Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Risk Management for Construction Dr. Robert A. Perkins, PE Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Alaska Fairbanks Class 3 • Quantitative Risk Analysis – – – – • Probability Basics Follow Newnan Chapter 10. Excel Simulation with Crystal Ball Certainty in estimating, from RAP site “Probability of harm….” • Two minutes of probability and statistics • Statistics • Want to know something about a population – Often its average, distribution of individuals within population, range, extremes • Can’t (usually) measure the population, so we take a sample Samples and Populations • Try to learn something about the population from the sample • The larger the sample, the more confident we will be. • Also, the less variability we see in the sample, the more confident we can be. • We want to know how confidently we can predict the population values from the sample. • Often we want to see if two samples come from the “same population,” or in common terms, “are the same.” • Are the asphalt lab test results “different” in May than in July? • When we are done that analysis, again we want to know • “How sure are we they are different?” Confidence. • For those questions we need some probability ideas Probability • The characteristic we are looking at is called the “random variable.” • It is a variable, perhaps called “y,” but unlike the “y” in y=mx+b, the value of our y is not determined by other variables or constants. It’s value is random, it is a • “Random variable” Toss the dice (or die) • “Random Variable” = value of die • See Excel RAND Estimation • Future event – Number of rain days • Often a parameter – Cost of asphalt in 2010 • Want a “number” • But “number” is a random variable Reality • Either convert to definite number – Difficult to get, but – Simple result • Handle as a probability – Easier to get, but – Results need some explanation • Often a definite number has an imbedded factor of safety – Which is based on probability Forecasting Methods • Subjective methods – from within firm • Statistical Methods – extrapolation • Modeling methods “Precise Estimate” • Use the best number(s) you have • Sometimes called a “deterministic” estimate. Other Precise • Breakeven • Sensitivity • Examine the impact that variability will have Range of Estimates • Optimistic Estimate • Most likely • Pessimistic Estimate Optimistic 4 * ( Most Likely ) Pess. Mean 6 • Has a scientific basis in Beta distribution • Could do 3 entire estimates using all optimistic, most likely, or pessimistic value – then take mean • Or do one estimate using mean for each parameter. • Answers will be slightly different. Risk and Expected Value • “Risk” (in this course) implies there are two or more possible outcomes and we know the probability associated with each outcome. • “Expected Value” is the weighted mean of the outcomes times probabilities • The town of Pittsfield needs to budget for snow removal this winter. Historically it costs Pittsfield $700,000 in a heavy snow year, $500,000 in an avenge year, and $200,000 if it is a light snow year. How much should the town budget? The town calls the National Weather Service, who says, "There is a 5% chance it will be a heavy snow year, a 50% chance it will be an average snow year, and a 45% it will be a light snow year." Expected Value Projected Chance Cost Snow (probability) Light 45% $200,000 Cost*Prob ability Medium 50% $500,000 $250,000 Heavy 5% $700,000 $35,000 $90,000 Total $375,000 Risk vs. Uncertainty • Risk implies you know the probability of the various outcomes • Uncertainty implies you do not • Might handle by increasing factors of safety • Better to use probability tools Probability Distribution of Outcomes • Sales of 100, 200, 300…600 are equally probable, each with one-sixth probability • The total of the probabilities is 1.0 • Uniform Distribution Relative Frequency Newman, Lavelle, Eschenbach, 8th • Experiment, Sample Space, and Event • Consider the experiment of rolling a (six-faced) die, the set {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} defines the sample space of the experiment. Any subset of the sample space is an event. – The event of getting odd number {1, 3, 5} – The event of getting {6} – The event of getting a number less than 