Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Interictal Fast Ripples Recorded from a Dense Microelectrode Array in Human Epileptic Neocortex Catherine Schevon, MD, PhD; Andrew Trevelyan, PhD; Robert Goodman, MD; Guy McKhann Jr, MD; Charles Schroeder, PhD; Ronald Emerson, MD June, 2009 Multielectrode Array (MEA) NeuroPortTM, Cyberkinetics Neurotechnology Systems, Foxboro, MA (now Blackrock Microsystems, Salt Lake City, UT) Covers 4 x 4 mm area 96 contacts in a regular 10x10 grid Depth 1 mm (Layer IV/V) 400 micron spacing Active tips 35-75 μm long x 3-5 μm radius 30K samples/channel/sec Implanted in epilepsy patients undergoing chronic intracranial EEG recording, in neocortex to be included in resection I II III IV V VI WM • Advantages: • Fine spatial/temporal resolution • Regular grid spacing • Limitations: • Records from one small area • One cortical layer per site Patient MEA location Epileptogenic Zone Pathology 1 (41F) R middle temporal gyrus R mesial temporal lobe Nonspecific 2 (30M) L lateral frontal L lateral frontal and temporal N/A (MST only) 3 (39M) L lateral frontal L lateral frontal (3x3 cm area) Nonspecific 4 (25F) L inferior temporal gyrus L mesial/basal/lateral temporal lobe Mild MTS “µEEG” iEEG Microelectrode recording downsampled and aligned with clinical EEG recording • • “Macrodischarges” μEEG • Correlate with iEEG epileptiform discharges • Appear widespread in µEEG “Microdischarges” µEEG 200 µV µEEG 50 µV 100-200 Hz 200-500 Hz 30 µV 0.8 – 2 kHz 30 µV HFO associated with a macrodischarge 1 second 30 ms µEEG 200 µV µEEG 100-200 Hz 50 µV 200-500 Hz 30 µV HFO associated with a microdischarge 30 µV 0.8 – 2 kHz 1 second 40 ms Correlation with interictal events Macro Micro ND Micro Macro Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 2 Patient 3 Patient 3 Patient 4 Patient 4 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 Detections/min during sleep and association with paroxysmal µEEG features 10 20 30 40 50 Percentage of macrodischarges and microdischarges with associated HFOs 60 Detections by array location “HFO events” = time period during which one or more HFOs are detected 85% of events were seen at a single channel 40 µV 50 ms “HFO events” = time period during which one or more HFOs are detected 11% of events occurred on a large scale Almost all were found within the epileptogenic zone (ie not in Patient 1) 80% of these occurred with macrodischarges 40 µV 400 ms µEEG 200 µV Site to site differences during a large scale event 100-200 Hz 200-500 Hz 0.8 – 2 kHz 50 ms µEEG 100-200 Hz 200-500 Hz 0.8 – 2 kHz 50 ms Conclusions and Questions HFOs and microdischarges are distinct phenomena – Evidence of different mechanisms underlying microdischarges and macrodischarges? Large-scale HFOs – – – – Arise from multiple simultaneous independent generators Specific markers of the epileptogenic zone? Selectively detected by sparse sampling or large sensors? Evidence of an epileptic network? Are fast ripples a primary event or a secondary local response (eg excitability)? Co-authors and colleagues Ron Emerson Robert Goodman Guy McKhann, Jr. Charles Schroeder Andrew Trevelyan Allen Waziri Julien Besle Joe Isler Anna Ipata Elana Zion-Golumbic Sara Inati Peter Lakatos Dan Friedman Helen Scharfman Michael Goldberg Are all HFOs created equal? Recording characteristics of Neuroport microelectrodes vs microwires or depth electrodes Selective recording from cortical layers IV and V Use of detection thresholds create the impression of a binary process Patient Implant Location MEA location Epileptogenic Zone Pathology 1 (41F) Right lateral and subtemporal regions Right middle temporal gyrus 4 cm from anterior temporal pole Right mesial temporal lobe Nonspecific, no mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS), no dysplasia 2 (30M) Left lateral frontal, mesial frontal, and lateral temporal lobes Left lateral frontal, minimum distance 2 cm superior to Broca’s area and on different gyrus Boundaries not defined but maximal area identified in left superior/lateral frontal lobe N/A (MST only) 3 (39M) Left lateral and mesial frontal lobe Left lateral frontal, minimum distance 1.5 cm superior to Broca’s area and on different gyrus Left frontal operculum (3x3 cm cortical area), superior to Broca’s area Nonspecific 4 (25F) Left lateral and subtemporal regions Left inferior temporal gyrus 2.5 cm from anterior temporal pole Left mesial and anterolateral temporal lobe Mild MTS Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3 – Higher HFO rates (overall and max per channel) than seen with microwires or macroelectrodes but avg per channel similar – HFOs more frequent in epileptogenic zone (but N of 1 outside EZ…) – Almost all HFOs had a fast ripple component Patient 4 HFO rates Wake Sleep Wake Sleep Wake Sleep Wake Sleep Average 0 5 10 15 20 25 Detections per minute LS-HFOEs Avg per channel Max per channel HFOEs FRs HFOs HFO duration Filtered 100-500 Hz activity in subset of channels Average of all channels (what a macroelectrode would see?)