Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Forecasting Wheat Futures Prices: A Neural Network Application Mary Malliaris Linda Salchenberger 1995 Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute Introduction • Forecasting agricultural commodities futures prices is essential in determining a profitable futures trading strategy • There has been no significant improvement in the success rate for short-term forecasts when results from studies conducted prior to 1985 are compared with those conducted since 1985 Purpose • To test the hypothesis that wheat futures prices can be modeled as a nonlinear, deterministic process using neural networks NEURAL NETWORKS FOR PREDICTION • Neural Networks are computational models which have their conceptual origins in neural physiology • A set of processing elements or neurons (nodes) are interconnected and organized in layers DATA • January 1990 through December 1999 • Several agricultural markets (wheat, corn, oats, and soybeans) • There are five trading periods for wheat for each calendar year and wheat contracts expire in March, May, July, September, and December. VARIABLES • The final networks included the following sixteen variables: the change in the closing price, change in volume, change in open interest, and the trend variable as previously defined, for each of the four agricultural commodities markets. We also included the number of days to expiration of the current wheat contract, for a total of 17 input variables. • A trend indicator variable was computed for each of the four agricultural commodities using the formula: |(pt - pt-1 ) / pt | + |(vt - vt-1 ) / vt | Measuring Network Performance • The normalized RMSE • Thiel's U1 statistic RESULTS • The networks achieved a lower MAD, RMSE, and nRMSE in comparison to the random walk model • In every year except 1990, Thiel’s U1 statistic is less than one, establishing that the network predictions are better than the random walk predictions for those years SUMMARY • The neural networks developed in this study outperformed the random walk predictions, and provided evidence that a nonlinear structure exists in the data tested • The implication is that prices can be predicted using available information, thus, signaling the existence of profitable trading strategies