Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Propaganda in WW I By Bridget Mahoney-Fernandes Background and Context First widespread and systematic use of propaganda by governments occurred during WWI First time the word entered common usage in U.S. Used extensively by both sides to shape public opinion, procure men, money and resources In U.S. Wilson established the Committee on Public Information (CPI) headed by George Creel After war, there was widespread criticism of government propaganda after many claims were exposed as false. Professionals in advertising and public relations loved itwill use it to develop modern advertising in 1920s Propaganda analysis- anti-propaganda movement in 1920s and 30s to educate and expose manipulations of governments and corporations (also reaction to Nazis!) Definition of Propaganda The spreading of ideas, information or rumor for the purpose of helping or injuring a cause. It’s intent is to convince, sell an idea or product. Not merely biased: It is an intentional “slanting” of truth. Distortions and falsehoods used to mislead audience. “They make us believe and do something we would not believe or do if we thought about it calmly and dispassionately” It comes in many formats (Speeches, posters, movies, pamphlets, music, jokes, commercials etc.) and it can be tailored for a specific audience. Creel committee had 19 sub-divisions!) In general… It may use fact. Creel employee later admitted: “We never told the whole truth” It may use false information. Atrocity stories: Babies on Bayonets, Tub Full of Eyeballs, Ravished Women, Fake “German” diary accounts of melting bodies to obtain fat Both sides printed fake newspapers to drop behind enemy lines In General… Typically relies on emotions and biases to distort evidence- appeals to heart not mind. “Bleeding Belgium” “The Criminal Kaiser” “Make the World Safe for Democracy” Visuals: German soldiers as aggressive, dangerous, Allies as noble fighters, patriotic symbols Use of color and fonts: blood red, dark sinister Use of music In General… It focuses on its own message, doesn’t consider other positions (thus differs from “argument” or “persuasion” which consider other perspectives, offers facts and predicts the results of accepting the argument) 8 Devices Commonly Used Word Games: Name Calling Device Glittering Generalities Euphemism False Connections: Transfer Testimonial Special Appeals: Plain Folks Bandwagon Fear Word Game: Name Calling Device Very common formespecially in politics Propagandist uses negative labels for those he wants us to reject without examining evidence. WW I: Hun, Barbarian, AllLies Allies called sub warfare: “inhumane” but they used them too! Today: Terrorist, Extremist, Commie, Queer, Liberal Name Calling Device In WW I and all wars the enemy is also “demonized” Visuals: Spike helmets, blood, knives More subtle form: use emotionally charged words: liberal, conservative, coward, counter culture, flipflopper, traitor Name Calling Device A visual form of “Name Calling”? Or the conservative radio host who referred to him repeatedly as “Barrack Hussein Obama” Watch Out for Name Calling! Ask yourself the following when you spot an example of name-calling: What does the name mean? Does the idea in question have a legitimate connection with the real meaning of the name? Is an idea that serves my best interests being dismissed through giving it a name I don’t like? Leaving the name out of consideration, what are the merits of the idea itself? Word Game: Glittering Generalities Propagandist lowers our resistance by identifying his program with “virtue”words, symbols, ideas we hold dear and sacred. Opposite of Name Calling Creates a favorable image in our minds without analysis of facts Operation Iraqi Freedom Glittering Generalities Common Generalities: Civilization, Democracy, Christianity, Motherhood Fatherhood, Freedom Visual symbols: Flags, Uncle Sam, Columbia, Cross, Mothers, Fathers, Children Glittering Generalities Problem! Words, symbols mean different things to different people! In advertising, words sound good, but don’t really mean anything: “Lite”, “New and Improved”, “Change” Watch out for Glittering Generalities! When confronted with this device ask yourself: What does the virtue word really mean? Leaving the virtue word out of consideration, what are the merits of the idea itself? Does the idea in question really have a legitimate connection with the real meaning of the word? Is an idea that does not serve my interests being “sold” to me merely through a name I like? Word Games: Euphemisms Propagandist attempts to make unpleasant reality more palatable by using words that are bland and euphemistic- i.e. substituted words that are less offensive “Passed away” instead of “died” 1940s we changed War Dept. to Dept. of Defense Reagan renamed MX- Missile “The Peacekeeper” Murder= liquidation Genocide = ethnic cleansing Euphemisms Comedian George Carlin has noted that after every war we have a new way to describe battle traumatized veterans: Civil War- “Gun Shy” WW I- “Shell Shock” WW II - “Combat Fatigue” Vietnam- “Post- Traumatic Stress Disorder” (now completely disconnected from the reality of war altogether) Watch out for Euphemisms Ask yourself; What is really being said here? Why are they using this wording, what are they trying to hide? False Connections: Transfer Propagandist uses authority, sanction, prestige of something we love and respect to something he would have us accept or accept. Gets us to transfer feelings from one thing to another. Transfer My church supports it, so will I Symbols constantly used: Cross=Christianity Flag=The Nation Uncle Sam=The people and their opinion Today, appeals to Science and Medicinelab coats, glasses Transfer After the war had broken out, but before we got into it, William Jennings Bryan resigned as Secretary of State against the war for peace: “We are the greatest of the Christian nations…and the world looks to us to lead the way from bloodstained precedents of the past out into the larger and brighter future.” Transfer Today the transfer device appeals to sex appeal, love, power, popularity, and money Watch out for Transfer When confronted with this device ask yourself: In the most simple and concrete terms, what is the proposal of the speaker? Is there any legitimate connection between the proposal and the revered thing, person or institution? False Connection: Testimonial A famous person endorses an idea, product or opposes it. The President said… My doctor said… Oprah says… Problem! Is the celebrity really qualified to make the judgment? Dr. Jarvik! Testimonial WW I Examples: Brits released a report of supposed German war crimes. Only a few facts proven- but widely accepted because report signed by well known scholars. Brits published a book in the U.S. in which 60 prominent Americans including 2 ex presidents urged the country to go to war. Watch out for Testimonials Ask yourself: Why should I regard this person (or organization or publication) as having expert knowledge or trustworthy information on the subject in question? What is the merit of the idea without the testimonial? Special Appeals: Plain Folks Propagandist wins our confidence by appearing to be people like ourselves “Just one of the guys” “Average Joe” Candidates kiss babies, eat local cuisine, put on hats, hang out in diners Really prevalent in political campaigns and ads Plain Folks Presidents all millionaires BUT: Clinton ate at McDonald’s, George W. Bush uses “folks” and cleans his ranch, jogs, has a dog. Bush senior hated broccoli, loved to golf. Watch out for Plain Folks Ask yourself: What is he trying to cover up with the plainfolks approach? Who’s really paying for this commercial? How plain are they?? What are the facts? Special Appeals: Bandwagon Propagandist appeals to our desire to fit in, be part of the crowd Everyone is doing it, so should you! Be part of the crowd, don’t be left out! Watch out for Bandwagon Ask yourself the following: Regardless of the fact that others are supporting this program, should I support it? Does the program serve or undermine my individual and collective interests? Special Appeals: Fear Propagandist warns audience that disaster will result if they do not follow a course of action. Plays to deep seated fears Examples: Insurance ads show terrible accidents, destroyed homes, dead teenagers WMD-Weapons of Mass Destruction Hillary Clinton : “Who do you want to answer the phone at 3:00 a.m.” Watch out for Fear Ask yourself: Is the speaker exaggerating the fear or threat in order to obtain my support? How legitimate is the fear that the speaker is provoking? Will performing the recommended action actually reduce the supposed threat?