Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Storage Ring Compton Light Sources Y. K. Wu DFELL, Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory Department of Physics, Duke University March 2, 2010 Acknowledgment: M. Busch, M. Emanian, J. Faircloth, S. Hartman, J. Li, S. Mikhailov, V. Popov, G. Swift, P. Wang, P. Wallace (DFELL) M. Ahmed, T. Clegg, H. Gao, C. Howell, H. Karwowski, J. Kelley, A. Tonchev, W. Tornow, H. Weller (TUNL) HIGS Collaborators Work supported by U.S. Grant and Contract: DOE DE-FG02-01ER41175 and AFOSR MFELFA9550-04-01-0086 DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu Outline Compton Gamma-ray Sources A brief historical overview Major Compton gamma-ray facilities New projects High Intensity Gamma-ray Source (HIGS) Accelerator facility Operation modes Beam diagnostics Optical resonator issues High flux operation Issues with Compton Light Sources: focus on Gamma-ray Source Accelerators Laser beams Energy range Impacts on LS operation due to Compton gamma-ray source Y. K. Wu History of Compton Light Sources Early History Early 1920's, Arthur Compton, Discovery of Compton Effect A. H. Compton, Bulletin Nat. Res. Council (U.S.) 20, 19 (1922); Phys. Rev. 21, 483 (1923) 1963, Milburn, and Arutyunian and Tumanian, first proposed γ-beam production via Compton backscattering of photon with accelerator based high-energy electron beam R. H. Milburn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 75 (1963). F. R. Arutyunian and V. A. Tumanian, Phys. Lett. 4, 176 (1963). 1963 – 1965, the first Compton γ-ray beam experimental demonstrations, – Kulikov et al.with a 600 MeV synchrotron – Bemporad et al. with the 6.0 GeV Cambridge Electron Acclerator O. F. Kulikov et al., Phys. Lett. 13, 344 (1964); C. Bemporad et al., Phys. Rev. B 138, 1546 (1965). 1967 – 1969, Ballam et al. with the 20 GeV Stanford linear Acclerator, first physics measurements using Compton γ-ray beam to study the photo-production cross section (~GeVs) with a hydrogen bubble chamber J. J. Murray and P. R. Klein, SLAC Report No. SLAC-TN-67-19, unpublished (1967). J. Ballam et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 498 (1969). DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu History of Compton Light Sources Major Compton Gamma Source Facilities (1970's – 1990's) 1978 – 1993, LADON, ADONE storage ring, Frascati, Italy The first γ-ray Compton light source facility for nuclear physics research, by colliding electron beam (1.5 GeV) inside a laser cavity. It produced polarized γ-ray beams up to 80 MeV with an on-target flux of up to 5x10^5 s−1 for nuclear experiments. L. Casano et al., Laser and Unconv. Opt. J. 55, 3 (1975). G. Matone et al., Lect. Notes Phys. 62, 3 (1977). L. Federici et al., Nuovo Cimento Lett. 27, 339 (1980). L. Federici et al., Nuovo Cimento B 59, 247 (1980). D. Babusci et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 305, 19 (1991). 1987 – 2006, LEGS, NSLS x-ray ring, Brookhaven National Lab, US A. M. Sandorfi et al., IEEE Trans.NS-30, 3083 (1984). 1993 – persent, ROKK-1/ROKK-2/ROKK-1M, Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Russia G. Ya. Kezerashvili et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A. 328, 506 (1993). G. Ya. Kezerashvili et al., AIP Conference Proceedings 343, 260 (1995). G. Ya. Kezerashvili et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B. 145, 40 (1998). 1995 – 2008, GRAAL, ESRF storage ring, ESRF, Grenoble, France A. A. Kazakov et al., JETP Lett. 40, 445 (1984). 1996 – present, HIγS, Duke FEL storage ring, Duke University, US V. N. Litvinenko et al., Phys. Lett. 78, 4569 (1997). 1998 – present, LEPS, Spring-8 storage ring, Spring-8, Japan T. Nakano et al., Nucl. Phys. A 629, 559c (1998). T. Nakano et al., Nucl. Phys. A 684, 71c (2001). DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu History of Compton Light Sources H.R. Weller et al. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 62, p. 257-303 (2009). DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu New Compton Source Projects A Few New Compton Source Projects in Planning and Development Shanghai Laser Electron Gamma Source (SLEGS), Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF) – 3.5 GeV electron beam and a 500 W CO2 polarized laser – An energy up to 22 MeV and a flux of 109-10γ/s Q. Y. Pan et al., Synchrotron Radiation News, Volume 22, Issue 3, p. 11 (2009). Compton Gamma Source Project at MAX-lab – 3 GeV electron beam from the MAX IV storage ring to be built, up to 500 mA – An ultraviolet (UV) laser beam – The maximum gamma-ray energy around 500 MeV – A tagged flux as high as a few times 107 γ/s L. Isaksson, MAX-lab, Lund, Sweden, private communication (2009). Laser-Electron Photon 2 (LEPS2), Spring-8 – For conducting research in the quark-nuclear physics – Higher intensity and higher maximum energy compared with LEPS – Expanded detector acceptance for a 4π γ-detector. The LEPS2 website, www.hadron.jp; and the 2006 RCNP Annual Report, for example, www.rcnp.osakau.ac.jp/~annurep/2006/topics/yosoi.pd DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu Major Compton Gamma Source Facilities Around the World MAX-Lab ROKK GRAAL LEGS HIGS DFELL, Duke University LADON LEPS SLEGS 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu A Storage Ring Compton Gamma Source High Intensity Gamma-ray Source (HIGS) at Duke University DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu HIGS Accelerators High Intensity Gamma-ray Source (HIGS) Accelerators Recent Accelerator Upgrades New lattice for OK-5 FEL New HOM-damped RF cavity New OK-5 FEL with circular polarization A New Booster synchrotron for top-off injection Typical User Operation Modes FEL: single-bunch, up to 95 mA HIGS: two-bunch, 80 - 110 mA DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu HIGS Accelerators OK-5 and OK-4 FELs (Since Aug. 2005) OK-5 wigglers e-beam OK-5 helical wiggler, OK-5A OK-4 Planar wigglers OK-5 helical wiggler, OK-5B OK-4 wigglers 20.15 m DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu HIGS Research Operation Principle of HIGS 52.8 m DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu HIGS Research Operation Modes of HIGS Operation Modes of HIGS Qusi-CW operation vs Pulsed High-flux vs high energy resolution FWHM DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu HIGS Research High Energy-Resolution Operation Asymmetric Bunch Pattern: one large (lasing) and one small (non-lasing) Improving stability of gamma energy resolution and increase flux Develop a reliable way to measure bunch pattern, and An automatic injection scheme to maintain charge distribution DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu Beam Diagnostics/Feedback Electron/Photon Collision Angle Monitor DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu Beam Diagnostics/Feedback Bunch Length and FEL Spectrum Monitors Beam Diagnostics Live Spectrum Monitor Live bunch length monitors 349 MeV, 27 mA DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu Beam Diagnostics/Feedback Bunch-by-bunch Longitudinal Feedback Providing bunch-by-bunch damping of longitudinal instabilities LFB BPM iGp-64F Digital signal processing system MILMEGA 200 W Power amplifier Feed through With . Nose cone Beam pipe DFELL, Duke University Pill-box cavity Commissioned for User Operation (Oct., 2008) Part of Ph.D. thesis work of Wenzhong Wu Y. K. Wu 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Beam Diagnostics/Feedback LFB Stabilizing Longitudinal Motion Synchrotron sidebands Synchrotron sidebands? DFELL, Duke University LFB OFF LFB ON 574 MeV, 4-bunch, mA 574 MeV, 4-bunch, 1515 mA Part of Ph.D. thesis work of Wenzhong Wu Y. K. Wu 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Beam Diagnostics/Feedback In-cavity Aperture System for High Current Operation Electron Beam Mirror WIG01 WIG02 6.72 m Lw = 4 m WIG03 6.72 m 6.72 m Aperture Mirror 16.54 m 4.58 m Collision Point DFELL, Duke University WIG03 22.29 m Part of Ph.D. thesis work of Senlin Huang NIM A 606, p. 762 (2009). Y. K. Wu 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Beam Diagnostics/Feedback Correcting Mirror Deformation 45 MeV Setup with OK-5 FEL DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu HIGS Summary Stability of Gamma Operation in Electron Loss Mode Current Current Gamma flux Gamma flux with closed apertures DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu High-Finesse FEL Resonator High Reflectivity FEL Mirrors 780 nm Mirrors Minimal round-trip loss: ~ 0.107% Finesse @ Low power ~ 3,000 Effective: R ~ 99.95% Kicker firing 761 nm, Loss ~0.00107 DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu High-Finesse FEL Resonator High Reflectivity FEL Mirrors Mirror degradation Carbon deposition on the surface Vertical Horizontal 780 nm, CCV020, downstream cavity mirror, D=50 mm DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu Intracavity FEL Power Measurement Experimental Layout Ebeam: 514 MeV, about 88 mA in two equally populated bunches FEL beam λ = 545 nm; Gamma-beam collimator: d = 0.75” Collimated (d=3/4”), γ-beam image Collimated flux: 3.68% 12m DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu Intracavity FEL Power Measurement Intracavity FEL Power Measurements: γ-Spectrum Ebeam: 514 MeV, about 88 mA in two equally populated bunches FEL beam λ = 545 nm; Gamma-beam collimator: d = 0.75” C. Sun et al. NIMA 605, p 