Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Armstrong’s Story By Loretta Lee February 2008 It’s population… 600 550 524 500 502 484 491 450 400 350 300 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 Students 2007-2008 Demographics 100 89.9 90 87.7 84.3 83.1 80 70 60 % 50 40 30 20 10 0 0.8 1.6 0.8 0.6 Am. Indian 3.8 3.6 3.9 3.3 Asian 2004-2005 2.1 2.6 6.1 5 Black 2005-2006 3.4 4.6 6 6.9 Hispanic 2006-2007 White 2007-2008 Special Programs 50 40 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 30 % 18 19 20 13 15 15 14 13 13 10 0 0 0 0 1.7 1.2 0 ELL/LEP Spec. Ed. F/R Lunch Gifted Acquiring literacy is an empowering process, enabling millions to enjoy access to knowledge and information which broadens horizons, increases opportunities and creates alternatives for building a better life. Kofi Annan-Secretary-General of the United Nations "Matthew Effect"—the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Sebastian Wren, Ph.D. In 1983, Walberg and Tsai first coined the term the "Matthew Effect" to describe the fact that, without intervention, some students rapidly develop and build upon strong literacy foundations, and other students languish behind their more fortunate peers. Research indicates that past the 4th grade, literacy intervention and remediation programs are only successful with about 13% of struggling readers. Early intervention is much more effective than later intervention or remediation. With effective early intervention, research has shown that virtually every child can learn to read. Early, diagnostic assessment is the key to defeating the Matthew Effect. To be effective, that assessment must be used to inform instruction, and instruction must be individually catered to the learning needs of each individual child. Kindergarteners Meeting or Exceeding DRA Level 4 by End of School Year 100 88.5 90 80 70 60 % 80.6 58.5 50 40 30 20 10 0 2004-2005 2005-2006 Kindergarteners 2006-2007 Kindergarten Reading Data 2004-2005 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2005-2006 2006-2007 53 32.6 24.9 33.1 32.8 53.7 52.7 33 24 14.8 5.4 8 15 15 8.1 Text Reading Average Fluent Writing Dictation Letter Identification Text Reading Average=DRA level Fluent Writing=5 minutes Dictation=37 sounds Letter Identification=54 (26 lower case, 26 uppercase, typeset a and g) Concepts About Print=15 Concepts About Print 1st Graders Meeting or Exceeding DRA Level 18 by End of School Year % 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 93.9 87.3 74.6 2004-2005 2005-2006 1st Graders 2006-2007 1st Grade Reading Data 2004-2005 2005-2006 70 64.9 60 46.8 50 51.9 40 30 20 2006-2007 34.5 26.4 21.1 36.4 35.2 24 10 0 Text Reading Average Text Reading Average=DRA level Fluent Writing=10 minutes Dictation=37 sounds Fluent Writing Dictation 2nd Graders Meeting or Exceeding DRA Level 28 or QRI Level 2 by End of Year 100 90 80 70 60 % 50 40 30 20 10 0 89.5 70.1 Winter Score 2004-2005 67.1 Winter Score 2005-2006 2nd Graders 2006-2007 Mean Vs. Median The mean is the arithmetic average of a group of scores. The mean is sensitive to extreme scores when population samples are small. The median is the middle score in a list of scores; it is the point at which half the scores are above and half the scores are below. Current reports emphasize them equally. Medians