* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Monsalve - Conference
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
QUIET Q/U Imaging ExperimenT QUIET Project Miami Physics Conference 2009 December 16 Raul Monsalve for the QUIET Collaboration University of Miami What is QUIET ? • Radiotelescope that measures intensity and polarization of the CMB • Located in Chile • Main science objective is to improve characterization of Emode polarization and detect the difficult B-mode polarization • Two phases are planned. Phase-I is ongoing, started in August 2008. Phase II is planned to start in 2012, in a larger scale, improving the techniques learned during phase-I QUIET Collaboration U. CHICAGO FERMILAB STANFORD MANCHESTER OXFORD OSLO COLUMBIA JPL PRINCETON CALTECH U. MIAMI SITE MPI-BONN KEK Science Goals • We can measure the polarisation of the CMB the same way as for light • The Stokes parameters quantify the polarization properties of a light ray ▫ ▫ ▫ ▫ I = no filter at all Q = linear polarizer at 0 and 90° U = linear polarizer at -45 and 45 ° V = circular polarizer • I is just the temperature • Q and U combine to form E- and B-modes • No known physical process can generate Vpolarized CMB radiation Science Goals Status and Forecast on the EE and BB characterization Site and Instrumentation Site • Chajnantor Scientific Reserve in Chile at 5080 m above sea level • Among the best places for mm and submm astronomy • Access to CBI infrastructure • Accessible at all times • 1 hour drive from San Pedro de Atacama • Good sky coverage • For outside work bottled oxygen systems are used • Oxygen concentration in control room is increased ~27% Phase-I Summary Frequency N° of HEMT Detectors Resolution Telescope Type Module Sensitivity Array Sensitivity Observation Period Q Band W Band 40 GHz 90 GHz 17/2 84/6 28 arcmin (FWHM) 12 arcmin (FWHM) Crossed Dragone Crossed Dragone 300 μK s½ 550 μK s½ 70 μK s½ 60 μK s½ Oct 2008 – June 2009 June 2009 – Mid 2010 ? Mount • Inherited from CBI • Alt-Az axes • Rotation about optical axis (boresight axis) • Elevation range limited to 43 deg < el < 87 deg Optics • Crossed Dragone design • 1.4 m primary and secondary mirrors • FWHM: 28 (Q) and 12 (W) arcmin Horn Arrays • Conical corrugated feed horn arrays • Excellent beam symmetry • Low sidelobe response • Low cross-polarization • Broad frequency band • Typical FWHM of ~7 deg • Built by UM OMTs • Splits incoming radiation into L and R • 20% bandwidth • Low loss • High isolation on the output ports to avoid temperature-to-polarization leakage Detector Modules • Heart of the receiver • Polarimeter on a chip • Automated assembly and operation • Measuring of Q and U simultaneously in each pixel • Operate at ~20K Module/OMTs Seven element demonstration array Receiver Calibration and Preliminary Data Calibration Strategy Polarization MOON Once/7 days, Relative Gains, Angles NOISE SOURCE Once/1.5 hours, Relative Gains, Angles TAU A Once/2 days, Absolute Gains, Angles, Beams Temperature JUPITER Once/7 days, ∆T Gains, Beam SKY-DIP Once/1.5 hours, Relative Gains, Stability Gain Stability + supplemental measurements Calibration Beam Shape using Jupiter Calibration Tau A Gains Moon Polarization Fits CMB Analysis Observation Regions Patch Centers • Low foreground regions in coordination with ABS, Polarbear (Multifrequency measurements for galactic foreground removal) • Distribution to allow continuous scanning 4x(15x15)=900 [deg²] Telescope Operation during Q-Band Season Average 68.1% Downtime mainly due to: -Mechanical Problems -Generator problems -Bad weather Phase-I, EE Power-spectra Forecasts Q W Patch 2a Results (PRELIMINARY) Other Interesting Observations Galactic Center Polarization Maps with Q-Band Data (PRELIMINARY) Other Interesting Observations Galactic Center Temperature Map with Q-Band Data (PRELIMINARY) QUIET WMAP Phase-II Phase-II Summary Beginning operations 2013 ? N° of telescopes 3 Telescope type Crossed Dragone Ka Band Q Band W Band 32 GHz 40 GHz 90 GHz N° of modules (P/T) 16/2 55/6 1389/108 Beamsize (FWHM) 28 arcmin 20 arcmin 8.5 arcmin Module Sensitivity 165 μK s½ 178 μK s½ 364 μK s½ Frequency Phase-II Power-spectra Forecasts Current Performance (noise, duty cycle, 1/f) Likely Improvement Appendix • Alternate technique to identify gravitational lensing effects (Zaldarriaga(1999), Hu(2002)) • Lens reconstruction: Lensing Deflection Field calculation from cross-correlation of E- and B-modes • Stronger constraints on cosmological parameters than using B-mode power spectrum • By measuring shape and amplitude of the Deflection power spectrum QUIET Phase-II can place constraints on parameters such as: • Neutrino mass (Maltoni, 2004) • Dark energy density (Stompor, 1999) • Spatial curvature (Stompor, 1999) Summary • QUIET Science: • Experiment addressing fundamental questions in physics • Taking the CMB polarization knowledge to new levels • QUIET Status: • Largest HEMT-based focal plane array ever deployed, using state of the art MMIC packaging techniques • Phase-I observing and proposing Phase-II to start in 2012/2013 Systematic Errors o Overall signal size o Overall gain calibration o Beamsize calibration o Pointing error o Fake signal source o Instrumental I->Q/U : caused by OMT, 1% for Q-band. Negligible. o Gain fluctuations : up to 20% negligible for phase I. o E->B mixing source o Polarization angle : calibration better than 5% for phase I. o Optics cross polarization : only affects by order of ∆ө² o Q/U gain mismatch : relative gain between Q and U stable. o Patch geometry : finite patch, patch irregularity, pixelization Systematic Errors E->B, Patch geometry