Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Neptune’s Resonances With Kuiper Belt Objects and What It Tells Us About the Early Solar System The Origin of Pluto’s Orbit: Implications for the Solar System Beyond Neptune Renu Malhotra A signature of Planetary Migration: The Origin of Asymmetric Capture in the 2:1 Resonance Ruth A. Murray-Clay & Eugene I. Chiang On the Plutinos and Twotinos of the Kuiper Belt E.I. Chiang & A.B. Jordan Resonant and Secular Families of the Kuiper Belt E.I. Chiang The Effect of Neptune’s Accretion on Pluto and the Plutinos Paul Wiegert Horseshoe Orbit Stationary frame | Rotating frame Janus & Epimetheus The Migration of the Planets » Initial orbit (AU) • • • • Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune 5.4 8.7 16.3 23.2 Migration Final orbit -0.2 0.8 3.0 7.0 5.2 9.5 19.3 30.2 Pluto migrates out as a result of being in resonance with Neptune Eccentricity final from Eccentricity initial, resonance, and initial and final semi-major axes of the migrating planet e 2 final e 2 initial aN , final 1 ln j 1 aN , initial j is a resonance value ( j 1: j ) e final e 2 initial e final aN , final 1 ln j 1 aN , initial 1 30 0 ln 0.25 2 1 25 2 Groupings of the test particles Semi-major axis, eccentricity, and inclination over the period 0 to 108 years Ф – resonance angle ω – argument of perihelion Cold Hot e=0.001, sini=e/2 e=0.1, sini=e/2 Eccentricity and inclination of the known Plutinos, and of the simulated particles under hot conditions Different distributions reveal the rate of migration 107 yrs 106 yrs Known Plutinos Simulated Particles Dione A Jupiter-mass planet spends 50,000 years of migrating from 1 AU to 4 AU. As its exterior resonances swept through a group of planetesimals, it excited their orbits and captured them into resonances. Rotating Frame images of the orbits of the captured particles. Ratio P2 : P1 Decimal Form P2 / P1 1 : 1 1 17 : 16 0.941176 Semi-Major Axis a1 a2 2 P1 3 1 P2 1.041244 16 : 15 0.9375 1.043965 15 : 14 0.933333 1.047069 14 : 13 0.928571 1.050646 13 : 12 0.923077 1.054811 12 : 11 0.916667 1.059723 11 : 10 0.909091 1.065602 10 : 9 0.9 1.072766 9 : 8 0.888889 1.081687 17 : 15 0.882353 1.087022 8 : 7 0.875 1.093104 15 : 13 0.866667 1.100099 7 : 6 0.857143 1.108233 13 : 11 0.846154 1.117808 6 : 5 0.833333 1.129243 17 : 14 0.823529 1.138188 11 : 9 0.818182 1.143142 16 : 13 0.8125 1.148465 5 : 4 0.8 1.160397 14 : 11 0.785714 1.17442 9 : 7 0.777778 1.182396 13 : 10 0.769231 1.191138 17 : 13 0.764706 1.195833 4 : 3 0.75 1.211414 15 : 11 0.733333 1.2297