312(2009) Avg Flux Density from 11B at 8.916 MeV True γ-spectrum 11B data: Pb = 800 (+/-100) W, PFEL = 1.6 kW (+/- 0.2 kW) DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu Intracavity FEL Power Measurement Intracavity FEL Power Measurements Ebeam: 514 MeV; FEL beam λ = 545 nm; Collimator: d = 0.75” HPGe data Preliminary Results: HPGe data DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu Gamma Energy Tuning Range with OK-5 FEL (3.5 kA) DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu Highest Total Flux (2009): > 1010 γ/s @ 9 – 11 MeV DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light H. R. Weller et al., “Research Opportunities at the Upgraded HIγS Facility,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. Vol 62, Issue 1, p. 257-303 (2009). Y. K. Wu Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics Research at HIGS Nuclear Structure Few-Nucleon Physics Astro-physics Gerasimov-Drell-Hearn (GDH) Sum Rule Compton Scattering from Nucleons Photon-Pion Physics DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light HIGS H. R. Weller et al., “Research Opportunities at the Upgraded HIγS Facility,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. Vol 62, Issue 1, p. 257-303 (2009). Y. K. Wu Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Accelerators for Compton Light Sources Advantages of storage rings – High repetition rate – Orbit stability and beam stability (at higher energies) – Adequate ebeam emittance and energy spread – Known technologies – Powering a high average flux Compton source Other Accelerators – Warm temperature Linacs: • Low rep-rate pulsed operation • Expensive laser • Less stable • Powering a high peak flux source – Super-conducting linac (e.g. ERL) • High rep-rate • Costly • Less mature technology • A potential driver for very high average flux source DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu – – – – – Tuneable wavelength => a large Compton photon energy range Self-synchronization and self alignment Complex and Expensive High intracavity power Driver for a versatile, high-flux Compton source for a wide range of research programs External Lasers – Ti:sapphire m TW lasers, low reprate, time syn, low stability, costly – CW lasers – – – Laser Cavities – Used in LADON project (low finesse) – High finesse Fabry-Perot cavity • DC laser with high finesse – JLAB, Compton polarimeter, 1064 nm, finesse 30,000, 1.6 kW • CW pulsed laser V. Brisson, e t al. Nucl. I nstrum. Meth. A 608(2009)S75–S77 – Laboratoire de l’Acce´le´rateur Line´aire, C.N.R.S./IN2P3, DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Orsay, Y. K. Wu Light Sources France Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC – Ti:sapph, 76 MHz, 1 ps, finesse 30,000 – – – – – – 0.1 eV photons, 10 – 100 keV x-rays, e-beam: 80 – 250 MeV; 1eV photons, 10 – 100 keV x-rays, e-beam: 25 – 80 MeV; E-beam, 2 GeV, 0.1 eV photons, γ-ray: 6 MeV E-beam, 2 GeV, 1 eV photons, γ-ray: 60 MeV E-beam, 3 GeV, 0.1 eV photons, γ-ray: 14 MeV E-beam, 3 GeV, 1 eV photons, γ-ray: 140 MeV Figure of Merits for Gamma-ray Beams: – Brightness is no longer a good figure of merit for gamma-ray beam – New merits: flux (γ/s), spectral flux (γ/s/eV, avg, peak), relative energy spread (FWHM) Compton X-ray Source Driven by a Storage Ring – Don Ruth, SLAC, www.lynceantech.com. – Next talk: “Experience with the Compact light source” DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu Critical Issues for Storage Ring Compton Gamma Sources Impact On the Storage Ring Light Source when Operating Compton Gamma Source as an Optical Insertion Device (OID) Effect of Electron Loss When Compton scattered electron loses more energy than allowed by the energy aperture (smaller of energy dynamic aperture and energy acceptance limited by RF/vacuum chambers). Two strategies: – “Hide” loss among beam lifetime • Electron-loss mode operation (Energy loss > Aperture) • Good for higher energy gamma operation • Limited flux: 10^6 – few 10^7 γ/s • Gamma-ray energy determination: Tagging of electrons – Prevent electron loss • No-loss mode (Energy loss < Aperture) • Good for lower energy gamma operation • High flux possible (greater than 10^9 γ/s) • Gamma-ray energy selection: Collimation of gamma-beam Impact on Electron Beam Parameters – An issue with extremely high flux operation – Impact on e-beam energy and longitudinal distributions – (estimates using damping wiggler model; need real simulation) – Impact on transverse beam distribution (emittance) DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu – – – – High gamma beam energies <=> User research programs Additional flux limitation due to tagging rate, 10^5 – 10^6 e-/s per tagging channel