4 {1, 2, 3} • If, in an n-trial experiment, an event E occurs m times, then the probability, P{E} of realizing the event E is defined mathematically as m P{E} lim ( ) n n In our (six-faced) die example, consider the event of getting the number 5. If the die is rolled 100,000 times, there is a big chance we will get the number 5 in about (100,000/6). i.e. n = 100,000 and m = (100,000/6) P{5} = m/n = 1/6 By Definition 0 ≤ P{E} ≤ 1 P{E} = 0 if the event E is impossible P{E} = 1 if the event E is certain In our (six-faced) die example, the probability that the outcome of the rolling is 7 is impossible The probability that the outcome of the rolling is an integer number from 1 to 6 is certain Addition Law of Probability • Consider two events E and F, these two events could be mutually exclusive if they do not intersect. – Assume event E = {1, 3, 5} and event F = {2, 4, 6}, these two events do not intersect and they are mutually exclusive – On the other hand, the two events E = {1, 2, 3, 4} and F = {3, 4, 5, 6} intersect in {3, 4} and they are not mutually exclusive Addition Law of Probability • E + F represents the union of E and F – The union of E = {1, 2, 3, or 4} and F {3, 4, or 5} is {1, 2, 3, 4, 5} • EF represents the intersection of E and F – The Intersection of E = {1, 2, 3, or 4} and F {3, 4, or 5} is {3, 4} • How to Calculate P(E+F) Addition Law of Probability • E + F represents the union of E and F – The union of E = {1, 2, 3, or 4} and F {3, 4, or 5} is {1, 2, 3, 4, 5} • EF represents the intersection of E and F – The Intersection of E = {1, 2, 3, or 4} and F {3, 4, or 5} is {3, 4} • How to Calculate P(E+F) Addition Law of Probability Consider the experiment of rolling a die. The sample space of the experiment is {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}. For a fair die, we have P{1} = P{2} = P{3} = P{4} = P{5} = P{6} Define E = {1, 2, 3, or 4} and F = {3, 4, or 5} the outcomes 3 and 4 are common between E and F, hence EF = {3 or 4}. Thus, P{E} = P{1} + P{2} + P{3} + P{4} = 1/6 + 1/6 + 1/6 + 1/6 = 4/6 F P{F} = P{3} + P{4} + P{5} = 3/6 E 1 3 5 P{EF} = P{4} + P{5} = 2/6 4 P{E+F} = P{1} + P{2} + P{3} + P{4} + P{5} = 5/6 2 We can also say: P{E+F} = P{E} + P{F} – P{EF} = 4/6 + 3/6 – 2/6 = 5/6 Addition Law of Probability • Note in Example 1 that E and F are NOT mutually exclusive. They intersect in {3 or 4}. Now, let us modify E and F to make them mutually exclusive. Define E = {1, 2, 3, or 4} and F = {5, or 6} the outcomes 3 and 4 are common between E and F, hence EF = {}. Thus, P{E} = P{1} + P{2} + P{3} + P{4} = 1/6 + 1/6 + 1/6 + 1/6 = 4/6 P{F} = P{5} + P{6} = 1/6 + 1/6 = 2/6 P{EF} = 0 P{E+F} = P{1} + P{2} + P{3} + P{4} + P{5} + P{6} = 6/6 We can also say: P{E+F} = P{E} + P{F} – P{EF} = 4/6 + 2/6 – 0 = 6/6 E 1 3 2 4 5 F 6 Addition Law of Probability • Conclusion P{E+F} = P{E} + P{F} – P{EF} IF E and F are mutually exclusive, P{E+F} = P{E} + P{F} Revisit Expected Value • If events are independent, you can multiply their probabilities • Flip a head and role a six • 1/2 * 1/6 = 1/12 • Probability that the crane and the backhoe will go down at the same time. Buy Collision Insurance? • • • • Cost $800, with $500 deductable Assume small accident cost $300 Total wreck is $13,000 P of no accident = 0.90, Small = 0.07, Total = 0.03 Decision Tree Expected Value • Buy Insurance (0.9*0 +(0.07*300) +(0.03*500) =$36 • Don’t buy (0.9*0 +(0.07*300) +(0.03*13,000) =$411 • Of course the EV is less than the cost of the insurance, $800. • Roll of die • “Random Variable” = value of die • Excel, RAND function • Sum of probabilities must = 1.0 • Take 15 coins and toss • Count number of heads in each trial Number of Heads Number of Heads 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 15 10 5 0 0 Frequency in 49 trials Number of Heads, 15 coins Normal Distribution • AKA Bell Curve, Gaussian Distribution • When Random Variable is product of many independent parameters, normal is common result. – Height of men Distributions • The coin example was “quantal” , “discrete” data. – heads or tails • Data is often continuous – Weight of rat, 234.0 grams • Look at triangular distribution Relative Frequency $150 Value $250 $450 Concrete cost next year, $/CY What is probability • It will cost $100/CY? • It will cost $600/CY? • It will cost $200/CY? Relative Frequency $150 Value $200 $250 $450 Concrete cost next year, $/CY Probability Price less than Probability 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 Probability 0.4 0.2 0 0 200 400 $/CY of Concrete 600 Combining Probabilities • Most cannot be combined • Monte Carlo Method • Inserts random numbers in probability statements • Computes outcome • Repeats 1000 or 10,000 times or more Example • Circular Stair My Estimate . Item Unit Cost Buy stairs $5000 Carpenter time $35 40 1400 Welder time $42 20 840 Painter time $32 20 640 Rent crane $120 8 960 Total Units (hr) Extended $5000 $8840 • Wrought iron fabricator – “it depends how busy we are, and material costs at the time you give us the PO. It may cost anywhere between $3500 and $7000.” • Carpenter foreman – “it varies quite a bit, my guess is 40 hours, but it could take anywhere from 30 to 70 hours, but 40 is my best guess.” • Welder – “pretty sure” he can complete between 15 and 25 hours. • Painter – same. • The crane shop – Will charge me $120 if they have a crane, but if they have to rent one for me it will cost double that. They do say there is only a 20% change they will have to rent, this time of year. Beta • Next, here are my guesses inputted into a beta distribution analysis. • Total = (Low + 4*Most likely +High)/6 • Total = ( $6,620 + 4*$8,840 + $13,220 )/6 = $9,200 Risk Analysis • Each parameter is a random variable, and • we have some idea of the probability • For example, the amount of carpenter hours is a random variable. We put 40 hours into the estimate as if it was a number, but in fact it is not a number, but may have many values, depending on what happens in the future. • What we can put into the estimate is a “probability distribution” that states the likelihood of each value of the random variable Buy Staircase • The number can be anything between the two limits and the probability is equal for all numbers within those limits. This is called a uniform distribution. Carpenter time • She gave us the least, maximum, and most likely times. The random variable of the carpenter’s time might be described by a triangular distribution. Welder and Painter • They have given a range that they have some confidence in, but are by no means sure. • Let’s translate the “pretty sure” into meaning that they are about 68% sure they will finish within those limits. – Of course there is some chance that it could be a lot longer, and for the moment let’s assume it could be shorter as well. • The “normal distribution” or “bell curve” has the property that 68% is the probably within one “standard deviation” of the average. • So let’s approximate the welder and painters times as a normal distribution with an average (or “mean”) of 20 hours and a “standard deviation” of 5 hours. • About 65% of the area, that is the probability, lay between 15 and 25 hours, just like the mechanics told us. Crane Cost • This is figure is not a probably distribution, the chart just shows it will be one number 80% of the time and 20% the other. Crystal Ball • Call Crystal Ball What is the chance the job will cost less than my original number, $8840? Cost between 8 and 10 thousand? There is a 50% change the job will cost more than $9548 10% chance job will cost more than $11,000 Method Number % Difference from point estimate Point Estimate $8,840 - Range Low Estimate $6,620 - 25% Range High Estimate Beta $13,220 49% $9,200 4% 50% Confidence $9,548 8% 90% Confidence (less than) $11,000 24% • We are tempted to look at the point estimate and consider it the “right number,” • Then judge that the beta and 50% confidence level are closest to being correct. • But of course the point estimate itself is unlikely to be exactly correct. • My point here is that the difference between the 50% confidence number and the 90% confidence number is $1500; • the 90% confidence number is 15% greater than the 50% confidence number. Which to use? • Owners and A/E’s might feel 50% confidence is “fair” • Contractors could not stay in business if they only made a profit 50% of the time Schedule Risk • • • • Similar Process Easy to input Beta = PERT Computational issues Can lay critical path into Excel and use Crystal Ball or other • Schedule ties to duration of tasks and thus to item estimates and job estimates.