Download ULX nebulae

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Nebulae Associated with
Ultraluminous X-ray Sources
P. Abolmasov,
Special Astrophysical Observatory
Very commonly used ionization diagram
Collisionally excited
(shocks or X-rays):
[NII]6583,6448
[SII]6717,6731
[OI]6300,6364
“High excitation”
(ionization potential
> 1Ry):
[OIII], HeII
[FeIII], ArIV etc…
Ultraluminous X-ray Sources (ULXs)
LX ≥ 1039 erg/s non-nuclear compact sources
Eddington limit
for ~ 10 M
Not young SNRs!
(usual a for stellar-mass BH)
Not AGNe!
Unknown nature!
(can be ~1040 erg/s bright)
Most popular models:
-IMBH with a massive donor star accreting @ 0.01-1 critical
(Eddington) rate
-Supercritical accretor like SS433 with a thick disk with a
funnel, seen face-on
Observational Properties:
-Luminosities 1039-1041 erg/s in the standard X-ray range
(Chandra 0.5-8keV)
-Powerlaw or powerlaw+soft excess (T ~ 0.1-0.2keV) X-ray spectra
-~1 per 20 giant spirals
-Connected to the young stellar population (5-20 Myr…)
-Some have radio counterparts (NGC5408 X-1, HoII X-1)
-Some have point-like optical counterparts identified with OB
supergiants
-Some are close to massive star clusters (usually offset by tens of parsecs)
-Many have nebular counterparts (ULX nebulae)
ULX nebulae:
-Shock excitation ([SII], [NII], [OI] etc. )
-Large sizes, ~50-500pc
-HeII λ4686 emission (stellar?)
What are they?
-SNRs? (too powerful)
-Superbubbles? (lack of young stars)
-X-ray ionized nebulae? (requires too much
X-rays in some cases!)
MH9/10, the optical
counterpart of HoIX X-1
(Grisé et al., 2006)
HoII X-1
Ho IX X-1
NGC6946 ULX1 (=X8, X11)
IC 342 X-1
“Peculiar SNRs”
Our results from the 6m:
Eight ULX nebulae
Two spectrographs :
-- MPFS (panoramic)
-- SCORPIO (long slit)
Medium spectral resolution (Δ ~ 5-10Å)
Spectral range 4000-7200Å
MF16
(counterpart of NGC6946 ULX-1):
34pc (~1,˝5)
X-ray source
coordinates:
20h 35m 00s.75
+60˚ 11' 30".9
(HST ACS,
filter F658N)
20pc (~1˝)
But: HeIIλ4686 / Hβ ~ 0.2 !!
Radio isophotes
(VLA)
LX ≈ 2.5 1039 erg/s (0.5-8.0 keV)
L(H) ≈ 2 1038 erg/s
L(optical lines, total) ≈ 2 1039 erg/s
Also a bright radio source
from Blair&Fesen, 1994
NGC 6946 galaxy:
D = 5,5 (from 5,1 to 5,9) Mpc
Scd, active star formation
MF16
Observations with the 6m SAO telescope
Spectrograph
wavelength range,Å
spectral
resolution
seeing,
arcsec
MPFS (panoramic)
4000-7000
~1000
1,5
SCORPIO (long-slit) 4000-5700
~2000
1,5
Long
Slit
MPFS
FOV
1˝
Emission lines’ mapping:
Hα
[OIII]
(5007+4959)
1˝
Barycenter shift:
line
H
:
H
:
HeII :
[OIII] :
[SII] :
[NII] :


