Download Document

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Classical and Quantum Precision with
Broadband Down-Converted Light
Avi Pe’er
Dept. of Physics and BINA center for Nano-Technology,
Bar Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, ISRAEL
email: [email protected]
Outline


Coherence properties of broadband down conversion and SFG
(sum frequency generation).
Experiments:
Low power – Quantum Behavior

High power - Super precision in phase measurement with SFG

Conclusions
Parametric Conversion
Non-linear
crystal
Signal
Pump
Non-linear
crystal
Idler
Up conversion
Idler
Down conversion
Energy conservation
s i   p
As    A  p   
*
i
Signal
Up conversion (SFG)
Momentum conservation (phase matching)
  
k s  ki  k p
The Signal and Idler are Complex
Conjugates
Parametric Conversion II
Many options for pair production
3-waves mixing
p
s
i
 p   s  i
4-waves mixing
p
p
s
i
2 p  s  i
Attractive in-fiber
pump
Non linear
fiber
idler
signal
Broadband Phase Matching
Co-Linear Phase Matching:
s ns   i ni    p n p 
Broad phase matching around
the degeneracy point.
The broadband FWM
Ultra
- zero dispersion
Broadbroad
– degenerate
type I
-20
740nm
0.8
0.4
Power [dbm]
Phase mi smatch cm-1
Phase mi smatch cm-1
-30
0.2
0.6
0
0.4
-0.2
630nm
-40
-50
-60
-0.4
0.2
-70
-0.6
0
-0.8
-80
1.50E+015
1.04 1.05
1.08 1.09
1.2
1.4 1.06
1.6 1.07 1.8
2
micron
λ micron
2.00E+015
2.50E+015
Frequency [Hz]
3.00E+015
3.50E+015
What is non-Classical ?
The signal – idler correlation To the last photon!

A major effect at the single-photon level

What about high-power ?
Time-Energy Entangled Photons
The two-photon Wavefunction
  ts , ti   0 Es ts  Ei ti  
 p  5 MHz
SIGNAL (cw)
PUMP (cw)
1
2
ts  ti 
(2)
IDLER (cw)
  30nm  10THz
1  p  0.2 s
t s  ti
1   100 fs
Time-Energy Entangled Photons
SIGNAL (CW)
Gate
CW PUMP
(2)
IDLER (CW)
The time DIFFERENCE between the photons behaves as an ultrashort pulse
Coincidence Detection by SFG
Signal (CW)
Delay
CW pump
(2)
(2)
Delay
Idler (CW)
 104  105 s 1
 10 9
 10 4 s 1
How High can ‘Low Power’ be ?
(How many ‘single photons’ can arrive in one second ?)
1
1
1






 max    1013 s-1  2 W !!
Analysis
The input flux of photon pairs:
  n
For SFG with a continuously-pumped, broadband down-converted light :
I SFG   nn  1   n   n
2
2
2
2
Coherent contribution
(Entangled pairs)
The Experimental Setup
Computer
Beam
dump
Pump
532nm
PP-KTP
Down-converting
crystal
Fourier
plane
IR detector
PP-KTP
SFG
crystal
SPCM
~40,000 s-1
Intensity Dependence of Quantum SFG
 n 2  n
 n
 n2T 2
“Nonlinear Interactions with an Ultrahigh Flux of Broadband Entangled Photons”,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 043602 (2005)
Phase measurement
Optical phase estimation is THE tool for
precision measurement
!
Length
Time
Frequency
Mach-Zehnder interferometer
e i
B1
A2
B2
 
 
 A cos    A sin  
B1  A1 sin
B2
A1

2
 A2 cos

1
2

2

2
2
With one input
 
cos  
B1  I1 sin 2
2
B2  I1
2
2

2

2
A variable beam splitter !
What are the limits
e
A1
1.0
i
B1
0.8
0.6
B2
0.4
0.2
2
1. When does the first photon
appear in output 1 ?
1
 
N
SQL !
4
6
8
10
12
2. But what about the linear range ?
Quantum noise !!
Beam splitter noise
If we ask a photon ‘which way?’
It will randomly answer
Fluctuations !
(Splitting noise)
SQL !
1
 ~
N
Schemes to overcome SQL
Number N  N
1
2
correlation
1  2
Phase
correlation
Correlated beams
(Holland & Burnett 1993) …
 0
Detector 1
N
−
N
Detector 2
Number
near-correlation
1
 
N
Heisenberg sensitivity for first photon of relative intensity noise
Heisenberg detection
Pump
LO
a1
Homodyne
LO

a1ei
b1
c1
d1
c2
d2
 0
Squeezing
a2
b2
a2
Interferometer stage
Detection stage
Conclusions




Broadband down conversion – a combination of two
worlds - Ultrashort temporal resolution with CW
spectral resolution.
A non-linear interaction with entangled photons Demonstration of non-classicality at low power
Robust, ultrafast detection of squeezing using the
quantum properties of up-conversion
Heisenberg scaled phase measurement with
broadband down conversion and up conversion
Semi classical model
A1
n
B1
B2
2
B1,2 
A1
2
2
 Re  nA1 
‘vacuum fluctuations’
penetrate through the unused port
Only one quadrature of the ‘noise’ is important → Squeeze it
!
(Caves, 1981) +
…
Squeezed light
Vacuum
Squeezed vacuum
2
M
2M
p
p
q
q
Measuring squeezing
φ
LO
ω
Up
conversion
Homodyne detection
2ω
Down
conversion
Squeezing
_
1.Loss –
The quantum resource (number correlation) is very fragile
2.Need ideal detectors
(100% efficient).
3. Bandwidth
Photo detectors are limited to several GHz at most.
Ultrafast squeezing detection !
φ
LO
2ω
Down
conversion
ω
Up
conversion
Squeezing
SFG detection
_
What happens if we up-convert the
down-converted…
Non-Linear
Crystal
(a) Squeezed state (M=3)
(b) Squeezed input (M=10)
squeezed beam
(photon pairs) ω
2
Up conversion
2ω
M
2M
ADC  q  ip
p
q
(c) UC state (M=3)
AUC  Ain2
p
q
(c) UC state (M=10)
Q  iP  q 2  p 2  i 2 pq
NOT squeezed
P  2qp
Q  M2
Q  q2  p2
P  2qp
Q  M2
Q  q2  p2
Ultrafast
squeezing detector
Why is it good?
1. Loss –
Still sensitive to input loss
2. NO Need for ideal detectors
(Up conversion efficiency not critical).
3. ‘Unlimited’ bandwidth
(Up to 100THz).
Two-photon Interactions with BPDC
Rate of TPA (SFG)
At   real
RTP t   A2 t 
A   A*  p   
RTP     dA A   
When    p
RTP  p    d A    dt At 
2
2
Ultrashort pulse !

Temporal resolution of a transform-limited pulse

Spectral resolution of single frequency CW
Experimental Setup
Computer
Pump
Signal
Idler
4D5/2,1/2
Idler
~ 1270
nm
Signal
~ 870
nm
Digital
oscilloscope
PMT
Delay line
Rb cell
516.65
nm
5S1/2
Experimental Results
Temporal resolution of 23 fs,
5 orders of magnitude
Below the duration of the light (3 ns).
Spectral resolution as of the pump (0.04nm)
3 orders of magnitude
Below the bandwidth of the light
(~100nm each beam)
Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 023005 (2004).
What is non-Classical ?
The signal – idler correlation exceeds shot-noise
The Down converted field is pure real !

A major effect at the single-photon level

What about high-power ?
Related documents