Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Nebulae Associated with Ultraluminous X-ray Sources P. Abolmasov, Special Astrophysical Observatory Very commonly used ionization diagram Collisionally excited (shocks or X-rays): [NII]6583,6448 [SII]6717,6731 [OI]6300,6364 “High excitation” (ionization potential > 1Ry): [OIII], HeII [FeIII], ArIV etc… Ultraluminous X-ray Sources (ULXs) LX ≥ 1039 erg/s non-nuclear compact sources Eddington limit for ~ 10 M Not young SNRs! (usual a for stellar-mass BH) Not AGNe! Unknown nature! (can be ~1040 erg/s bright) Most popular models: -IMBH with a massive donor star accreting @ 0.01-1 critical (Eddington) rate -Supercritical accretor like SS433 with a thick disk with a funnel, seen face-on Observational Properties: -Luminosities 1039-1041 erg/s in the standard X-ray range (Chandra 0.5-8keV) -Powerlaw or powerlaw+soft excess (T ~ 0.1-0.2keV) X-ray spectra -~1 per 20 giant spirals -Connected to the young stellar population (5-20 Myr…) -Some have radio counterparts (NGC5408 X-1, HoII X-1) -Some have point-like optical counterparts identified with OB supergiants -Some are close to massive star clusters (usually offset by tens of parsecs) -Many have nebular counterparts (ULX nebulae) ULX nebulae: -Shock excitation ([SII], [NII], [OI] etc. ) -Large sizes, ~50-500pc -HeII λ4686 emission (stellar?) What are they? -SNRs? (too powerful) -Superbubbles? (lack of young stars) -X-ray ionized nebulae? (requires too much X-rays in some cases!) MH9/10, the optical counterpart of HoIX X-1 (Grisé et al., 2006) HoII X-1 Ho IX X-1 NGC6946 ULX1 (=X8, X11) IC 342 X-1 “Peculiar SNRs” Our results from the 6m: Eight ULX nebulae Two spectrographs : -- MPFS (panoramic) -- SCORPIO (long slit) Medium spectral resolution (Δ ~ 5-10Å) Spectral range 4000-7200Å MF16 (counterpart of NGC6946 ULX-1): 34pc (~1,˝5) X-ray source coordinates: 20h 35m 00s.75 +60˚ 11' 30".9 (HST ACS, filter F658N) 20pc (~1˝) But: HeIIλ4686 / Hβ ~ 0.2 !! Radio isophotes (VLA) LX ≈ 2.5 1039 erg/s (0.5-8.0 keV) L(H) ≈ 2 1038 erg/s L(optical lines, total) ≈ 2 1039 erg/s Also a bright radio source from Blair&Fesen, 1994 NGC 6946 galaxy: D = 5,5 (from 5,1 to 5,9) Mpc Scd, active star formation MF16 Observations with the 6m SAO telescope Spectrograph wavelength range,Å spectral resolution seeing, arcsec MPFS (panoramic) 4000-7000 ~1000 1,5 SCORPIO (long-slit) 4000-5700 ~2000 1,5 Long Slit MPFS FOV 1˝ Emission lines’ mapping: Hα [OIII] (5007+4959) 1˝ Barycenter shift: line H : H : HeII : [OIII] : [SII] : [NII] : -0,111 -0,088 -0,11 -0,10 0,72 -0,02 0,058 0,011 -0,116 -0,081 -0,061 -0,064 1˝ ±0,013 ±0,02 ±0,02 ±0,015 ±0,014 ±0,013 Hβ [SII] (6717+6731) HeII4686 [NII] (6548+6583) Integral spectrum: Very rich high-excitation spectrum (HeII, FeIII, OIII) and bright shockionized lines (SII, NII, OI). SCOPRIO spectrum: MPFS total spectrum Possible interpretations – fast (photoionizing) shock waves or photoionization by a broadband continuum… Two-component lines: HeII4686 H [OIII]4959 [OIII]5007 V2-V1 120-130 km/s [OIII]5007 Broader component width ~ 200-300km/s H For a single H line: precursor Shock (cooling matter) VS (from Dopita&Sutherland, 1996) Total luminosity in H (if the shock surface area is given); Shock velocity estimate from the component ratio: FH , precursor VS 866 km s F H , shock 7.69 L(Hβ) = (7,2±0,4) 1037 erg/s Single Hβ line Narrow-to-broad components ratio 1,85±0,19 kinematics Additional source of excitation/ionization? nH, cm-3 SHOCK WAVES OR PHOTOIONIZATION? from Evans et al., 1999 Only lgU~-5 can be provided by the extrapolated model for X-ray spectrum (Chandra data, taken from Roberts&Colbert, 2003), lgU~-2.7 needed MF16 MF16 B/n1/2 = Photoionization by power law continuum (labelled by ionization parameter logarithm lgU) F 1 U d cn 13.6eV h Using single recombination line Total effective recombination coefficient for He++ for Case B Weakly varying function of physical conditions Recombination with HeII4686 emission coefficient L<228Å ≥ 1039erg/s HeII4686 L(HeII)=1.6 1037 erg/s Cannot be explained by a shock wave, and an EUV source needed with L<228Å ≥ 1039erg/s MF16 Or X-ray source with L ~ 1041 erg/s or larger! Photoionization by power law continuum (labelled by ionization parameter logarithm lgU) Pure photoionization models (CLOUDY 96.01 modeling results): Central source emitting: fixed X-ray spectrum (best-fit from Roberts&Colbert, 2003), with dilution corresponding to 13pc + black body with temperatures (3-30) 104K and integral flux densities 0.3-7.0 erg/cm2/s Photoionization best-fit: lgT(K) = 5.15±0.05 (T~120 000K) F = 0.6 ± 0.1 erg/cm2/s => UV luminosity ~1040erg/s Other high-excitation nebulae: M101 P098 from the work of Kuntz et al (2001) High-excitation nebulae: HoII X-1 Bubble nebulae: HoIX X-1 Bubble nebulae: IC342 X-1 HeII4686 accompanied by other high-excitation lines, both allowed and forbidden (MF16) Both high-excitation and low-excitation lines are enhanced everywhere! Seyfert NLRs PNe Compare with Baldwin’s picture! Photoionized HII regions ULXNe SNRs Unification scheme for ULNXe? Low EUV luminosity / large shell size High EUV luminosity / small shell (the case of HoIX X-1 and IC342 X-1): (the case of MF16): Shock-ionized shell X-ray source Very large diffuse shell or no shell at all Strömgren zone (M101 P098) In the framework of supercritical accretor model: Supercritical wind photosphere emitting EUV quanta! Higher massloss rate: Wind photosphere Lower mass loss: Thin wind-blown bubble HST images B W50 (VLA) H+[NII] Optical emission of W50: Optical filaments Zealey et al.,1980 50pc [OIII]5007 / H ~ 8 ?!! L(H) ~ 1039 erg/s ?!! Conclusions: -All the observed ULX nebulae are at least partially shock-powered -Practically all of them contain signatures of high excitation (bright HeII, [OIII] lines) -To explain the spectra of some of them, EUV source is needed even brighter than the X-ray source - Many of ULXs most likely have wind/jet activity similar to that of SS433