Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
SEMMELWEIS UNIVERSITY BUDAPEST Department of Pedododntics and Orthodontics FILLING MATERIALS in Pedodontics Dr. Rózsa Noémi Dr. Déri Katalin Materials • Filling materials: – short term temporary – long term temporary – definitive – underfilling materials • Endodontic materials • Prophylactic, preventive materials: – fissure sealer – varnish, gel • Impression materials • Luting materials: – cements – orthodontic bonding Temporary FM • Characteristics: • non toxic • good retention • good marginal adaptation • easy to apply and to take out • aesthetic • not expensive Short-term – setting under wet conditions Long-term – Zink-oxyd-eugenol cement (ZOE) Endodontic – GIC, ZOE Inlay: •temporary light curing composite •gutta-percha Underfilling materials • Effects: • Temperature stability, isolation • Protection: - Elektric stimulation - Mechanical and chemical effects • Therapeutical action: - antiinflammatory - dentinbridge • Dentine tube obliteration • Antibacterial Thickness: • Varnish – 1-50µm (dentin-sealer) • Liner – 0.2 – 1mm: Ca(OH)2, GIC • Base – 1-2mm: cements Underfilling materials • Cink oxy-phosphate cement • • • • • • liner – fast setting, luting – long setting, No obliteration of the dentintubes pulp – phosphoric acid in vitro: citotoxic, mutagen setting: acid-basic reaction • cinc-oxyd-eugenol cement (ZOE) • good marginal sealing • eugenol – low %: bacteriostatic and pain releasing • long-term TF • base - deep cavity - under composit filling Underfilling materials • Polycarboxylate cement • • • • • • • Phosphoric acid → polyacrylic acid Setting: acid-base reaction Tooth structures: chemical binding in vivo: ↓ toxicity in vitro: ↑ ~ - Zn, F-, mutagenic ↓ mechanical properties, ↑ solubility difficult „handling” • Calcium-phosphate cement • good biocompatibility • Setting: acid-base reaction • pulp capping • under development Underfilling materials • Calcium-hydroxide - Ca(OH)2 • • • • antiseptic facilitates dentin formation Ca(OH)2 release /absorption– results week structure self-curing: - ↑ solubility - ↓ mechanical properties – an other application, GIC • underfilling, direct and indirect pulp capping • light-curing: - ↓ solubility - ↑ mechanical properties - 0,5 – 1mm: pulplesion, under amalgam - ↓ toxicity • Direct pulp capping –in primary dentition may cause chronic pulpitis MINERAL TRIOXIDE AGGREGATE MTA Torabinejad et al. - 1995 1993 – lateral root perforation retrograde root filling, direct pulp capping, bifurcation perforation, • tricalcium-silicate apexification. • dicalcium-silicate MTA pH = 12,5 ~ Ca(OH)2 • tricalcium-aluminate • calciumsulfat-dihidrate • bismutoxid • tetracalcium-aluminoferrit Glassionomer cement GIC • reactive glassparticules (composite: inert glass) • • • • setting: acid-basic reaction „sandwich” technique ion: F-, Al3+, Sr2+ structure: - calcium-aluminium-fluor-silicate glass - strocium-aluminium-fluor-silicate glass - Polyakrilic acid/polycarbonate acid glass-polyalchenoate cement • liner: dentin > 1 mm • fissure sealing • prosthetic preparation • temporary filling • definitive filling - primary molars Glassionomer Cement - GIC Type Advantage Disadvantage Indication Traditional self curing F- release No Adhesive technique aesthetics Powder/liquid proportions Mechanical properties Primary molars Colour (pink) Long-term water absorption FS Cervical erosions TF insensitive to moisture aesthetics 1% ~ polym. shrinkage allergy Pulpal lesions underfilling prosthetic Small occlusal cavity F- release Water absorption, water release Exact dosage mechanical properties aesthetics Primary molars TF, underfilling prosthetics traditional GIC aesthetics, ↓F- Primary molars Dual setting Resin reinforced GIC Hard, fast setting CERMET (Metal reinforced GIC) Fissure sealing GIC CERMET CEMENT INDICATION GC Fuji VII or Triage • Molars short after eruption or partially erupted - FS; • Allergic reactions; • „Barbie” filling in primary dentition. Pink colour Dual setting glassionomer cement: Chemical setting: 2’30” Light-curing: 2O” GC Fuji Triage GC Fuji Triage or VII • Additional indications Sensitivity Intermediate endodontic sealing Intermediate restoration Root surface protection GC Fuji II LC Amalgam • Quantity: • Cu contents: • • • low: 2-5% - conventional ~ high: 12-30% - non-gamma-2 ~ Form: < 20-25 µm – – – – lathe-cut plate spherical Irregular form mixed Amalgam Conventional amalgam Ag3Sn γphase + Hg → Ag2Hg3 + Sn8Hg + ≈Ag3Sn γ1phase γ2phase γ-phase High Copper amalgam Ag3Sn + Cu3Sn + Hg → Ag2Hg3 + γphase γ1phase Cu6Sn5 η’-phase + ≈Ag3Sn γ-phase • corrosion • mercuroscopic expansion • Hg Primary Dentition - Amalgam Amalgam • amalgam – dental unit water pipe • pregnancy • children • biological dentistry (natural dentistry) Composite filling materials = min. two, chemically different material and one phase 3D combination LUTZ et al. Filler type Conventional composite CC macrofiller Hibrid composite HC minifiller, midifiller, nanofiller Particule 10 – 100µm Properties •↓polym. shrinkage • good physical ~ • difficult polishing 0,1 – 1 µm • ↑ polym. shrinkage 1 – 10 µm • good physical and 0,005 – 0,01 µm optical ~ Homogenic microfilled composite HMC microfiller 0,01 – 0,1 µm Nonhomogenic microfilled, heterogenic composite IMC microfillercomplex microfiller + 100 – 200 µm • resist. abrasion • good polishing •↑ polym. shrinkage • good marginal sealing • aesthetics • fracture Composit Filling Materials Special composites Filler type Ormocers Organically modified ceramic „cross linked” polysiloxan in the organic matrix Insert - Glass for Molars megafiller 0,5 -2,0 mm Modified heterogen/homogen composites modified filler: fibre, crystal • better physical ~ Flowable composites Flow HK - ↓ filler% • fissure sealant • base for composites Condensing compozites ↑ filler% > 80% Properties •↓polym. shrinkage • good resistance to abrasion • difficult to polish • occlusal contact • difficult to apply • special polym. technique • molars • ↓ aesthetic ~ • ↑ viscosity ≈ HK Compomer • • Special composite, Composition: - bifunctional monomer - composite - Reactive glass filler – GIC Setting: - free radical polymerisation - acid-basic reaction (water absorption from the environment, 3% max. water content, during several month):→ chemical setting: material and tooth → FLight curing → filling material Self curing → luting cement Twinky Star Light curing coloured compomer Primary dentition Alternative ~ amalgam Radiopaque FCompliance Twinky Star Oba AA, Sönmez IS, Sari Ş. Clinical Evaluation of a Colored Compomer In Primary Molars Med Princ Pract 2009; 18:31-34 36 patients → 80 II. class fillings, primary dentitions M/F = 1; 12 month Minimally invasive technique 2 mm thickness, 40” Results: - 3,9% (3 fillings) – replacement 1,3% caries 1,29% (1 filling) - fracture 2,6% - marginal shinkage 2 fillings – marginal discolouration F – pink, silver M – lemon, blue MagicFilTM - Coloured compomer Dual setting Insensitive to moisture F- , Zn2+ → bactericidal Setting: 40” → 4’ Croll TP. MagicFil: A colourful kiddie compomer. Compend Contin Educ dent 2002; 23:1044-1048. Jafaranta B, Soderholm K-J, Guelmann M. Light penetration and bond strength of MagicfilTM to primary molars. Baltimor Convention Center 2005. blue < white < purple < yellow Stainless steelcrowns • ring • primary molars; • occlusal rehabilitation; • long-term solution; • time-consuming preparation; • cementation. Stainless steel crowns • Tooth preparation and crown adaptation Stainless steel crowns • contact