Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Radiation in a Radioactive World Nuclear Physics and Engineering By: Douglas Osborn Is this what you think when I say nuclear? Is this only thing something nuclear can do? Do you think of these people when I say RADIATION? Do you think of these things as well? • Food • Space • Utilities • Consumer Products • Medicine RADIOLOGICAL FUNDAMENTALS Atomic Structure Definitions Types of Ionizing Radiation Units of Measure Atomic Structure • • • • • Atomic Structure Particles Elements & Isotopes Stable vs. Unstable Standard Nomenclature Ions Atomic Structure Particles Protons (positive) Neutrons (neutral) Electrons (negative) Proton Nucleus Neutron P+ N Nucleus eElectron Elements • The number of protons in the nucleus determines the element • If the number of protons changes, the element changes P+ hydrogen P+ N N P+ helium N P+ N P+ N P+ N lithium Isotopes • Isotopes - atoms of the same element which have the same number of protons, but a different number of neutrons • Isotopes have the same chemical properties; however, the nuclear properties can be quite different P+ Hydrogen (protium) P+ N Hydrogen (deuterium) P+ N N Hydrogen (tritium) Stable vs. Unstable Atoms If there are too many or too few neutrons for a given number of protons, the nucleus will not be stable P+ e- P+ N N e- Hydrogen (protium) Hydrogen (tritium) STABLE “Non-Radioactive” UNSTABLE “Radioactive” Standard Nomenclature 60 A # of protons and neutrons Co X Z 27 27 # of protons Represents element Ions Ions are atoms with positive or negative charge: eN e- N N P+ P+ P+ N N eNeutral N P+ P+ P+ e- N e- N Positive Ions e- N e- N P+ P+ P+ N e- N e- Negative Definitions • Ionization • Radiation • Ionizing vs. Non-Ionizing • Radioactivity & Radioactive Decay • Radioactive Half-Life • Radioactive Material • Radioactive Contamination Ionization The process of removing electrons from neutral atoms AND Free ejected electron Radiation • Energy released from unstable atoms and some devices in the form of rays or particles • Can be either ionizing or non-ionizing ENERGY RADIATION UNSTABLE ATOM PARTICLE Ionizing Radiation • Radiation that possesses enough energy to cause ionization in the atoms with which it interacts • Released from unstable atoms and some devices in the form of rays or particles - alpha a - beta b - gamma/x-ray g - neutron 0n1 Non-Ionizing Radiation • Radiation that doesn’t have the amount of energy needed to ionize the atom with which it interacts • Examples: - radar waves - microwaves - visible light - infrared radiation - ultraviolet radiation Radioactivity The process of unstable (or radioactive) atoms becoming stable by emitting radiation. This event over time is called radioactive decay. P+ N N P+ P+ P+ N P+ N P+ P+ P+ N N N P+P+ P+ N P+ N N P+NP+ NN N P+ P+ N P+ N P+N P+ N P+NP+ P+ P+P+ P+ N N N N N P+N N N P+ P+ P+ P+P+NNP+ P+P+ P+P+ NP+NNP+ N P+ N N N N P+ P+ N P+ N NNP+ N N Large, unstable nucleus alpha beta gamma N P+ e- neutron N Excess Energy Released Decay Chain After 18 decays we arrive at stable: 238 234 234 206 UTh Pa Pb 929091 82 b Radioactive Half-Life The time it takes for one half of the radioactive atoms present to decay Example: Co-60 = 5 years Ni-60 Co-60 100 atoms today Co-60 50 atoms after 5 yrs Ni-60 Co-60 25 atoms after 10 yrs Ni-60 Co-60 12 atoms after 15 yrs Radioactive Decay Develop a model for radioactive decay. Call it the radioactive decay law. How do we describe the rate of de-energization? Observations in Nature: Decay / De-energization Occurs Number of Radioactive Nuclides decreases with time De-energization of a single nuclide is a statistical process Let’s perform a simulation Rules • DON’T OPEN the packages until I give you instructions !! • Need one volunteer from each table group You are the data runner. • Carefully open the package. • Pour the contents onto your desk – carefully. DO NOT EAT THEM! • Determine the total number in the bag. – Report this number to the data runner. • Count those with the “M” UP and return them to the bag. – Report this count to the data runner. – Eliminate (eat?) those not returned to the bag. • Calculate and record total counts • Shake the bag and repeat the above. Total Counts Counting Period Counts From Table Group 1 Counts From Table Group 2 Counts From Table Group 3 Normalized Value One Sigma Error Counts From Table Group 4 (Semilog Plot) N 100 * N % N (Linear Plot) Initial Count 844 677 968 685 3174 56.3 1.8 1.000 Count 1 435 331 456 316 1538 39.2 2.5 0.485 Count 2 201 163 250 187 801 Count 3 96 81 111 86 