Download GR – SF A

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
EU Single market for energy
Expectations of the
European industrial consumers
Peter CLAES
President Ifiec Europe
September 10, 2003
SVSE 2003 - Praha
1
What is IFIEC Europe ?
European federation of national
federations of industrial energy consumers
Issues :
• Market liberalisation (electricity – natural
gas)
• Environmental aspects of energy policy
• European Climate Change Policy
• Renewables / nuclear energy / CHP / …
• Energy
taxation
September
10, 2003
SVSE…
2003 - Praha
2
IFIEC Members
EU-members
Future EUmembers
Members
D – F – GB
B - NL – IRL
I – GR – SF
A–P
H
Non-members
S – DK – LUX
CZ – EST – LV
LT – PL – SLO
SK – M – CY
E (?)
September 10, 2003
SVSE 2003 - Praha
3
1. Does the single market work ?
Performance indicators:
 How many users changed suppliers?
 Did prices fall or (at least) converge ?
September 10, 2003
SVSE 2003 - Praha
4
How many users changed suppliers ?
(1998-2001, Source: DG Tren, Eurostat)
Electricity
Industrial
Electricity
Domestic
Gas
Industrial
Gas
Domestic
Austria
20-30%
5-10%
<2%
Not eligible
Belgium
2-5%
Not eligible
???
Not eligible
France
10-20%
Not eligible
20-30%
Not eligible
Germany
20-30%
5-10%
<2%
<2%
Italy
>50%
Not eligible
10-20%
2-5%
Netherlands
20-30%
Not eligible
30-50%
Not eligible
Spain
10-20%
Not eligible
20-30%
Not eligible
UK
>50%
30-50%
>50%
>50%
September 10, 2003
SVSE 2003 - Praha
5
Did prices fall or (at least) converge ?
September 10, 2003
SVSE 2003 - Praha
6
Did prices fall or (at least) converge ?
September 10, 2003
SVSE 2003 - Praha
7
Did prices fall or (at least) converge ?
September 10, 2003
SVSE 2003 - Praha
8
Did prices fall or (at least) converge ?
September 10, 2003
SVSE 2003 - Praha
9
2. What went wrong ?
2.1. Does unbundling work ?
• Accounting unbundling (“Japanese Walls”)
• Management unbundling
• Legal unbundling
• Ownership unbundling (“Chinese Walls”)
September 10, 2003
SVSE 2003 - Praha
10
2. What went wrong ?
2.1. Does unbundling work ?
2.2. The impact of subsidiarity
September 10, 2003
SVSE 2003 - Praha
11
The impact
of
subsidiarity
Source :
Second benchmarking
report DG Tren
September 10, 2003
SVSE 2003 - Praha
12
Source : Second benchmarking report DG Tren
September 10, 2003
SVSE 2003 - Praha
13
2. What went wrong ?
2.1. Does unbundling work ?
2.2. The impact of subsidiarity
2.3. Cross-border Transmission
September 10, 2003
SVSE 2003 - Praha
14
Cross-border Transmission
2.3.1. Suboptimal use of existing capacity
• e.g. Belgian-French border (electricity)
• available capacity : app. 4.000 MW
• available for market : 350-500 MW
• ULF : peaks of > 2.000 MW
September 10, 2003
SVSE 2003 - Praha
15
Cross-border Transmission
2.3.2. Lack of cross-border transmission capacity
September 10, 2003
SVSE 2003 - Praha
16
Cross-border Capacity Electricity
In % of installed production capacity (Source: DG Tren)
Potential
competition
from imports
Market share
of Top 3
producers
Austria
21%
45%
Belgium
25%
96%
France
12%
92%
Germany
11%
64%
Italy
14%
69%
Netherlands
19%
59%
Spain
4%
83%
UK
3%
36%
September 10, 2003
SVSE 2003 - Praha
17
Cross-border Transmission
2.3.3. No efficient congestion management system
• no agreement within ETSO
• no efficient exchange of information
between TSOs
• no single European CM-system
• re-dispatching
• auctioning
• rationing
• market splitting
September 10, 2003
SVSE 2003 - Praha
18
2. What went wrong ?
2.1. Does unbundling work ?
2.2. The impact of subsidiarity
2.3. Cross-border Transmission
2.4. Complexity of energy policy
September 10, 2003
SVSE 2003 - Praha
19
Complexity of energy policy
• European Climate Change Programme
• renewables
• CHP
• CO2-emissions
• nuclear energy ?
• financing of other policies (public services,
local entities, …)
• security of supply
• + NIMBY-syndrome !
September 10, 2003
SVSE 2003 - Praha
20
3. Recommendations of Ifiec
• full ownership unbundling (Chinese walls)
• full market opening for all users
• publication of all relevant information by
TSOs and regulators
September 10, 2003
SVSE 2003 - Praha
21
3. Recommendations of Ifiec
Electricity
• cost-based, fair CBT financing mechanism
(non-distance related, fair share to be paid by
producer)
• non-discriminatory, transparent and efficient
congestion management system (no auctioning)
September 10, 2003
SVSE 2003 - Praha
22
3. Recommendations of Ifiec
Gas (gas-to-gas competition)
• cost-reflective and simple tariff structure
• non-discriminatory, cost-reflective access to
gas infrastructures (incl. Storage, off-shore
facilities)
• clear, non-discriminatory, transparent balancing
rules (preferably daily balancing)
• capacity rights subject to “use-it-or-loose-it”
September 10, 2003
SVSE 2003 - Praha
23
Related documents