Download Document

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Spatial Characteristics of
Serial Sexual Assault in New
Zealand
Dr Samantha Lundrigan
Victoria University of Wellington
Research Aims
 To examine the characteristics of New
Zealand sex offenders with respect to:
 Spatial behaviour
 Consistency in offence environment
selection
The New Zealand Context
 4million in a land
area of 268,680 km
sq.
 92% rural land, 8%
built up.
 2001 population
density of 14 per km
sq.
Data collection
 Police files – New Zealand Police
Criminal Profiling Squad
 Crime scene, background and
geographical information coded and
mapped
The sample
 76 serial offenders
 Between 1970 and 2002
 Collectively 270 offences (mean of 3.5 per
series)
 Characteristics
 70% strangers, 20% friend/associate, 1%
previous partner
 Mean age of 23 (12-60)
 53% NZ Maori, 21% NZ European, 18% Pacific
Island People
Results
Journey to crime
Criminal
Range
50.00
mindist (km)
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
50.00
100.00
150.00
200.00
maxdist (km)
r = 0.470 (P<.001)
250.00
300.00
Spatial pattern
 Marauders 37%, Commuters 34%, Transients 29%
Measure
Marauders (median
km)
Commuters
(median km)
Mean distance travelled**
2.36
5.78
Min distance travelled*
0.18
0.91
Maximum distance travelled**
4.75
11.73
Mean Interpoint Distance
12.89
4.40
Max distance between offences
20.28
8.73
Min distance between
offences*
01.17
0.32
* p<.05 ** p<.01
Environmental
consistency
 Variables








Type of contact site
Victim transportation
Day of week
Time of day
Distance to offence
Area type
Land use
Deprivation score
Consistency score
 Mean 4.56, Median
4.79, Standard
deviation 1.70
 Min 1, Max 8
Score
N
Cum%
0≤ 2
8
10.5
2≤ 4
24
42.1
4≤ 6
31
82.9
6≤ 8
13
100.0
Consistency score
 44 (57%) of offenders scored above 4,
the score midpoint.
 Proportional chance expected 2.5% of
offenders (z=45.42, p<.0001).
Future Research
 More detailed analysis of environmental
characteristics
 Offender-offence environment
consistency
 Implications for Geographic profiling
systems
Thank you
 Dr Samantha Lundrigan
Institute of Criminology
Victoria University of Wellington
Wellington
New Zealand
[email protected]
Related documents