374 Count 4 53 42 72 51 218 Count 5 21 28 36 21 106 Count 6 13 12 17 16 58 Count 7 5 4 12 4 25 Count 8 3 2 2 3 10 Count 9 2 0 1 0 3 Count 10 2 0 0 0 2 Count 11 1 0 0 0 1 Count 12 0 0 0 0 0 0.252 19.3 5.2 0.118 0.069 10.3 9.7 0.033 0.018 5.0 20.0 0.008 0.003 1.7 57.7 0.001 0.001 1.0 100.0 0.000 0.000 Graphical Outputs 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 10000 1000 100 10 1 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 Next Question: What have we observed? • Decay / De-energization Occurs • Number of Radioactive Nuclides decreases with time • De-energization of a single nuclide is a statistical process – This being the case, at the beginning of the deenergization process when a lot of radioactive nuclides are present, the statistics are much better – Thus sample counting statistics are much better in the beginning than after most of the nuclides have deenergized – Why is this? Counting Statistics: Randomness • De-energization events are random – Quantity per unit time depends on the total number of radioactive nuclides present – Thus the quantity decreases with time • Detection events also are random within the counting media depending on random processes associated with the detector – Probability of penetration into the detector – Probability of interaction in the detector • Variability and precision of repeated counts can be described with reasonable rigor based solely on the total number of detected events Counting Statistics – Variability • Variability refers to the distribution of a number of repeated counts around a true value or a mean value • Repeat counts follow a Poisson Distribution, but when a large number of repeat counts are taken, the Normal Distribution is a good approximation • The shape of the Normal curve can be described by using only the mean, m, and the standard deviation, s or s • The mean is the arithmetic average of all counts • In the normal distribution, about – 68% of all counts will fall within one standard deviation – 95% within 1.96 standard deviations – 99% within 2.58 standard deviations • A property of the Poisson Distribution is that the Standard Deviation is simply the square root of the mean Precise Example of a Normal Distribution • Note the symmetry • Note how the “counts” are distributed Counting Statistics – Precision • Precision refers to the repeatability of a single count – How close will a repeated count be to the previous count – or to the next count? – How close will one count be to the “true mean” of many repeated counts? – If we have only one count, we expect the true mean is probably different from our one count • Probability that the true mean lies within specific limits around the count is determined from the shape of the normal error curve, the Normal Distribution – The obtained (measured) count, N, is taken as the mean value, and the standard deviation, s or s, is then the square root of the measured count: s N – Thus there is a 68% probability that the true mean lies within one standard deviation, or the square root of the measured count • The “error” in a given count is then generally considered to be: % Error N x100% N Counting Statistics: Precision Decision • How good is good enough in practice? – Analyzing the %Error formula clearly says that the more counts you are able to obtain, the more precise your measurement will be. – The %Error formula states there is a 68% probability that the true value lies within + one standard deviation of the single measured count – This can also be stated as being within the 68% Confidence Interval – This is a good estimate for general applications • For more precise work, it’s preferred to be within the 95% Confidence Interval 1.96 N % Error x100% N • And for critical work, you may need to be within the 99% Confidence Interval % Error 2.58 N x100% N Counting Statistics – Examples Sample Confidence Interval Error Estimates 68% C.I. Measured Counts, N N N N 95% C.I. 1 . 96 N 99% C.I. N 2 . 