point preparation • marginal finishing of the crown Aesthetic crowns • PedoPearlsTM (1980) • Celluloid crown + composit Whiter Biter Crown II • „strip crown” • NuSmileR • „Pedo Jacket” • white veneers Aesthetic crowns • Kinder Krown Pedo II – colour discrepancy, easy to apply • Kinder Krown Pedo I, White Steel Crown – not suitable Source: Hosoya Y, Omachi K, Staninec M. Colorimetric values of esthetic stainless steel crowns. Quintessence Int 2002; 33:537-541. Aesthetic crowns • PedoPearls (1980) • polyester/epoxi hybrid coated prefabcricated aluminium crowns • minimal occlusion • contactpoint – metal • selfcuring or dual curing composit Indication: • primary dentition Contraindications: • bruxism • severe orthodontic anomalies Aesthetic crowns • NuSmileR Composite filling Source: Th. Croll. Restoring four primary incisors using NuSmile Primary Crowns. Paediatric Restoration, 2007 Dental products Report Europe Aesthetic crowns • NuSmileR • 25-30% Source: Th. Croll. Restoring four primary incisors using NuSmile Primary Crowns. Paediatric Restoration, 2007 Dental Products Report Europe FISSURESEALANT MATERIALS • Bis-GMA • GIC FISSURESEALANT MATERIALS White/ opaque Toothcoloured Clear Coloured Colourchannging Chroma Bis-GMA – adverse effects BISPHENOL-A METACRYLIC ACID • LOCAL - CARIES INCIPIENS sealing; - pulp – phosphoric acid; - gingival irritation - fluoride; • SYSTEMIC - allergy, anaphylactic reaction ,asthma; - carcinogenic, teratogenic CleanProTM „Colour changing” Fissure sealant Helioseal Clear Chroma 3M - ESPE IVOCLARVIVADENT CleanProTM – „No rinse sealant technique” • Self etching: 15” - AdperTM PromptTM L-PopTM; • No need for rinse; • Only for occlusal surfaces; • self curing fissure sealer EMBRACE - WetBond • Insensitive to moisture • No bond necessary. Pulpdent,J.P.O’Donnell InTen-S • Light curing composite • ↓ polym. shrinkage: 1,6%; • Cavity preparation I – V, FS, primary dentition, ceramic veneers reparation VOCO – ADMIRA SEAL • ORMOCER based • = organically modified ceramic • biocompatibility • minimal shrinkage • better adhesive properties • high filled : 54% • 0,7 μm ø glass ceramic parts • thixotropic. VITAL AMPUTATION (PULPOTOMY) PUPLDRESSING MATERIALS • Medication for damaged primary pulps. = controversy discussion for many years: • Calcium hydroxide Ca(OH)2; • MTA; • Iron sulphate Fe2(SO4)3; • Formocresol after Buckley (1904); • Glutaraldehyde 2-5%. ROOTCANAL FILLING MATERIALS PROPERTIES: No irritation; Form stability; Radiopaque; No solubility; Wall coating; (biocompatibility); Antiseptic and bacteriostatic; Easy to remove; No discoloration. British Endodontic Society: Guidelines for root canal treatment ROOTCANAL FILLING MATERIALS • ADULT ENDODONTIC THERAPY Composition Product name Company Cink-oxyd-eugenol Aptal Harz, Hermetic Speiko Lege Artis Epoxyresin AH26, AH26 Plus Dentsply DeTrey Metacrylate Polyhydroxi-metilmetacrylate Hydron Hydron Canada Polyketon Diaket ESPE Polydimetil-siloxan Roeko Seal Automix Roeko Salycilate and Ca(OH)2 Apexit/Sealapex Glassionomer cement Ketac Endo/ Endion ESPE/Voco Vivadent/Kerr ROOTCANAL FILLING MATERIALS • ADULT ENDODONTIC THERAPY ~ Composition Product name Company Paraformaldehid N2 Universal Hager& Werken Cortikosteroid Endomethasone Pharma-Dental Hexachlorofen, dichlorofen Diaket A ESPE Mineral Trioxide Agregate ProRoot MTA Denstply GUTTAPERCHA • Properties: • less solubility; • good handling; • no tissue irritation; • no deformation; • solubility in organic solvents: xylol, chloroform, eucalypt; • X-ray opacity; • biological neutrality; • easy to remove. • deformation under pressure: easy to press through the apex; • not rigid enough: difficult to apply in narrow root canals; • sealer application for wall-coating. Thank you for your kind attention!