High efficincy: tagging a large amount of Compton gamma-rays: 30% - 60% Energy resolution as limited by the absolute energy spread of the e-beam • Example: 3 GeV e-beam, 0.1% (sigmaE), 150 MeV gamma-ray • dE (FWHM) = 7.1 MeV; dE/E (γ,FWHM) = 5%; – Reliability of tagging signal at high rates Collimation – Low gamma beam energies <=> User research programs – If OID, fixed gamma energy with a fixed e-beam energy; how to vary gamma energy? – Potentially very high flux – Low efficiency: collimation selects only a few percent Compton gamma-rays – Challenge in high precision flux measurement (pileups, scattering, secondary particles, etc) – Energy spread issues: collimation effect, e-beam energy spread, emittance effect • Long beamline • Good e-beam aiming stability • Example: 3 GeV e-beam, ~5% γ-beam energy spread (FWHM) – Half opening angle: 30 micro-radians – If collimator aperture r = 3 mm, beamline length ~ 100 m; – Stability of ebeam aiming; a few micro-radians DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu Energy Spread of γ-beam Energy Distribution of Compton Gamma-beam E-beam Energy Spread (Scaled) Collimator Effect (Scaled) Emittance Effect (Scaled) Collimator Effect Monochromatic electron and Effect photon beams New Merit: Degree of Collimation DFELL, Duke University Part of Ph.D. thesis work of Changchun Sun Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 12, 062801 (2009) Y. K. Wu 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Industrial and Medical Applications Compton Gamma-beam Imaging at HIGS DFELL, Duke University Polarization Effect: Linear vs Circular 22.5 MeV Gamma-beam 680 MeV-ebeam, 378 nm FEL, 27 m from collision 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu Industrial and Medical Applications Compton Gamma-beam Imaging at HIGS Imager Resolution Test with a bar phantom test and 2.75 MeV gamma-beam DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu Industrial and Medical Applications Compton Gamma-beam Radiograph DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu The End DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu 1 MeV Gamma-beam High Resolution Mode: DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu Switch-yard for OK-4 and OK-5 Wigglers Photon-pion physics 150 – 160 MeV operation with the OK-5 FEL lasing around 150 nm DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu Summary High Intensity Gamma-ray Source Development and User Research An Overview of HIGS Accelerator Facility and Development Program: Accelerator Physics and FEL Research An Overview of HIGS User Research Program: Nuclear Physics Program HIGS Capabilities (2009) Energy Tuning: 1 - 100 MeV Maximum Total Flux: > 1010 γ/s around 9 - 10 MeV Maximum Spectrum Flux: : ~ 103 γ/s/eV around 5 - 10 MeV High Energy Resolution: 0.8% (< = 5 MeV) Polarization: linear, and switchable left- and right-circular HIGS Near-Term Development Higher Gamma-beam Energy: 100 - 160 MeV for photon-pion physics research Higher Flux Operation: 1011 γ/s total below 20 MeV DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu HIGS Operation Summary (Aug. 1, 2008 – Jul . 31, 2009) HIGS beam-on-target: 1584 hr DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu Industrial and Medical Applications Compton Gamma-beam Imaging AIST, Tsukaba, Ibaraki, Japan Radiograph TH571A Tetrode tube H. Toyokawa, NIM A545, p. 469 (2005) DFELL, Duke University 48th Sample CT images using 10 MeV LCS photon beam Y. K. Wu ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC High-Finesse FEL Resonator High Reflectivity FEL Mirrors High Reflectivity Mirrors (1060 – 520 nm) Spec: R > 99.95% Example: transmission 15 ppm @ 780 nm (Vendor measurement) General Optics, GSI (2008) Tmin ~ 0.0015% DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu Intracavity FEL Power Measurement Intracavity FEL Power Measurements Ebeam: 514 MeV; FEL beam λ = 545 nm; Collimator: d = 0.75” HPGe data Preliminary Results: HPGe data DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu Industrial and Medical Applications Radiation Therapy and Diagnostics Radioisotopes Cancer treatment: 1012 – 1014 g/s Diagnostic: 1012 g/s 15 MeV Compton g-beam g-beam from 15 MeV Linac K. J. Weeks., NIM A393 (1997) p. 544-547. DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu Industrial and Medical Applications Radiation Therapy and Diagnostics Radiation Dose for Cancer Treatment A solid epithelial tumor ranges: 60 - 80 Gy Lymphoma tumor: 20 – 40 Gy B Girolami et al. Phys. Med. Biol._v41, p1581(1996). DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu DFELL, Duke University 48th ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop (FLS2010), SLAC Y. K. Wu