58 N 20 4.5 0.224 0.438 0.577 50 7.1 0.141 0.277 0.365 100 10.0 0.100 0.196 0.258 200 14.1 0.071 0.139 0.182 1,000 31.6 0.032 0.062 0.082 5,000 70.7 0.014 0.028 0.036 10,000 100.0 0.010 0.020 0.026 40,000 200.0 0.005 0.010 0.013 70,000 264.6 0.004 0.007 0.010 N Derivation of the Radioactive Decay Law • Define Activity Rate of Decay A • Mathematically dN(t) A N(t) dt Where N(t) is the number of radioactive nuclei present at time t • Need a constant of proportionality Radioactiv e Decay Constant dN(t) A N(t) -N(t) dt • Why do we have a minus sign in the formula? Activity (Continued) dN(t) A N(t) -N(t) dt dN(t) A -N(t) dt Rearrange the terms dN(t) dN dt dt N(t) N N(t) No t dN dt N 0 N(t) N(t) t t ln t e N t No e No No Units of Activity • Curie – – – • The traditional unit of activity 1 Ci = 3.7x1010 disintegrations/second Based on the disintegration rate of 1 gm of Ra-226 Becquerel – SI Unit – 1 Bq = 1 dis/sec Half-life • Half Life Definition The average amount of time required for the sample size or activity t o decrease to 1/2 of its initial amount. • Derivation => initial conditions: No N(t) : t t 12 2 No 1 t1/2 N oe e t1/2 ln( 2) t1/2 2 2 ln( 2) 0.693 0.693 t1/ 2 t1/2 t1/2 Mean Lifetime • Half life is the average amount of time for half of a large sample of nuclides to deenergize • Mean lifetime is the average (statistical mean) amount of time a single nucleus exists before de-energizing – It can be shown that this is 1 Radioactive Decay on a Linear Scale Normalizing has been done for illustration only. It is NOT necessary!! Radioactive Decay on a Semi-Log Scale Normalizing has been done for illustration only. It is NOT necessary!! Summary of Concepts Activity A N Radioactive Decay Law (Two identical expressions) Nt No e t At Ao e t Half Life and the Radioactive Decay Constant ln( 2) 0.693 t1/2 t1/2 t1/ 2 0.693 Radioactive Material Radioactive material is any material containing unstable atoms that emit radiation Radioactive Contamination • Radiation is energy • Radioactive material is the physical material emitting the radiation • Radioactive contamination is radioactive material that is uncontained and in an unwanted place • Exposure to radiation does not result in contamination Types of Ionizing Radiation • Alpha (a - particle • Beta (b - particle • Gamma (g - ray • Neutron (h - particle Alpha Radiation (a) Particle, Large Mass, Characteristics +2 Charge Range Very Short 1 - 2” in air Shielding Paper Outer layer of skin Hazards Internal Sources Plutonium, Uranium, Americium Beta Radiation (b) Characteristics Particle, Small Mass, -1 Charge Range 12ft / MeV in air Shielding Plastic, glass, aluminum, wood Hazards Internal and the skin and eyes Sources Tritium, Sr-90, Fission products Gamma Rays (g) and X-Rays No mass, no charge Characteristics electromagnetic Range Hundreds of feet in air Shielding Lead, Steel Concrete Hazards External Source Whole Body Penetrating Sources Co-60, Kr-88, Cs-137 Neutron Radiation (h) Characteristics Particle with no charge Range Hundreds of feet in air Shielding Hazards Sources Hydrogenous material water, polyethylene External Source Whole Body Penetrating Uranium, Plutonium, Californium Units of Measure • Radiation Energy Roentgen, RAD, REM • Radioactivity Rate dpm, Curie • Contamination Radioactivity Area or volume Spread Roentgen (R) • Unit for measuring exposure • Defined only for ionization in air • Applies only to gamma and x-rays • Not related to biological effects Wilhelm Roentgen 1845 -1923 Discovered X-rays RAD (Radiation Absorbed Dose) • Unit for measuring absorbed dose in any material • Applies to all types of radiation • Does not take into account the potential effect that different types of radiation have on the body REM (Roentgen Equivalent Man) • Unit for measuring dose equivalence • Most commonly used unit • Pertains to the human body • Takes into account the energy absorbed (dose) and the biological effect on the body due to the different types of radiation Quality Factor (QF) The QF is used as a multiplier to reflect the relative amount of biological damage caused by the same amount of energy deposited in cells by the different types of ionizing radiation. Alpha 20 rad x QF = rem Neutrons 2 - 11 Betas 1 Gamma & X-rays 1 Conversion of rem to millirem 1 rem = 1000 millirem (mrem) 500 mrem = 0.8 rem = 0.25 rem = 0.5 rem 800 mrem 250 mrem Dose Rate Rate DoseDose vs. Dose • Dose rate is themrem/hr rate at which you receive the dose • Dose rate = dose divided by time (rad/hr, mrad/hr) • Dose is the amount of radiation you receive mrem 0 0 0 1 0 2 5 Measuring Radioactivity A measure of the number of disintegrations radioactive material undergoes in a certain period of time We measure the rate of decay which will lead us to the quantity of radioactive material present Radioactivity Units Basic unit disintegration per minute (dpm) derived from the number of counts measured by instrument and the efficiency of the instrument Traditional unit Curie (Ci) 1 Ci = 3.7 x 1010 dpm Marie Curie 1867 - 1934 Discovered radium & polonium Contamination Units How spread out is the radioactive material? Radioactivity Area or Volume 10 cm Radioactivity L X W X H 