Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
EPOCA Kickoff Meeting, Gijon, 11 June 2008 Acidification of the Arctic Ocean James C. Orr1, Sara Jutterström2, Laurent Bopp3, Leif G. Anderson2, Victoria J. Fabry4, Thomas Frölicher5, Peter Jones6, Fortunat Joos5, Ernst Maier-Reimer7, Joachim Segschneider7, Marco Steinacher5 and Didier Swingedouw8 1MEL/IAEA, Monaco 2Dept. of Chemistry, Götenborg University, Sweden 3LSCE/IPSL, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Gif-sur-Yvette, France 4Dept. of Biological Sciences, California State University San Marcos, USA 5Climate & Environmental Physics, University of Bern, Switzerland 6Ocean Sciences Div., Bedford Inst. of Oceanography, Dartmouth, Canada 7Max Planck Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany. 8Université Catholique de Louvain, Institut d’Astronomie et de Geophysique Funding: EU (GOSAC, Georges Lemaitre, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium NOCES), NASA, DOE, Swiss NSF, CSIRO Decline of surface pH and [CO32-] during the 21st century • pH reduced by 0.3 to 0.4 by 2100 under IS92a (i.e., a 100% to 150% increase in [H+]) • [CO32-] decline results in surface undersaturation (A < 1) in S. Ocean: down to 55+/-5 mol/kg (in 2100, IS92a) 1765 1994 2100s 2100i Aragonite Saturation Calcite Saturation Orr et al. 2005 (Nature) By Present 2100…state Large of changes ocean saturation in subsurface w.r.t. 2-] 22-] = [CO 2-] sat saturation ) [in mol aragonite:state [CO([CO ] [CO 3 A 3 A kg-1] 3 3A Pacific • Shoaling of the aragonite horizon (i.e., • saturation Aragonite saturation horizon 2[CO ]A = 0)32-]A = 0) (where 3 [CO – – Southern Southern Ocean Ocean (by ~1000 m) m) (down to ~1000 – – North North Atlantic Atlantic (by ~3000 m) m) (down to ~3000 Atlantic • Surface undersaturation ocean is 2supersaturated ([CO 3 ]A < 0) everywhere – Southern For at least Ocean 400 kyr – Subarctic & probablyPacific 25Ma Uncertainty due to Emissions Scenario (IS92a vs. IPCC SRES scenarios) *From Bern “reduced complexity” model (G.-K Plattner & F. Joos) Models: BGC model: PISCES Coupled climate model: IPSL/CM4.1 •Atmosphere: LMD •Ocean: OPA/ORCA-LIM Model - Resolution: 2° nominal (½° tropics) - Isopycnal Diffusion & GM - TKE Model (prognostic Kz) - Sea ice model (LIM) PO43- NH4+ Diatoms DSi NO3- Nano-phyto DFe MicroZoo DOM Meso Zoo POM Small Part. Euphotic Layer (100-150m) Aumont & Bopp (2006) Big Part. IPCC Scenarios used for 4th Assessment Report (AR4) Without sulfate aerosols With sulfate aerosols Ctl now Ctl preind Ctl preind Year Year Atmospheric CO2 from 3 coupled carbon-climate models Atmospheric CO2 2xCO2 Year Three fully coupled atmosphere-ocean models (IPCC AR4 WG1 contributors), including ocean & terrestrial carbon modules (C4MIP, Friedlingstein et al., 2006) IPSL.CM4 LOOP (OPA/ORCA2, PISCES) MPIM (MPIOM, HAMOCC5.1) NCAR CSM1.4 (NCOM, OCMIP2+ prognostic) Changes differ between 2 Polar Oceans: pH & [CO32-] Southern Ocean Arctic pH Carbonate Surface Arctic projected to reach “ΩA < 1” from 10 to 32 years sooner than Southern Ocean (on average), i.e., lower atmospheric pCO2 by 56-122 μatm Year Arctic (> 70N) S. Ocean (<60S) Arctic - S. Ocean IPSL 2061 2071 -10 MPIM 2023 2055 -32 NCAR 2038 2065 -27 Arctic (> 70N) S. Ocean (<60S) Arctic - S. Ocean IPSL 554 610 -56 MPIM 424 546 -122 NCAR 444 560 -116 Atmospheric pCO2 (uatm) Model-only projections under SRES A2 scenario Two “trans-Arctic” sections: (1) Combined AOS-94 + ODEN91 & (2) Beringia 2005 Barents Sea Kara Sea Fram Strait Trans-Arctic Model vs. Data Evaluation: Temperature (oC) Salinity Trans-Arctic Model vs. Data: arag • Data • Model • Model – Data • MLD too deep • Surface [CO32-] too high • Overall pattern, but less structure Model minus Data: [CO32-] along AOS94-ODEN91 IPSL1 IPSL2 MPIM NCAR Model minus Data: [CO32-] along Beringia 2005 IPSL1 MPIM IPSL2 NCAR AOS94-ODEN91 Beringia 2005 Models vs. Data: mean profile (distance-weighted) AOS94-ODEN91 Beringia 2005 Projected [CO32-]A : saturation w.r.t. Aragonite projections from model only (under A2 scenario) Projected [CO32-]A : saturation w.r.t. Aragonite projections from model only (under A2 scenario) Projected [CO32-]A : Saturation w.r.t. Aragonite *Beringia (2005) baseline + model perturbations (A2) Projected [CO32-]C : Saturation w.r.t. Calcite *Beringia (2005) baseline + model perturbations (A2) Data-model approach improves consistency of projected undersaturation in Arctic surface waters A (δpCO2) 1st signs Average Calcite 1st signs IPSL 2014 (+22) 2046 (+117) 2059 (+168) MPIM 2014 (+18) 2048 (+136) 2070 (+244) NCAR 2014 (+16) 2048 (+126) 2060 (+180) “Data-Model” projections under SRES A2 scenario along Beringia section IPCC Scenarios in use for 4th Assessment Report (AR4) Without sulfate aerosols With sulfate aerosols Ctl now Ctl preind Ctl preind Year Year Undersaturation is strongest in the Arctic: simulation with +1% increase per year Aragonite undersaturation [CO32-]Arag at 2xCO2 *Model approach (model results only) Why?: Perturbation in [CO32-] due only to climate change is large and negative in the Arctic (2xCO2) Mean Arctic profiles at 2xCO2 with & without terrestrial ice melt T S DIC Alk Control + CO2 & Climate & Ice melt +CO2 + CO2 & Climate CO32- Mean Arctic profiles at 4xCO2 with & without terrestrial ice melt T S DIC Alk Control +CO2 + CO2 & Climate & Ice melt + CO2 & Climate CO32- Simulated changes in surface [CO32-] at 2xCO2 Arctic Southern Ocean 125 114 CO2 only 65 64 CO2 + clim (no land ice) 63 66 CO2 + clim + land ice 57 64 Change (total) -68 -51 Change (CO2) -60 -51 Change (clim + land ice) -8 0 Change (land ice) -5 -2 Fraction (CO2) 0.88 0.998 Fraction (clim + land ice) 0.12 0.002 Fraction (land ice) 0.08 2xCO2 Preindustrial Arctic Marine Calcifiers • Pelagic: – Foraminifera [calcite] – Shelled pteropod (Limacina helicina) [aragonite] – Coccolithophores (Coccolithus pelagicus, Emiliana huxleyi) [calcite] not the dominant Arctic primary producer • Benthic: – Molluscs dominate, particularly bivalve molluscs [calcite & aragonite] – Gastropods, scaphopods (tusk shells) [aragonite] – Echinoderms (Brittle stars, sea stars, sea urchins, sea cucumbers) [high Mg-calcite in internal ossicles] – Benthic forams [calcite], – Coralline red algae [high Mg calcite] – Bryzoans – BUT, No Cold-water corals yet discovered (perhaps too cold) How will Arctic ecosystems respond to ocean acidification? Effects on other other Arctic animals? Conclusions • With 2 transArctic data sections & 3 models, we projected changes in [CO32-] and saturation under SRES A2 scenario – Changes w.r.t. Aragonite: • Now - some near-subsurface waters already undersaturated (Canada Basin), due to anthropogenic CO2 increase • in 10 years - some surface waters become undersaturated • in 40 years - average surface waters become undersaturated – Changes w.r.t. Calcite: • in 10 years - near-subsurface waters become undersaturated • in 50 years - some surface waters become undersaturated • in 70 years - average surface waters become undersaturated – Changes occur 10 to 30 years sooner in Arctic, relative to the Southern Ocean • Uncertainties remain (circulation, climate change, terrestrial ice melt/runoff, sea ice, riverine Alk & DIC delivery) • Potential loss of Arctic marine calcifiers by 2100? • Need for low-temp undersaturated perturbation studies (bivalves, echinoderms, coccolithophores, cold-water corals,…) • Need impact studies in currently undersaturated zones (shelves) Aragonite Saturation along trans-Arctic sections *Data-Model approach • Future [CO32-] computed on section after adding model perturbations to data: DIC, Alk, T, S, SiO2, & Aragonite PO43(Historical + SRES A2) • Deep saturation horizons resist change • Undersaturation invades from surface – Aragonite: surface undersat. by 2050 Calcite [CO32-]ARAG Calcite Saturation along trans-Arctic sections *Data-Model approach • Future [CO32-] computed on section after adding model perturbations to data: DIC, Alk, T, S, SiO2, & Aragonite PO43(Historical + SRES A2) • Deep saturation horizons resist change • Undersaturation invades from surface – Calcite: surface undersat. by 2100 Calcite [CO32-]CALC Simulated changes in surface [CO32-] at 4xCO2 Arctic Southern Ocean 125 114 CO2 only 36 39 CO2 + clim (no land ice) 35 39 CO2 + clim + land ice 26 38 Change (total) -100 -76 Change (CO2) -89 -76 Change (clim + land ice) -10 0 -9 -1 Fraction (CO2) 0.89 0.995 Fraction (clim + land ice) 0.11 0.005 Fraction (land ice) 0.10 4xCO2 Preindustrial Change (land ice)