Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
From: AAAI Technical Report FS-92-03. Copyright © 1992, AAAI (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved. Research Summary_ Nameand Address: Dr. Sattiraju Prabhakar School of ComputingSciences University of Technology, Sydney PO Box 123, Broadway Sydney, NSW2007, Australia email: [email protected] Tel. (O): (61-2) 330-1851 Fax: (61-2) 330-1807 The primary goals of this work are to develop (i) the structure-behavior-function (SBF) modelsfor various kinds of knowledgeused by the designer during Creative Design, and (ii) the methodologies to composedifferent, but related, SBF models to arrive at reusable design models. Wehave been developing a methodology called PerformanceDriven Creativity (PDC)which arrives at creative designs by considering the interactions of existing design knowledgeof a device and the failure knowledgeof this device in a new operating environment [Prabhakar and Goel 1992]. The failure and the design knowledgeare represented using different SBFmodelswhich use similar ontologies. The failure knowledgecan be arrived at using (i) the previous experiences of design failures, (ii) prototypical behaviors, or (iii) basic concepts in the failure SBFmodel[Prabhakar 1989, Prabhakar, et al 1990]. The resulting failure knowledgerepresents howa fault develops, while the device performs within a new operating environment,due to the existing design knowledge.Oncethe failure knowledgeis arrived at, it is used to discover the new constraints the knowndesign of the device should follow. Newbehaviors are generated for these constraints. These behaviors are composedwith the behavior of the device. Since the behaviors that realize the new constraints can be significantly different from the knownbehavior of the device, composition of these behaviors needs comprehension, abstraction, specification or reorganization of the concepts involved in describing the behaviors. Someof the methodologies for behavior composition have already been identified. Further work is in progress to identify and develop other methodologies. [Goel and Prabhakar 1991] A. Goel and S. Prabhakar. "A Control Architecture for Model-basedRedesign Problem Solving". Artificial Intelligence in Design Workshop,Proc. Twelfth International Joint Conferenceon Artificial Intelligence, pp. 121-136,Sydney,Australia, Aug.1991. [Prabhakar 1989] S. Prabhakar. "Diagnostic Reasoning with Surface and Deep Level Knowledgein Medical Domain".Ph.D Dissertation, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India, 1989. [Prabhakar and Goel 1992] S. Prabhakar and A. Goel. Using diagnostic experiences in experience-based innovative design. In Proceedingsof Applications of Artificial Intelligence X: Knowledge-Based Systems, pp. 420-434, 1992. [Prabhakar, et al 1990] S. Prabhakar, I.S.N. Murthy and L.M. Patnaik. "Diagnosing Multiple Faults using a Taxonomic Organization of Deep Level Causal Knowledge". AAAI Spring Symposium Series: AI in Medicine, Stanford University, 1990. 118