10 cm dpm microcurie 100 cm2 milliliter BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS • Background Sources • Radiation Effects • Prenatal Exposure • Risks in Perspective Background Sources • Natural • Manmade • U.S. Average Background Radiation Background = natural + manmade We are constantly exposed to background radiation, from both natural and manmade sources Background Radiation Sources CONSUMER CONSUMERPRODUCTS PRODUCTS INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL ATMOSPHERIC ATMOSPHERIC TESTING TESTING MEDICAL INTERNAL INTERNAL RADON RADON TERRESTRIAL TERRESTRIAL COSMIC NATURAL MANMADE Natural Background Sources SOURCE AVG DOSE COSMIC - outer space 28 mrem/yr TERRESTRIAL - Earth 28 mrem/yr INTERNAL - our body 40 mrem/yr RADON - Earth 200 mrem/yr Manmade Background Sources SOURCE AVG DOSE MEDICAL 54 mrem/yr CONSUMER PRODUCTS 10 mrem/yr INDUSTRIAL USES <3 mrem/yr ATMOSPHERIC Testing <1 mrem/yr Medical Procedures PROCEDURE AVG DOSE THERAPY 600 rem to tumor CAT SCAN 5.8 rem to head MAMMOGRAM 0.4 rem to breast CHEST X-RAY 10 mrem Consumer Products Radium Dial Factory PRODUCT AVG DOSE TOBACCO PRODUCTS 1.3 rem/yr DENTURES 60 rem/yr - gums TINTED GLASSES 4 rem/yr - eyes BUILDING MATERIALS 7 mrem/yr U.S. Average The average annual dose to the general population from natural background and manmade sources is about: 360 mrem. mrem. 360 Radiation Effects • Cell Damage • Cell Sensitivity • Possible Effects on Cells • Radiation Damage Factors • Acute vs. Chronic • Somatic vs. Heritable Cell Damage The human body is made up of many organ systems. Each system is made up of tissues. Specialized cells make up tissues. Ionizing radiation can potentially affect the normal function of cells. Cell Damage (cont.) The method by which radiation causes damage to human cells is by ionization of atoms in the cells. Any potential radiation damage begins with damage to atoms. Cell Damage (cont.) Ionizing radiation can directly rupture membranes that surround the cells Ionizations result in the formation of free radicals which can recombine to form harmful chemicals such as hydrogen peroxide Cell Sensitivity Some cells are more sensitive than others to environmental factors such as: – Viruses – Toxins – Ionizing radiation Highest Sensitivity • Actively dividing cells • Non-specialized cells • Blood forming cells • Hair follicles • Cells that form sperm Lowest Sensitivity • Less actively dividing cells • More specialized cells • Brain cells • Muscle cells Possible Effects of Radiation on Cells • There is no damage • Cells repair the damage and operate normally • Cells are damaged and operate abnormally • Cells die Radiation Damage Factors • Total Dose • Dose Rate • Type of Radiation • Area of Body Exposed • Individual Sensitivity Total Dose In general, the greater the dose, the greater the potential for biological effects. Effects Dose Dose Rate The faster the dose is delivered, the less time the body has to repair itself. Type of Radiation Cell damage varies with the type of radiation. For example, internally deposited alpha emitters are more damaging than beta or gamma emitters for the same energy deposited. 1 MeV Beta particle creates 60 ion pairs per 1 cm of travel 1 MeV Alpha particle creates 7000 ion pairs per 0.1 cm of travel Area of Body Exposed • In general, the larger the area of the body that receives a dose, the greater the biological effect. • Extremities are less sensitive than blood forming and other critical organs. vs. Individual Sensitivity • Age The human body becomes less sensitive to ionizing radiation with increasing age; however, elderly people are more sensitive than middle-aged adults. • Genetic make-up Some individuals are more sensitive to environmental factors. Acute vs. Chronic Dose Potential biological effects depend on how much and how fast a radiation dose is received. Radiation doses are grouped into: Acute - high highdose dose of radiation received in a short period short periodof time (seconds to days) small dose dose of radiation received Chronic - a small long period periodof time (months to years) over a long Acute Dose The body’s cell repair mechanisms are not as effective for repairing damage caused by an acute dose. – Damaged cells will be replaced by new cells and the body will repair itself, although this may take a number of months. – In extreme cases the dose may be high enough that recovery would be unlikely. Acute Exposure Effects AVG DOSE DAMAGE > 5000 rem Death Within 2 -3 Days > 500 rem Gastrointestinal Damage 450 - 600 rem LD 50-60 200 - 500 rem Blood