Download Functional dyspepsia - Selam Higher Clinic

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Functional dyspepsia
Ermias D. (MD)
Diagnosis
• Functional, idiopathic, non ulcer
• Rome III criteria
– Bothersome post prandial fullness
– Early satiety
– Epigastric pain
– Epigastric burn
– No evidence of structural diseases
• Three – six months duration
subcategorize nonulcer dyspepsia
• Reflux-like dyspepsia - heartburn, regurgitation, or both, with
dyspeptic symptoms and no endoscopic evidence of
esophagitis.
• ulcer-like dyspepsia - Epigastric pain.
• Dysmotility-like dyspepsia - nausea, vomiting, early satiety,
and abdominal bloating or distention.
• Non specific dyspepsia
• The usefulness of this subclassification under question,
because of marked overlap among the subtypes.
• Also, provides little information about the underlying
pathophysiologic abnormality, such as gastroduodenal ulcer
or gastroparesis.
pathophysiology
• Gastric motor fn
–
–
–
–
–
Gastroparesis
Antral hypomotility
Low fasting gastric volume
Faster gastric emptying (10%)
Lower gastric compliance, early satiety, wt loss
• Tx – sumatryptan – fundal relaxation
• Visceral sensitivity – lower pain threshold
• H. Pylori infection - ??
• Psychosocial factors – multiple somatic complaints
Diagnosis
• Characteristic history
• Dx by exclusion
treatment
•
•
•
•
•
•
Controversial and disappointing
Aim – help pt to accept, and cope with sx
Patient counseling
Mx of psychosocial factors
Dietary advice
Discontinue contributory medications
Drug treatment
• Summaries of treatment trials
– Prokinetic agents > placebo (RRR 50%)
– H2 antagonists > placebo (RRR 30%)
– PPI and bismuth salts > placebo
– No benefit from antacids or sucralfate
• Limitation of trials: short duration,
heterogeneous syndrome, inclusion of
ass. disorders
60%
PPI
60%
49%
50%
40%
30%
Meta analysis
of six randomized trials
20%
10%
0%
good out come
Good out come
with PPI than placebo
PPI and H2RB comparable
40
3
8
%
36
%
sx relief
28
%
35
30
25
20
1262 patients,
randomized,
omeperazole vs placebo
for
four wks
More benefit in
omeperazole group
15
Greatest
benefit among ulcer like,
reflux like
than dysmotility like sx
10
5
0
20 mg
10 mg
omeperazole
placebo
H2 receptor antagonist
• Low methodological quality studies
– H2RB likely to improve symptoms
• Better quality studies
– Reduced efficacy of H2RB
• Studies differ in agent used, dose,
inclusion criteria, length of follow up and
outcome
Prokinetic agents
• Rationale - abnormal gastric emptying
• Cisapride, domperidone – showed benefit
over placebo
• Availability
• Metoclopramide – side effects with long
term use
• Tegaserod (5HT4 receptor agonist),
itopride (D2 antagonist) – on trial
antidepressants
• TCA (amitriptyline)
• Uncertain benefit
• Improve associated conditions
– Insomnia
– fibromyalgia
H. pylori
• Controversial pathogenetic roll
• Mixed results after eradication therapy
• Only small proportion of patients respond
after eradication therapy
• Long term benefit (AGA, ACG)
• Psychotherapy
• Visceral analgesia
– Serotonin receptor antagonist
– Somatostatin analogue - octreotide
• Alternative medicine
– Herbal and natural products (peppermint, caraway)
– acupuncture
Related documents