are less sensitive to extreme scores and are probably a better indicator generally of where the middle of the class is achieving, especially for smaller sample sizes. Means are the arithmetic average and are often used with larger sample sizes. -NWEA 2nd Grade MAP Reading Scores 195 191 190 185 185 RIT 180 Scores 174 175 170 165 2007-2008 Fall Median Winter Median Spring Median 3rd Grade MAP Reading Scores 205 200 185 198 197 195 194 195 RIT 190 Scores 201 200 188 186 186 2005-2006 2006-2007 180 175 Fall Median Winter Median 2007-2008 Spring Median MAP Reading Strands Grade 3 Spring Medians 205 203 200 195 RIT Scores 199 198 195 194 198 199 199 201 201 200 200 199 198 198 198 196 195 190 185 180 175 Word Recognition & Vocabulary Comprehension: Interpretive 2005 2007 Comprehension: Informational not Interpretive Comprehension: Narrative 2006 Evaluative Comprehension 2007 2008 Literature Third Grade Meeting Reading Target Growth 100 90 80 70 60 % 50 40 30 20 10 0 66.1 54.7 54.4 2005 2006 Fall to Spring 2007 51.6 2008 2.5 Fall 2006 33.3 36.4 28.8 40.9 24.2 34.8 38.2 35.3 26.5 31.6 22.8 100 90 80 70 60 % 50 40 30 20 10 0 43 MAP Reading Test Performance Grade 3 1.5 Spring 2007 Fall 2007 Spring 2008 95% Above At Grade Level Below MCA Reading Test Performance Grade 3 100 90 80 70 60 % 50 40 30 20 10 42 38 36 7 13 Exceeds Meets Partially Meets Does Not Meet 41 8 0 2006 2007 15 MCA Reading Strands Grade 3 100 90 80 70 % Correct 79.5 67.6 75.1 66.9 74.3 70.8 77.6 74.5 70.8 77.2 70.6 62.5 66 57.1 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Vocabulary Comprehension Literature Fiction 2006 Non-Fiction 2007 Multiple Choice Constructed Response 4th Grade MAP Reading Scores 215 210 210 205 205 RIT 200 Scores 207 205 205 203 200 199 198 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 195 190 185 Fall Median Winter Median Spring Median MAP Reading Strands Grade 4 Spring Medians 215 211 210 205 RIT Scores 208 203 207 203 209 208 206 203 209 207207 207 208 207 205 202 201 200 195 190 185 Word Recognition & Vocabulary 2007 Comprehension: Informational not Interpretive Comprehension: Interpretive 2005 Comprehension: Narrative 2006 Evaluative Comprehension 2007 2008 Literature Fourth Grade Meeting Reading Target Growth 100 90 80 70 60 % 50 40 30 20 10 0 65.466.7 2005 68.5 62.7 2006 Fall to Spring 55.456.6 2007 Spring to Spring 59 58.3 2008 Fall 2006 Spring 2007 3.3 26.2 29.5 41 40.6 39.1 20.3 36.2 6.9 27.6 29.3 38.9 20.4 9.3 100 90 80 70 60 % 50 40 30 20 10 0 31.5 MAP Reading Test Performance Grade 4 Fall 2007 Spring 2008 95% Above At Grade Level Below MCA Reading Test Performance Grade 4 100 90 80 70 60 49 % 50 40 30 20 10 Exceeds Meets Partially Meets Does Not Meet 34 33 26 13 20 20 4 0 2006 2007 MCA Reading Strands Grade 4 100 90 80 70 60 % 50 Correct 40 30 20 10 0 77.7 62.3 Vocabulary 74.9 67 Comprehension 75.3 68.9 74.2 67.9 Literature Fiction 2006 2007 77.5 65.8 Non-Fiction 78 67 Multiple Choice 67.5 58.7 Constructed Response 5th Grade MAP Reading Scores 214 215 210 205 208 210 204 213 210 209 206 205 2006-2007 2007-2008 RIT 200 Scores 195 190 185 2005-2006 Fall Median Winter Median Spring Median MAP Reading Strands Grade 5 Spring Medians 220 215 215 210 RIT Scores 213 210 216 212 217 217 216 214 212 212 209 216 212 213 212 212 210 205 200 195 190 Word