System Damaged 100 - 200 rem Radiation Sickness 25 - 50 rem Slight Blood Changes 5 rem Annual Limit Effects of High-Level Acute Doses (Skin/Extremities) • Burns • Necrosis • Loss of fingers Chronic Dose A small dose of radiation received over a long period of time. Typical examples are: The dose we receive from natural background background The dose we receive from occupational occupational exposure Body is better equipped to tolerate chronic doses Effects of Chronic Doses • Increased risk of cataract formation • Increased risk of developing cancer Somatic vs. Heritable • Somatic effects appear in the exposed exposed individual. individual. Some examples: – Cells may become cancerous – Increased risk of cataract formation – Possible life shortening • Heritable (genetic) effects appear in future generations future generations – Not yet observed in human populations Prenatal Exposure • Prenatal Sensitivity • Potential Prenatal Effects Prenatal Sensitivity Embryo/fetus cells are rapidly dividing, which makes them sensitive to many environmental factors including ionizing radiation. Potential Prenatal Effects for Entire Pregnancy Although no effects were seen in Japanese children conceived after the atomic bomb, there were effects seen in some children who were in the womb when exposed to radiation. 1. Slightly Smaller Head Size 2. Lower Average Birth Weight 3. Increased Incidence of Mental Retardation 4. Increased Risk of Childhood Cancer Risks in Perspective • Cancer Risk Info • Comparison of Health Risks • Occupational Risk Comparison Cancer Risk Information • Health effects have been observed in humans at acute doses in excess of 10 rem. • No increase in cancer has been observed in individuals who receive a dose of ionizing radiation at occupational levels. • The possibility of cancer induction cannot be dismissed even though an increase has not been observed. Cancer Risk (cont.) • Current rate of cancer death among Americans is about 20%. • An individual who receives 25,000 millirem over a working life increases his/her risk of cancer by 1% to about 21%. • The average annual dose to DOE workers is less than 100 millirem. Comparison of Health Risks Health Risk Days Lost Unmarried Male 3500 Tobacco User 2250 Unmarried Female 1600 Overweight Individual 777 Alcohol Consumer 365 Motor Vehicle Driver 207 100 mrem/yr for 70 yrs 10 Comparison of Occupational Risk Industry Days Lost Coal Miner 328 Farmer 277 Transportation Worker 164 U.S. Average 74 Manufacturer 43 Radiological Worker 40 Trades Employee 30 EO9 HOW RADIATION EFFECTS YOUR BRAIN Nuclear Applications • • • • • Food Industry Medicine Space Electricity Food Industry • C-14 dating • Smoke Detectors – Am-241 • Soft drink bottles - radioisotopes are used to measure and control how much soda there is in soft drink bottles • Shrink wrap film/plastic insulation on wires - the plastic is shrunk by radiation instead of using heat, which damages the insulation • Investigators, police, and other security groups use neutron activation to detect explosives, such as mines, and to detect drugs and weapons • Companies who process materials such as coal or concrete use neutron activation to analyze the material for quality Medicine • Nuclear Medicine – about 1/3 of all medical procedures involve radiation or radioactive materials • An estimated 10 to 12 million nuclear medicine diagnostic and therapeutic procedures are performed each year in the U.S. alone • Examples: – – – – – – X-rays NMRI PET Scans Radioactive Tracers Gamma Knife Cancer Therapy Space • Nuclear Jet Engine • Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator • Gas Core Reactor Propulsion Electricity • Energy is generated from coal, gas, oil, water, wind, solar, and nuclear. Part of that energy is used to produce electricity. Electrical generation plants use the heat or motion of those primary sources to generate electricity. One way of doing this is by using nuclear power. Alvin W. Vogtle NPP Pressurized Water Reactor Boiler Water Reactor CANDU Reactor Liquid Metal Reactor Gas Cooled Reactor Three Mile Island • Middletown, PA • March 28, 1979 • First meltdown of a full scale nuclear power plant • Mechanical Failure followed by human error Chernobyl • Ukraine • April 26, 1986 • First commercial reactor to have radiation related deaths • Human error and lack of safety culture • 56 deaths directly related to accident (47 emergency workers) F4 Sled Test F4 Sled Test Slow Motion Spent fuel Cask Testing (Train) Train vs. Truck Cask Results Spent Fuel Cask Testing (Truck) Truck Crash Result