-0,111 -0,088
-0,11 -0,10
0,72 -0,02
0,058 0,011
-0,116 -0,081
-0,061 -0,064
1˝
±0,013
±0,02
±0,02
±0,015
±0,014
±0,013
Hβ
[SII]
(6717+6731)
HeII4686
[NII]
(6548+6583)
Integral spectrum:
Very rich high-excitation spectrum
(HeII, FeIII, OIII) and bright shockionized lines (SII, NII, OI).
SCOPRIO spectrum:
 MPFS total
spectrum
Possible interpretations – fast (photoionizing)
shock waves or photoionization by a broadband
continuum…
Two-component lines:
HeII4686
H
[OIII]4959
[OIII]5007
V2-V1  120-130 km/s
[OIII]5007
Broader component width ~ 200-300km/s
H
For a single H line:
precursor
Shock
(cooling matter)
VS
(from Dopita&Sutherland, 1996)
Total luminosity in H (if the shock surface area is given);
Shock velocity estimate from the component ratio:
 FH  , precursor
VS  866 km  
s  F
 H  , shock



7.69
L(Hβ) = (7,2±0,4) 1037 erg/s
Single Hβ line
Narrow-to-broad components ratio 1,85±0,19
kinematics
Additional source of
excitation/ionization?
nH, cm-3
SHOCK WAVES OR
PHOTOIONIZATION?
from Evans et al., 1999

Only lgU~-5 can be provided by the extrapolated
model for X-ray spectrum (Chandra data, taken from
Roberts&Colbert, 2003), lgU~-2.7 needed
MF16
MF16
B/n1/2 =
Photoionization by power law continuum
(labelled by ionization parameter logarithm lgU)

F
1
U
d
cn 13.6eV h
Using single recombination line
Total effective recombination
coefficient for He++ for Case B
Weakly varying
function of physical
conditions
Recombination with HeII4686
emission coefficient
L<228Å ≥ 1039erg/s
HeII4686
L(HeII)=1.6 1037 erg/s
Cannot be explained by a
shock wave, and an EUV
source needed with
L<228Å ≥ 1039erg/s
MF16
Or X-ray source
with L ~ 1041 erg/s
or larger!
Photoionization by power
law continuum (labelled by
ionization parameter
logarithm lgU)
Pure photoionization models (CLOUDY 96.01 modeling
results):
Central source emitting:
fixed X-ray spectrum (best-fit from
Roberts&Colbert, 2003), with dilution
corresponding to 13pc
+
black body with temperatures
(3-30) 104K and integral flux
densities 0.3-7.0 erg/cm2/s
Photoionization best-fit:
lgT(K) = 5.15±0.05
(T~120 000K)
F = 0.6 ± 0.1 erg/cm2/s
=> UV luminosity ~1040erg/s
Other high-excitation nebulae:
M101 P098
from the work of Kuntz et al (2001)
High-excitation nebulae:
HoII X-1
Bubble nebulae: HoIX X-1
Bubble nebulae: IC342 X-1
HeII4686 accompanied by other high-excitation lines, both
allowed and forbidden (MF16)
Both high-excitation and low-excitation lines are enhanced
everywhere!
Seyfert
NLRs
PNe
Compare with
Baldwin’s
picture!
Photoionized HII
regions
ULXNe
SNRs
Unification scheme for ULNXe?
Low EUV luminosity / large shell size
High EUV luminosity / small shell
(the case of HoIX X-1 and IC342 X-1):
(the case of MF16):
Shock-ionized
shell
X-ray source
Very large
diffuse shell or
no shell at all
Strömgren zone
(M101 P098)
In the framework of supercritical accretor
model:
Supercritical wind photosphere emitting EUV quanta!
Higher massloss rate:
Wind photosphere
Lower mass loss:
Thin wind-blown bubble
HST images
B
W50 (VLA)
H+[NII] 
Optical emission of W50:
Optical filaments
Zealey et al.,1980
50pc
[OIII]5007 / H ~ 8 ?!!
L(H) ~ 1039 erg/s ?!!
Conclusions:
-All the observed ULX nebulae are at least partially shock-powered
-Practically all of them contain signatures of high excitation (bright
HeII, [OIII] lines)
-To explain the spectra of some of them, EUV source is needed even
brighter than the X-ray source
- Many of ULXs most likely have wind/jet activity similar to that of
SS433
Related documents