Recognition & Vocabulary 2007 Comprehension: Informational not Interpretive Comprehension: Interpretive 2005 Comprehension: Narrative 2006 Evaluative Comprehension 2007 2008 Literature Fifth Grade Meeting Reading Target Growth 100 90 80 70 60 % 50 40 30 20 10 0 67.1 54.754.3 2005 52.8 50 2006 Fall to Spring 49.3 2007 Spring to Spring 67.2 57.1 2008 Fall 2006 Spring 2007 Fall 2007 36.1 21.3 34.4 43.8 8.2 18.8 1.6 2.6 24.7 35.9 36.4 36.4 33.3 34.7 1.3 100 90 80 70 60 % 50 40 30 20 10 0 30.7 MAP Reading Test Performance Grade 5 Spring 2008 95% Above At Grade Level Below MCA Reading Test Performance Grade 5 100 90 80 70 60 49 % 50 40 30 24 Exceeds Meets Partially Meets Does Not Meet 42 29 22 20 10 20 9 4 0 2006 2007 MCA Reading Strands Grade 5 100 90 80 70 60 % 50 Correct 40 30 20 10 0 72.6 73.8 76.5 68.6 65.3 74.1 67.2 70.7 72.8 73.6 68.6 68.8 61.9 33.9 Vocabulary Comprehension Literature Fiction 2006 2007 Non-Fiction Multiple Choice Constructed Response 6th Grade MAP Reading Scores 225 215 220 219 220 217 214 214 211 RIT 210 Scores 217 213 213 205 200 195 2005-2006 Fall Median 2006-2007 Winter Median 2007-2008 Spring Median MAP Reading Strands Grade 6 Spring Medians 225 221 220 218 216 219 216 218 217 216 217 216 220 219219 218 214 215 RIT Scores 221 221 220 210 205 200 Word Recognition & Vocabulary Comprehension: Interpretive Comprehension: Narrative Evaluative Comprehension 195 2007 Comprehension: Informational not Interpretive 2005 2006 2007 2008 Literature Sixth Grade Meeting Reading Target Growth 100 90 80 70 60 % 50 40 30 20 10 0 61.3 54.5 2005 55.6 60 2006 Fall to Spring 71.6 65.7 2007 Spring to Spring 69.2 65.3 2008 Fall 2007 18.1 2.4 22.2 25.9 37.3 Spring 2007 1.2 2.7 24 24 33.8 Fall 2006 95% Above At Grade Level Below 42.2 49.3 44.6 16.2 5.4 100 90 80 70 60 % 50 40 30 20 10 0 50.6 MAP Reading Test Performance Grade 6 Spring 2008 MCA Reading Test Performance Grade 6 100 90 80 70 60 % 50 40 30 Exceeds Meets Partially Meets Does Not Meet 43 33 30 31 23 20 10 25 12 4 0 2006 2007 MCA Reading Strands Grade 6 100 90 80 70 60 % 50 Correct 40 30 20 10 0 79 67.7 70.6 64.9 63.1 65.9 69.4 67 73.9 67.4 64.9 71.4 47.8 45.7 Vocabulary Comprehension Literature Fiction 2006 2007 Non-Fiction Multiple Choice Constructed Response The ability to recall basic math facts fluently is necessary for students to attain higher-order math skills. “Cognitive psychologists have discovered that humans have fixed limits on the attention and memory that can be used to solve problems. One way around these limits is to have certain components of a task become so routine and over-learned that they become automatic.” (Whitehurst, 2003) . The implication for mathematics is that some of the subprocesses, particularly basic facts, need to be developed to the point that they are done automatically. Studies have found that lack of math fact retrieval can impede participation in math class discussions, successful mathematics 2nd Grade MAP Math Scores 195 189 190 184 185 RIT 180 Scores 175 175 170 165 2007-2008 Fall Winter Spring rd 3 Grade MAP Math Scores 210 205 203 202 203 200 RIT 195 Scores 190 198 196 194 188 189 189 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 185 180 Fall Winter Spring 208 195 190 2007 Strand Categories and Medians Number Sense & Computation Functions & Algebra Statistics & Probability Geometry & Measurement Math Reasoning was embedded within the other strands in 2007 ur em en t ea s M lS at ia Sp St at is ti c s an d Pr o en se /G eo m ba bi et ry lit y ns Pa tt er ns /F un ct io ns /A lg eb ra ra tio Co m pu ta ti o n/ Op e um be N M at h Re as o ni ng rS en se 185 2005 2007 2006 2008 205 204 201 205 208 210 205 203 202 201 201 204 203 201 202 198 201 199 199 200 201 205 201 RIT Scores 205 210 199 210 215 211 MAP Math Strands Grade 3 Spring Medians Third Grade Meeting Math Target Growth 100 90 80 70 60 % 50 40 30 20 10 0 81.8 71.9 62.3 2005 2006 Fall to Spring 2007 68.8 2008 Fall 2006 15.2 31.8 43.9 53 95% Above At Grade Level Below 2.9 11.8 16.7 27.9 39.4 39.7 29.4 27.6 1.3 100 90 80 70 60 % 50 40 30 20 10 0 59.2 MAP Math Test Performance Grade 3 Spring 2007 Fall 2007 Spring 2008 MCA Math Test Performance Grade 3 100 90 80 70 60 45 % 50 40 30 20 10 Exceeds Meets Partially Meets Does Not Meet 53 19 29 26 20 6 2 0 2006 2007 MCA Math Strands Grade 3 100 90 80 70 60 % 50 Correct 40 30 20 10 0 78 79 72 70 61 61 73 65 63 70 61 61 52 Number Sense Patterns, Functions and Algebra Data, Statistics and probability Spatial Sense, Geometry and Measurement 2006 2007 Mathematical Reasoning 46 Multiple Choice Constructed Response 4th Grade MAP Math Scores 220 216 215 210 RIT 205 Scores 210 208 212 210 206 206 202 201 200 195 190 2005-2006 Fall 2006-2007 Winter Spring 2007-2008 MAP Math Strands Grade 4 Spring Medians 205 200 Math Reasoning was embedded within the other strands in 2007 Sp ur em en t at ia lS M en se /G eo m Pr o an d ti c s at is ea s et ry lit y ba bi br a St 2007 Strand Categories and Medians Number Sense & Computation Functions & Algebra Statistics & Probability Geometry & Measurement Pa tt er ns /F un ct io ns /A lg e ns ra tio Co m pu ta ti o n/ Op e um be N M at h Re as o ni ng rS en se 195 2005 2007 2006 2008 216 214 215 212 216 214 212 210 214 216 215 214 214 214 206 213 206 RIT 210 Scores 211 213 214 211 214 213 215 214 220 218 222 225 Fourth Grade Meeting Math Target Growth 100 90 80 70 60 % 50 40 30 20 10 0 72.2 64.1 2005 75.371.6 2006 Fall to Spring 63.8 58.5 2007 Spring to Spring 52.5 46.7 2008 Fall 2006 6.6 1.6 Fall 2007 27.9 24.6 41 40.6 39.1 Spring 2007 18.8 21.7 3.3 30 32.1 32.1 30.4 5.4 100 90 80 70 60 % 50 40 30 20 10 0 45 MAP Math Test Performance Grade 4 Spring 2008 95% Above At Grade Level Below MCA Math Test Performance Grade 4 100 90 80 70 60 57 % 50 40 30 20 10 Exceeds Meets Partially Meets Does Not Meet 39 26 25 17 23 11 1 0 2006 2007 MCA Math Strands Grade 4 100 90 80 70 60 % 50 Correct 40 30 20 10 0 82 74 80 69 63 67 72 72 71 62 63 59 47 Number Sense Patterns, Functions and Algebra Data, Statistics and probability Spatial Sense, Geometry and Measurement 2006 2007 Mathematical Reasoning Multiple Choice 51 Constructed Response 5th Grade MAP Math Scores 230 220 RIT 215 Scores 225 224 225 223 220 218 217 214 212 211 210 205 200 2005-2006 Fall 2006-2007 Winter Spring 2007-2008 MAP Math Strands Grade 5 Spring Medians 215 210 Math Reasoning was embedded within the other strands in 2007 ur em en t ea s M Sp at ia l Se an d Pr o ns e/ G eo m ba bi et ry lit y br a lg e St at is ti cs 2007 Strand Categories and Medians Number Sense & Computation Functions & Algebra Statistics & Probability Geometry & Measurement Pa tt er ns /F un ct io ns /A ra ti on s pu ta ti on /O pe r um be N Co m M at h R ea so ni ng Se ns e 205 2005 2007 2006 2008 221 224 221 221 224 221 225 225 227 224 223 223 225 220 223 224 221 221 220 223 224 223 221 RIT Scores 220 225 223 224 230 229 235 Fifth Grade Meeting Math Target Growth 100 90 80 70 60 % 50 40 30 20 10 0 52.3 46.9 2005 66.7 58.8 2006 Fall to Spring 69.7 57.7 2007 Spring to Spring 58.9 54.8 2008 MAP Math Test Performance Grade 5 Fall 2006 Fall 2007 25.8 29 11.3 25 33.9 35.9 31.2 Spring 2007 7.8 15.6 7.8 10.7 28 1.3 40 30 20 10 0 40.3 % 50 36.4 60 100 90 80 70 60 Spring 2008 95% Above At Grade Level Below MCA Math Test Performance Grade 5 100 90 80 70 60 % 50 40 30 41 26 Exceeds Meets Partially Meets Does Not Meet 37 24 20 10 23 25 15 9 0 2006 2007 MCA Math Strands Grade 5 100 90 80 70 60 % 50 Correct 40 30 20 10 0 76 70 63 76 69 64 69 58 62 75 70 66 56 48 47 33 Number Sense Patterns, Data, Spatial Sense, Mathematical Functions and Statistics and Geometry and Reasoning Algebra probability Measurement 2006 2007 Multiple Choice Constructed Response Gridded Response 6th Grade MAP Math Scores 235 230 225 227 230 229 223 222 RIT 220 Scores 230 224 222 219 215 210 205 2005-2006 Fall 2006-2007 Winter Spring 2007-2008 219 220 215 210 2007 Strand Categories and Medians Number Sense & Computation Functions & Algebra Statistics & Probability Geometry & Measurement Math Reasoning was embedded within the other strands in 2007 ur em en t ea s M at ia l Sp St at is ti cs an d Pr o Se ns e/ G eo m ba bi et ry lit y br a lg e Pa tt er ns /F un ct io ns /A ra ti on s pu ta ti on /O pe r um be N Co m M at h R ea so ni ng Se ns e 205 2005 2007 2006 2008 226 227 224 227 226 227 227 234 233 232 229 230 227 225 230 230 226 227 230 227 221 RIT Scores 222 225 223 228 230 228 MAP Math Strands Grade 6 Spring Medians 235 Sixth Grade Meeting Math Target Growth 100 90 80 70 60 % 50 40 30 20 10 0 49.4 48 2005 58.8 50.6 2006 Fall to Spring 56.2 61.5 50 2007 Spring to Spring 43.1 2008 Spring 2007 2.4 15.7 22.2 3.7 Fall 2007 95% Above At Grade Level Below 43.4 38.6 42 32.1 22.4 2.6 26 Fall 2006 35.5 39.5 35.6 5.5 100 90 80 70 60 % 50 40 30 20 10 0 32.9 MAP Math Test Performance Grade 6 Spring 2008 MCA Math Test Performance Grade 6 100 90 80 70 60 % 50 40 30 43 24 Exceeds Meets Partially Meets Does Not Meet 42 26 25 20 10 8 17 14 0 2006 2007 MCA Math Strands Grade 6 100 90 80 70 60 % 50 Correct 40 30 20 10 0 71 68 58 69 62 68 58 73 72 64 72 69 60 53 46 Number Sense Patterns, Data, Spatial Sense, Mathematical Functions and Statistics and Geometry and Reasoning Algebra probability Measurement 2006 2007 Multiple Choice Constructed Response 44 Gridded Response Statements of the past and questions of the future are entrusted to teachers, who enlighten their students today. “Substitute feedback for assessment… The point of assessment in education is to advance learning, not to merely audit absorption of facts… Improving the quality of classroom feedback offers the greatest performance gains of any single instructional approach. This just makes sense. The more you teach without finding out who understands the information and who doesn't, the greater the likelihood that only already-proficient students will succeed." Grant Wiggins The End?? Or The Never Ending Story…..