pre_Implementation Implementation 55,000 Average Direct Cost 50,000 Mean = $42,776 45,000 40,000 Mean = $35,236 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 Quarter Results-Acute Rejection Rate Rejection rate within 1 year of transplant – 7.9% All patients successfully treated and have functioning graft Results-1 Year Survival Survival Rate 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Graft Patient Conclusions and Next Steps By revising the renal transplant induction immunosuppression protocol and making better use of homecare nursing we have reduced both length of stay and costs for renal transplantation while maintaining excellent patient outcomes.