Download Data assimilation using an adjoint model

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Data assimilation using an
adjoint model
First Test
By S. Taguchi
TransCom Paris
14 June 2005
Collaboration of AIST and FastOpt
Continuous + adjoint
 annual mean flux
•
•
•
•
•
•
Formulation
c: Observation vector
G: Transport matrix
x:Flux area, prior estimate and uncertainty
Results(Data error, 0.1,0.5,1.0)
Future
Question; Not to be answered
• Relationship between the definition of
adjoint and the current adjoint sensitivity
• How to derive the adjoint sensitivity used in
this study
• Posterior error covariance
Questions; to be answered
• How the problem is set up
• How we compensate the limitations in the
current adjoint sensitivity (forget trend)
• Sensitivity of the solution to the
specifications in observation errors.
continuous + adjoint
 annual flux
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
c=Gx
c: observation vector CMDL – Base Run
G: Transport Matrix Adjoint sensitivity + Prior
x: Unknown source 3x3 grids Annual mean
σc c: Obsrvation Uncertainty
σx Prior flux ucertainty f – z
JBLS=(c-Gx)t X(c-Gx) + (f-z)t W(f-z)
No off-diagonal elements in X and W.
[c.1]Observation vector
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
c= Observations – baseline, 1997 one year
Annual Mean; adjusted
Point barrow/CMDL from CD-ROM/WDCGG
1 hour observations
Mean and standard deviation; 6h
Mean  Fitting
Standard deviation  Error (Min=1,0.5,0.1ppm)
Missing period  Base run
[c.2] Three steps in making
Baseline
• NIRE-CTM-96 ECMWF 90-97
• Initial 350ppm , 90-97 year ECMWF
• (1) Fossil90+CASA+Takahashi02
• (2) CASA’ = Trend Adjusted CASA
• (3) Annual mean adjusted,
 Last time series are baseline.
[c.3]Forward model for
Base run and adjoint sensitivity
•
•
•
•
•
NIRE-CTM-96 one used for TransCom 2.
2.5x2.5x15 (144x73x15~1.6 x 10 5)
6 hour
Semi-lag, non-local PBL, Mass fixer
European Centre for Medium Range
Weather Forecast, ERA-15, Operational(p),
• 1979-1999
[G.1] Adjoint sensitivity;
output of a transport model
running in reverse time direction
•
•
•
•
3D (144x73x15)
Max 31 days, 6hour time resolution
Specify; periods(=<31d),and point in 3D
If 1 ppm/6h is given continuously
at a specified period at a point, how much
concentrations will be obtained at
observational site.
• 1979-1999
[G.2]1460 fixed period adjoint
sensitivity
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
number terminal time
start time
1. 6UTC,1st,Dec,1996 0UTC,1st,Jan,1997
2. 12UTC,1st,Dec,1996 6UTC,1st,Jan,1997
3.
..
..
1460, 0UTC,31st,Dec,1997  18UTC,31st,Dec,1997
Ignore all information prior to 31 days !
Blue=CMDL
Red=Original
Green=Trend
adjusted
 Baseline
Observation
vector and
Observation
error
Area of unknown flux Prior flux uncertainty = sum of flux at
9 grid with 1ppm/6h
Solution
Min=0.1
Min-0.5
Min=1.0
Updated Source
MinObs Error=1.
Init=1996.Dec.31
Future
• Extend Integration time  Consistent
annual 3x3grids.
• By 9 years time series  9 years mean ,
grid
• By 9 Stations  annual mean, grid
• By 12 Stations  monthly mean, 3x3 grid
• ( Minami-torishima, Izana, Samoa, etc.)
• Column integrated concentrations
Related documents