Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
1-1 Public and Private Families: An Introduction Dr. Andrew J. Cherlin, author 3rd Edition McGraw-Hill McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-2 Chapter One Public and Private Families McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-3 How Do We Feel About the American Family? Attempts at same sex marriage brought up questions Widespread disapproval of homosexual relationships 64% said it was wrong or always wrong Why do we care about the definition of “family” when Cohabitation is common Births outside marriage are common McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-4 Are We Ambivalent? On one hand, marriage-centered family life remains the preference On the other, there is much more toleration for family life without the boundaries of marriage and the idea to never marry is acceptable McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-5 Characteristics of Today’s Singles Postpone marriage for career or education Women in the labor market Greater acceptance of premarital sex Decline in young men’s earning power Able to avoid unwanted pregnancy Willingness to cohabitate McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-6 The Young Middle Class Working toward self-fulfillment Staying in school for higher degrees Developing careers Cohabiting Having children without marrying Many ambivalent about marriage McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-7 Poor or Near Poor Not immune to cultural trends Economics plays a greater role Job prospects for men without college degrees has greatly declined Income has declined in terms of cost of living Gap between rich and poor is widening McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-8 McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-9 Definition of Family Social Conservative definition - only one family is “correct” Two parent Breadwinner-Homemaker family Economic definition - specific rules about who qualifies to be a family member Only those that “qualify” are eligible for benefits McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-10 Cultural Definition of Family Cultural definition - varies from culture to culture Western nations practice monogamy one husband and one wife Many African, Arabic and Asian nations practice polygamy - more than one spouse at a time McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-11 What is a Family? How well are families taking care of children, the frail elderly and the ill? How well are families providing emotional satisfaction people value ? Intimacy Love Personal fulfillment McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-12 The Public Family: Cost and Benefits Externalities = costs or benefits that accrue to others when an individual or business produces something Negative = costs imposed when an individual or business produces something of value to itself Positive = benefits received by others when an individual or business produces something that is not fully compensated for to that business or individual McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-13 The Public Family: Cost and Benefits Families “produce” children Families care for young, poor, and elderly By performing these tasks they are saving the public funds it would cost to do so McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-14 Public Goods Things that might be enjoyed by people who did not pay for or produce themselves Children might be considered a public good A look at Social Security as an example McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-15 The Free-Rider Problem Tendency for people to obtain public good by letting others produce the good and they enjoy them. McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-16 The Public Family Definition = one adult, or two adults who are related by marriage, partnership, or shared parenthood, who is/are taking care of dependents, and the dependents themselves The presence of dependents is the key to this definition McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-17 The Private Family Provides intimacy, emotional support and love Relationship by blood = sharing of common ancestor, including both horizontal and vertical kinship ties McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-18 The Private Family Definition = Two or more individuals who maintain an intimate relationship that they expect will last, and who live in the same household and pool their income and household labor The intimacy, whether it be parent-child attachment, sexual among the partners, or sharing of inner selves is the crux of this family McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-19 Kinship Ties From the Private Family Created = have been constructed Assigned = have been acquired McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-20 Two Views, Same Family McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-21 Sociological Perspective on the Family Looks at the family as a single unit and a social institution Comes with a set of roles and rules that define its importance to society Sociologists view the social world of the family by looking at important external forces Sociologists are uncertain of the current and future role of the family in American society McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-22 Contrasting Views of the Family Optimistic (political liberal view) Family is changing, but it has always been changing Changes in women’s lives in work and family roles has given them broader opportunities Americans value increased independence McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-23 Contrasting Views of the Family Pessimistic (political conservative view) Marriage has weakened as an institution With fewer children and more women working Dire warnings of families failing health, but not fatally wounded McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-24 Steering a Middle Course Changes in families have benefits and costs Great changes have occurred since mid-1900s self-fulfillment is highly valued more women working outside the home increase in divorce rate increase in single parent rate a “thinner” culture in the home fewer joint familial activities McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-25 Diversity American families are becoming more diverse Two parent and single parent families Many immigrant families from Latin America and Asia Bring their own cultural traditions Married women more likely to work McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-26 How Sociologists Look at the Diversity of Families Objectively collect and analyze scientific data by using: The scientific method and forming a hypothesis Random samples/selection Survey method Observational study McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-27 The National Survey McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-28 Five Views of the Family Functionalist Perspective Conflict Perspective Exchange Perspective Symbolic Interaction Perspective Feminist Perspective McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-29 Functionalist Perspective Focuses on stability and cooperation Each partner performed certain functions Husband worked outside the home Wife did housework and childcare Breadwinner-Homemaker Model McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-30 Conflict Perspective Conflict Theory Focuses on inequality, power, and social change Male dominance = physical force and control of economic resources Men cannot be as dominant in societies where women produce valuable goods and the state regulates physical force McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-31 Exchange Perspective Exchange theory Women choose to exchange performance of household and childcare services in return for benefit of men’s income Men choose to perform outside labor in exchange for household and childcare services performed by women McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-32 Exchange Perspective When men are sole earners, they are in a “bargaining position” When women earn money, they are less dependent on men economically McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-33 Symbolic Interaction Perspective Symbolic Interaction Theory We interpret symbols of how people act Shared understandings of how people should act creates the basis of social roles that people play Spouse, parent, breadwinner, homemaker, child, etc. Valuable in these times of more stepfamilies, dual career marriages, and single parent families McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-34 Feminist Perspective Feminist Theory Gender defines social roles and cultural characteristics These roles have no biological reason behind them, but are culturally dictated, therefore are socially constructed These roles appear to be constructed to give men power McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1-35 Perspectives From Evolutionary Psychology Evolutionary Psychology Women reproduced and tried to find men who provided protection and support Men maximized their reproductive potential by impregnating many women and controlling sexual access to women McGraw-Hill © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved